↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM435+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:32:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   55 (  25   ~;  17   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) = sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).

fof(m__1032,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xm)
    & sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),xm) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1032) ).

fof(mMulAsso,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2)
        & aInteger0(X3) )
     => sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) = sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mMulAsso) ).

fof(m__979,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xa)
    & aInteger0(xb)
    & aInteger0(xp)
    & xp != sz00
    & aInteger0(xq)
    & xq != sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__979) ).

fof(mMulComm,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2) )
     => sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mMulComm) ).

fof(mIntMult,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2) )
     => aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mIntMult) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),xm) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1032]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X4)
      | ~ aInteger0(X5)
      | ~ aInteger0(X6)
      | sdtasdt0(X4,sdtasdt0(X5,X6)) = sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X4,X5),X6) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulAsso])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),xm) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) = sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ aInteger0(X3)
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1032]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xq),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__979]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xp),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__979]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X3)
      | ~ aInteger0(X4)
      | sdtasdt0(X3,X4) = sdtasdt0(X4,X3) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulComm])]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X3)
      | ~ aInteger0(X4)
      | aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mIntMult])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xm,xp)) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_13]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) = sdtasdt0(X3,sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aInteger0(X3)
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_15]),c_0_13]),c_0_14])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : NUM435+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 01:08:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 24
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 13
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 8
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 13
% 0.24/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 26
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 31
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 30
% 0.24/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 95
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 32
% 0.24/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 60
% 0.24/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 0.24/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 357
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 271
% 0.24/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 357
% 0.24/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 53
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 14
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.24/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 34
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 170
% 0.24/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 682
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.24/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 319
% 0.24/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 267
% 0.24/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 35
% 0.24/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 6
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 7138
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42  # User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.24/1.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3064 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------