↑ Up

SInE---0.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SInE---0.4
% Problem  : NUM435+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s

% Computer : n131.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 15:21:19 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.06s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   19
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  108 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  127 (  59   ~;  55   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn  21   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(12,axiom,
    ( aInteger0(xa)
    & aInteger0(xb)
    & aInteger0(xp)
    & ~ equal(xp,sz00)
    & aInteger0(xq)
    & ~ equal(xq,sz00) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpBM6tiN/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m__979) ).

fof(14,conjecture,
    equal(sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)),sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpBM6tiN/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m__) ).

fof(15,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2)
        & aInteger0(X3) )
     => equal(sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)),sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpBM6tiN/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',mMulAsso) ).

fof(17,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2) )
     => aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpBM6tiN/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',mIntMult) ).

fof(19,axiom,
    ( aInteger0(xm)
    & equal(sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),xm),sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpBM6tiN/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',m__1032) ).

fof(23,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aInteger0(X1)
        & aInteger0(X2) )
     => equal(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X2,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpBM6tiN/sel_theBenchmark.p_1',mMulComm) ).

fof(27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal(sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)),sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[14]) ).

fof(28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal(sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)),sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[27,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(72,plain,
    aInteger0(xq),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

cnf(74,plain,
    aInteger0(xp),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

cnf(82,negated_conjecture,
    sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

fof(83,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X1)
      | ~ aInteger0(X2)
      | ~ aInteger0(X3)
      | equal(sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)),sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

fof(84,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X4)
      | ~ aInteger0(X5)
      | ~ aInteger0(X6)
      | equal(sdtasdt0(X4,sdtasdt0(X5,X6)),sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X4,X5),X6)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[83]) ).

cnf(85,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) = sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ aInteger0(X3)
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[84]) ).

fof(89,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X1)
      | ~ aInteger0(X2)
      | aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

fof(90,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X3)
      | ~ aInteger0(X4)
      | aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X3,X4)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[89]) ).

cnf(91,plain,
    ( aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[90]) ).

cnf(95,plain,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),xm) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

cnf(96,plain,
    aInteger0(xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

fof(106,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X1)
      | ~ aInteger0(X2)
      | equal(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),sdtasdt0(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

fof(107,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X3)
      | ~ aInteger0(X4)
      | equal(sdtasdt0(X3,X4),sdtasdt0(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[106]) ).

cnf(108,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[107]) ).

cnf(122,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)) != sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xp,xq),xm),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[82,95,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(227,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm))
    | ~ aInteger0(xm)
    | ~ aInteger0(xq)
    | ~ aInteger0(xp) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[122,85,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(239,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) = sdtasdt0(X3,sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aInteger0(X3)
    | ~ aInteger0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[108,85,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(245,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm))
    | $false
    | ~ aInteger0(xq)
    | ~ aInteger0(xp) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[227,96,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(246,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm))
    | $false
    | $false
    | ~ aInteger0(xp) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[245,72,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(247,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm))
    | $false
    | $false
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[246,74,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(248,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)) != sdtasdt0(xq,sdtasdt0(xp,xm)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[247,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2077,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) = sdtasdt0(X3,sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | ~ aInteger0(X2)
    | ~ aInteger0(X1)
    | ~ aInteger0(X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[239,91]) ).

cnf(2088,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xm,xq)) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm))
    | ~ aInteger0(xq)
    | ~ aInteger0(xm)
    | ~ aInteger0(xp) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[248,2077,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2244,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xm,xq)) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm))
    | $false
    | ~ aInteger0(xm)
    | ~ aInteger0(xp) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2088,72,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2245,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xm,xq)) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm))
    | $false
    | $false
    | ~ aInteger0(xp) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2244,96,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2246,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xm,xq)) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm))
    | $false
    | $false
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2245,74,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2247,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xm,xq)) != sdtasdt0(xp,sdtasdt0(xq,xm)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[2246,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2377,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aInteger0(xq)
    | ~ aInteger0(xm) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[2247,108,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2379,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | ~ aInteger0(xm) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2377,72,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2380,negated_conjecture,
    ( $false
    | $false ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[2379,96,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2381,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[2380,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(2382,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    2381,
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM435+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.03/0.23  % Computer : n131.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.03/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 03:37:45 CST 2018
% 0.03/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.28  % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.28  --creating new selector for []
% 0.06/0.37  -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpBM6tiN/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.37  -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmpBM6tiN/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.37  -prover status Theorem
% 0.06/0.37  Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 0.
% 0.06/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.37  % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.37  Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.06/0.37  # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.06/0.37  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.06/0.37  # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.06/0.38  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------