%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM466+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:18 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.38s 2.21s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.38s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 32 RR)
% Number of literals : 67 ( 15 equ; 42 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_60,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xl,X1) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_60) ).
cnf(i_0_11,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_11) ).
cnf(i_0_58,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xl),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_58) ).
cnf(i_0_12,plain,
( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_12) ).
cnf(i_0_6,plain,
( aNaturalNumber0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_6) ).
cnf(i_0_51,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2)) = X2
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ doDivides0(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_51) ).
cnf(i_0_64,negated_conjecture,
doDivides0(xl,xm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_64) ).
cnf(i_0_57,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_57) ).
cnf(i_0_52,plain,
( aNaturalNumber0(esk2_2(X1,X2))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ doDivides0(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_52) ).
cnf(i_0_61,negated_conjecture,
doDivides0(xm,xn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_61) ).
cnf(i_0_56,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0hrh7ew6/input.p',i_0_56) ).
cnf(c_0_76,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(xl,X1) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_60 ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_78,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xl),
i_0_58 ).
cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(X1,xl) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_77]),c_0_78])]) ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
( aNaturalNumber0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,xl)) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]),c_0_78])]),c_0_81]) ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2)) = X2
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ doDivides0(X1,X2) ),
i_0_51 ).
cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
doDivides0(xl,xm),
i_0_64 ).
cnf(c_0_85,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xm),
i_0_57 ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
( aNaturalNumber0(esk2_2(X1,X2))
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
| ~ doDivides0(X1,X2) ),
i_0_52 ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(xl,X2)) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_77]),c_0_78])]) ).
cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xl,esk2_2(xl,xm)) = xm,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),c_0_85]),c_0_78])]) ).
cnf(c_0_89,negated_conjecture,
aNaturalNumber0(esk2_2(xl,xm)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_84]),c_0_85]),c_0_78])]) ).
cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
( sdtasdt0(X1,xm) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]),c_0_89])]) ).
cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
doDivides0(xm,xn),
i_0_61 ).
cnf(c_0_92,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xn),
i_0_56 ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
( sdtasdt0(xm,X1) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_77]),c_0_85])]) ).
cnf(c_0_94,negated_conjecture,
sdtasdt0(xm,esk2_2(xm,xn)) = xn,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_91]),c_0_92]),c_0_85])]) ).
cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
aNaturalNumber0(esk2_2(xm,xn)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_91]),c_0_92]),c_0_85])]) ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_94]),c_0_95])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.11 % Problem : NUM466+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jul 6 07:50:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.38/2.21 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.38/2.21 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.38/2.21 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.38/2.21 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S068N
% 7.38/2.21 # and selection function PSelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.38/2.21 #
% 7.38/2.21 # Preprocessing time : 0.013 s
% 7.38/2.21 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.38/2.21
% 7.38/2.21 # Proof found!
% 7.38/2.21 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.38/2.21 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.38/2.21 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.38/2.21
% 7.38/2.21 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.38/2.21 # User time : 0.020 s
% 7.38/2.21 # System time : 0.004 s
% 7.38/2.21 # Total time : 0.024 s
% 7.38/2.21 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.38/2.21
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------