↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : NUM476+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.42s 2.13s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.42s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   14
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  25 unt;   4 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   53 (  28 equ;  17 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xl,X1) != xn
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_68) ).

cnf(i_0_69,negated_conjecture,
    ( sz00 = xl
    | sdtasdt0(xl,esk8_0) = xn ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_69) ).

cnf(i_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    ( sz00 = xl
    | aNaturalNumber0(esk8_0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_73) ).

cnf(i_0_65,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xl,esk3_0) = xm,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_65) ).

cnf(i_0_62,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(xm,xn) = sdtasdt0(xl,esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_62) ).

cnf(i_0_15,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(sz00,X1) = sz00
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_15) ).

cnf(i_0_66,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_66) ).

cnf(i_0_14,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sz10) = X1
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_14) ).

cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_60,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xl),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_60) ).

cnf(i_0_23,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | sdtpldt0(X2,X1) != sz00
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_23) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_58,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xn),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_58) ).

cnf(i_0_63,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-hux9b2j7/input.p',i_0_63) ).

cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xl,X1) != xn
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_68 ).

cnf(c_0_89,negated_conjecture,
    ( sz00 = xl
    | sdtasdt0(xl,esk8_0) = xn ),
    i_0_69 ).

cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
    ( sz00 = xl
    | aNaturalNumber0(esk8_0) ),
    i_0_73 ).

cnf(c_0_91,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xl,esk3_0) = xm,
    i_0_65 ).

cnf(c_0_92,negated_conjecture,
    xl = sz00,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_89]),c_0_90]) ).

cnf(c_0_93,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(xm,xn) = sdtasdt0(xl,esk4_0),
    i_0_62 ).

cnf(c_0_94,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(sz00,esk3_0) = xm,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]) ).

cnf(c_0_95,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(sz00,X1) = sz00
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_96,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(esk3_0),
    i_0_66 ).

cnf(c_0_97,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sz10) = X1
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_98,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz10),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_99,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xl),
    i_0_60 ).

cnf(c_0_100,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(xm,xn) = sdtasdt0(sz00,esk4_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_92]) ).

cnf(c_0_101,hypothesis,
    xm = sz00,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),c_0_96])]) ).

cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
    xn != xl,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_97]),c_0_98]),c_0_99])]) ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    ( X1 = sz00
    | sdtpldt0(X2,X1) != sz00
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    i_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_104,hypothesis,
    sdtpldt0(sz00,xn) = sdtasdt0(sz00,esk4_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_100,c_0_101]) ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_106,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xn),
    i_0_58 ).

cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
    xn != sz00,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_92]) ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    sdtasdt0(sz00,esk4_0) != sz00,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_104]),c_0_105]),c_0_106])]),c_0_107]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(esk4_0),
    i_0_63 ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_95]),c_0_109])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : NUM476+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 09:01:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.42/2.13  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.42/2.13  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.42/2.13  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.42/2.13  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S068N
% 4.42/2.13  # and selection function PSelectNewComplexAHP.
% 4.42/2.13  #
% 4.42/2.13  # Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 4.42/2.13  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.42/2.13  
% 4.42/2.13  # Proof found!
% 4.42/2.13  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.42/2.13  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.42/2.13  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.42/2.13  
% 4.42/2.13  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.42/2.13  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 4.42/2.13  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 4.42/2.13  # Total time               : 0.020 s
% 4.42/2.13  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 4.42/2.13  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------