↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM477+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:32:52 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   50 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  18   ~;  13   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn   7   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
        & sdtpldt0(xm,X1) = xn )
    | sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).

fof(mMonMul2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
        & aNaturalNumber0(X2) )
     => ( X1 != sz00
       => sdtlseqdt0(X2,sdtasdt0(X2,X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mMonMul2) ).

fof(m__1494_04,hypothesis,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
        & xn = sdtasdt0(xm,X1) )
    & doDivides0(xm,xn)
    & xn != sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1494_04) ).

fof(m_MulZero,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
     => ( sdtasdt0(X1,sz00) = sz00
        & sz00 = sdtasdt0(sz00,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m_MulZero) ).

fof(m__1494,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(xm)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xn) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__1494) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X1] :
          ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
          & sdtpldt0(xm,X1) = xn )
      | sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X4)
      | X3 = sz00
      | sdtlseqdt0(X4,sdtasdt0(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMonMul2])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(esk1_0)
    & xn = sdtasdt0(xm,esk1_0)
    & doDivides0(xm,xn)
    & xn != sz00 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[m__1494_04])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
        | sdtpldt0(xm,X2) != xn )
      & ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( sdtasdt0(X2,sz00) = sz00
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2) )
      & ( sz00 = sdtasdt0(sz00,X2)
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m_MulZero])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( sdtlseqdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X1,X2))
    | X2 = sz00
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    xn = sdtasdt0(xm,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1494]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,sz00) = sz00
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    sz00 = esk1_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    xn != sz00,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( sdtasdt0(X1,esk1_0) = esk1_0
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    xn != esk1_0,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_18]),c_0_13])]),c_0_19]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : NUM477+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 16:56:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.40  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.40  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.40  # Preprocessing time       : 0.017 s
% 0.23/1.40  
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.40  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.40  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object total steps             : 21
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object formula steps           : 10
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 0.23/1.40  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 10
% 0.23/1.40  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.40  # Parsed axioms                        : 37
% 0.23/1.40  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7
% 0.23/1.40  # Initial clauses                      : 52
% 0.23/1.40  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.23/1.40  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 51
% 0.23/1.40  # Processed clauses                    : 82
% 0.23/1.40  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.23/1.40  # ...subsumed                          : 18
% 0.23/1.40  # ...remaining for further processing  : 63
% 0.23/1.40  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 7
% 0.23/1.40  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.23/1.40  # Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 0.23/1.40  # Generated clauses                    : 363
% 0.23/1.40  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 331
% 0.23/1.40  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.23/1.40  # Paramodulations                      : 350
% 0.23/1.40  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Equation resolutions                 : 13
% 0.23/1.40  # Current number of processed clauses  : 47
% 0.23/1.40  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.23/1.40  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.40  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.23/1.40  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 35
% 0.23/1.40  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 177
% 0.23/1.40  # ...number of literals in the above   : 998
% 0.23/1.40  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.23/1.40  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 472
% 0.23/1.40  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 166
% 0.23/1.40  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 20
% 0.23/1.40  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.23/1.40  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.23/1.40  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.23/1.40  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.40  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9169
% 0.23/1.40  
% 0.23/1.40  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.40  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 0.23/1.40  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.23/1.40  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 3080 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------