↑ Up

lazyCoP---0.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : NUM477+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 11:33:15 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 29.89s 4.39s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : NUM477+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 16:49:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 29.89/4.39  % SZS status Theorem
% 29.89/4.39  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 29.89/4.39  	~sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c1, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	~sdtlseqdt0(xm,xn),
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 29.89/4.39  	sdtlseqdt0(X0,sdtasdt0(X0,X1)) | sz00 = X1 | ~aNaturalNumber0(X0) | ~aNaturalNumber0(X1)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	X2 = xm).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	X3 = xn).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c3, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(lazy_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c4, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	sz00 = X1 | ~aNaturalNumber0(X0) | ~aNaturalNumber0(X1),
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(lazy_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c5, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	X0 != X2 | sdtasdt0(X0,X1) != X3,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(lazy_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	X0 = X2).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c6, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	sdtasdt0(X0,X1) != X3,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c5])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c7, axiom,
% 29.89/4.39  	xn = sdtasdt0(xm,sK12)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	sdtasdt0(X0,X1) = sdtasdt0(xm,sK12)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c8, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c6, c7])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c9, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c6, c7])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c10, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	X4 != xn | X4 != X3,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a3])], [c6, c7])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	X4 = xn).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c11, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	X4 != X3,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a4])], [c10])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	X4 = X3).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c12, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a5])], [c11])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c13, axiom,
% 29.89/4.39  	xn = sdtasdt0(xm,sK12)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	sK12 = X1).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	sz00 = X5).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c14, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	~aNaturalNumber0(X0) | ~aNaturalNumber0(X1),
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c4, c13])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c15, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c4, c13])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c16, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	xn = sdtasdt0(xm,X5),
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c4, c13])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c17, axiom,
% 29.89/4.39  	sz00 = sdtasdt0(X6,sz00) | ~aNaturalNumber0(X6)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	sdtasdt0(X6,sz00) = sdtasdt0(xm,X5)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	xn = X7).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c18, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c16, c17])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c19, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	~aNaturalNumber0(X6),
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c16, c17])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c20, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	sz00 = X7,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c16, c17])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c21, axiom,
% 29.89/4.39  	sz00 != xn).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a10, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	xn = X7).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a11, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	sz00 = X8).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c22, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a10, a11])], [c20, c21])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c23, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a10, a11])], [c20, c21])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c24, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	sz00 != X8,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_subterm_extension, [assumptions([a10, a11])], [c20, c21])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a12, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	sz00 = X8).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c25, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a12])], [c24])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c26, axiom,
% 29.89/4.39  	aNaturalNumber0(xm)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a13, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	X6 = xm).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c27, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a13])], [c19, c26])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c28, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a13])], [c19, c26])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c29, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	aNaturalNumber0(X6)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a14, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	X0 = X6).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c30, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	~aNaturalNumber0(X1),
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(predicate_reduction, [assumptions([a14])], [c14, c29])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c31, axiom,
% 29.89/4.39  	aNaturalNumber0(sK12)).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(a15, assumption,
% 29.89/4.39  	X1 = sK12).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c32, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15])], [c30, c31])).
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c33, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a15])], [c30, c31])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  cnf(c34, plain,
% 29.89/4.39  	$false,
% 29.89/4.39  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X0, xm),
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X1, sK12),
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X2, xm),
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X3, xn),
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X4, xn),
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X5, sz00),
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X6, xm),
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X7, xn),
% 29.89/4.39  		bind(X8, sz00)
% 29.89/4.39  	],
% 29.89/4.39  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9, a10, a11, a12, a13, a14, a15])).
% 29.89/4.39  
% 29.89/4.39  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------