↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM479+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:55:11 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  105 (  51 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  107 (  38   ~;  31   |;  24   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  19   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mMulCanc,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
     => ( X1 != sz00
       => ! [X2,X3] :
            ( ( aNaturalNumber0(X3)
              & aNaturalNumber0(X2) )
           => ( ( sdtasdt0(X2,X1) = sdtasdt0(X3,X1)
                | sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X1,X3) )
             => X2 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mMulCanc) ).

fof(m__1524_04,hypothesis,
    ( doDivides0(xl,xm)
    & ? [X1] :
        ( xm = sdtasdt0(xl,X1)
        & aNaturalNumber0(X1) )
    & xl != sz00 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1524_04) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( ( xm = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(xm,xl))
      & aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xm,xl)) )
   => ( ( sdtasdt0(xn,xm) = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl))
        & aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl)) )
     => sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xl,xn),sdtsldt0(xm,xl)) = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(m__1524,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(xm)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xl) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1524) ).

fof(mMulAsso,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( aNaturalNumber0(X3)
        & aNaturalNumber0(X2)
        & aNaturalNumber0(X1) )
     => sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mMulAsso) ).

fof(mMulComm,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aNaturalNumber0(X2)
        & aNaturalNumber0(X1) )
     => sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mMulComm) ).

fof(m__1553,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xn),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1553) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
     => ( X1 != sz00
       => ! [X2,X3] :
            ( ( aNaturalNumber0(X3)
              & aNaturalNumber0(X2) )
           => ( ( sdtasdt0(X2,X1) = sdtasdt0(X3,X1)
                | sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X1,X3) )
             => X2 = X3 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mMulCanc]) ).

fof(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    ( doDivides0(xl,xm)
    & ? [X1] :
        ( xm = sdtasdt0(xl,X1)
        & aNaturalNumber0(X1) )
    & xl != sz00 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__1524_04]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X32,X33,X34] :
      ( ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X32)
        | X32 = sz00
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X34)
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X33)
        | X33 = X34
        | sdtasdt0(X33,X32) != sdtasdt0(X34,X32) )
      & ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X32)
        | X32 = sz00
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X34)
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X33)
        | X33 = X34
        | sdtasdt0(X32,X33) != sdtasdt0(X32,X34) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    ( doDivides0(xl,xm)
    & xm = sdtasdt0(xl,esk1_0)
    & aNaturalNumber0(esk1_0)
    & xl != sz00 ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( xm = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(xm,xl))
        & aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xm,xl)) )
     => ( ( sdtasdt0(xn,xm) = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl))
          & aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl)) )
       => sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xl,xn),sdtsldt0(xm,xl)) = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl)) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
    | sdtasdt0(X1,X2) != sdtasdt0(X1,X3)
    | X1 = sz00
    | X2 = X3 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    xm = sdtasdt0(xl,esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xl),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1524]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    xl != sz00,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xl,xn),sdtsldt0(xm,xl)) != sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl))
    & sdtasdt0(xn,xm) = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl))
    & aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl))
    & xm = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(xm,xl))
    & aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xm,xl)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(xl,X1) != xm
    | X1 = esk1_0 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    xm = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(xm,xl)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    aNaturalNumber0(sdtsldt0(xm,xl)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X27] :
      ( sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X25,X26),X27) = sdtasdt0(X25,sdtasdt0(X26,X27))
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X27)
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X26)
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X25) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulAsso])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xl,xn),sdtsldt0(xm,xl)) != sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    sdtsldt0(xm,xl) = esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xn,xm) = sdtasdt0(xl,sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xl)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(X1,X2),X3) = sdtasdt0(X1,sdtasdt0(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( sdtasdt0(X23,X24) = sdtasdt0(X24,X23)
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X24)
      | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X23) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mMulComm])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(sdtasdt0(xl,xn),esk1_0) != sdtasdt0(xn,xm),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xn),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1553]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(xl,sdtasdt0(esk1_0,X1)) = sdtasdt0(xm,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(X1,X2) = sdtasdt0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    sdtasdt0(xl,sdtasdt0(xn,esk1_0)) != sdtasdt0(xn,xm),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_25]),c_0_14]),c_0_28]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtasdt0(xl,sdtasdt0(X1,esk1_0)) = sdtasdt0(xm,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xn,xm) != sdtasdt0(xm,xn),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_28])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xm),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1524]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_30]),c_0_34]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM479+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:33:57 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.46  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % new_bool_3 with pid 656605 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.09/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.46  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.46  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % SubtermCWHack with pid 656613 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.46  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.46  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMM22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.46  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.46  % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 39
% 0.09/0.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
% 0.09/0.46  % Initial clauses                      : 60
% 0.09/0.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.09/0.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 59
% 0.09/0.46  % Processed clauses                    : 411
% 0.09/0.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 19
% 0.09/0.46  % ...subsumed                          : 175
% 0.09/0.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 217
% 0.09/0.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 19
% 0.09/0.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 0.09/0.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.09/0.46  % Generated clauses                    : 1293
% 0.09/0.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1070
% 0.09/0.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.09/0.46  % Paramodulations                      : 1270
% 0.09/0.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 23
% 0.09/0.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1337
% 0.09/0.46  % ...of those cached                   : 1302
% 0.09/0.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.09/0.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.09/0.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.09/0.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.09/0.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.09/0.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 190
% 0.09/0.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 35
% 0.09/0.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.09/0.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 151
% 0.09/0.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 700
% 0.09/0.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 3076
% 0.09/0.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.09/0.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2127
% 0.09/0.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1395
% 0.09/0.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 178
% 0.09/0.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 194
% 0.09/0.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
% 0.09/0.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.09/0.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.09/0.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 25509
% 0.09/0.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1036
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.46  % User time                : 0.031 s
% 0.09/0.46  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.46  % Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.09/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 3676 pages
% 0.09/0.46  
% 0.09/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.46  % User time                : 0.033 s
% 0.09/0.46  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.09/0.46  % Total time               : 0.044 s
% 0.09/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.09/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------