%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM487+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:36:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.64s 2.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.64s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 25 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 22 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_215,negated_conjecture,
( xr = xn
| sdtpldt0(xr,X1) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_215) ).
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_213,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xr),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_213) ).
cnf(i_0_212,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xp,xr) = xn,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_212) ).
cnf(i_0_71,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xp),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_71) ).
cnf(i_0_19,plain,
( X1 = X2
| sdtpldt0(X1,X3) != sdtpldt0(X2,X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_19) ).
cnf(i_0_73,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xn),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_73) ).
cnf(i_0_9,plain,
( sdtpldt0(sz00,X1) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).
cnf(i_0_2,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_2) ).
cnf(i_0_207,hypothesis,
sz00 != xp,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-m8c5b7fe/lgb.p',i_0_207) ).
cnf(c_0_226,negated_conjecture,
( xr = xn
| sdtpldt0(xr,X1) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_215 ).
cnf(c_0_227,plain,
( sdtpldt0(X1,X2) = sdtpldt0(X2,X1)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_228,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xr),
i_0_213 ).
cnf(c_0_229,negated_conjecture,
( xr = xn
| sdtpldt0(X1,xr) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_226,c_0_227]),c_0_228])]) ).
cnf(c_0_230,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xp,xr) = xn,
i_0_212 ).
cnf(c_0_231,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xp),
i_0_71 ).
cnf(c_0_232,hypothesis,
xr = xn,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_229,c_0_230]),c_0_231])]) ).
cnf(c_0_233,plain,
( X1 = X2
| sdtpldt0(X1,X3) != sdtpldt0(X2,X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X3)
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_234,hypothesis,
sdtpldt0(xp,xn) = xn,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_230,c_0_232]) ).
cnf(c_0_235,hypothesis,
aNaturalNumber0(xn),
i_0_73 ).
cnf(c_0_236,plain,
( xp = X1
| sdtpldt0(X1,xn) != xn
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_233,c_0_234]),c_0_235]),c_0_231])]) ).
cnf(c_0_237,plain,
( sdtpldt0(sz00,X1) = X1
| ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
i_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_238,plain,
aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
i_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_239,hypothesis,
sz00 != xp,
i_0_207 ).
cnf(c_0_240,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_236,c_0_237]),c_0_238]),c_0_235])]),c_0_239]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : NUM487+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jul 6 09:35:05 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.64/2.44 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.64/2.44 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.64/2.44 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.64/2.44 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S
% 7.64/2.44 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 7.64/2.44 #
% 7.64/2.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 7.64/2.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.64/2.44
% 7.64/2.44 # Proof found!
% 7.64/2.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.64/2.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.64/2.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.64/2.44
% 7.64/2.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.64/2.44 # User time : 0.042 s
% 7.64/2.44 # System time : 0.005 s
% 7.64/2.44 # Total time : 0.046 s
% 7.64/2.44 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.64/2.44
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------