↑ Up

ePrincess---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : NUM487+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:45:01 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 16.03s 4.99s
% Output   : Proof 116.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : NUM487+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 09:20:53 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.51/0.58          ____       _                          
% 0.51/0.58    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.51/0.58   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.51/0.58  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.51/0.58  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.51/0.58  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.51/0.58  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.51/0.58  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.51/0.58  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.51/0.58  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.51/0.58  
% 0.51/0.58  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.51/0.63  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 1.87/1.01  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.97/1.55  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 16.03/4.99  Prover 0: proved (4364ms)
% 16.03/4.99  
% 16.03/4.99  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 16.03/4.99  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 16.03/4.99  
% 16.03/4.99  Generating proof ... found it (size 5345)
% 111.27/80.90  
% 111.27/80.90  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 111.27/80.90  Assumed formulas after preprocessing and simplification: 
% 111.27/80.90  | (0)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : ( ~ (xp = sz10) &  ~ (xp = sz00) &  ~ (sz10 = sz00) & sdtmndt0(xn, xp) = xr & sdtasdt0(xp, v4) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xp, v3) = xn & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & isPrime0(xp) & doDivides0(xp, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v4) & aNaturalNumber0(v3) & aNaturalNumber0(xr) & aNaturalNumber0(xp) & aNaturalNumber0(xm) & aNaturalNumber0(xn) & aNaturalNumber0(sz10) & aNaturalNumber0(sz00) &  ~ isPrime0(sz10) &  ~ isPrime0(sz00) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : (v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v9, v5) = v10) |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v8, v6) = v9) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtasdt0(v8, v7) = v10) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v8) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (sdtasdt0(v11, v5) = v10 & sdtasdt0(v5, v11) = v12 & sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v14 & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v13 & sdtpldt0(v13, v14) = v12 & sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v11)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] :  ! [v10] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (sdtasdt0(v11, v5) = v12 & sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v14 & sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v13 & sdtasdt0(v5, v11) = v10 & sdtpldt0(v13, v14) = v12 & sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v11)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v8, v9)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 & sdtlseqdt0(v10, v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v9) &  ~ (v10 = v8) & sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v10 & sdtlseqdt0(v11, v9) & sdtlseqdt0(v8, v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v9) &  ~ (v10 = v8) & sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v9) &  ~ (v10 = v8) & sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 & sdtlseqdt0(v10, v8) & sdtlseqdt0(v9, v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v9) &  ~ (v10 = v8) & sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v8, v9)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v10) & sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v10 & sdtlseqdt0(v10, v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v10) & sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v5) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v10) & sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v11 & sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v9) &  ~ (v10 = v8) & sdtpldt0(v6, v5) = v11 & sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v9) &  ~ (v10 = v8) & sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v11 & sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = v6 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v10) & sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v11 & sdtpldt0(v6, v5) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = sz10 | v7 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ iLess0(v9, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v7, v6) | doDivides0(v7, v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : ((v12 = v7 &  ~ (v10 = v7) &  ~ (v10 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v10, v11) = v7 & doDivides0(v10, v7) & aNaturalNumber0(v11) & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 &  ~ doDivides0(v7, v10) &  ! [v13] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v13) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v13))))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = sz10 | v7 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ iLess0(v9, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v7, v6) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : ((v12 = v7 &  ~ (v10 = v7) &  ~ (v10 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v10, v11) = v7 & doDivides0(v10, v7) & aNaturalNumber0(v11) & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (v11 = v5 & sdtasdt0(v7, v10) = v5 & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 &  ~ doDivides0(v7, v10) &  ! [v13] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v13) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v13))))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = sz10 | v7 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ iLess0(v9, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v7, v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : ((v12 = v7 &  ~ (v10 = v7) &  ~ (v10 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v10, v11) = v7 & doDivides0(v10, v7) & aNaturalNumber0(v11) & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (v11 = v6 & sdtasdt0(v7, v10) = v6 & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 &  ~ doDivides0(v7, v10) &  ! [v13] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v13) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v13))))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v7 = sz10 | v7 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ iLess0(v9, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] : ((v12 = v7 &  ~ (v10 = v7) &  ~ (v10 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v10, v11) = v7 & doDivides0(v10, v7) & aNaturalNumber0(v11) & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (v11 = v6 & sdtasdt0(v7, v10) = v6 & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (v11 = v5 & sdtasdt0(v7, v10) = v5 & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 &  ~ doDivides0(v7, v10) &  ! [v13] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v13) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v13))))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : (v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] : (sdtsldt0(v10, v5) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v8, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] : (sdtasdt0(v6, v7) = v10 & sdtasdt0(v5, v10) = v9)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v8, v5) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v14 & sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v13 & sdtasdt0(v5, v8) = v10 & sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v12 & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v11 & sdtpldt0(v13, v14) = v9 & sdtpldt0(v11, v12) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v8) = v9) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] : (sdtasdt0(v10, v7) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v8) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] :  ? [v12] :  ? [v13] :  ? [v14] : (sdtasdt0(v8, v5) = v12 & sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v14 & sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v13 & sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v11 & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 & sdtpldt0(v13, v14) = v12 & sdtpldt0(v10, v11) = v9)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ isPrime0(v7) |  ~ iLess0(v9, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v7, v6) | doDivides0(v7, v5) |  ? [v10] : (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 &  ~ doDivides0(v7, v10) &  ! [v11] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v11) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v11)))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ isPrime0(v7) |  ~ iLess0(v9, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v7, v6) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v11 = v5 & sdtasdt0(v7, v10) = v5 & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 &  ~ doDivides0(v7, v10) &  ! [v12] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v12) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v12))))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ isPrime0(v7) |  ~ iLess0(v9, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v7, v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v11 = v6 & sdtasdt0(v7, v10) = v6 & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 &  ~ doDivides0(v7, v10) &  ! [v12] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v12) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v12))))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ isPrime0(v7) |  ~ iLess0(v9, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ((v11 = v6 & sdtasdt0(v7, v10) = v6 & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (v11 = v5 & sdtasdt0(v7, v10) = v5 & aNaturalNumber0(v10)) | (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v10 &  ~ doDivides0(v7, v10) &  ! [v12] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v12) = v10) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v12))))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v9) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] : (sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v10 & sdtpldt0(v5, v10) = v9)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] :  ! [v9] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v8) = v9) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v10] : (sdtpldt0(v10, v7) = v9 & sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v10)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = v7 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v8) = v6) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = v7 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v8) = v6) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v8 = v6 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v8) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v7, v5) = v8) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v7 = v6 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v7 = v6 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v8) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v5) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v7 = v6 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v8) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v6) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v8, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v7, v6) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v10) &  ~ (v9 = v8) & sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v9 & sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v11 & sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v10 & sdtlseqdt0(v10, v11) & sdtlseqdt0(v9, v8))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v10) &  ~ (v9 = v8) & sdtpldt0(v7, v6) = v9 & sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v11 & sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v10 & sdtlseqdt0(v10, v11) & sdtlseqdt0(v8, v9))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v8) &  ~ (v10 = v9) & sdtpldt0(v7, v6) = v10 & sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v9 & sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v11 & sdtlseqdt0(v11, v8) & sdtlseqdt0(v9, v10))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v9] :  ? [v10] :  ? [v11] : ( ~ (v11 = v8) &  ~ (v10 = v9) & sdtpldt0(v7, v6) = v10 & sdtpldt0(v7, v5) = v9 & sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v11 & sdtlseqdt0(v9, v10) & sdtlseqdt0(v8, v11))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : (v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | aNaturalNumber0(v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtmndt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v8) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | aNaturalNumber0(v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v8) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v5, v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] :  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v8) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v7) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v5, v8)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : (v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v7) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v5, v6)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtasdt0(v6, v5) = v7) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | aNaturalNumber0(v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v6, v5) = v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v7) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtpldt0(v6, v5) = v7) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | aNaturalNumber0(v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ doDivides0(v6, v7) |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | doDivides0(v5, v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] :  ! [v7] : ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v7) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v5, v7)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v5 | v6 = sz10 |  ~ isPrime0(v5) |  ~ doDivides0(v6, v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, sz10) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(sz10, v5) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, sz00) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(sz00, v5) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v6, v5) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = v5 |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | iLess0(v5, v6)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = sz00 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, sz00) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(sz00, v5) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v6 = sz00 |  ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v5 = xp | v5 = sz10 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = xp) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : (v5 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, sz10) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtasdt0(sz10, v5) = v5) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v5, sz00) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtasdt0(sz00, v5) = sz00) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(sz10, v5) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtasdt0(v5, sz10) = v5) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(sz00, v5) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtasdt0(v5, sz00) = sz00) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v5, sz00) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtpldt0(sz00, v5) = v5) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(sz00, v5) = v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtpldt0(v5, sz00) = v5) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ doDivides0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v7] : (sdtasdt0(v5, v7) = v6 & aNaturalNumber0(v7))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v7] : (sdtpldt0(v5, v7) = v6 & aNaturalNumber0(v7))) &  ! [v5] :  ! [v6] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v6, v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6)) &  ! [v5] : (v5 = xp | v5 = sz10 |  ~ doDivides0(v5, xp) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5)) &  ! [v5] : (v5 = sz10 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | isPrime0(v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) &  ~ (v6 = sz10) & doDivides0(v6, v5) & aNaturalNumber0(v6))) &  ! [v5] : (v5 = sz10 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v5)) &  ! [v5] : (v5 = sz10 | v5 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v6] : (isPrime0(v6) & doDivides0(v6, v5) & aNaturalNumber0(v6))) &  ! [v5] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) | sdtlseqdt0(v5, v5)) & (xr = xn | ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(xr, xn) &  ! [v5] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v5) |  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, v5) = v6)))))
% 111.44/80.97  | Instantiating (0) with all_0_0_0, all_0_1_1, all_0_2_2, all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4 yields:
% 111.44/80.97  | (1)  ~ (xp = sz10) &  ~ (xp = sz00) &  ~ (sz10 = sz00) & sdtmndt0(xn, xp) = xr & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_3_3 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_1_1) = xn & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4 & isPrime0(xp) & doDivides0(xp, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0) & aNaturalNumber0(all_0_1_1) & aNaturalNumber0(xr) & aNaturalNumber0(xp) & aNaturalNumber0(xm) & aNaturalNumber0(xn) & aNaturalNumber0(sz10) & aNaturalNumber0(sz00) &  ~ isPrime0(sz10) &  ~ isPrime0(sz00) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v4, v0) = v5) |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v5) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (sdtasdt0(v6, v0) = v5 & sdtasdt0(v0, v6) = v7 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v8 & sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v7 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (sdtasdt0(v6, v0) = v7 & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v8 & sdtasdt0(v0, v6) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v7 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v3, v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v6, v4) & sdtlseqdt0(v3, v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v3) & sdtlseqdt0(v4, v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v3, v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = sz10 | v2 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v1) | doDivides0(v2, v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v2 &  ~ (v5 = v2) &  ~ (v5 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v2 & doDivides0(v5, v2) & aNaturalNumber0(v6) & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v8) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = sz10 | v2 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v1) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v2 &  ~ (v5 = v2) &  ~ (v5 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v2 & doDivides0(v5, v2) & aNaturalNumber0(v6) & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v0 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v0 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v8) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = sz10 | v2 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v2 &  ~ (v5 = v2) &  ~ (v5 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v2 & doDivides0(v5, v2) & aNaturalNumber0(v6) & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v1 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v8) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = sz10 | v2 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v2 &  ~ (v5 = v2) &  ~ (v5 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v2 & doDivides0(v5, v2) & aNaturalNumber0(v6) & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v1 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v0 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v0 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v8) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtsldt0(v5, v0) = v4 & sdtasdt0(v3, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtasdt0(v1, v2) = v5 & sdtasdt0(v0, v5) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v8 & sdtasdt0(v0, v3) = v5 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v7 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtasdt0(v5, v2) = v4 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (sdtasdt0(v3, v0) = v7 & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v8 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v7 & sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ isPrime0(v2) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v1) | doDivides0(v2, v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v6] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v6) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6)))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ isPrime0(v2) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v1) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v6 = v0 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v0 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v7) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ isPrime0(v2) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v6 = v1 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v7) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ isPrime0(v2) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v6 = v1 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v0 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v0 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v7) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7))))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v0, v5) = v4)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtpldt0(v5, v2) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v5)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v3) = v1) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v3) = v1) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v1 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) &  ~ (v4 = v3) & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) & sdtlseqdt0(v4, v3))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) &  ~ (v4 = v3) & sdtpldt0(v2, v1) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) & sdtlseqdt0(v3, v4))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v3) &  ~ (v5 = v4) & sdtpldt0(v2, v1) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtlseqdt0(v6, v3) & sdtlseqdt0(v4, v5))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v3) &  ~ (v5 = v4) & sdtpldt0(v2, v1) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6 & sdtlseqdt0(v4, v5) & sdtlseqdt0(v3, v6))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | aNaturalNumber0(v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (sdtmndt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | aNaturalNumber0(v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v0, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v2) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v0, v3)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | aNaturalNumber0(v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v2) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | aNaturalNumber0(v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ doDivides0(v1, v2) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v0, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v2)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 | v1 = sz10 |  ~ isPrime0(v0) |  ~ doDivides0(v1, v0) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, sz10) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(sz10, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, sz00) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(sz00, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v0) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | iLess0(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, sz00) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(sz00, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = xp | v0 = sz10 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = xp) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, sz10) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(sz10, v0) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, sz00) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(sz00, v0) = sz00) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(sz10, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v0, sz10) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(sz00, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v0, sz00) = sz00) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, sz00) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtpldt0(sz00, v0) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(sz00, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtpldt0(v0, sz00) = v0) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v2] : (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v2] : (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v2))) &  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v1, v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = xp | v0 = sz10 |  ~ doDivides0(v0, xp) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = sz10 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | isPrime0(v0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) &  ~ (v1 = sz10) & doDivides0(v1, v0) & aNaturalNumber0(v1))) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = sz10 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v0)) &  ! [v0] : (v0 = sz10 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v1] : (isPrime0(v1) & doDivides0(v1, v0) & aNaturalNumber0(v1))) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v0)) & (xr = xn | ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(xr, xn) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, v0) = v1))))
% 111.94/81.01  |
% 111.94/81.01  | Applying alpha-rule on (1) yields:
% 111.94/81.01  | (2)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v0) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.01  | (3) sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn
% 111.94/81.01  | (4)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6)))
% 111.94/81.01  | (5)  ! [v0] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v0))
% 111.94/81.01  | (6)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.01  | (7)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) &  ~ (v4 = v3) & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) & sdtlseqdt0(v4, v3)))
% 111.94/81.01  | (8)  ! [v0] : (v0 = xp | v0 = sz10 |  ~ doDivides0(v0, xp) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.01  | (9) sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn)
% 111.94/81.01  | (10)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v2] : (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v2)))
% 111.94/81.01  | (11)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v5))
% 111.94/81.01  | (12) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.01  | (13)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ isPrime0(v2) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v1) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v6 = v0 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v0 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v7) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7)))))
% 111.94/81.02  | (14)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v0, v2))
% 111.94/81.02  | (15)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v5))
% 111.94/81.02  | (16)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v0))
% 111.94/81.02  | (17) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_3_3
% 111.94/81.02  | (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 111.94/81.02  | (19)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.02  | (20) aNaturalNumber0(xp)
% 111.94/81.02  | (21) isPrime0(xp)
% 111.94/81.02  | (22)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.02  | (23)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ isPrime0(v2) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v1) | doDivides0(v2, v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v6] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v6) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v6))))
% 111.94/81.02  | (24)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = sz10 | v2 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v1) | doDivides0(v2, v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v2 &  ~ (v5 = v2) &  ~ (v5 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v2 & doDivides0(v5, v2) & aNaturalNumber0(v6) & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v8) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8)))))
% 111.94/81.02  | (25)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v2)
% 111.94/81.02  | (26)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, sz00) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.02  | (27)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v0, v5) = v4))
% 111.94/81.02  | (28)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v1 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.02  | (29)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.02  | (30)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtasdt0(v5, v2) = v4 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5))
% 111.94/81.02  | (31)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (sdtasdt0(v6, v0) = v5 & sdtasdt0(v0, v6) = v7 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v8 & sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v7 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6))
% 111.94/81.02  | (32)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v3) = v1) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.02  | (33)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5))
% 111.94/81.02  | (34)  ! [v0] : (v0 = sz10 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v0))
% 111.94/81.02  | (35)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (sdtasdt0(v6, v0) = v7 & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v8 & sdtasdt0(v0, v6) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v7 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6))
% 111.94/81.02  | (36)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.02  | (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 111.94/81.02  | (38)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 | v1 = sz10 |  ~ isPrime0(v0) |  ~ doDivides0(v1, v0) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.02  | (39)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v8 & sdtasdt0(v0, v3) = v5 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v7 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v6, v7) = v5))
% 111.94/81.03  | (40)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.03  | (41) aNaturalNumber0(all_0_1_1)
% 111.94/81.03  | (42)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ isPrime0(v2) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v6 = v1 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v0 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v0 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v7) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7)))))
% 111.94/81.03  | (43)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | aNaturalNumber0(v2))
% 111.94/81.03  | (44)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, sz00) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(sz00, v0) = sz00)
% 111.94/81.03  | (45)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtsldt0(v5, v0) = v4 & sdtasdt0(v3, v1) = v5))
% 111.94/81.03  | (46)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v3, v4))
% 111.94/81.03  | (47)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v3, v4))
% 111.94/81.03  | (48)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | aNaturalNumber0(v2))
% 111.94/81.03  | (49)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v0))
% 111.94/81.03  | (50)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(sz00, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.03  | (51)  ~ isPrime0(sz00)
% 111.94/81.03  | (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 111.94/81.03  | (53) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.03  | (54)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v2 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v3) = v1) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.03  | (55)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v5))
% 111.94/81.03  | (56) sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_1_1) = xn
% 111.94/81.03  | (57)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.03  | (58)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] :  ? [v8] :  ? [v9] : (sdtasdt0(v3, v0) = v7 & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v9 & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v8 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v8, v9) = v7 & sdtpldt0(v5, v6) = v4))
% 111.94/81.03  | (59)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v3) = v4) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtpldt0(v5, v2) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v5))
% 111.94/81.03  | (60)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] :  ! [v5] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v4, v0) = v5) |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v1) = v4) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v5)
% 111.94/81.03  | (61)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v2] : (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v2)))
% 111.94/81.03  | (62)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v5))
% 111.94/81.03  | (63)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, sz00) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtpldt0(sz00, v0) = v0)
% 111.94/81.03  | (64)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v2) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v0, v3))
% 111.94/81.03  | (65)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v6, v4) & sdtlseqdt0(v3, v5)))
% 111.94/81.04  | (66) sdtmndt0(xn, xp) = xr
% 111.94/81.04  | (67)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) &  ~ (v4 = v3) & sdtpldt0(v2, v1) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6) & sdtlseqdt0(v3, v4)))
% 111.94/81.04  | (68) xr = xn | ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(xr, xn) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, v0) = v1)))
% 111.94/81.04  | (69)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | aNaturalNumber0(v2))
% 111.94/81.04  | (70)  ~ isPrime0(sz10)
% 111.94/81.04  | (71)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v2))
% 111.94/81.04  | (72)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2))
% 111.94/81.04  | (73)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, sz10) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(sz10, v0) = v0)
% 111.94/81.04  | (74)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(sz00, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (75)  ! [v0] : (v0 = sz10 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | isPrime0(v0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) &  ~ (v1 = sz10) & doDivides0(v1, v0) & aNaturalNumber0(v1)))
% 111.94/81.04  | (76)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(sz10, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v0, sz10) = v0)
% 111.94/81.04  | (77)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (78)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v3, v2) = v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (79)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2)
% 111.94/81.04  | (80)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | iLess0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.04  | (81)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(sz10, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (82)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v3 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtsldt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (83)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ doDivides0(v1, v2) |  ~ doDivides0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v0, v2))
% 111.94/81.04  | (84)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(sz00, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtpldt0(v0, sz00) = v0)
% 111.94/81.04  | (85)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, sz10) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (86) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.04  | (87)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 111.94/81.04  | (89)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v0 = xp | v0 = sz10 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = xp) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (90)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.04  | (91)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v3, v2) = v0))
% 111.94/81.04  | (92)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = sz10 | v2 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v2 &  ~ (v5 = v2) &  ~ (v5 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v2 & doDivides0(v5, v2) & aNaturalNumber0(v6) & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v1 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v0 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v0 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v8) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8)))))
% 111.94/81.04  | (93) doDivides0(xp, all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.04  | (94)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v3) &  ~ (v5 = v4) & sdtpldt0(v2, v1) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtlseqdt0(v6, v3) & sdtlseqdt0(v4, v5)))
% 111.94/81.04  | (95)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v2)
% 111.94/81.05  | (96)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v1, v0) | sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.05  | (97)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v4] :  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v3) &  ~ (v5 = v4) & sdtpldt0(v2, v1) = v5 & sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v6 & sdtlseqdt0(v4, v5) & sdtlseqdt0(v3, v6)))
% 111.94/81.05  | (98)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = sz00) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.05  | (99)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v3) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.05  | (100)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] : (sdtasdt0(v1, v2) = v5 & sdtasdt0(v0, v5) = v4))
% 111.94/81.05  | (101)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5))
% 111.94/81.05  | (102)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(sz00, v0) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v0, sz00) = sz00)
% 111.94/81.05  | (103)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ isPrime0(v2) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ((v6 = v1 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v7] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v7) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v7)))))
% 111.94/81.05  | (104)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v5) & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v6)))
% 111.94/81.05  | (105)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] : (v1 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, sz00) = v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.05  | (106)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = sz10 | v2 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v1) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v2 &  ~ (v5 = v2) &  ~ (v5 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v2 & doDivides0(v5, v2) & aNaturalNumber0(v6) & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v0 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v0 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v8) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8)))))
% 111.94/81.05  | (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 111.94/81.05  | (108) aNaturalNumber0(sz00)
% 111.94/81.05  | (109)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtpldt0(v1, v0) = v6 & sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v5))
% 111.94/81.05  | (110) aNaturalNumber0(xr)
% 111.94/81.05  | (111)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = sz10 | v2 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v4) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ iLess0(v4, all_0_3_3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | doDivides0(v2, v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] :  ? [v7] : ((v7 = v2 &  ~ (v5 = v2) &  ~ (v5 = sz10) & sdtasdt0(v5, v6) = v2 & doDivides0(v5, v2) & aNaturalNumber0(v6) & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (v6 = v1 & sdtasdt0(v2, v5) = v1 & aNaturalNumber0(v5)) | (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 &  ~ doDivides0(v2, v5) &  ! [v8] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v8) = v5) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v8)))))
% 111.94/81.05  | (112)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] : ( ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v2)
% 111.94/81.05  | (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 111.94/81.05  | (114)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v5 & sdtlseqdt0(v5, v3) & sdtlseqdt0(v4, v6)))
% 111.94/81.05  | (115)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] :  ! [v4] : (v2 = v1 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v2, v0) = v4) |  ~ (sdtasdt0(v0, v1) = v3) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v2) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v5] :  ? [v6] : ( ~ (v6 = v4) &  ~ (v5 = v3) & sdtasdt0(v1, v0) = v6 & sdtasdt0(v0, v2) = v5))
% 111.94/81.05  | (116) aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0)
% 111.94/81.05  | (117)  ! [v0] :  ! [v1] :  ! [v2] :  ! [v3] : ( ~ (sdtmndt0(v1, v0) = v2) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v2) = v3) |  ~ sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v1) |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) | aNaturalNumber0(v2))
% 111.94/81.05  | (118)  ! [v0] : (v0 = sz10 | v0 = sz00 |  ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v1] : (isPrime0(v1) & doDivides0(v1, v0) & aNaturalNumber0(v1)))
% 111.94/81.05  |
% 111.94/81.05  | Instantiating formula (32) with all_0_1_1, xr, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtmndt0(xn, xp) = xr, sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_1_1) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_1_1), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.05  | (119) all_0_1_1 = xr
% 111.94/81.05  |
% 111.94/81.05  | From (119) and (56) follows:
% 111.94/81.05  | (3) sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn
% 111.94/81.05  |
% 111.94/81.05  | From (119) and (41) follows:
% 111.94/81.05  | (110) aNaturalNumber0(xr)
% 111.94/81.05  |
% 111.94/81.05  | Instantiating formula (96) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), yields:
% 111.94/81.05  | (122) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0)
% 111.94/81.05  |
% 111.94/81.05  | Instantiating formula (34) with all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), yields:
% 111.94/81.05  | (123) all_0_0_0 = sz10 | all_0_0_0 = sz00 | sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 111.94/81.05  |
% 111.94/81.05  | Instantiating formula (118) with all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), yields:
% 111.94/81.05  | (124) all_0_0_0 = sz10 | all_0_0_0 = sz00 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_0_0_0) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.05  |
% 111.94/81.05  | Instantiating formula (96) with xr, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xr), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (125) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, xr) | sdtlseqdt0(xr, all_0_0_0)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with xr, xr and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xr), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (126) sdtlseqdt0(xr, xr)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (118) with xr and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xr), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (127) xr = sz10 | xr = sz00 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (95) with all_0_2_2, xp, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (128) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (79) with xn, xp, xr and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (129) sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with xp, xp and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (130) sdtlseqdt0(xp, xp)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (34) with xp and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (131) xp = sz10 | xp = sz00 | sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (118) with xp and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (132) xp = sz10 | xp = sz00 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xp) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_2_2, xn, xr, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (133)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_4_4, xn, xm, xr, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (134)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xr, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, v0) = all_0_4_4)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with xm, xm and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (135) sdtlseqdt0(xm, xm)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (34) with xm and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (136) xm = sz10 | xm = sz00 | sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (118) with xm and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (137) xm = sz10 | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (95) with all_0_2_2, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (138) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (43) with all_0_2_2, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (139) aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, xp, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_3_3, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (140)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, v0) = all_0_3_3)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (97) with xn, xr, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (141) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_4_4, xm, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (142) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (79) with all_0_4_4, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (143) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (48) with all_0_4_4, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (144) aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (61) with xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (145)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xp, v0) = xn & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with xn, xn and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (146) sdtlseqdt0(xn, xn)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (118) with xn and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (147) xn = sz10 | xn = sz00 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with sz10, xm and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (148) sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10) | sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with sz10, sz10 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (149) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with sz00, xr and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (150) sdtlseqdt0(xr, sz00) | sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xr)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with sz00, xp and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (151) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00) | sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xp)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with sz00, xm and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (152) sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz00) | sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (153) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00) | sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz10)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating formula (96) with sz00, sz00 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (154) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating (140) with all_13_0_5 yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (155) sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_13_0_5) = all_0_3_3
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Applying alpha-rule on (155) yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (156) sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5
% 111.94/81.06  | (157) sdtpldt0(xn, all_13_0_5) = all_0_3_3
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating (133) with all_15_0_6, all_15_1_7, all_15_2_8, all_15_3_9, all_15_4_10 yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (158) sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_15_0_6 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_15_2_8 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_15_4_10 & sdtpldt0(all_15_1_7, all_15_0_6) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(all_15_3_9, all_15_2_8) = all_15_4_10
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Applying alpha-rule on (158) yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (159) sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_15_2_8
% 111.94/81.06  | (160) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_15_4_10
% 111.94/81.06  | (161) sdtpldt0(all_15_3_9, all_15_2_8) = all_15_4_10
% 111.94/81.06  | (162) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7
% 111.94/81.06  | (163) sdtpldt0(all_15_1_7, all_15_0_6) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.06  | (164) sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_15_0_6
% 111.94/81.06  | (165) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating (134) with all_17_0_11 yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (166) sdtpldt0(xr, xm) = all_17_0_11 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_17_0_11) = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Applying alpha-rule on (166) yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (167) sdtpldt0(xr, xm) = all_17_0_11
% 111.94/81.06  | (168) sdtpldt0(xp, all_17_0_11) = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Instantiating (145) with all_19_0_12 yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (169) sdtpldt0(xp, all_19_0_12) = xn & aNaturalNumber0(all_19_0_12)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  | Applying alpha-rule on (169) yields:
% 111.94/81.06  | (170) sdtpldt0(xp, all_19_0_12) = xn
% 111.94/81.06  | (171) aNaturalNumber0(all_19_0_12)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  +-Applying beta-rule and splitting (131), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.06  |-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.06  | (172) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp)
% 111.94/81.06  |
% 111.94/81.06  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (132), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.06  	|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.06  	| (173) xp = sz00
% 111.94/81.06  	|
% 111.94/81.06  		| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 111.94/81.06  		| (174) $false
% 111.94/81.06  		|
% 111.94/81.06  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 111.94/81.06  	|-Branch two:
% 111.94/81.06  	| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 111.94/81.06  	| (176) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xp) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.06  	|
% 111.94/81.06  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (176), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.06  		|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.06  		| (177) xp = sz10
% 111.94/81.06  		|
% 111.94/81.06  			| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 111.94/81.06  			| (174) $false
% 111.94/81.06  			|
% 111.94/81.06  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 111.94/81.06  		|-Branch two:
% 111.94/81.06  		| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 111.94/81.07  		| (180)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xp) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.07  		|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_0_2_2, all_15_4_10 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_15_4_10, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (181) all_15_4_10 = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (77) with xn, xr, all_19_0_12, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_19_0_12) = xn, sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_19_0_12), aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (182) all_19_0_12 = xr
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| From (181) and (160) follows:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (138) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| From (181) and (161) follows:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (184) sdtpldt0(all_15_3_9, all_15_2_8) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| From (182) and (170) follows:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (3) sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| From (182) and (171) follows:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (110) aNaturalNumber0(xr)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (72) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (187) xp = sz00 | sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (95) with all_15_0_6, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_15_0_6, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (188) sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_15_0_6
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_15_1_7, all_0_0_0, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (189) all_0_0_0 = xm | xp = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_2_2, all_15_1_7, xn, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (190) xp = xn | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_0_2_2, all_15_1_7, xn, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (191) xp = xn | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (115) with all_0_2_2, all_15_1_7, all_0_0_0, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (192) all_0_0_0 = xm | xp = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_1_7) & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_15_0_6, all_15_1_7, xr, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_15_0_6, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (193) xr = xp | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_15_1_7, all_15_0_6, xp, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_15_0_6, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (194) xr = xp | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (95) with all_15_1_7, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (195) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_1_7
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (43) with all_15_1_7, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (196) aNaturalNumber0(all_15_1_7)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (112) with all_15_2_8, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_15_2_8, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (197) sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_15_2_8
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (43) with all_15_2_8, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_15_2_8, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (198) aNaturalNumber0(all_15_2_8)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (101) with all_15_3_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (199) all_0_0_0 = xm | xp = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_3_9) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (65) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, xn, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (200) xp = xn | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_3_9, v0))
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (101) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, xp, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (201) xp = xn | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (33) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_0_0_0, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (202) all_0_0_0 = xm | xp = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (115) with all_15_0_6, all_15_3_9, xr, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_15_0_6, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (203) xr = xp | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_0_6) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_15_2_8, all_15_3_9, xr, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_15_2_8, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (204) xr = xp | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_15_3_9, all_15_2_8, xp, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_15_2_8, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (205) xr = xp | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (72) with all_15_3_9, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (206) xp = sz00 | sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_15_3_9)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (114) with all_15_1_7, all_0_2_2, xn, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (207) xp = xn | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (115) with all_15_1_7, all_0_2_2, xp, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_1_7, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (208) xp = xn | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, xn, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (209) xp = xn | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (11) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, xn, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (210) xp = xn | xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_2_2, xn, xp, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.07  			| (211)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 111.94/81.07  			|
% 111.94/81.07  			| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_2_2, xn, xp, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (212)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_4_4, xn, xm, xp, xr and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (213)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xr, v0) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (67) with xn, xr, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (214) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (22) with xp, xn, xr and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (215) sdtlseqdt0(xr, xn)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (109) with xn, all_17_0_11, xp, xm, xr and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xm) = all_17_0_11, sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (216) xp = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) &  ~ (v0 = all_17_0_11) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (62) with xn, all_17_0_11, xp, xm, xr and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, sdtpldt0(xr, xm) = all_17_0_11, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (217) xp = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (62) with all_17_0_11, xn, xm, xp, xr and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, sdtpldt0(xr, xm) = all_17_0_11, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (218) xp = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (79) with all_17_0_11, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xm) = all_17_0_11, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (219) sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = all_17_0_11
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_4_4, all_13_0_5, xp, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (220) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (109) with all_17_0_11, all_13_0_5, xr, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xm) = all_17_0_11, sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (221) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_17_0_11) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (67) with all_13_0_5, xm, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (222) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_13_0_5, v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (25) with all_13_0_5, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (223) sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_13_0_5
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (48) with all_13_0_5, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (224) aNaturalNumber0(all_13_0_5)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, xp, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_3_3, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (225)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xm, v0) = all_0_3_3 & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (59) with all_0_4_4, xn, xr, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (226)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, xr) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (59) with all_0_4_4, xn, xp, xr, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (227)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, xp) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (62) with all_13_0_5, all_0_4_4, xp, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (228) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (62) with all_0_4_4, all_13_0_5, xn, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (229) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (7) with all_0_4_4, xm, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (230) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (61) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (231)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, v0) = all_0_0_0 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (61) with xr, xr and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xr, xr), aNaturalNumber0(xr), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (232)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xr, v0) = xr & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (61) with xp, xp and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xp, xp), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (233)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xp, v0) = xp & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (61) with xm, xm and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (234)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xm, v0) = xm & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (61) with xn, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (235)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xn, v0) = xn & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (94) with xn, xr, xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (236) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xr, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, xn) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (7) with xn, xr, xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(xr), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (237) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xr) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, xn))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (7) with all_13_0_5, xm, xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (238) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_13_0_5))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (71) with xn, xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (239) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (61) with xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (240)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = xp & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (61) with sz10, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (241)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = sz10 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (61) with sz00, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (242)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(sz00, v0) = sz00 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (90) with xm, all_0_2_2, xn and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (243) doDivides0(xn, all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (90) with xp, all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (244) doDivides0(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (90) with xn, all_0_2_2, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.08  			| (245) doDivides0(xm, all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.08  			|
% 111.94/81.08  			| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2, xp and discharging atoms doDivides0(xp, all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (246)  ? [v0] : (sdtasdt0(xp, v0) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating formula (96) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (247) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating formula (67) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_3_3, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (248) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_3_3) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_3_3, v0))
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating formula (7) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_3_3, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (249) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_3_3) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_3_3))
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating formula (79) with all_0_3_3, all_0_4_4, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_3_3, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (250) sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating formula (48) with all_0_3_3, xp, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_3_3, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (251) aNaturalNumber0(all_0_3_3)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating formula (22) with xm, all_0_4_4, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (252) sdtlseqdt0(xn, all_0_4_4)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating formula (22) with xn, all_0_4_4, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (253) sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_0_4_4)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating formula (96) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (254) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (235) with all_44_0_14 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (255) sdtpldt0(xn, all_44_0_14) = xn & aNaturalNumber0(all_44_0_14)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (255) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (256) sdtpldt0(xn, all_44_0_14) = xn
% 111.94/81.09  			| (257) aNaturalNumber0(all_44_0_14)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (233) with all_46_0_15 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (258) sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp & aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (258) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (259) sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp
% 111.94/81.09  			| (260) aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (242) with all_50_0_17 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (261) sdtpldt0(sz00, all_50_0_17) = sz00 & aNaturalNumber0(all_50_0_17)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (261) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (262) sdtpldt0(sz00, all_50_0_17) = sz00
% 111.94/81.09  			| (263) aNaturalNumber0(all_50_0_17)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (240) with all_52_0_18 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (264) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp & aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (264) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (265) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp
% 111.94/81.09  			| (266) aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (241) with all_54_0_19 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (267) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10 & aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (267) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (268) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10
% 111.94/81.09  			| (269) aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (231) with all_56_0_20 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (270) sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_56_0_20) = all_0_0_0 & aNaturalNumber0(all_56_0_20)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (270) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (271) sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_56_0_20) = all_0_0_0
% 111.94/81.09  			| (272) aNaturalNumber0(all_56_0_20)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (234) with all_58_0_21 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (273) sdtpldt0(xm, all_58_0_21) = xm & aNaturalNumber0(all_58_0_21)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (273) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (274) sdtpldt0(xm, all_58_0_21) = xm
% 111.94/81.09  			| (275) aNaturalNumber0(all_58_0_21)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (246) with all_60_0_22 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (276) sdtasdt0(xp, all_60_0_22) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(all_60_0_22)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (276) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (277) sdtasdt0(xp, all_60_0_22) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.09  			| (278) aNaturalNumber0(all_60_0_22)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (213) with all_62_0_23 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (279) sdtpldt0(xr, all_62_0_23) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_62_0_23
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (279) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (280) sdtpldt0(xr, all_62_0_23) = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.09  			| (281) sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_62_0_23
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (212) with all_64_0_24, all_64_1_25, all_64_2_26, all_64_3_27, all_64_4_28 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (282) sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_64_1_25 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_64_0_24 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_64_4_28 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_64_3_27 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_64_2_26 & sdtpldt0(all_64_1_25, all_64_0_24) = all_64_2_26 & sdtpldt0(all_64_4_28, all_64_3_27) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (282) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (283) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_64_3_27
% 111.94/81.09  			| (284) sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_64_1_25
% 111.94/81.09  			| (285) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_64_2_26
% 111.94/81.09  			| (286) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_64_0_24
% 111.94/81.09  			| (287) sdtpldt0(all_64_4_28, all_64_3_27) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.09  			| (288) sdtpldt0(all_64_1_25, all_64_0_24) = all_64_2_26
% 111.94/81.09  			| (289) sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_64_4_28
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (227) with all_66_0_29 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (290) sdtpldt0(all_66_0_29, xp) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = all_66_0_29
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (290) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (291) sdtpldt0(all_66_0_29, xp) = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.09  			| (292) sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = all_66_0_29
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (232) with all_68_0_30 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (293) sdtpldt0(xr, all_68_0_30) = xr & aNaturalNumber0(all_68_0_30)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (293) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (294) sdtpldt0(xr, all_68_0_30) = xr
% 111.94/81.09  			| (295) aNaturalNumber0(all_68_0_30)
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (226) with all_70_0_31 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (296) sdtpldt0(all_70_0_31, xr) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_70_0_31
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (296) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (297) sdtpldt0(all_70_0_31, xr) = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.09  			| (298) sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_70_0_31
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (211) with all_72_0_32, all_72_1_33, all_72_2_34, all_72_3_35, all_72_4_36 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (299) sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_72_1_33 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_72_0_32 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_72_3_35 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_72_2_34 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_72_4_36 & sdtpldt0(all_72_1_33, all_72_0_32) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(all_72_3_35, all_72_2_34) = all_72_4_36
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (299) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (300) sdtpldt0(all_72_1_33, all_72_0_32) = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.09  			| (301) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_72_0_32
% 111.94/81.09  			| (302) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_72_2_34
% 111.94/81.09  			| (303) sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = all_72_3_35
% 111.94/81.09  			| (304) sdtpldt0(all_72_3_35, all_72_2_34) = all_72_4_36
% 111.94/81.09  			| (305) sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = all_72_1_33
% 111.94/81.09  			| (306) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_72_4_36
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Instantiating (225) with all_74_0_37 yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (307) sdtpldt0(xm, all_74_0_37) = all_0_3_3 & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_74_0_37
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			| Applying alpha-rule on (307) yields:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (308) sdtpldt0(xm, all_74_0_37) = all_0_3_3
% 111.94/81.09  			| (309) sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_74_0_37
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (68), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.09  			|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.09  			| (310) xr = xn
% 111.94/81.09  			|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (164) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (311) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_15_0_6
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (197) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (312) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_15_2_8
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (289) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (313) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_64_4_28
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (188) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (314) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_15_0_6
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (159) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (315) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_15_2_8
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310)(310) and (294) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (316) sdtpldt0(xn, all_68_0_30) = xn
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (280) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (317) sdtpldt0(xn, all_62_0_23) = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (129) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (318) sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (167) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (319) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_17_0_11
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (3) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (320) sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = xn
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (292) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (321) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_66_0_29
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (219) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (322) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_17_0_11
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				| From (310) and (110) follows:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (236), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.09  				|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (177) xp = sz10
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  					| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 111.94/81.09  					| (174) $false
% 111.94/81.09  					|
% 111.94/81.09  					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 111.94/81.09  				|-Branch two:
% 111.94/81.09  				| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 111.94/81.09  				| (327)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xr, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, xn) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 111.94/81.09  				|
% 111.94/81.09  					| Instantiating (327) with all_83_0_38, all_83_1_39, all_83_2_40 yields:
% 111.94/81.10  					| (328)  ~ (all_83_0_38 = xn) &  ~ (all_83_1_39 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = all_83_1_39 & sdtpldt0(xr, sz10) = all_83_2_40 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xr) = all_83_0_38 & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, xn) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, all_83_1_39)
% 111.94/81.10  					|
% 111.94/81.10  					| Applying alpha-rule on (328) yields:
% 111.94/81.10  					| (329) sdtpldt0(sz10, xr) = all_83_0_38
% 111.94/81.10  					| (330)  ~ (all_83_1_39 = all_83_2_40)
% 111.94/81.10  					| (331) sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = all_83_1_39
% 111.94/81.10  					| (332) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, all_83_1_39)
% 111.94/81.10  					| (333)  ~ (all_83_0_38 = xn)
% 111.94/81.10  					| (334) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, xn)
% 111.94/81.10  					| (335) sdtpldt0(xr, sz10) = all_83_2_40
% 111.94/81.10  					|
% 111.94/81.10  					| From (310) and (331) follows:
% 111.94/81.10  					| (336) sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_83_1_39
% 111.94/81.10  					|
% 111.94/81.10  					| From (310) and (335) follows:
% 111.94/81.10  					| (337) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40
% 111.94/81.10  					|
% 111.94/81.10  					| From (310) and (329) follows:
% 111.94/81.10  					| (338) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38
% 111.94/81.10  					|
% 111.94/81.10  					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (237), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.10  					|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.10  					| (177) xp = sz10
% 111.94/81.10  					|
% 111.94/81.10  						| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 111.94/81.10  						| (174) $false
% 111.94/81.10  						|
% 111.94/81.10  						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 111.94/81.10  					|-Branch two:
% 111.94/81.10  					| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 111.94/81.10  					| (342)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xr) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, xn))
% 111.94/81.10  					|
% 111.94/81.10  						| Instantiating (342) with all_88_0_41, all_88_1_42, all_88_2_43 yields:
% 111.94/81.10  						| (343)  ~ (all_88_0_41 = all_88_1_42) &  ~ (all_88_2_43 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, sz10) = all_88_2_43 & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = all_88_0_41 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xr) = all_88_1_42 & sdtlseqdt0(all_88_1_42, all_88_0_41) & sdtlseqdt0(all_88_2_43, xn)
% 111.94/81.10  						|
% 111.94/81.10  						| Applying alpha-rule on (343) yields:
% 111.94/81.10  						| (344) sdtlseqdt0(all_88_1_42, all_88_0_41)
% 111.94/81.10  						| (345) sdtpldt0(sz10, xr) = all_88_1_42
% 111.94/81.10  						| (346) sdtpldt0(xr, sz10) = all_88_2_43
% 111.94/81.10  						| (347)  ~ (all_88_2_43 = xn)
% 111.94/81.10  						| (348) sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = all_88_0_41
% 111.94/81.10  						| (349) sdtlseqdt0(all_88_2_43, xn)
% 111.94/81.10  						| (350)  ~ (all_88_0_41 = all_88_1_42)
% 111.94/81.10  						|
% 111.94/81.10  						| From (310) and (346) follows:
% 111.94/81.10  						| (351) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_88_2_43
% 111.94/81.10  						|
% 111.94/81.10  						| From (310) and (348) follows:
% 111.94/81.10  						| (352) sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = all_88_0_41
% 111.94/81.10  						|
% 111.94/81.10  						| From (310) and (345) follows:
% 111.94/81.10  						| (353) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_88_1_42
% 111.94/81.10  						|
% 111.94/81.10  						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (206), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.10  						|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.10  						| (354) sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_15_3_9)
% 111.94/81.10  						|
% 111.94/81.10  							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (249), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.10  							|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.10  							| (177) xp = sz10
% 111.94/81.10  							|
% 111.94/81.10  								| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 111.94/81.10  								| (174) $false
% 111.94/81.10  								|
% 111.94/81.10  								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 111.94/81.10  							|-Branch two:
% 111.94/81.10  							| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 111.94/81.10  							| (358)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_3_3) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_3_3))
% 111.94/81.10  							|
% 111.94/81.10  								| Instantiating (358) with all_97_0_44, all_97_1_45, all_97_2_46 yields:
% 111.94/81.10  								| (359)  ~ (all_97_0_44 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (all_97_2_46 = all_0_3_3) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_44 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45 & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, all_97_0_44) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_0_3_3)
% 111.94/81.10  								|
% 111.94/81.10  								| Applying alpha-rule on (359) yields:
% 111.94/81.10  								| (360)  ~ (all_97_2_46 = all_0_3_3)
% 111.94/81.10  								| (361) sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_0_3_3)
% 111.94/81.10  								| (362)  ~ (all_97_0_44 = all_97_1_45)
% 111.94/81.10  								| (363) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46
% 111.94/81.10  								| (364) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45
% 111.94/81.10  								| (365) sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, all_97_0_44)
% 111.94/81.10  								| (366) sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_44
% 111.94/81.10  								|
% 111.94/81.10  								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (238), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.10  								|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.10  								| (177) xp = sz10
% 111.94/81.10  								|
% 111.94/81.10  									| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 111.94/81.10  									| (174) $false
% 111.94/81.10  									|
% 111.94/81.10  									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 111.94/81.10  								|-Branch two:
% 111.94/81.10  								| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 111.94/81.10  								| (370)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_13_0_5))
% 111.94/81.10  								|
% 111.94/81.10  									| Instantiating (370) with all_102_0_47, all_102_1_48, all_102_2_49 yields:
% 111.94/81.10  									| (371)  ~ (all_102_0_47 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_102_2_49 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_102_0_47 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48 & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_102_0_47) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_13_0_5)
% 111.94/81.10  									|
% 111.94/81.10  									| Applying alpha-rule on (371) yields:
% 111.94/81.10  									| (372) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_102_0_47)
% 111.94/81.10  									| (373)  ~ (all_102_2_49 = all_13_0_5)
% 111.94/81.10  									| (374) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_13_0_5)
% 111.94/81.10  									| (375) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48
% 111.94/81.10  									| (376) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49
% 111.94/81.10  									| (377) sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_102_0_47
% 111.94/81.10  									| (378)  ~ (all_102_0_47 = all_102_1_48)
% 111.94/81.10  									|
% 111.94/81.10  									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (187), into two cases.
% 111.94/81.10  									|-Branch one:
% 111.94/81.10  									| (379) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2)
% 111.94/81.10  									|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_72_2_34, all_15_3_9 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_72_2_34, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (380) all_72_2_34 = all_15_3_9
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_64_3_27, all_72_2_34 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_72_2_34, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_64_3_27, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (381) all_72_2_34 = all_64_3_27
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_15_1_7, all_64_3_27 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_64_3_27, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_1_7, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (382) all_64_3_27 = all_15_1_7
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_15_0_6, all_64_4_28 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_64_4_28, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_15_0_6, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (383) all_64_4_28 = all_15_0_6
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_15_2_8, all_64_4_28 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_64_4_28, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_15_2_8, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (384) all_64_4_28 = all_15_2_8
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (49) with xn, xm, all_64_2_26, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_64_2_26, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (385) all_64_2_26 = all_0_2_2
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (49) with xn, xm, all_15_0_6, all_64_2_26 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_64_2_26, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_15_0_6, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (386) all_64_2_26 = all_15_0_6
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3, all_97_0_44 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_97_0_44, sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (387) all_97_0_44 = all_0_3_3
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xm, all_62_0_23, all_102_0_47 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_102_0_47, sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_62_0_23, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (388) all_102_0_47 = all_62_0_23
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xm, all_13_0_5, all_102_0_47 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_102_0_47, sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_13_0_5, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (389) all_102_0_47 = all_13_0_5
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xn, xn, all_88_0_41 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = all_88_0_41, sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = xn, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (390) all_88_0_41 = xn
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xp, all_70_0_31, all_13_0_5 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_70_0_31, sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (391) all_70_0_31 = all_13_0_5
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_66_0_29, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_66_0_29, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (392) all_66_0_29 = all_0_4_4
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_17_0_11, all_66_0_29 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_66_0_29, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_17_0_11, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (393) all_66_0_29 = all_17_0_11
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xp, all_74_0_37, all_83_1_39 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_83_1_39, sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_74_0_37, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (394) all_83_1_39 = all_74_0_37
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xp, xn, all_83_1_39 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_83_1_39, sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (395) all_83_1_39 = xn
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_83_2_40, all_88_2_43 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_88_2_43, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (396) all_88_2_43 = all_83_2_40
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xn, all_83_0_38, all_88_1_42 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_88_1_42, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (397) all_88_1_42 = all_83_0_38
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (77) with xn, all_68_0_30, xp, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_68_0_30) = xn, sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_68_0_30), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 111.94/81.10  										| (398) all_68_0_30 = xp
% 111.94/81.10  										|
% 111.94/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_60_0_22, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_60_0_22) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_60_0_22), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.10  										| (399) all_60_0_22 = all_0_0_0 | xp = sz00
% 112.43/81.10  										|
% 112.43/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (50) with sz00, all_50_0_17 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, all_50_0_17) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_50_0_17), yields:
% 112.43/81.10  										| (400) all_50_0_17 = sz00
% 112.43/81.10  										|
% 112.43/81.10  										| Instantiating formula (77) with xn, all_68_0_30, all_44_0_14, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_68_0_30) = xn, sdtpldt0(xn, all_44_0_14) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_68_0_30), aNaturalNumber0(all_44_0_14), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.10  										| (401) all_68_0_30 = all_44_0_14
% 112.43/81.10  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (388,389) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (402) all_62_0_23 = all_13_0_5
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Simplifying 402 yields:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (403) all_62_0_23 = all_13_0_5
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (395,394) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (404) all_74_0_37 = xn
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (381,380) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (405) all_64_3_27 = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Simplifying 405 yields:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (406) all_64_3_27 = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (398,401) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (407) all_44_0_14 = xp
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (392,393) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (408) all_17_0_11 = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (385,386) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (409) all_15_0_6 = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (382,406) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (410) all_15_1_7 = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Simplifying 410 yields:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (411) all_15_1_7 = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (383,384) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (412) all_15_0_6 = all_15_2_8
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Simplifying 412 yields:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (413) all_15_0_6 = all_15_2_8
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (409,413) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (414) all_15_2_8 = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Combining equations (414,384) yields a new equation:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (415) all_64_4_28 = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Equations (390,397) can reduce 350 to:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (416)  ~ (all_83_0_38 = xn)
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| Simplifying 416 yields:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (333)  ~ (all_83_0_38 = xn)
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (411) and (162) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (418) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (411) and (195) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (165) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (414) and (315) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (138) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (414) and (312) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (53) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (415)(406) and (287) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (422) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (414) and (184) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (423) sdtpldt0(all_15_3_9, all_0_2_2) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (387) and (366) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (250) sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_3_3
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (403) and (281) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (223) sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_13_0_5
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (390) and (352) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (320) sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = xn
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (404) and (308) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (427) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_3_3
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (391) and (298) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (156) sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = all_13_0_5
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (403) and (317) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (429) sdtpldt0(xn, all_13_0_5) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (404) and (309) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (318) sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (408) and (319) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (12) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (396) and (351) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (337) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (397) and (353) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (338) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (400) and (262) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (434) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (397)(390) and (344) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (334) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, xn)
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (400) and (263) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (108) aNaturalNumber0(sz00)
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (407) and (257) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (20) aNaturalNumber0(xp)
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (411) and (196) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (438) aNaturalNumber0(all_15_3_9)
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										| From (414) and (198) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (139) aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2)
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (399), into two cases.
% 112.43/81.11  										|-Branch one:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (173) xp = sz00
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (174) $false
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.43/81.11  										|-Branch two:
% 112.43/81.11  										| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 112.43/81.11  										| (443) all_60_0_22 = all_0_0_0
% 112.43/81.11  										|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (443) and (277) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (86) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (443) and (278) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (116) aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, all_13_0_5, all_0_4_4, all_0_3_3 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_13_0_5) = all_0_3_3, sdtpldt0(xn, all_13_0_5) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (446) all_0_3_3 = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (77) with all_0_4_4, all_13_0_5, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_13_0_5) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_13_0_5), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (447) all_13_0_5 = xm
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (446) and (17) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (448) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (446) and (250) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (449) sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (447) and (223) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (450) sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (447) and (156) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (451) sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (446) and (427) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (143) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (447) and (429) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (12) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (447) and (224) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (446) and (251) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (144) aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (77) with xm, all_58_0_21, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, all_58_0_21) = xm, sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(all_58_0_21), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (456) all_58_0_21 = xp
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (456) and (274) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (451) sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| From (456) and (275) follows:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (20) aNaturalNumber0(xp)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_0_0_0, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(all_15_3_9, all_0_2_2) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (459)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (sdtasdt0(v0, xp) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xp, v0) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v2, v3) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (35) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_0_0_0, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(all_15_3_9, all_0_2_2) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (460)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (sdtasdt0(v0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, v0) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v2, v3) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = v0)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (31) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_0_2_2, xm, all_0_0_0, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (461)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (sdtasdt0(v0, xp) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xp, v0) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v3 & sdtpldt0(v2, v3) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (35) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_0_2_2, xm, all_0_0_0, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] : (sdtasdt0(v0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xp, v0) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v3 & sdtpldt0(v2, v3) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, xp, xp, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (463)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, v0) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = v0)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_97_2_46, all_0_4_4, sz10, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (464)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xm, v0) = all_97_2_46 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.11  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_97_2_46, all_0_4_4, sz10, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.11  											| (465)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, v0) = all_97_2_46)
% 112.43/81.11  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_97_2_46, all_0_4_4, sz10, xp, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (466)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, v0) = all_97_2_46 & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_97_2_46, all_0_4_4, sz10, all_0_4_4, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (467)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, v0) = all_97_2_46)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, xp, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (468)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (97) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (469) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_15_3_9, xm, xm, xp, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (470)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v4 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_15_3_9 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_2_2, xm, xm, xp, xn and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (471)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_2_2, xm, xm, xp, xn and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (472)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_0_2_2)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_15_3_9, xm, xm, xp, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (473)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_15_3_9)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (109) with xm, all_0_4_4, xp, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (474) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (55) with xm, all_0_4_4, xp, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (475) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_0_4_4, xm, xn, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (476) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (59) with xm, xm, xm, xp, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (477)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, xm) = xm & sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (97) with xm, xm, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (478) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xm) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xm, v2))
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (22) with xm, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (479) sdtlseqdt0(xp, xm)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (55) with xn, all_0_4_4, xp, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = xn, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (480) xp = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_0_4_4, xn, xm, xp, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = xn, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (481) xp = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (59) with xn, xn, xn, xp, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (482)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, xn) = xn & sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_15_3_9, xm, xp, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (483)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v3 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_15_3_9 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_2_2, xm, xp, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (484)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_2_2, xm, xp, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (485)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_0_2_2)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_15_3_9, xm, xp, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (486)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_15_3_9)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (27) with xm, xm, xp, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (487)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, v0) = xm)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_0_4_4, all_102_2_49, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (488) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_102_2_49, all_0_4_4, sz10, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (489) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (109) with all_0_4_4, all_102_2_49, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (490) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_97_2_46, all_102_2_49, all_0_4_4, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (491) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_102_2_49, xm, sz10, xm, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (492)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xp, v0) = all_102_2_49 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_102_2_49, xm, sz10, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.12  											| (493)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, v0) = all_102_2_49)
% 112.43/81.12  											|
% 112.43/81.12  											| Instantiating formula (79) with all_102_2_49, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (494) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_2_49
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_0_4_4, xn, xp, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (495) xp = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (27) with xn, xn, xp, xp, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (496)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, v0) = xn)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (109) with all_0_4_4, all_83_2_40, xm, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (497) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_0_4_4, all_83_2_40, xm, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (498) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_83_2_40, all_0_4_4, sz10, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (499) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_102_2_49, all_83_2_40, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (500) xm = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_83_2_40, all_102_2_49, xn, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (501) xm = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_83_2_40, xn, sz10, xp, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (502)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, v0) = all_83_2_40)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (94) with all_83_2_40, sz10, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (503) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (79) with all_83_2_40, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (504) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_2_40
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_97_1_45, all_0_4_4, xn, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (505)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, xn) = all_97_1_45 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_97_1_45, all_0_4_4, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (506)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, xm) = all_97_1_45 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_102_2_49, all_97_1_45, all_0_4_4, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (507) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (25) with all_97_1_45, all_0_4_4, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (508) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_1_45
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_102_1_48, all_0_4_4, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (509) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_0_4_4, all_102_1_48, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (510) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_102_1_48, all_0_4_4, sz10, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (511) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (109) with all_97_2_46, all_102_1_48, all_0_4_4, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (512) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_102_1_48, xm, xp, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (513)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, xp) = all_102_1_48 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_83_2_40, all_102_1_48, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (514) xm = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_97_1_45, all_102_1_48, all_0_4_4, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (515) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_102_1_48, all_97_1_45, xm, all_0_4_4, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (516) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (48) with all_102_1_48, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (517) aNaturalNumber0(all_102_1_48)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_0_4_4, all_83_0_38, xm, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (518) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (55) with all_83_0_38, all_0_4_4, sz10, xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (519) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (15) with all_83_0_38, all_0_4_4, xm, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (520) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (109) with all_102_2_49, all_83_0_38, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (521) xm = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_83_0_38, xn, xp, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (522)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, xp) = all_83_0_38 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_102_1_48, all_83_0_38, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (523) xm = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_83_0_38, all_102_1_48, xn, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (524) xm = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (7) with all_83_0_38, sz10, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.13  											| (525) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 112.43/81.13  											|
% 112.43/81.13  											| Instantiating formula (48) with all_83_0_38, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (526) aNaturalNumber0(all_83_0_38)
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms doDivides0(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (527)  ? [v0] : (sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, v0) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2, xm and discharging atoms doDivides0(xm, all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (528)  ? [v0] : (sdtasdt0(xm, v0) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (10) with all_0_2_2, xn and discharging atoms doDivides0(xn, all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (529)  ? [v0] : (sdtasdt0(xn, v0) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (61) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (530)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, v0) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (61) with all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (531)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, v0) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (61) with all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (532)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, v0) = all_0_4_4 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (97) with all_0_4_4, xn, all_0_4_4, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (533) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (67) with all_0_4_4, xn, all_0_4_4, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (534) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (94) with all_97_2_46, sz10, all_0_4_4, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (535) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (97) with all_102_2_49, sz10, all_0_4_4, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (536) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (7) with all_97_1_45, sz10, all_0_4_4, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (537) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (67) with all_102_1_48, sz10, all_0_4_4, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (538) all_0_4_4 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (61) with all_0_4_4, xm and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (539)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xm, v0) = all_0_4_4 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (71) with all_0_4_4, xn, xp and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xp, xn), sdtlseqdt0(xn, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (540) sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_0_4_4)
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (61) with all_0_4_4, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (541)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xn, v0) = all_0_4_4 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (7) with all_0_4_4, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (542) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_4_4, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (543) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (67) with all_97_2_46, all_0_4_4, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (544) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (67) with all_102_2_49, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (545) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (67) with all_83_2_40, xn, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (546) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (94) with all_83_2_40, sz10, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (547) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (97) with all_97_1_45, all_0_4_4, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (548) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (97) with all_102_1_48, xm, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (549) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (7) with all_83_0_38, sz10, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (550) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (97) with all_83_0_38, xn, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (551) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (61) with xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (552)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = xn & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_56_0_20, all_0_0_0, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_56_0_20) = all_0_0_0, aNaturalNumber0(all_56_0_20), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (553)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_56_0_20, xp) = v4 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_56_0_20) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_2_2, all_0_0_0, all_56_0_20, all_0_0_0, xp and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_56_0_20) = all_0_0_0, aNaturalNumber0(all_56_0_20), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (554)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_56_0_20, xp) = v4 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v3 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_56_0_20) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_0_2_2)
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_0_0, all_0_0_0, all_56_0_20, all_56_0_20, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_56_0_20) = all_0_0_0, aNaturalNumber0(all_56_0_20), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (555)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_56_0_20, all_56_0_20) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, v0) = all_0_0_0)
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (118) with all_56_0_20 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_56_0_20), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (556) all_56_0_20 = sz10 | all_56_0_20 = sz00 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_56_0_20) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.14  											|
% 112.43/81.14  											| Instantiating formula (109) with all_102_2_49, sz10, xm, all_54_0_19, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.14  											| (557) all_54_0_19 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (109) with all_83_2_40, sz10, xn, all_54_0_19, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (558) all_54_0_19 = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (27) with sz10, sz10, all_54_0_19, all_54_0_19, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (559)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, all_54_0_19) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = sz10)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_97_2_46, sz10, all_54_0_19, sz10, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (560)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, all_54_0_19) = all_97_2_46 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_102_2_49, sz10, all_54_0_19, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (561)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, all_54_0_19) = all_102_2_49 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_83_2_40, sz10, all_54_0_19, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (562)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, all_54_0_19) = all_83_2_40 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (62) with sz10, all_102_1_48, all_54_0_19, xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (563) all_54_0_19 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (62) with sz10, all_83_0_38, all_54_0_19, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (564) all_54_0_19 = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (97) with sz10, all_54_0_19, xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (565) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz10) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_54_0_19) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v2))
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (79) with sz10, sz10, all_54_0_19 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (566) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = sz10
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_97_1_45, sz10, all_0_4_4, all_54_0_19, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_1_45, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (567)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = all_97_1_45)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_102_1_48, sz10, xm, all_54_0_19, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (568)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = all_102_1_48)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_102_1_48, sz10, xm, all_54_0_19, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (569) all_54_0_19 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_83_0_38, sz10, xn, all_54_0_19, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (570)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = all_83_0_38)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (62) with all_83_0_38, sz10, xn, all_54_0_19, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_54_0_19) = sz10, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (571) all_54_0_19 = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (118) with all_54_0_19 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (572) all_54_0_19 = sz10 | all_54_0_19 = sz00 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_54_0_19) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_2_2, xp, all_52_0_18, sz10, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (573)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_0_0) = v4 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v2 & sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = v3 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_0_2_2)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_2_2, xp, all_52_0_18, sz10, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (574)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_0_0) = v4 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = v1 & sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = v3 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_15_3_9, xp, all_52_0_18, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (575)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xm, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v3 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_15_3_9)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_15_3_9, xp, all_52_0_18, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xm, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v3 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_15_3_9 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_4_4, xp, all_0_4_4, all_52_0_18, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (577)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = all_0_4_4)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (27) with xm, xp, xm, all_52_0_18, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (578)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = xm)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (59) with all_0_4_4, xp, all_52_0_18, sz10, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (579)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, all_52_0_18) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (59) with xm, xp, all_52_0_18, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (580)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, all_52_0_18) = xm & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (59) with xn, xp, all_52_0_18, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (581)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, all_52_0_18) = xn & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (97) with xp, all_52_0_18, xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (582) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (97) with xp, all_52_0_18, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (583) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (79) with xp, sz10, all_52_0_18 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (584) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xp
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_0_2_2, xp, all_46_0_15, xp, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (585)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = v4 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = v1 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_0_2_2)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_0_2_2, xp, all_46_0_15, xp, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (586)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = v4 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = v2 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v3 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (58) with all_15_3_9, xp, all_46_0_15, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.15  											| (587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xm, all_46_0_15) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = all_15_3_9)
% 112.43/81.15  											|
% 112.43/81.15  											| Instantiating formula (39) with all_15_3_9, xp, all_46_0_15, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9, sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (588)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] :  ? [v3] :  ? [v4] : (sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = v4 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v3 & sdtasdt0(xm, all_46_0_15) = v2 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v3, v4) = all_15_3_9 & sdtpldt0(v1, v2) = v0)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating formula (27) with xp, xp, all_46_0_15, all_46_0_15, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp, aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (589)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, all_46_0_15) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, v0) = xp)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating formula (59) with xn, xp, all_46_0_15, xp, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp, sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (590)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(v0, all_46_0_15) = xn & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating formula (94) with xp, all_46_0_15, xp, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp), aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (591) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_46_0_15) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, xp) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating formula (27) with all_0_4_4, xp, all_0_4_4, all_46_0_15, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_46_0_15) = xp, sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (592)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, v0) = all_0_4_4)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating formula (118) with all_46_0_15 and discharging atoms aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (593) all_46_0_15 = sz10 | all_46_0_15 = sz00 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_46_0_15) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating formula (61) with all_15_3_9, xm and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_15_3_9), aNaturalNumber0(all_15_3_9), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (594)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xm, v0) = all_15_3_9 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (594) with all_142_0_52 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (595) sdtpldt0(xm, all_142_0_52) = all_15_3_9 & aNaturalNumber0(all_142_0_52)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (595) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (596) sdtpldt0(xm, all_142_0_52) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.16  											| (597) aNaturalNumber0(all_142_0_52)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (529) with all_146_0_54 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (598) sdtasdt0(xn, all_146_0_54) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(all_146_0_54)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (598) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (599) sdtasdt0(xn, all_146_0_54) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.16  											| (600) aNaturalNumber0(all_146_0_54)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (522) with all_148_0_55 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (601) sdtpldt0(all_148_0_55, xp) = all_83_0_38 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_148_0_55
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (601) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (602) sdtpldt0(all_148_0_55, xp) = all_83_0_38
% 112.43/81.16  											| (603) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_148_0_55
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (589) with all_154_0_58 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (604) sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, all_46_0_15) = all_154_0_58 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_154_0_58) = xp
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (604) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (605) sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, all_46_0_15) = all_154_0_58
% 112.43/81.16  											| (606) sdtpldt0(xp, all_154_0_58) = xp
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (567) with all_162_0_62 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (607) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, all_0_4_4) = all_162_0_62 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_162_0_62) = all_97_1_45
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (607) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (608) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, all_0_4_4) = all_162_0_62
% 112.43/81.16  											| (609) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_162_0_62) = all_97_1_45
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (554) with all_164_0_63, all_164_1_64, all_164_2_65, all_164_3_66, all_164_4_67 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (610) sdtasdt0(all_56_0_20, xp) = all_164_0_63 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_164_1_64 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_164_2_65 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_56_0_20) = all_164_3_66 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_164_4_67 & sdtpldt0(all_164_1_64, all_164_0_63) = all_164_2_65 & sdtpldt0(all_164_4_67, all_164_3_66) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (610) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (611) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_164_4_67
% 112.43/81.16  											| (612) sdtasdt0(xp, all_56_0_20) = all_164_3_66
% 112.43/81.16  											| (613) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_164_1_64
% 112.43/81.16  											| (614) sdtpldt0(all_164_4_67, all_164_3_66) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.16  											| (615) sdtpldt0(all_164_1_64, all_164_0_63) = all_164_2_65
% 112.43/81.16  											| (616) sdtasdt0(all_56_0_20, xp) = all_164_0_63
% 112.43/81.16  											| (617) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_164_2_65
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (552) with all_166_0_68 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (618) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_166_0_68) = xn & aNaturalNumber0(all_166_0_68)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (618) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (619) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_166_0_68) = xn
% 112.43/81.16  											| (620) aNaturalNumber0(all_166_0_68)
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (553) with all_168_0_69, all_168_1_70, all_168_2_71, all_168_3_72, all_168_4_73 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (621) sdtasdt0(all_56_0_20, xp) = all_168_0_69 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_168_1_70 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_56_0_20) = all_168_2_71 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_168_3_72 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_168_4_73 & sdtpldt0(all_168_1_70, all_168_0_69) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(all_168_3_72, all_168_2_71) = all_168_4_73
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (621) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (622) sdtasdt0(all_56_0_20, xp) = all_168_0_69
% 112.43/81.16  											| (623) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_168_4_73
% 112.43/81.16  											| (624) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_168_1_70
% 112.43/81.16  											| (625) sdtpldt0(all_168_3_72, all_168_2_71) = all_168_4_73
% 112.43/81.16  											| (626) sdtasdt0(xp, all_56_0_20) = all_168_2_71
% 112.43/81.16  											| (627) sdtpldt0(all_168_1_70, all_168_0_69) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.16  											| (628) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_168_3_72
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (592) with all_170_0_74 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (629) sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_4_4) = all_170_0_74 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_170_0_74) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (629) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (630) sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_4_4) = all_170_0_74
% 112.43/81.16  											| (631) sdtpldt0(xp, all_170_0_74) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (590) with all_172_0_75 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (632) sdtpldt0(all_172_0_75, all_46_0_15) = xn & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_172_0_75
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (632) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (633) sdtpldt0(all_172_0_75, all_46_0_15) = xn
% 112.43/81.16  											| (634) sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_172_0_75
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (588) with all_174_0_76, all_174_1_77, all_174_2_78, all_174_3_79, all_174_4_80 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (635) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = all_174_0_76 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_174_1_77 & sdtasdt0(xm, all_46_0_15) = all_174_2_78 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_174_3_79 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_174_4_80 & sdtpldt0(all_174_1_77, all_174_0_76) = all_15_3_9 & sdtpldt0(all_174_3_79, all_174_2_78) = all_174_4_80
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (635) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (636) sdtasdt0(xm, all_46_0_15) = all_174_2_78
% 112.43/81.16  											| (637) sdtpldt0(all_174_3_79, all_174_2_78) = all_174_4_80
% 112.43/81.16  											| (638) sdtpldt0(all_174_1_77, all_174_0_76) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.16  											| (639) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = all_174_0_76
% 112.43/81.16  											| (640) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_174_3_79
% 112.43/81.16  											| (641) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_174_1_77
% 112.43/81.16  											| (642) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_174_4_80
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (587) with all_178_0_82, all_178_1_83, all_178_2_84, all_178_3_85, all_178_4_86 yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (643) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = all_178_0_82 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_178_1_83 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_178_2_84 & sdtasdt0(xm, all_46_0_15) = all_178_3_85 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_178_4_86 & sdtpldt0(all_178_1_83, all_178_0_82) = all_178_2_84 & sdtpldt0(all_178_4_86, all_178_3_85) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Applying alpha-rule on (643) yields:
% 112.43/81.16  											| (644) sdtasdt0(xm, all_46_0_15) = all_178_3_85
% 112.43/81.16  											| (645) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = all_178_0_82
% 112.43/81.16  											| (646) sdtpldt0(all_178_4_86, all_178_3_85) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.16  											| (647) sdtpldt0(all_178_1_83, all_178_0_82) = all_178_2_84
% 112.43/81.16  											| (648) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_178_4_86
% 112.43/81.16  											| (649) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_178_1_83
% 112.43/81.16  											| (650) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_178_2_84
% 112.43/81.16  											|
% 112.43/81.16  											| Instantiating (555) with all_180_0_87 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (651) sdtpldt0(all_56_0_20, all_56_0_20) = all_180_0_87 & sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_180_0_87) = all_0_0_0
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (651) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (652) sdtpldt0(all_56_0_20, all_56_0_20) = all_180_0_87
% 112.43/81.17  											| (653) sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_180_0_87) = all_0_0_0
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (473) with all_184_0_89, all_184_1_90, all_184_2_91, all_184_3_92, all_184_4_93 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (654) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_184_1_90 & sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_184_4_93 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_184_3_92 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_0_89 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_2_91 & sdtpldt0(all_184_1_90, all_184_0_89) = all_184_2_91 & sdtpldt0(all_184_4_93, all_184_3_92) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (654) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (655) sdtpldt0(all_184_1_90, all_184_0_89) = all_184_2_91
% 112.43/81.17  											| (656) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_184_1_90
% 112.43/81.17  											| (657) sdtpldt0(all_184_4_93, all_184_3_92) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.17  											| (658) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_184_3_92
% 112.43/81.17  											| (659) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_184_4_93
% 112.43/81.17  											| (660) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_2_91
% 112.43/81.17  											| (661) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_0_89
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (472) with all_186_0_94, all_186_1_95, all_186_2_96, all_186_3_97, all_186_4_98 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (662) sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = all_186_1_95 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_186_0_94 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_186_2_96 & sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = all_186_4_98 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_186_3_97 & sdtpldt0(all_186_1_95, all_186_0_94) = all_186_2_96 & sdtpldt0(all_186_4_98, all_186_3_97) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (662) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (663) sdtpldt0(all_186_4_98, all_186_3_97) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.17  											| (664) sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = all_186_1_95
% 112.43/81.17  											| (665) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_186_0_94
% 112.43/81.17  											| (666) sdtpldt0(all_186_1_95, all_186_0_94) = all_186_2_96
% 112.43/81.17  											| (667) sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = all_186_4_98
% 112.43/81.17  											| (668) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_186_2_96
% 112.43/81.17  											| (669) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_186_3_97
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (505) with all_188_0_99 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (670) sdtpldt0(all_188_0_99, xn) = all_97_1_45 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_188_0_99
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (670) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (671) sdtpldt0(all_188_0_99, xn) = all_97_1_45
% 112.43/81.17  											| (672) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_188_0_99
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (541) with all_190_0_100 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (673) sdtpldt0(xn, all_190_0_100) = all_0_4_4 & aNaturalNumber0(all_190_0_100)
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (673) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (674) sdtpldt0(xn, all_190_0_100) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.17  											| (675) aNaturalNumber0(all_190_0_100)
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (539) with all_192_0_101 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (676) sdtpldt0(xm, all_192_0_101) = all_0_4_4 & aNaturalNumber0(all_192_0_101)
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (676) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (677) sdtpldt0(xm, all_192_0_101) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.17  											| (678) aNaturalNumber0(all_192_0_101)
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (486) with all_196_0_103, all_196_1_104, all_196_2_105, all_196_3_106, all_196_4_107 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (679) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_196_0_103 & sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_196_3_106 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_196_4_107 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_196_1_104 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_196_2_105 & sdtpldt0(all_196_1_104, all_196_0_103) = all_196_2_105 & sdtpldt0(all_196_4_107, all_196_3_106) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (679) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (680) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_196_0_103
% 112.43/81.17  											| (681) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_196_4_107
% 112.43/81.17  											| (682) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_196_2_105
% 112.43/81.17  											| (683) sdtpldt0(all_196_4_107, all_196_3_106) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.17  											| (684) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_196_1_104
% 112.43/81.17  											| (685) sdtpldt0(all_196_1_104, all_196_0_103) = all_196_2_105
% 112.43/81.17  											| (686) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_196_3_106
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (485) with all_198_0_108, all_198_1_109, all_198_2_110, all_198_3_111, all_198_4_112 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (687) sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = all_198_0_108 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_1_109 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_2_110 & sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = all_198_3_111 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_198_4_112 & sdtpldt0(all_198_1_109, all_198_0_108) = all_198_2_110 & sdtpldt0(all_198_4_112, all_198_3_111) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (687) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (688) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_2_110
% 112.43/81.17  											| (689) sdtpldt0(all_198_4_112, all_198_3_111) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.17  											| (690) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_1_109
% 112.43/81.17  											| (691) sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = all_198_0_108
% 112.43/81.17  											| (692) sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = all_198_3_111
% 112.43/81.17  											| (693) sdtpldt0(all_198_1_109, all_198_0_108) = all_198_2_110
% 112.43/81.17  											| (694) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_198_4_112
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (482) with all_200_0_113 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (695) sdtpldt0(all_200_0_113, xn) = xn & sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_200_0_113
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (695) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (696) sdtpldt0(all_200_0_113, xn) = xn
% 112.43/81.17  											| (697) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_200_0_113
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (484) with all_202_0_114, all_202_1_115, all_202_2_116, all_202_3_117, all_202_4_118 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (698) sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = all_202_0_114 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_202_1_115 & sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = all_202_2_116 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_202_3_117 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_202_4_118 & sdtpldt0(all_202_1_115, all_202_0_114) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(all_202_3_117, all_202_2_116) = all_202_4_118
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (698) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (699) sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = all_202_0_114
% 112.43/81.17  											| (700) sdtpldt0(all_202_3_117, all_202_2_116) = all_202_4_118
% 112.43/81.17  											| (701) sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = all_202_2_116
% 112.43/81.17  											| (702) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_202_3_117
% 112.43/81.17  											| (703) sdtpldt0(all_202_1_115, all_202_0_114) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.17  											| (704) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_202_1_115
% 112.43/81.17  											| (705) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_202_4_118
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (483) with all_204_0_119, all_204_1_120, all_204_2_121, all_204_3_122, all_204_4_123 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (706) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_204_0_119 & sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_204_2_121 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_3_122 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_4_123 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_204_1_120 & sdtpldt0(all_204_1_120, all_204_0_119) = all_15_3_9 & sdtpldt0(all_204_3_122, all_204_2_121) = all_204_4_123
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (706) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (707) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_3_122
% 112.43/81.17  											| (708) sdtpldt0(all_204_1_120, all_204_0_119) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.17  											| (709) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_4_123
% 112.43/81.17  											| (710) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_204_0_119
% 112.43/81.17  											| (711) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_204_1_120
% 112.43/81.17  											| (712) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_204_2_121
% 112.43/81.17  											| (713) sdtpldt0(all_204_3_122, all_204_2_121) = all_204_4_123
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (502) with all_208_0_125 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (714) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_208_0_125 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_208_0_125) = all_83_2_40
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (714) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (715) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_208_0_125
% 112.43/81.17  											| (716) sdtpldt0(xn, all_208_0_125) = all_83_2_40
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (496) with all_210_0_126 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (717) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_210_0_126 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_210_0_126) = xn
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (717) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (718) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_210_0_126
% 112.43/81.17  											| (719) sdtpldt0(xn, all_210_0_126) = xn
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Instantiating (528) with all_212_0_127 yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (720) sdtasdt0(xm, all_212_0_127) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(all_212_0_127)
% 112.43/81.17  											|
% 112.43/81.17  											| Applying alpha-rule on (720) yields:
% 112.43/81.17  											| (721) sdtasdt0(xm, all_212_0_127) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.18  											| (722) aNaturalNumber0(all_212_0_127)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (527) with all_214_0_128 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (723) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_214_0_128) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(all_214_0_128)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (723) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (724) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_214_0_128) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.18  											| (725) aNaturalNumber0(all_214_0_128)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (581) with all_220_0_131 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (726) sdtpldt0(all_220_0_131, all_52_0_18) = xn & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_220_0_131
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (726) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (727) sdtpldt0(all_220_0_131, all_52_0_18) = xn
% 112.43/81.18  											| (728) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_220_0_131
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (580) with all_224_0_133 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (729) sdtpldt0(all_224_0_133, all_52_0_18) = xm & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_224_0_133
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (729) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (730) sdtpldt0(all_224_0_133, all_52_0_18) = xm
% 112.43/81.18  											| (731) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_224_0_133
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (579) with all_226_0_134 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (732) sdtpldt0(all_226_0_134, all_52_0_18) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_226_0_134
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (732) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (733) sdtpldt0(all_226_0_134, all_52_0_18) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.18  											| (734) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_226_0_134
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (578) with all_228_0_135 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (735) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_228_0_135 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_228_0_135) = xm
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (735) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (736) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_228_0_135
% 112.43/81.18  											| (737) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_228_0_135) = xm
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (576) with all_230_0_136, all_230_1_137, all_230_2_138, all_230_3_139, all_230_4_140 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (738) sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_230_0_136 & sdtasdt0(xm, all_52_0_18) = all_230_2_138 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_230_4_140 & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = all_230_3_139 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = all_230_1_137 & sdtpldt0(all_230_1_137, all_230_0_136) = all_15_3_9 & sdtpldt0(all_230_3_139, all_230_2_138) = all_230_4_140
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (738) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (739) sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = all_230_3_139
% 112.43/81.18  											| (740) sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_230_0_136
% 112.43/81.18  											| (741) sdtpldt0(all_230_1_137, all_230_0_136) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.18  											| (742) sdtpldt0(all_230_3_139, all_230_2_138) = all_230_4_140
% 112.43/81.18  											| (743) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_230_4_140
% 112.43/81.18  											| (744) sdtasdt0(xm, all_52_0_18) = all_230_2_138
% 112.43/81.18  											| (745) sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = all_230_1_137
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (477) with all_232_0_141 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (746) sdtpldt0(all_232_0_141, xm) = xm & sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_232_0_141
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (746) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (747) sdtpldt0(all_232_0_141, xm) = xm
% 112.43/81.18  											| (748) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_232_0_141
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (532) with all_234_0_142 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (749) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, all_234_0_142) = all_0_4_4 & aNaturalNumber0(all_234_0_142)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (749) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (750) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, all_234_0_142) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.18  											| (751) aNaturalNumber0(all_234_0_142)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (531) with all_236_0_143 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (752) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_236_0_143) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(all_236_0_143)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (752) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (753) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_236_0_143) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.18  											| (754) aNaturalNumber0(all_236_0_143)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (530) with all_238_0_144 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (755) sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_238_0_144) = all_0_2_2 & aNaturalNumber0(all_238_0_144)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (755) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (756) sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, all_238_0_144) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.18  											| (757) aNaturalNumber0(all_238_0_144)
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (577) with all_240_0_145 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (758) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_4_4) = all_240_0_145 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_240_0_145) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (758) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (759) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_4_4) = all_240_0_145
% 112.43/81.18  											| (760) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_240_0_145) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (575) with all_242_0_146, all_242_1_147, all_242_2_148, all_242_3_149, all_242_4_150 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (761) sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_242_0_146 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_242_2_148 & sdtasdt0(xm, all_52_0_18) = all_242_3_149 & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = all_242_4_150 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = all_242_1_147 & sdtpldt0(all_242_1_147, all_242_0_146) = all_242_2_148 & sdtpldt0(all_242_4_150, all_242_3_149) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (761) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (762) sdtpldt0(all_242_1_147, all_242_0_146) = all_242_2_148
% 112.43/81.18  											| (763) sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = all_242_4_150
% 112.43/81.18  											| (764) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_242_2_148
% 112.43/81.18  											| (765) sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_242_0_146
% 112.43/81.18  											| (766) sdtpldt0(all_242_4_150, all_242_3_149) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.18  											| (767) sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = all_242_1_147
% 112.43/81.18  											| (768) sdtasdt0(xm, all_52_0_18) = all_242_3_149
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (573) with all_244_0_151, all_244_1_152, all_244_2_153, all_244_3_154, all_244_4_155 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (769) sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_0_0) = all_244_0_151 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_52_0_18) = all_244_3_154 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = all_244_4_155 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_244_2_153 & sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = all_244_1_152 & sdtpldt0(all_244_1_152, all_244_0_151) = all_244_2_153 & sdtpldt0(all_244_4_155, all_244_3_154) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (769) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (770) sdtpldt0(all_244_4_155, all_244_3_154) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.18  											| (771) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_52_0_18) = all_244_3_154
% 112.43/81.18  											| (772) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = all_244_4_155
% 112.43/81.18  											| (773) sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = all_244_1_152
% 112.43/81.18  											| (774) sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_0_0) = all_244_0_151
% 112.43/81.18  											| (775) sdtpldt0(all_244_1_152, all_244_0_151) = all_244_2_153
% 112.43/81.18  											| (776) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_244_2_153
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (468) with all_246_0_156 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (777) sdtpldt0(all_246_0_156, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_246_0_156
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (777) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (778) sdtpldt0(all_246_0_156, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.18  											| (779) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_246_0_156
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (467) with all_248_0_157 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (780) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_248_0_157 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_248_0_157) = all_97_2_46
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (780) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (781) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_248_0_157
% 112.43/81.18  											| (782) sdtpldt0(xp, all_248_0_157) = all_97_2_46
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (513) with all_250_0_158 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (783) sdtpldt0(all_250_0_158, xp) = all_102_1_48 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_250_0_158
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (783) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (784) sdtpldt0(all_250_0_158, xp) = all_102_1_48
% 112.43/81.18  											| (785) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_250_0_158
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Instantiating (574) with all_252_0_159, all_252_1_160, all_252_2_161, all_252_3_162, all_252_4_163 yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (786) sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_0_0) = all_252_0_159 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_52_0_18) = all_252_2_161 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_252_4_163 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = all_252_3_162 & sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = all_252_1_160 & sdtpldt0(all_252_1_160, all_252_0_159) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(all_252_3_162, all_252_2_161) = all_252_4_163
% 112.43/81.18  											|
% 112.43/81.18  											| Applying alpha-rule on (786) yields:
% 112.43/81.18  											| (787) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_252_4_163
% 112.43/81.19  											| (788) sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = all_252_1_160
% 112.43/81.19  											| (789) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = all_252_3_162
% 112.43/81.19  											| (790) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_52_0_18) = all_252_2_161
% 112.43/81.19  											| (791) sdtpldt0(all_252_3_162, all_252_2_161) = all_252_4_163
% 112.43/81.19  											| (792) sdtasdt0(all_52_0_18, all_0_0_0) = all_252_0_159
% 112.43/81.19  											| (793) sdtpldt0(all_252_1_160, all_252_0_159) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (493) with all_254_0_164 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (794) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_254_0_164 & sdtpldt0(xm, all_254_0_164) = all_102_2_49
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (794) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (795) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_254_0_164
% 112.43/81.19  											| (796) sdtpldt0(xm, all_254_0_164) = all_102_2_49
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (492) with all_256_0_165 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (797) sdtpldt0(xp, all_256_0_165) = all_102_2_49 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_256_0_165
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (797) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (798) sdtpldt0(xp, all_256_0_165) = all_102_2_49
% 112.43/81.19  											| (799) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_256_0_165
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (471) with all_258_0_166, all_258_1_167, all_258_2_168, all_258_3_169, all_258_4_170 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (800) sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = all_258_1_167 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_258_0_166 & sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = all_258_3_169 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_258_2_168 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_258_4_170 & sdtpldt0(all_258_1_167, all_258_0_166) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(all_258_3_169, all_258_2_168) = all_258_4_170
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (800) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (801) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_258_4_170
% 112.43/81.19  											| (802) sdtpldt0(all_258_3_169, all_258_2_168) = all_258_4_170
% 112.43/81.19  											| (803) sdtasdt0(xn, xp) = all_258_3_169
% 112.43/81.19  											| (804) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_258_0_166
% 112.43/81.19  											| (805) sdtasdt0(xp, xn) = all_258_1_167
% 112.43/81.19  											| (806) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_258_2_168
% 112.43/81.19  											| (807) sdtpldt0(all_258_1_167, all_258_0_166) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (466) with all_260_0_171 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (808) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, all_260_0_171) = all_97_2_46 & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_260_0_171
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (808) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (809) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, all_260_0_171) = all_97_2_46
% 112.43/81.19  											| (810) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_260_0_171
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (464) with all_262_0_172 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (811) sdtpldt0(xm, all_262_0_172) = all_97_2_46 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_262_0_172
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (811) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (812) sdtpldt0(xm, all_262_0_172) = all_97_2_46
% 112.43/81.19  											| (813) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_262_0_172
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (463) with all_264_0_173 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (814) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, all_264_0_173) = all_0_4_4 & sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_264_0_173
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (814) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (815) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, all_264_0_173) = all_0_4_4
% 112.43/81.19  											| (816) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_264_0_173
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (487) with all_266_0_174 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (817) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_266_0_174 & sdtpldt0(xm, all_266_0_174) = xm
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (817) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (818) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_266_0_174
% 112.43/81.19  											| (819) sdtpldt0(xm, all_266_0_174) = xm
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (470) with all_268_0_175, all_268_1_176, all_268_2_177, all_268_3_178, all_268_4_179 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (820) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_268_1_176 & sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_268_3_178 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_268_2_177 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_268_4_179 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_268_0_175 & sdtpldt0(all_268_1_176, all_268_0_175) = all_15_3_9 & sdtpldt0(all_268_3_178, all_268_2_177) = all_268_4_179
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (820) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (821) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_268_3_178
% 112.43/81.19  											| (822) sdtasdt0(xp, xp) = all_268_1_176
% 112.43/81.19  											| (823) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_268_0_175
% 112.43/81.19  											| (824) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_268_2_177
% 112.43/81.19  											| (825) sdtpldt0(all_268_1_176, all_268_0_175) = all_15_3_9
% 112.43/81.19  											| (826) sdtpldt0(all_268_3_178, all_268_2_177) = all_268_4_179
% 112.43/81.19  											| (827) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_268_4_179
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (586) with all_270_0_180, all_270_1_181, all_270_2_182, all_270_3_183, all_270_4_184 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (828) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = all_270_0_180 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = all_270_2_182 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_3_183 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_4_184 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_270_1_181 & sdtpldt0(all_270_1_181, all_270_0_180) = all_0_2_2 & sdtpldt0(all_270_3_183, all_270_2_182) = all_270_4_184
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (828) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (829) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_270_1_181
% 112.43/81.19  											| (830) sdtpldt0(all_270_1_181, all_270_0_180) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.19  											| (831) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_4_184
% 112.43/81.19  											| (832) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = all_270_2_182
% 112.43/81.19  											| (833) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = all_270_0_180
% 112.43/81.19  											| (834) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_3_183
% 112.43/81.19  											| (835) sdtpldt0(all_270_3_183, all_270_2_182) = all_270_4_184
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (585) with all_272_0_185, all_272_1_186, all_272_2_187, all_272_3_188, all_272_4_189 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (836) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = all_272_0_185 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = all_272_3_188 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_272_4_189 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_272_1_186 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_272_2_187 & sdtpldt0(all_272_1_186, all_272_0_185) = all_272_2_187 & sdtpldt0(all_272_4_189, all_272_3_188) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (836) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (837) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_272_1_186
% 112.43/81.19  											| (838) sdtpldt0(all_272_4_189, all_272_3_188) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.19  											| (839) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = all_272_3_188
% 112.43/81.19  											| (840) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = all_272_0_185
% 112.43/81.19  											| (841) sdtpldt0(all_272_1_186, all_272_0_185) = all_272_2_187
% 112.43/81.19  											| (842) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_272_4_189
% 112.43/81.19  											| (843) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_272_2_187
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (568) with all_274_0_190 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (844) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xm) = all_274_0_190 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_274_0_190) = all_102_1_48
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (844) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (845) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xm) = all_274_0_190
% 112.43/81.19  											| (846) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_274_0_190) = all_102_1_48
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (562) with all_276_0_191 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (847) sdtpldt0(all_276_0_191, all_54_0_19) = all_83_2_40 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_276_0_191
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (847) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (848) sdtpldt0(all_276_0_191, all_54_0_19) = all_83_2_40
% 112.43/81.19  											| (849) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_276_0_191
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (559) with all_278_0_192 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (850) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, all_54_0_19) = all_278_0_192 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_278_0_192) = sz10
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (850) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (851) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, all_54_0_19) = all_278_0_192
% 112.43/81.19  											| (852) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_278_0_192) = sz10
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (561) with all_280_0_193 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (853) sdtpldt0(all_280_0_193, all_54_0_19) = all_102_2_49 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_280_0_193
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (853) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (854) sdtpldt0(all_280_0_193, all_54_0_19) = all_102_2_49
% 112.43/81.19  											| (855) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_280_0_193
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (560) with all_292_0_199 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (856) sdtpldt0(all_292_0_199, all_54_0_19) = all_97_2_46 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_292_0_199
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (856) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (857) sdtpldt0(all_292_0_199, all_54_0_19) = all_97_2_46
% 112.43/81.19  											| (858) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_292_0_199
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (506) with all_294_0_200 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (859) sdtpldt0(all_294_0_200, xm) = all_97_1_45 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_294_0_200
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (859) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (860) sdtpldt0(all_294_0_200, xm) = all_97_1_45
% 112.43/81.19  											| (861) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_294_0_200
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (465) with all_296_0_201 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (862) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_296_0_201 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_296_0_201) = all_97_2_46
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (862) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (863) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_296_0_201
% 112.43/81.19  											| (864) sdtpldt0(xn, all_296_0_201) = all_97_2_46
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (570) with all_300_0_203 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (865) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xn) = all_300_0_203 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_300_0_203) = all_83_0_38
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (865) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (866) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xn) = all_300_0_203
% 112.43/81.19  											| (867) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_300_0_203) = all_83_0_38
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (462) with all_302_0_204, all_302_1_205, all_302_2_206, all_302_3_207 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (868) sdtasdt0(all_302_3_207, xp) = all_302_2_206 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_302_1_205 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_302_3_207) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_302_0_204 & sdtpldt0(all_302_1_205, all_302_0_204) = all_302_2_206 & sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = all_302_3_207
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (868) yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (869) sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = all_302_3_207
% 112.43/81.19  											| (870) sdtpldt0(all_302_1_205, all_302_0_204) = all_302_2_206
% 112.43/81.19  											| (871) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_302_0_204
% 112.43/81.19  											| (872) sdtasdt0(xp, all_302_3_207) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.19  											| (873) sdtasdt0(all_302_3_207, xp) = all_302_2_206
% 112.43/81.19  											| (874) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_302_1_205
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Instantiating (461) with all_304_0_208, all_304_1_209, all_304_2_210, all_304_3_211 yields:
% 112.43/81.19  											| (875) sdtasdt0(all_304_3_211, xp) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_304_3_211) = all_304_2_210 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_304_1_209 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_304_0_208 & sdtpldt0(all_304_1_209, all_304_0_208) = all_304_2_210 & sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = all_304_3_211
% 112.43/81.19  											|
% 112.43/81.19  											| Applying alpha-rule on (875) yields:
% 112.43/81.20  											| (876) sdtasdt0(xp, all_304_3_211) = all_304_2_210
% 112.43/81.20  											| (877) sdtasdt0(all_304_3_211, xp) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.20  											| (878) sdtpldt0(all_304_1_209, all_304_0_208) = all_304_2_210
% 112.43/81.20  											| (879) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_304_0_208
% 112.43/81.20  											| (880) sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = all_304_3_211
% 112.43/81.20  											| (881) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_304_1_209
% 112.43/81.20  											|
% 112.43/81.20  											| Instantiating (460) with all_306_0_212, all_306_1_213, all_306_2_214, all_306_3_215 yields:
% 112.43/81.20  											| (882) sdtasdt0(all_306_3_215, xp) = all_306_2_214 & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_306_0_212 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_306_3_215) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_306_1_213 & sdtpldt0(all_306_1_213, all_306_0_212) = all_306_2_214 & sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = all_306_3_215
% 112.43/81.20  											|
% 112.43/81.20  											| Applying alpha-rule on (882) yields:
% 112.43/81.20  											| (883) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_306_1_213
% 112.43/81.20  											| (884) sdtpldt0(all_306_1_213, all_306_0_212) = all_306_2_214
% 112.43/81.20  											| (885) sdtasdt0(all_306_3_215, xp) = all_306_2_214
% 112.43/81.20  											| (886) sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = all_306_3_215
% 112.43/81.20  											| (887) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_306_0_212
% 112.43/81.20  											| (888) sdtasdt0(xp, all_306_3_215) = all_0_2_2
% 112.43/81.20  											|
% 112.43/81.20  											| Instantiating (459) with all_308_0_216, all_308_1_217, all_308_2_218, all_308_3_219 yields:
% 112.43/81.20  											| (889) sdtasdt0(all_308_3_219, xp) = all_0_2_2 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_308_3_219) = all_308_2_218 & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_308_0_216 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_308_1_217 & sdtpldt0(all_308_1_217, all_308_0_216) = all_308_2_218 & sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = all_308_3_219
% 112.43/81.20  											|
% 112.43/81.20  											| Applying alpha-rule on (889) yields:
% 112.43/81.20  											| (890) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_308_0_216
% 112.43/81.20  											| (891) sdtasdt0(xp, all_308_3_219) = all_308_2_218
% 112.43/81.20  											| (892) sdtpldt0(all_308_1_217, all_308_0_216) = all_308_2_218
% 112.43/81.20  											| (893) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_308_1_217
% 112.81/81.20  											| (894) sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = all_308_3_219
% 112.81/81.20  											| (895) sdtasdt0(all_308_3_219, xp) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.20  											|
% 112.81/81.20  											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (565), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.20  											|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.20  											| (177) xp = sz10
% 112.81/81.20  											|
% 112.81/81.20  												| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 112.81/81.20  												| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.20  												|
% 112.81/81.20  												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.20  											|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.20  											| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 112.81/81.20  											| (899)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz10) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_54_0_19) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v2))
% 112.81/81.20  											|
% 112.81/81.20  												| Instantiating (899) with all_314_0_220, all_314_1_221, all_314_2_222 yields:
% 112.81/81.20  												| (900)  ~ (all_314_0_220 = sz10) &  ~ (all_314_1_221 = all_314_2_222) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xp) = all_314_1_221 & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_314_2_222 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_54_0_19) = all_314_0_220 & sdtlseqdt0(all_314_2_222, all_314_1_221) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_314_0_220)
% 112.81/81.20  												|
% 112.81/81.20  												| Applying alpha-rule on (900) yields:
% 112.81/81.20  												| (901) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_314_2_222
% 112.81/81.20  												| (902) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_314_0_220)
% 112.81/81.20  												| (903) sdtlseqdt0(all_314_2_222, all_314_1_221)
% 112.81/81.20  												| (904)  ~ (all_314_0_220 = sz10)
% 112.81/81.20  												| (905)  ~ (all_314_1_221 = all_314_2_222)
% 112.81/81.20  												| (906) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, xp) = all_314_1_221
% 112.81/81.20  												| (907) sdtpldt0(xp, all_54_0_19) = all_314_0_220
% 112.81/81.20  												|
% 112.81/81.20  												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (582), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.20  												|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.20  												| (177) xp = sz10
% 112.81/81.20  												|
% 112.81/81.20  													| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 112.81/81.20  													| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.20  													|
% 112.81/81.20  													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.20  												|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.20  												| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 112.81/81.20  												| (911)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 112.81/81.20  												|
% 112.81/81.20  													| Instantiating (911) with all_319_0_223, all_319_1_224, all_319_2_225 yields:
% 112.81/81.20  													| (912)  ~ (all_319_0_223 = xp) &  ~ (all_319_1_224 = all_319_2_225) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xp) = all_319_1_224 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_319_2_225 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_52_0_18) = all_319_0_223 & sdtlseqdt0(all_319_2_225, all_319_1_224) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_319_0_223)
% 112.81/81.20  													|
% 112.81/81.20  													| Applying alpha-rule on (912) yields:
% 112.81/81.20  													| (913) sdtlseqdt0(all_319_2_225, all_319_1_224)
% 112.81/81.20  													| (914) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_319_2_225
% 112.81/81.20  													| (915) sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_319_0_223)
% 112.81/81.20  													| (916)  ~ (all_319_0_223 = xp)
% 112.81/81.20  													| (917)  ~ (all_319_1_224 = all_319_2_225)
% 112.81/81.20  													| (918) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xp) = all_319_1_224
% 112.81/81.20  													| (919) sdtpldt0(xp, all_52_0_18) = all_319_0_223
% 112.81/81.20  													|
% 112.81/81.20  													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (591), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.20  													|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.20  													| (177) xp = sz10
% 112.81/81.20  													|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.20  													|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.20  													| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 112.81/81.20  													| (923)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_46_0_15) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, xp) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.81/81.20  													|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating (923) with all_324_0_226, all_324_1_227, all_324_2_228 yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (924)  ~ (all_324_0_226 = xp) &  ~ (all_324_1_227 = all_324_2_228) & sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, xp) = all_324_1_227 & sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, sz10) = all_324_2_228 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_46_0_15) = all_324_0_226 & sdtlseqdt0(all_324_0_226, xp) & sdtlseqdt0(all_324_2_228, all_324_1_227)
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Applying alpha-rule on (924) yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (925) sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, sz10) = all_324_2_228
% 112.81/81.20  														| (926) sdtlseqdt0(all_324_2_228, all_324_1_227)
% 112.81/81.20  														| (927) sdtpldt0(all_46_0_15, xp) = all_324_1_227
% 112.81/81.20  														| (928) sdtlseqdt0(all_324_0_226, xp)
% 112.81/81.20  														| (929)  ~ (all_324_0_226 = xp)
% 112.81/81.20  														| (930)  ~ (all_324_1_227 = all_324_2_228)
% 112.81/81.20  														| (931) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_46_0_15) = all_324_0_226
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0, all_270_0_180, all_272_0_185 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = all_272_0_185, sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = all_270_0_180, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (932) all_272_0_185 = all_270_0_180
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_46_0_15, xm, all_174_0_76, all_178_0_82 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = all_178_0_82, sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = all_174_0_76, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (933) all_178_0_82 = all_174_0_76
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15, all_270_2_182, all_272_3_188 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = all_272_3_188, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = all_270_2_182, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (934) all_272_3_188 = all_270_2_182
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_272_4_189, all_302_1_205 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_302_1_205, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_272_4_189, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (935) all_302_1_205 = all_272_4_189
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_270_3_183, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_3_183, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (936) all_270_3_183 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_270_3_183, all_272_4_189 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_272_4_189, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_3_183, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (937) all_272_4_189 = all_270_3_183
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_252_4_163, all_306_0_212 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_306_0_212, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_252_4_163, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (938) all_306_0_212 = all_252_4_163
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_252_4_163, all_270_3_183 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_3_183, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_252_4_163, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (939) all_270_3_183 = all_252_4_163
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_252_4_163, all_270_4_184 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_4_184, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_252_4_163, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (940) all_270_4_184 = all_252_4_163
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_168_1_70, all_306_0_212 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_306_0_212, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_168_1_70, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (941) all_306_0_212 = all_168_1_70
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_164_1_64, all_302_1_205 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_302_1_205, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_164_1_64, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (942) all_302_1_205 = all_164_1_64
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_164_2_65, all_270_4_184 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_4_184, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_164_2_65, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (943) all_270_4_184 = all_164_2_65
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (85) with all_252_3_162, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = all_252_3_162, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (944) all_252_3_162 = all_0_0_0
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, sz10, all_244_4_155, all_252_3_162 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = all_252_3_162, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = all_244_4_155, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (945) all_252_3_162 = all_244_4_155
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_304_1_209, all_308_0_216 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_308_0_216, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_304_1_209, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (946) all_308_0_216 = all_304_1_209
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_272_2_187, all_308_0_216 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_308_0_216, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_272_2_187, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (947) all_308_0_216 = all_272_2_187
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_270_1_181, all_272_1_186 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_272_1_186, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_270_1_181, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (948) all_272_1_186 = all_270_1_181
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_244_2_153, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_244_2_153, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (949) all_244_2_153 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_244_2_153, all_304_1_209 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_304_1_209, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_244_2_153, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (950) all_304_1_209 = all_244_2_153
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_244_2_153, all_272_1_186 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_272_1_186, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_244_2_153, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (951) all_272_1_186 = all_244_2_153
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_168_3_72, all_272_1_186 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_272_1_186, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_168_3_72, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (952) all_272_1_186 = all_168_3_72
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_168_4_73, all_304_1_209 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_304_1_209, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_168_4_73, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (953) all_304_1_209 = all_168_4_73
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_164_4_67, all_244_2_153 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_244_2_153, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_164_4_67, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (954) all_244_2_153 = all_164_4_67
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_268_4_179, all_15_3_9 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_268_4_179, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (955) all_268_4_179 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_242_2_148, all_308_1_217 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_308_1_217, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_242_2_148, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (956) all_308_1_217 = all_242_2_148
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_204_3_122, all_268_2_177 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_268_2_177, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_3_122, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (957) all_268_2_177 = all_204_3_122
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_204_3_122, all_242_2_148 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_242_2_148, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_3_122, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (958) all_242_2_148 = all_204_3_122
% 112.81/81.20  														|
% 112.81/81.20  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_204_4_123, all_304_0_208 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_304_0_208, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_4_123, yields:
% 112.81/81.20  														| (959) all_304_0_208 = all_204_4_123
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_204_4_123, all_242_2_148 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_242_2_148, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_4_123, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (960) all_242_2_148 = all_204_4_123
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_196_4_107, all_308_1_217 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_308_1_217, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_196_4_107, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (961) all_308_1_217 = all_196_4_107
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_184_3_92, all_268_2_177 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_268_2_177, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_184_3_92, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (962) all_268_2_177 = all_184_3_92
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_178_1_83, all_304_0_208 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_304_0_208, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_178_1_83, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (963) all_304_0_208 = all_178_1_83
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_178_2_84, all_268_4_179 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_268_4_179, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_178_2_84, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (964) all_268_4_179 = all_178_2_84
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_178_2_84, all_242_2_148 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_242_2_148, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_178_2_84, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (965) all_242_2_148 = all_178_2_84
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_174_1_77, all_204_3_122 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_204_3_122, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_174_1_77, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (966) all_204_3_122 = all_174_1_77
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_268_0_175, all_302_0_204 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_302_0_204, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_268_0_175, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (967) all_302_0_204 = all_268_0_175
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_230_4_140, all_268_0_175 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_268_0_175, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_230_4_140, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (968) all_268_0_175 = all_230_4_140
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_204_1_120, all_306_1_213 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_306_1_213, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_204_1_120, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (969) all_306_1_213 = all_204_1_120
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_196_1_104, all_230_4_140 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_230_4_140, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_196_1_104, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (970) all_230_4_140 = all_196_1_104
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_196_1_104, all_204_1_120 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_204_1_120, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_196_1_104, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (971) all_204_1_120 = all_196_1_104
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_196_2_105, all_306_1_213 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_306_1_213, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_196_2_105, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (972) all_306_1_213 = all_196_2_105
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_184_0_89, all_204_1_120 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_204_1_120, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_0_89, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (973) all_204_1_120 = all_184_0_89
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_184_2_91, all_15_3_9 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_2_91, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_15_3_9, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (974) all_184_2_91 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_184_2_91, all_184_0_89 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_0_89, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_2_91, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (975) all_184_0_89 = all_184_2_91
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_178_4_86, all_302_0_204 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_302_0_204, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_178_4_86, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (976) all_302_0_204 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xp, all_174_3_79, all_184_2_91 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_184_2_91, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_174_3_79, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (977) all_184_2_91 = all_174_3_79
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_202_1_115, all_258_0_166 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_258_0_166, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_202_1_115, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (978) all_258_0_166 = all_202_1_115
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_198_1_109, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_1_109, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (979) all_198_1_109 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_198_2_110, all_202_1_115 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_202_1_115, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_2_110, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (980) all_202_1_115 = all_198_2_110
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_198_2_110, all_198_1_109 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_1_109, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_2_110, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (981) all_198_1_109 = all_198_2_110
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_186_0_94, all_198_1_109 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_198_1_109, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_186_0_94, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (982) all_198_1_109 = all_186_0_94
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with xm, xn, all_186_2_96, all_258_0_166 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_258_0_166, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_186_2_96, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (983) all_258_0_166 = all_186_2_96
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (81) with all_252_1_160, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = all_252_1_160, aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (984) all_252_1_160 = all_0_0_0
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (49) with sz10, all_0_0_0, all_244_1_152, all_252_1_160 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = all_252_1_160, sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = all_244_1_152, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (985) all_252_1_160 = all_244_1_152
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_54_0_19, sz10, sz10, all_314_2_222 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_314_2_222, sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (986) all_314_2_222 = sz10
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_52_0_18, sz10, xp, all_319_2_225 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_319_2_225, sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xp, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (987) all_319_2_225 = xp
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_0_0, xm, all_302_3_207, all_304_3_211 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = all_304_3_211, sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = all_302_3_207, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (988) all_304_3_211 = all_302_3_207
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_4_4, sz10, all_248_0_157, all_292_0_199 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_292_0_199, sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_248_0_157, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (989) all_292_0_199 = all_248_0_157
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_4_4, sz10, all_226_0_134, all_97_2_46 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_226_0_134, sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (990) all_226_0_134 = all_97_2_46
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_4_4, sz10, all_226_0_134, all_248_0_157 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_248_0_157, sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_226_0_134, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (991) all_248_0_157 = all_226_0_134
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_4_4, sz10, all_97_1_45, all_292_0_199 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_292_0_199, sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_1_45, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (992) all_292_0_199 = all_97_1_45
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_264_0_173, all_266_0_174 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_266_0_174, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_264_0_173, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (993) all_266_0_174 = all_264_0_173
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_246_0_156, all_264_0_173 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_264_0_173, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_246_0_156, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (994) all_264_0_173 = all_246_0_156
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_232_0_141, all_246_0_156 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_246_0_156, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_232_0_141, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (995) all_246_0_156 = all_232_0_141
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_210_0_126, all_266_0_174 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_266_0_174, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_210_0_126, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (996) all_266_0_174 = all_210_0_126
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_200_0_113, all_232_0_141 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_232_0_141, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_200_0_113, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (997) all_232_0_141 = all_200_0_113
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, sz10, all_254_0_164, all_260_0_171 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_260_0_171, sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_254_0_164, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (998) all_260_0_171 = all_254_0_164
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, sz10, all_208_0_125, all_260_0_171 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_260_0_171, sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_208_0_125, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (999) all_260_0_171 = all_208_0_125
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, all_0_0_0, all_306_3_215, all_308_3_219 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = all_308_3_219, sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = all_306_3_215, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1000) all_308_3_219 = all_306_3_215
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, sz10, all_280_0_193, all_296_0_201 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_296_0_201, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_280_0_193, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1001) all_296_0_201 = all_280_0_193
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, sz10, all_256_0_165, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_256_0_165, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1002) all_256_0_165 = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, sz10, all_256_0_165, all_280_0_193 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_280_0_193, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_256_0_165, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1003) all_280_0_193 = all_256_0_165
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, sz10, all_224_0_133, all_296_0_201 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_296_0_201, sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_224_0_133, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1004) all_296_0_201 = all_224_0_133
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xp, all_172_0_75, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = all_172_0_75, sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1005) all_172_0_75 = xn
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_262_0_172, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_262_0_172, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1006) all_262_0_172 = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_262_0_172, all_276_0_191 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_276_0_191, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_262_0_172, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1007) all_276_0_191 = all_262_0_172
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_220_0_131, all_276_0_191 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_276_0_191, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_220_0_131, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1008) all_276_0_191 = all_220_0_131
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_250_0_158, all_102_1_48 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_250_0_158, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_1_48, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1009) all_250_0_158 = all_102_1_48
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_188_0_99, all_250_0_158 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_250_0_158, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_188_0_99, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1010) all_250_0_158 = all_188_0_99
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_102_2_49, all_250_0_158 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_250_0_158, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1011) all_250_0_158 = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xn, all_294_0_200, all_83_0_38 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_294_0_200, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_0_38, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1012) all_294_0_200 = all_83_0_38
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xn, all_148_0_55, all_294_0_200 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_294_0_200, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_148_0_55, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1013) all_294_0_200 = all_148_0_55
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xn, all_83_2_40, all_294_0_200 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_294_0_200, sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1014) all_294_0_200 = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (77) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_236_0_143, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_236_0_143) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_236_0_143), aNaturalNumber0(all_15_3_9), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1015) all_236_0_143 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (77) with all_0_4_4, xp, all_234_0_142, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, all_234_0_142) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_234_0_142), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_4_4), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1016) all_234_0_142 = xp
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, xp, all_214_0_128, all_0_0_0 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_214_0_128) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_214_0_128), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_0_0), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1017) all_214_0_128 = xp | all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, xn, all_212_0_127, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, all_212_0_127) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_212_0_127), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1018) all_212_0_127 = xn | xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (77) with all_0_4_4, xn, all_192_0_101, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, all_192_0_101) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_192_0_101), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1019) all_192_0_101 = xn
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (77) with all_0_4_4, xm, all_190_0_100, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_190_0_100) = all_0_4_4, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4, aNaturalNumber0(all_190_0_100), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1020) all_190_0_100 = xm
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, xm, all_146_0_54, xn and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, all_146_0_54) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_146_0_54), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1021) all_146_0_54 = xm | xn = sz00
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (946,947) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1022) all_304_1_209 = all_272_2_187
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Simplifying 1022 yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1023) all_304_1_209 = all_272_2_187
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (956,961) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1024) all_242_2_148 = all_196_4_107
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Simplifying 1024 yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1025) all_242_2_148 = all_196_4_107
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (938,941) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1026) all_252_4_163 = all_168_1_70
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Simplifying 1026 yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1027) all_252_4_163 = all_168_1_70
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (969,972) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1028) all_204_1_120 = all_196_2_105
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Simplifying 1028 yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1029) all_204_1_120 = all_196_2_105
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (959,963) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1030) all_204_4_123 = all_178_1_83
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Simplifying 1030 yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1031) all_204_4_123 = all_178_1_83
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (950,1023) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1032) all_272_2_187 = all_244_2_153
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (953,1023) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1033) all_272_2_187 = all_168_4_73
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (967,976) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1034) all_268_0_175 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Simplifying 1034 yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1035) all_268_0_175 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (935,942) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1036) all_272_4_189 = all_164_1_64
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Simplifying 1036 yields:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1037) all_272_4_189 = all_164_1_64
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.21  														| Combining equations (1001,1004) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.21  														| (1038) all_280_0_193 = all_224_0_133
% 112.81/81.21  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1038 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1039) all_280_0_193 = all_224_0_133
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1012,1013) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1040) all_148_0_55 = all_83_0_38
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1014,1013) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1041) all_148_0_55 = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (989,992) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1042) all_248_0_157 = all_97_1_45
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1042 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1043) all_248_0_157 = all_97_1_45
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1003,1039) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1044) all_256_0_165 = all_224_0_133
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1044 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1045) all_256_0_165 = all_224_0_133
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1007,1008) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1046) all_262_0_172 = all_220_0_131
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1046 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1047) all_262_0_172 = all_220_0_131
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (952,948) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1048) all_270_1_181 = all_168_3_72
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (951,948) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1049) all_270_1_181 = all_244_2_153
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1032,1033) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1050) all_244_2_153 = all_168_4_73
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1050 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1051) all_244_2_153 = all_168_4_73
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (937,1037) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1052) all_270_3_183 = all_164_1_64
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1052 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1053) all_270_3_183 = all_164_1_64
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1049,1048) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1054) all_244_2_153 = all_168_3_72
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1054 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1055) all_244_2_153 = all_168_3_72
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (939,1053) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1056) all_252_4_163 = all_164_1_64
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1056 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1057) all_252_4_163 = all_164_1_64
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (936,1053) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1058) all_164_1_64 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (940,943) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1059) all_252_4_163 = all_164_2_65
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1059 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1060) all_252_4_163 = all_164_2_65
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (968,1035) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1061) all_230_4_140 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1061 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1062) all_230_4_140 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (957,962) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1063) all_204_3_122 = all_184_3_92
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1063 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1064) all_204_3_122 = all_184_3_92
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (964,955) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1065) all_178_2_84 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1065 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1066) all_178_2_84 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (993,996) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1067) all_264_0_173 = all_210_0_126
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1067 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1068) all_264_0_173 = all_210_0_126
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (994,1068) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1069) all_246_0_156 = all_210_0_126
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1069 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1070) all_246_0_156 = all_210_0_126
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1006,1047) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1071) all_220_0_131 = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (999,998) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1072) all_254_0_164 = all_208_0_125
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (978,983) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1073) all_202_1_115 = all_186_2_96
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1073 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1074) all_202_1_115 = all_186_2_96
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1002,1045) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1075) all_224_0_133 = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (984,985) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1076) all_244_1_152 = all_0_0_0
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (944,945) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1077) all_244_4_155 = all_0_0_0
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1060,1027) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1078) all_168_1_70 = all_164_2_65
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1057,1027) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1079) all_168_1_70 = all_164_1_64
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1011,1010) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1080) all_188_0_99 = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1009,1010) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1081) all_188_0_99 = all_102_1_48
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (991,1043) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1082) all_226_0_134 = all_97_1_45
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1082 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1083) all_226_0_134 = all_97_1_45
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (995,1070) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1084) all_232_0_141 = all_210_0_126
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1084 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1085) all_232_0_141 = all_210_0_126
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (949,1055) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1086) all_168_3_72 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (954,1055) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1087) all_168_3_72 = all_164_4_67
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1051,1055) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1088) all_168_3_72 = all_168_4_73
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (965,1025) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1089) all_196_4_107 = all_178_2_84
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (960,1025) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1090) all_204_4_123 = all_196_4_107
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1090 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1091) all_204_4_123 = all_196_4_107
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (958,1025) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1092) all_204_3_122 = all_196_4_107
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1092 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1093) all_204_3_122 = all_196_4_107
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (997,1085) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1094) all_210_0_126 = all_200_0_113
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (970,1062) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1095) all_196_1_104 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1095 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1096) all_196_1_104 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (990,1083) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1097) all_97_1_45 = all_97_2_46
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (973,1029) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1098) all_196_2_105 = all_184_0_89
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (971,1029) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1099) all_196_1_104 = all_196_2_105
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1099 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1100) all_196_1_104 = all_196_2_105
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (966,1064) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1101) all_184_3_92 = all_174_1_77
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1093,1064) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1102) all_196_4_107 = all_184_3_92
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1102 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1103) all_196_4_107 = all_184_3_92
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1091,1031) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1104) all_196_4_107 = all_178_1_83
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1104 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1105) all_196_4_107 = all_178_1_83
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (980,1074) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1106) all_198_2_110 = all_186_2_96
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1106 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1107) all_198_2_110 = all_186_2_96
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (979,982) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1108) all_186_0_94 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (981,982) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1109) all_198_2_110 = all_186_0_94
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1109 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1110) all_198_2_110 = all_186_0_94
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1110,1107) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1111) all_186_0_94 = all_186_2_96
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1111 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1112) all_186_0_94 = all_186_2_96
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1100,1096) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1113) all_196_2_105 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1113 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1114) all_196_2_105 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1098,1114) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1115) all_184_0_89 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1115 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1116) all_184_0_89 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1103,1105) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1117) all_184_3_92 = all_178_1_83
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1117 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1118) all_184_3_92 = all_178_1_83
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1089,1105) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1119) all_178_1_83 = all_178_2_84
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1081,1080) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1120) all_102_1_48 = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1120 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1121) all_102_1_48 = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1108,1112) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1122) all_186_2_96 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (975,1116) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1123) all_184_2_91 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1123 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1124) all_184_2_91 = all_178_4_86
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (977,1124) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1125) all_178_4_86 = all_174_3_79
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (974,1124) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1126) all_178_4_86 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1118,1101) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1127) all_178_1_83 = all_174_1_77
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1127 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1128) all_178_1_83 = all_174_1_77
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1119,1128) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1129) all_178_2_84 = all_174_1_77
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1129 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1130) all_178_2_84 = all_174_1_77
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1130,1066) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1131) all_174_1_77 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1131 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1132) all_174_1_77 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1126,1125) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1133) all_174_3_79 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1079,1078) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1134) all_164_1_64 = all_164_2_65
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1134 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1135) all_164_1_64 = all_164_2_65
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1087,1088) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1136) all_168_4_73 = all_164_4_67
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1086,1088) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1137) all_168_4_73 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1137,1136) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1138) all_164_4_67 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1058,1135) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1139) all_164_2_65 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1040,1041) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1140) all_83_0_38 = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Simplifying 1140 yields:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1141) all_83_0_38 = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1139,1135) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1058) all_164_1_64 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1138,1136) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1137) all_168_4_73 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1133,1125) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1126) all_178_4_86 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1132,1128) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1145) all_178_1_83 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1072,998) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (999) all_260_0_171 = all_208_0_125
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1094,996) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1147) all_266_0_174 = all_200_0_113
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1139,943) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1148) all_270_4_184 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1058,1053) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (936) all_270_3_183 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1137,1033) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.22  														| (1150) all_272_2_187 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.22  														|
% 112.81/81.22  														| Combining equations (1071,1008) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1151) all_276_0_191 = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Combining equations (1075,1004) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1152) all_296_0_201 = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Combining equations (1058,942) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1153) all_302_1_205 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Combining equations (1126,976) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1154) all_302_0_204 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Combining equations (1150,1023) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1155) all_304_1_209 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Combining equations (1145,963) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1156) all_304_0_208 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Equations (986) can reduce 905 to:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1157)  ~ (all_314_1_221 = sz10)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Equations (1141) can reduce 333 to:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1158)  ~ (all_83_2_40 = xn)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (932) and (840) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (833) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, all_0_0_0) = all_270_0_180
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (933) and (645) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (639) sdtasdt0(all_46_0_15, xm) = all_174_0_76
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (934) and (839) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (832) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, all_46_0_15) = all_270_2_182
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1139) and (617) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (128) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1077) and (772) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1163) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, sz10) = all_0_0_0
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1138) and (611) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (86) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1132) and (641) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (418) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1122) and (668) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (138) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1076) and (773) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1167) sdtasdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0) = all_0_0_0
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1155)(1156) and (878) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1168) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_304_2_210
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1153)(1154) and (870) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1169) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_302_2_206
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1151) and (848) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1170) sdtpldt0(all_83_2_40, all_54_0_19) = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (936)(1148) and (835) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1171) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_270_2_182) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1075) and (730) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1172) sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = xm
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1080)(1097) and (671) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1173) sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, xn) = all_97_2_46
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1005) and (633) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1174) sdtpldt0(xn, all_46_0_15) = xn
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1041)(1141) and (602) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1175) sdtpldt0(all_83_2_40, xp) = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (986) and (901) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (566) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = sz10
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (987) and (914) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (584) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xp
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (988) and (880) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (869) sdtpldt0(all_0_0_0, xm) = all_302_3_207
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1015) and (753) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (422) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (999) and (809) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1180) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, all_208_0_125) = all_97_2_46
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1094) and (718) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (697) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_200_0_113
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1072) and (795) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (715) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_208_0_125
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1147) and (819) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1183) sdtpldt0(xm, all_200_0_113) = xm
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1072) and (796) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1184) sdtpldt0(xm, all_208_0_125) = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1019) and (677) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (143) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1000) and (894) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (886) sdtpldt0(xm, all_0_0_0) = all_306_3_215
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1152) and (864) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1187) sdtpldt0(xn, all_102_2_49) = all_97_2_46
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1020) and (674) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (12) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_0_4_4
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1005) and (634) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (318) sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1141) and (867) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1190) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_300_0_203) = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1121) and (846) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1191) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_274_0_190) = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1097) and (609) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1192) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_162_0_62) = all_97_2_46
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (986) and (903) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1193) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_314_1_221)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1141) and (334) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1194) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, xn)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1015) and (754) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (438) aNaturalNumber0(all_15_3_9)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1016) and (751) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (20) aNaturalNumber0(xp)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1019) and (678) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1121) and (517) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1198) aNaturalNumber0(all_102_2_49)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1141) and (526) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1199) aNaturalNumber0(all_83_2_40)
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Instantiating formula (77) with all_83_2_40, all_54_0_19, xp, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_83_2_40, all_54_0_19) = all_83_2_40, sdtpldt0(all_83_2_40, xp) = all_83_2_40, aNaturalNumber0(all_83_2_40), aNaturalNumber0(all_54_0_19), aNaturalNumber0(xp), yields:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1200) all_54_0_19 = xp
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_304_2_210, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_304_2_210, sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1201) all_304_2_210 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Instantiating formula (16) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_302_2_206, all_304_2_210 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_304_2_210, sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_302_2_206, yields:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1202) all_304_2_210 = all_302_2_206
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Instantiating formula (77) with xn, all_46_0_15, xp, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_46_0_15) = xn, sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_46_0_15), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1203) all_46_0_15 = xp
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| Combining equations (1201,1202) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1204) all_302_2_206 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1203) and (833) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1205) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_270_0_180
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1203) and (639) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1206) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_174_0_76
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1203) and (832) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1207) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_2_182
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1200)(1200) and (851) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1208) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_278_0_192
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1200) and (608) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1209) sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_162_0_62
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1200) and (906) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1210) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_314_1_221
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1200) and (845) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1211) sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_274_0_190
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1200) and (866) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1212) sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = all_300_0_203
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1200) and (566) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1213) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = sz10
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1203)(1203) and (605) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1214) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_154_0_58
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1203) and (630) follows:
% 112.81/81.23  														| (1215) sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_170_0_74
% 112.81/81.23  														|
% 112.81/81.23  														| From (1203) and (925) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  														| (1216) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_324_2_228
% 112.81/81.24  														|
% 112.81/81.24  														| From (1204) and (1169) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  														| (422) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  														|
% 112.81/81.24  														| From (1200) and (907) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  														| (1218) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_314_0_220
% 112.81/81.24  														|
% 112.81/81.24  														| From (1203) and (259) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  														| (1219) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = xp
% 112.81/81.24  														|
% 112.81/81.24  														| From (1203) and (260) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  														| (20) aNaturalNumber0(xp)
% 112.81/81.24  														|
% 112.81/81.24  														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (593), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.24  														|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.24  														| (1221) all_46_0_15 = sz00
% 112.81/81.24  														|
% 112.81/81.24  															| Combining equations (1203,1221) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  															| (1222) xp = sz00
% 112.81/81.24  															|
% 112.81/81.24  															| Simplifying 1222 yields:
% 112.81/81.24  															| (173) xp = sz00
% 112.81/81.24  															|
% 112.81/81.24  															| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 112.81/81.24  															| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.24  															|
% 112.81/81.24  															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.24  														|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.24  														| (1225)  ~ (all_46_0_15 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.24  														| (1226) all_46_0_15 = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_46_0_15) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.81/81.24  														|
% 112.81/81.24  															| Equations (1203) can reduce 1225 to:
% 112.81/81.24  															| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 112.81/81.24  															|
% 112.81/81.24  															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (572), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.24  															|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.24  															| (1228) all_54_0_19 = sz00
% 112.81/81.24  															|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1200,1228) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1222) xp = sz00
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Simplifying 1222 yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (173) xp = sz00
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.24  															|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.24  															| (1232)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.24  															| (1233) all_54_0_19 = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_54_0_19) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.81/81.24  															|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Equations (1200) can reduce 1232 to:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (49) with all_0_0_0, xp, all_270_2_182, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_270_2_182, sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1235) all_270_2_182 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_270_0_180, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_270_0_180, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1236) all_270_0_180 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_174_0_76, all_15_3_9 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_174_0_76, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1237) all_174_0_76 = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, all_0_4_4, all_170_0_74, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_170_0_74, sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1238) all_170_0_74 = all_0_4_4
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, all_0_4_4, all_162_0_62, all_170_0_74 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_170_0_74, sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = all_162_0_62, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1239) all_170_0_74 = all_162_0_62
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_314_0_220, all_200_0_113 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_314_0_220, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_200_0_113, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1240) all_314_0_220 = all_200_0_113
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_314_1_221, all_200_0_113 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_314_1_221, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_200_0_113, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1241) all_314_1_221 = all_200_0_113
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_278_0_192, all_314_1_221 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_314_1_221, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_278_0_192, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1242) all_314_1_221 = all_278_0_192
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_154_0_58, all_314_0_220 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_314_0_220, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_154_0_58, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1243) all_314_0_220 = all_154_0_58
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, xp, all_314_1_221 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_314_1_221, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = xp, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1244) all_314_1_221 = xp
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xm, all_274_0_190, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = all_274_0_190, sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = xm, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1245) all_274_0_190 = xm
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xn, all_300_0_203, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = all_300_0_203, sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = xn, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1246) all_300_0_203 = xn
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, sz10, all_324_2_228, all_208_0_125 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_324_2_228, sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_208_0_125, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1247) all_324_2_228 = all_208_0_125
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, sz10, sz10, all_324_2_228 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_324_2_228, sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1248) all_324_2_228 = sz10
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1248,1247) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1249) all_208_0_125 = sz10
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1240,1243) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1250) all_200_0_113 = all_154_0_58
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Simplifying 1250 yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1251) all_200_0_113 = all_154_0_58
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1244,1242) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1252) all_278_0_192 = xp
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1241,1242) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1253) all_278_0_192 = all_200_0_113
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1253,1252) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1254) all_200_0_113 = xp
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Simplifying 1254 yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1255) all_200_0_113 = xp
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1255,1251) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1256) all_154_0_58 = xp
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1239,1238) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1257) all_162_0_62 = all_0_4_4
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Simplifying 1257 yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1258) all_162_0_62 = all_0_4_4
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1256,1251) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1255) all_200_0_113 = xp
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Combining equations (1252,1242) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1244) all_314_1_221 = xp
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Equations (1244) can reduce 1157 to:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1235) and (1207) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (128) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1236) and (1205) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (86) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1237) and (1206) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (418) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_15_3_9
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1235) and (1171) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1265) sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1249) and (1180) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (363) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_97_2_46
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1256) and (1214) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1219) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = xp
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1249) and (715) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1213) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = sz10
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1249) and (1184) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (376) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1255) and (1183) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (451) sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1249) and (716) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (337) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1246) and (1190) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (504) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_83_2_40
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1245) and (1191) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (494) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_2_49
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1258) and (1192) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1274) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_97_2_46
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1244) and (1193) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (172) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp)
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| Instantiating formula (77) with all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9, all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_15_3_9) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(all_0_2_2, all_0_2_2) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_15_3_9), aNaturalNumber0(all_0_2_2), yields:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1276) all_15_3_9 = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1276) and (418) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1277) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																| From (1276) and (596) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1278) sdtpldt0(xm, all_142_0_52) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (202), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.24  																|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (173) xp = sz00
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																	| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 112.81/81.24  																	| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.24  																	|
% 112.81/81.24  																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.24  																|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.24  																| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 112.81/81.24  																| (1282) all_0_0_0 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 112.81/81.24  																|
% 112.81/81.24  																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (189), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.24  																	|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.24  																	| (173) xp = sz00
% 112.81/81.24  																	|
% 112.81/81.24  																		| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 112.81/81.24  																		| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.24  																		|
% 112.81/81.24  																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.24  																	|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.24  																	| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 112.81/81.24  																	| (1286) all_0_0_0 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0)
% 112.81/81.24  																	|
% 112.81/81.24  																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1282), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.24  																		|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.24  																		| (1287) all_0_0_0 = xm
% 112.81/81.24  																		|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287) and (724) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																			| (1288) sdtasdt0(xm, all_214_0_128) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																			|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287) and (128) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																			| (1289) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																			|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287)(1287) and (1163) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																			| (1290) sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = xm
% 112.81/81.24  																			|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287) and (86) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																			| (1277) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																			|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287)(1287) and (1167) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																			| (1292) sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = xm
% 112.81/81.24  																			|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287) and (756) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																			| (1293) sdtpldt0(xm, all_238_0_144) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.24  																			|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287)(1287) and (653) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																			| (1294) sdtpldt0(xm, all_180_0_87) = xm
% 112.81/81.24  																			|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287)(1287) and (271) follows:
% 112.81/81.24  																			| (1295) sdtpldt0(xm, all_56_0_20) = xm
% 112.81/81.24  																			|
% 112.81/81.24  																			| From (1287) and (869) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1296) sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = all_302_3_207
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| From (1287) and (886) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1297) sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = all_306_3_215
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| From (1287) and (116) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, all_214_0_128, all_212_0_127, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, all_214_0_128) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, all_212_0_127) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_214_0_128), aNaturalNumber0(all_212_0_127), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1299) all_214_0_128 = all_212_0_127 | xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, all_214_0_128, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, all_214_0_128) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_214_0_128), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1300) all_214_0_128 = xn | xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, all_212_0_127, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, all_212_0_127) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_212_0_127), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1301) all_212_0_127 = xp | xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| Instantiating formula (29) with all_0_2_2, xp, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1302) xp = xn | xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| Instantiating formula (77) with all_0_2_2, all_238_0_144, all_142_0_52, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, all_238_0_144) = all_0_2_2, sdtpldt0(xm, all_142_0_52) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(all_238_0_144), aNaturalNumber0(all_142_0_52), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1303) all_238_0_144 = all_142_0_52
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| Instantiating formula (77) with xm, all_56_0_20, xp, xm and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, all_56_0_20) = xm, sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(all_56_0_20), aNaturalNumber0(xp), aNaturalNumber0(xm), yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1304) all_56_0_20 = xp
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xm, all_302_3_207, all_306_3_215 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = all_306_3_215, sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = all_302_3_207, yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1305) all_306_3_215 = all_302_3_207
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| From (1304)(1304) and (652) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1306) sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_180_0_87
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| From (1303) and (1293) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1278) sdtpldt0(xm, all_142_0_52) = all_0_2_2
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| From (1305) and (1297) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1296) sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = all_302_3_207
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			| From (1303) and (757) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (597) aNaturalNumber0(all_142_0_52)
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (556), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																			|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1310) all_56_0_20 = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																				| Combining equations (1304,1310) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																				| (1222) xp = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																				|
% 112.81/81.25  																				| Simplifying 1222 yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																				| (173) xp = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																				|
% 112.81/81.25  																				| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																				| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.25  																				|
% 112.81/81.25  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.25  																			|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1314)  ~ (all_56_0_20 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																			| (1315) all_56_0_20 = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_56_0_20) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.81/81.25  																			|
% 112.81/81.25  																				| Equations (1304) can reduce 1314 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																				| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																				|
% 112.81/81.25  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1315), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																				|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																				| (1317) all_56_0_20 = sz10
% 112.81/81.25  																				|
% 112.81/81.25  																					| Combining equations (1304,1317) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																					| (1318) xp = sz10
% 112.81/81.25  																					|
% 112.81/81.25  																					| Simplifying 1318 yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																					| (177) xp = sz10
% 112.81/81.25  																					|
% 112.81/81.25  																					| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																					| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.25  																					|
% 112.81/81.25  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.25  																				|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.25  																				| (1321)  ~ (all_56_0_20 = sz10)
% 112.81/81.25  																				| (1322)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_56_0_20) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.81/81.25  																				|
% 112.81/81.25  																					| Equations (1304) can reduce 1321 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																					| (18)  ~ (xp = sz10)
% 112.81/81.25  																					|
% 112.81/81.25  																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xp, xp, all_180_0_87, xp and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = all_180_0_87, sdtpldt0(xp, xp) = xp, yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																					| (1324) all_180_0_87 = xp
% 112.81/81.25  																					|
% 112.81/81.25  																					| From (1324) and (1294) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																					| (451) sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = xm
% 112.81/81.25  																					|
% 112.81/81.25  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (152), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																					|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																					| (1326) sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																					|
% 112.81/81.25  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (153), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																						|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																						| (1327) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																						|
% 112.81/81.25  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (150), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																							|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																							| (1328) sdtlseqdt0(xr, sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																							|
% 112.81/81.25  																								| From (310) and (1328) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																								| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																								|
% 112.81/81.25  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																								|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																								| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																								|
% 112.81/81.25  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (148), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																									|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																									| (1331) sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10)
% 112.81/81.25  																									|
% 112.81/81.25  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (123), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																										|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																										| (1332) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 112.81/81.25  																										|
% 112.81/81.25  																											| From (1287) and (1332) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																											| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 112.81/81.25  																											|
% 112.81/81.25  																											| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																											| (1334) xm = sz10
% 112.81/81.25  																											|
% 112.81/81.25  																											| From (1334) and (479) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																											| (1335) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz10)
% 112.81/81.25  																											|
% 112.81/81.25  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1301), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																											|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																											|
% 112.81/81.25  																												| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																												| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																												|
% 112.81/81.25  																												| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																												| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.25  																												|
% 112.81/81.25  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.25  																											|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.25  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																											| (1340) all_212_0_127 = xp
% 112.81/81.25  																											|
% 112.81/81.25  																												| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																												| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																												|
% 112.81/81.25  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																												|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																												|
% 112.81/81.25  																													| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																													|
% 112.81/81.25  																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																													| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.25  																													|
% 112.81/81.25  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.25  																												|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.25  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																												| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 112.81/81.25  																												|
% 112.81/81.25  																													| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																													|
% 112.81/81.25  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																													|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																													|
% 112.81/81.25  																														| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																														| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																														|
% 112.81/81.25  																														| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																														| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.25  																														|
% 112.81/81.25  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.25  																													|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.25  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																													| (1352) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.25  																													|
% 112.81/81.25  																														| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																														| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																														|
% 112.81/81.25  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																														|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																														|
% 112.81/81.25  																															| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																															| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																															|
% 112.81/81.25  																															| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																															| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.25  																															|
% 112.81/81.25  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.25  																														|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.25  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																														| (1358) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_0_6) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 112.81/81.25  																														|
% 112.81/81.25  																															| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																															| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																															|
% 112.81/81.25  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1358), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																															|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																															| (1360) xr = xp
% 112.81/81.25  																															|
% 112.81/81.25  																																| Combining equations (310,1360) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																| Combining equations (1361,1360) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (310) xr = xn
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																| Combining equations (1361,1200) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																| Equations (1361) can reduce 37 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																| From (1361) and (1335) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (1366) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10)
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																| From (1361) and (172) follows:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (239) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn)
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																																|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (1368) xp = xm
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| Combining equations (1368,1361) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (1369) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| Simplifying 1369 yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.25  																																|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 112.81/81.25  																																| (1375)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) &  ~ (v0 = all_17_0_11) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 112.81/81.25  																																|
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|
% 112.81/81.25  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (1377) xr = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|
% 112.81/81.25  																																		| Combining equations (310,1377) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.25  																																		| (1378) xn = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																																		|
% 112.81/81.25  																																		| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 112.81/81.25  																																		| (1379) xn = sz00
% 112.81/81.25  																																		|
% 112.81/81.25  																																		| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 112.81/81.25  																																		| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.25  																																		|
% 112.81/81.25  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (1381)  ~ (xr = sz00)
% 112.81/81.25  																																	| (1382) xr = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.81/81.25  																																	|
% 112.81/81.25  																																		| Equations (310) can reduce 1381 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																		| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 112.81/81.26  																																		|
% 112.81/81.26  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																		|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																		|
% 112.81/81.26  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																			| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																			|
% 112.81/81.26  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																		|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																		| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.26  																																		|
% 112.81/81.26  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																			|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																			| (1379) xn = sz00
% 112.81/81.26  																																			|
% 112.81/81.26  																																				| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																				| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																				|
% 112.81/81.26  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																			|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																			| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 112.81/81.26  																																			| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.81/81.26  																																			|
% 112.81/81.26  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1382), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																				|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																				| (1392) xr = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																				|
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| Combining equations (310,1392) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																				|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																				| (1396)  ~ (xr = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																				| (1397)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.81/81.26  																																				|
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| Equations (310) can reduce 1396 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|
% 112.81/81.26  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| (1368) xp = xm
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| Combining equations (1368,1361) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (1369) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| Simplifying 1369 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 112.81/81.26  																																					| (1406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 112.81/81.26  																																					|
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|
% 112.81/81.26  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|
% 112.81/81.26  																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																							| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																							|
% 112.81/81.26  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																						| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 112.81/81.26  																																						|
% 112.81/81.26  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																							|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																							| (1379) xn = sz00
% 112.81/81.26  																																							|
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																								|
% 112.81/81.26  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																							|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																							| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 112.81/81.26  																																							| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 112.81/81.26  																																							|
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| Combining equations (1334,1415) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| (1416) all_146_0_54 = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																								|
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| From (1416) and (600) follows:
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																								|
% 112.81/81.26  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																								|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																								|
% 112.81/81.26  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																									| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																									|
% 112.81/81.26  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																								|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																								| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.81/81.26  																																								|
% 112.81/81.26  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																									|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																									| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.26  																																									|
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																									|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																									| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 112.81/81.26  																																									| (1427)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 112.81/81.26  																																									|
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|
% 112.81/81.26  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|
% 112.81/81.26  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																											| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																											|
% 112.81/81.26  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																										| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.81/81.26  																																										|
% 112.81/81.26  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (563), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																											|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																											| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 112.81/81.26  																																											|
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| Combining equations (1363,1434) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																											|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																											| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 112.81/81.26  																																											| (1439)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 112.81/81.26  																																											|
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| Equations (1363,1334) can reduce 1438 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|
% 112.81/81.26  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (501), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 112.81/81.26  																																												| (1446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 112.81/81.26  																																												|
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|
% 112.81/81.26  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|
% 112.81/81.26  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																														| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																														|
% 112.81/81.26  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																													| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 112.81/81.26  																																													|
% 112.81/81.26  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1391), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																														|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																														|
% 112.81/81.26  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																															| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																															|
% 112.81/81.26  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																														|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																														| (1456)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 112.81/81.26  																																														|
% 112.81/81.26  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																															|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																															| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.26  																																															|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																															|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																															| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 112.81/81.26  																																															| (1462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 112.81/81.26  																																															|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																																| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 112.81/81.26  																																																|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (489), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	| (1472)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.26  																																																	|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																			| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																			| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.26  																																																			|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																			| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																			| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.26  																																																			|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 112.81/81.26  																																																		|
% 112.81/81.26  																																																			| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| Combining equations (1434,1363) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| (1369) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| Simplifying 1369 yields:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			| (1485)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																			|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| Equations (1363,1334) can reduce 1438 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																				|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					| (1368) xp = xm
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| Combining equations (1361,1368) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					| (1497)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																					|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 112.81/81.27  																																																						|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (524), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							| (1507)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																							|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (569), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| Combining equations (1434,1363) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| (1369) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| Simplifying 1369 yields:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								| (1516)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																								|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| Equations (1363,1334) can reduce 1438 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| (1368) xp = xm
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| Combining equations (1361,1368) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									| (1524)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																									|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																										|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 112.81/81.27  																																																											|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 112.81/81.27  																																																												|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (495), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													| (1368) xp = xm
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| Combining equations (1361,1368) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													| (1544)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																													|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 112.81/81.27  																																																														|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (523), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																																| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.27  																																																																|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																																| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.27  																																																																|
% 112.81/81.27  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															| (1554)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 112.81/81.27  																																																															|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																| (1368) xp = xm
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| Combining equations (1361,1368) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| (1371) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																| (1563)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (546), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	| (1568)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, v0))
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																		|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (521), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				| (1370) xm = xn
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				| (1581)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																				|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																					|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						| Instantiating formula (2) with xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						|
% 112.81/81.28  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																															|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																															| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 112.81/81.28  																															| (1591)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_0_6) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 112.81/81.28  																															|
% 112.81/81.28  																																| Equations (310) can reduce 1590 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																| (1592)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.28  																																|
% 112.81/81.28  																																| Simplifying 1592 yields:
% 112.81/81.28  																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.28  																																|
% 112.81/81.28  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (142), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.28  																																|
% 112.81/81.28  																																	| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																	| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.28  																																| (1597)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.81/81.28  																																|
% 112.81/81.28  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																	|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																	| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.28  																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.28  																																		|
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																		|
% 112.81/81.28  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																	|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																	| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.28  																																	| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.81/81.28  																																	|
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.28  																																		|
% 112.81/81.28  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (571), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																		|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 112.81/81.28  																																		|
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| Combining equations (1200,1363) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| (1605) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| Simplifying 1605 yields:
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																		|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| (1608)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xn)
% 112.81/81.28  																																		| (1609)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 112.81/81.28  																																		|
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| Equations (1200) can reduce 1608 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.28  																																				|
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																				|
% 112.81/81.28  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.28  																																			| (1615) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.81/81.28  																																			|
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.28  																																				|
% 112.81/81.28  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1602), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																				|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.28  																																				|
% 112.81/81.28  																																					| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.28  																																					| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.28  																																					|
% 112.81/81.28  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.28  																																				|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.28  																																				| (1620)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 112.81/81.28  																																				|
% 112.81/81.28  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (474), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.28  																																					|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.28  																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.28  																																					|
% 112.81/81.29  																																						| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																						| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																						|
% 112.81/81.29  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																					|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.29  																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.29  																																					| (1624)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.29  																																					|
% 112.81/81.29  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.29  																																						|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.29  																																						| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.29  																																						|
% 112.81/81.29  																																							| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																							| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																							|
% 112.81/81.29  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																						|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.29  																																						| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.29  																																						| (1628)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 112.81/81.29  																																						|
% 112.81/81.29  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.29  																																							|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.29  																																							| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.29  																																							|
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.29  																																								|
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																								|
% 112.81/81.29  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																							|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.29  																																							| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.29  																																							| (1633) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.29  																																							|
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.29  																																								|
% 112.81/81.29  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (525), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.29  																																								|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.29  																																								|
% 112.81/81.29  																																									| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																									| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																									|
% 112.81/81.29  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																								|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.29  																																								| (1638)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 112.81/81.29  																																								|
% 112.81/81.29  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1633), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.29  																																									|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.29  																																									| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.29  																																									|
% 112.81/81.29  																																										| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																										| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																										|
% 112.81/81.29  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																									|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.29  																																									| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.29  																																									| (1642)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.29  																																									|
% 112.81/81.29  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.29  																																										|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.29  																																										| (1360) xr = xp
% 112.81/81.29  																																										|
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| Combining equations (310,1360) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																										|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.29  																																										| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 112.81/81.29  																																										| (1647)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_17_0_11) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 112.81/81.29  																																										|
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| Equations (310) can reduce 1590 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| (1592)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| Simplifying 1592 yields:
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|
% 112.81/81.29  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1352), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|
% 112.81/81.29  																																												| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																												| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																												|
% 112.81/81.29  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 112.81/81.29  																																											| (1653)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 112.81/81.29  																																											|
% 112.81/81.29  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.29  																																												|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.29  																																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 112.81/81.29  																																												|
% 112.81/81.29  																																													| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 112.81/81.29  																																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 112.81/81.29  																																													|
% 112.81/81.29  																																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																													| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																													|
% 112.81/81.29  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																												|-Branch two:
% 112.81/81.29  																																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 112.81/81.29  																																												| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 112.81/81.29  																																												|
% 112.81/81.29  																																													| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 112.81/81.29  																																													|
% 112.81/81.29  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 112.81/81.29  																																													|-Branch one:
% 112.81/81.29  																																													| (1361) xp = xn
% 112.81/81.29  																																													|
% 112.81/81.29  																																														| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 112.81/81.29  																																														| (174) $false
% 112.81/81.29  																																														|
% 112.81/81.29  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 112.81/81.29  																																													|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																													| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.29  																																													| (1663)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.21/81.29  																																													|
% 113.21/81.29  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																														|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.29  																																														|
% 113.21/81.29  																																															| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																															| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																															|
% 113.21/81.29  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																														|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																														| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.29  																																														| (1667)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 113.21/81.29  																																														|
% 113.21/81.29  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																															|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.29  																																															|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.29  																																																|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																																|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																															|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.21/81.29  																																															| (1672) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 113.21/81.29  																																															|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (503), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																																|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.29  																																																|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																																|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																| (1677)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.21/81.29  																																																|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	| (1681)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_13_0_5, v0))
% 113.21/81.29  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1672), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		| (1685)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 113.21/81.29  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			| (1690) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																			|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1615), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				| (1695)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.21/81.29  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					| (1699)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 113.21/81.29  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																							| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																							| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.29  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.29  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.29  																																																						| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.30  																																																						| (1703)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_3_3) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_3_3, v0))
% 113.21/81.30  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (475), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																							| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.30  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																							| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.30  																																																							| (1707)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 113.21/81.30  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 113.21/81.30  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									| Combining equations (1712,1340) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.30  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																										|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																										| (1715)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 113.21/81.30  																										| (1716) all_0_0_0 = sz10 | all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																										|
% 113.21/81.30  																											| From (1287) and (1715) follows:
% 113.21/81.30  																											| (1717)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 113.21/81.30  																											|
% 113.21/81.30  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (136), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																											|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																											| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 113.21/81.30  																											|
% 113.21/81.30  																												| Using (1333) and (1717) yields:
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1719) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																												|
% 113.21/81.30  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																											|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																											| (1717)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 113.21/81.30  																											| (1721) xm = sz10 | xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																											|
% 113.21/81.30  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																												|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																												|
% 113.21/81.30  																													| From (1336) and (1717) follows:
% 113.21/81.30  																													| (1723)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00)
% 113.21/81.30  																													|
% 113.21/81.30  																													| Using (1327) and (1723) yields:
% 113.21/81.30  																													| (1719) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																													|
% 113.21/81.30  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																												|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1726) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1)
% 113.21/81.30  																												|
% 113.21/81.30  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																													|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																													|
% 113.21/81.30  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.21/81.30  																														| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																														|
% 113.21/81.30  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																													|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.21/81.30  																													| (1672) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 113.21/81.30  																													|
% 113.21/81.30  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																														|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																														|
% 113.21/81.30  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.21/81.30  																															| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																															|
% 113.21/81.30  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																														|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.21/81.30  																														| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 113.21/81.30  																														|
% 113.21/81.30  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																															|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																															|
% 113.21/81.30  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.21/81.30  																																| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																																|
% 113.21/81.30  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																															|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.21/81.30  																															| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.21/81.30  																															|
% 113.21/81.30  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1716), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																																|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																																| (1739) all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																																|
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| Combining equations (1739,1287) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																																	|
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																																	|
% 113.21/81.30  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																																|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																																| (1742)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.30  																																| (1743) all_0_0_0 = sz10
% 113.21/81.30  																																|
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| Combining equations (1743,1287) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.21/81.30  																																	|
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| From (1334) and (1331) follows:
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| (149) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 113.21/81.30  																																	|
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| From (1334) and (1717) follows:
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| (1746)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 113.21/81.30  																																	|
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| Using (149) and (1746) yields:
% 113.21/81.30  																																	| (1719) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																																	|
% 113.21/81.30  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																									|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																									| (1748)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10)
% 113.21/81.30  																									| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 113.21/81.30  																									|
% 113.21/81.30  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (125), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																										|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																										| (1750) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, xr)
% 113.21/81.30  																										|
% 113.21/81.30  																											| From (1287)(310) and (1750) follows:
% 113.21/81.30  																											| (1751) sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn)
% 113.21/81.30  																											|
% 113.21/81.30  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																											|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																											| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																											|
% 113.21/81.30  																												| Combining equations (1379,310) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1377) xr = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																												|
% 113.21/81.30  																												| From (1379) and (337) follows:
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1754) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_83_2_40
% 113.21/81.30  																												|
% 113.21/81.30  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (142), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.30  																												|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.30  																												|
% 113.21/81.30  																													| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.30  																													| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.30  																													|
% 113.21/81.30  																													| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.30  																													| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.30  																													|
% 113.21/81.30  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.30  																												|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.30  																												| (1597)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.21/81.30  																												|
% 113.21/81.31  																													| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																													| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																													|
% 113.21/81.31  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																													|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																													|
% 113.21/81.31  																														| From (1336) and (1172) follows:
% 113.21/81.31  																														| (1762) sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																														|
% 113.21/81.31  																														| From (1336) and (376) follows:
% 113.21/81.31  																														| (1763) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_102_2_49
% 113.21/81.31  																														|
% 113.21/81.31  																														| From (1336) and (494) follows:
% 113.21/81.31  																														| (1764) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_102_2_49
% 113.21/81.31  																														|
% 113.21/81.31  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																														|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																														| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.21/81.31  																														|
% 113.21/81.31  																															| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																															| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.31  																														|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.31  																														| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.21/81.31  																														| (1769)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 113.21/81.31  																														|
% 113.21/81.31  																															| Instantiating (1769) with all_464_0_575, all_464_1_576 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1770)  ~ (all_464_0_575 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_464_1_576 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_464_0_575 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1770) yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1771)  ~ (all_464_0_575 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1772)  ~ (all_464_1_576 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1773) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_464_0_575
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1774) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																															| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																															| From (1379) and (1774) follows:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1777) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (558), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																															|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																																| Combining equations (1200,1363) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1605) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																| Simplifying 1605 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.31  																															|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1608)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xn)
% 113.21/81.31  																															| (1784)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 113.21/81.31  																															|
% 113.21/81.31  																																| Instantiating (1784) with all_470_0_577, all_470_1_578 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1785)  ~ (all_470_0_577 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (all_470_1_578 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_470_0_577 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_470_1_578
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1785) yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1786)  ~ (all_470_0_577 = all_83_2_40)
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1787)  ~ (all_470_1_578 = sz10)
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1788) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_470_0_577
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1789) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_470_1_578
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																| Equations (1200,1379) can reduce 1608 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																| From (1379) and (1789) follows:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1791) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_470_1_578
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																																|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.31  																																|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.31  																																| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 113.21/81.31  																																|
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|
% 113.21/81.31  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																																		|
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.31  																																		|
% 113.21/81.31  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.31  																																	| (1628)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 113.21/81.31  																																	|
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																																		|
% 113.21/81.31  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																																		|
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																																			|
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.31  																																			|
% 113.21/81.31  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.31  																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.31  																																		| (1703)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_3_3) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_3_3, v0))
% 113.21/81.31  																																		|
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																																			|
% 113.21/81.31  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (571), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																																			|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| Combining equations (1200,1363) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1605) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| Simplifying 1605 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.31  																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| (1608)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xn)
% 113.21/81.31  																																			| (1609)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 113.21/81.31  																																			|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| Instantiating (1609) with all_493_0_588, all_493_1_589 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1819)  ~ (all_493_0_588 = all_493_1_589) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_493_1_589 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1819) yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1820)  ~ (all_493_0_588 = all_493_1_589)
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1821) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_493_1_589
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1822) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| Equations (1200,1379) can reduce 1608 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| From (1379) and (1822) follows:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1824) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																																					|
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.31  																																					|
% 113.21/81.31  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 113.21/81.31  																																				| (1375)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) &  ~ (v0 = all_17_0_11) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 113.21/81.31  																																				|
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																																					|
% 113.21/81.31  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.31  																																					|
% 113.21/81.31  																																						| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																						| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.31  																																						|
% 113.21/81.31  																																						| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																						| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.31  																																						|
% 113.21/81.31  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.31  																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.31  																																					| (1663)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.21/81.31  																																					|
% 113.21/81.31  																																						| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.31  																																						| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.31  																																						|
% 113.21/81.31  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.31  																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.31  																																						| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 113.21/81.31  																																						|
% 113.21/81.31  																																							| Combining equations (1200,1434) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.31  																																							| (1838) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.31  																																							|
% 113.21/81.31  																																							| Simplifying 1838 yields:
% 113.21/81.31  																																							| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.31  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																						| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 113.21/81.32  																																						| (1485)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.21/81.32  																																						|
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| Instantiating (1485) with all_511_0_594, all_511_1_595 yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1844)  ~ (all_511_0_594 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (all_511_1_595 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_511_0_594 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (1844) yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1845)  ~ (all_511_0_594 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1846)  ~ (all_511_1_595 = sz10)
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1847) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_511_0_594
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1848) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| Equations (1200,1336) can reduce 1438 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| From (1336) and (1848) follows:
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1850) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																								|
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																								|
% 113.21/81.32  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.32  																																							| (1699)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 113.21/81.32  																																							|
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																								|
% 113.21/81.32  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (478), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.32  																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.32  																																								|
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																									|
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																									|
% 113.21/81.32  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.32  																																								| (1861)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xm) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xm, v2))
% 113.21/81.32  																																								|
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																									|
% 113.21/81.32  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.32  																																									|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.32  																																									|
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																										|
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																										|
% 113.21/81.32  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																									|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 113.21/81.32  																																									| (1497)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.21/81.32  																																									|
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																										|
% 113.21/81.32  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.32  																																										|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.32  																																										|
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																											|
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																											|
% 113.21/81.32  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																										|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.32  																																										| (1681)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_13_0_5, v0))
% 113.21/81.32  																																										|
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																											|
% 113.21/81.32  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.32  																																											|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.32  																																											|
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																												|
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																												|
% 113.21/81.32  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																											|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.32  																																											| (1879)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 113.21/81.32  																																											|
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																												|
% 113.21/81.32  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (497), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.32  																																												|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.21/81.32  																																												|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																												|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.21/81.32  																																												| (1885)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.21/81.32  																																												|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| Instantiating (1885) with all_551_0_610, all_551_1_611 yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1886)  ~ (all_551_0_610 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_551_1_611 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_551_1_611 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_551_0_610
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (1886) yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1887)  ~ (all_551_0_610 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1888)  ~ (all_551_1_611 = all_83_2_40)
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1889) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_551_1_611
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1890) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_551_0_610
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| From (1379) and (1890) follows:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1893) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_551_0_610
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.32  																																													| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 113.21/81.32  																																													|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| Instantiating (1587) with all_557_0_612, all_557_1_613, all_557_2_614 yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1900)  ~ (all_557_0_612 = all_557_1_613) &  ~ (all_557_2_614 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_557_2_614 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_557_0_612 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_557_1_613 & sdtlseqdt0(all_557_1_613, all_557_0_612) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_557_2_614)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (1900) yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1901)  ~ (all_557_2_614 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1902)  ~ (all_557_0_612 = all_557_1_613)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1903) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_557_2_614
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1904) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_557_0_612
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1905) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_557_1_613
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1906) sdtlseqdt0(all_557_1_613, all_557_0_612)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1907) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_557_2_614)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| From (1336) and (1905) follows:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1910) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_557_1_613
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.32  																																															| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.32  																																															| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																															|
% 113.21/81.32  																																															| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.32  																																															| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.32  																																															|
% 113.21/81.32  																																															| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.32  																																															| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.32  																																															|
% 113.21/81.32  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.21/81.32  																																														|
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| Instantiating (1387) with all_563_0_615, all_563_1_616 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1917)  ~ (all_563_0_615 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_563_1_616 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_563_1_616 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_563_0_615
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (1917) yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1918)  ~ (all_563_0_615 = all_102_1_48)
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1919)  ~ (all_563_1_616 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1920) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_563_1_616
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1921) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_563_0_615
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| From (1336) and (1920) follows:
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1924) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_563_1_616
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|
% 113.21/81.33  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.33  																																															| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 113.21/81.33  																																															|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| Instantiating (1452) with all_569_0_617, all_569_1_618, all_569_2_619 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1931)  ~ (all_569_0_617 = all_569_1_618) &  ~ (all_569_2_619 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_569_2_619 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_569_0_617 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_569_1_618 & sdtlseqdt0(all_569_1_618, all_569_0_617) & sdtlseqdt0(all_569_2_619, all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (1931) yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1932) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_569_1_618
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1933) sdtlseqdt0(all_569_1_618, all_569_0_617)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1934)  ~ (all_569_2_619 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1935) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_569_2_619
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1936) sdtlseqdt0(all_569_2_619, all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1937) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_569_0_617
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1938)  ~ (all_569_0_617 = all_569_1_618)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| From (1336) and (1935) follows:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1941) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_569_2_619
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| From (1336) and (1932) follows:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1942) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_569_1_618
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.21/81.33  																																																|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| Instantiating (1421) with all_575_0_620, all_575_1_621, all_575_2_622 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1949)  ~ (all_575_0_620 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_575_1_621 = all_575_2_622) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_575_1_621 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_575_2_622 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_575_0_620 & sdtlseqdt0(all_575_0_620, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_575_2_622, all_575_1_621)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (1949) yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1950) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_575_0_620
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1951)  ~ (all_575_1_621 = all_575_2_622)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1952) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_575_1_621
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1953) sdtlseqdt0(all_575_2_622, all_575_1_621)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1954)  ~ (all_575_0_620 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1955) sdtlseqdt0(all_575_0_620, all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1956) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_575_2_622
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| From (1336) and (1956) follows:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1959) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_575_2_622
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| From (1336) and (1950) follows:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1960) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_575_0_620
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 113.21/81.33  																																																	|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| Instantiating (1537) with all_580_0_623, all_580_1_624, all_580_2_625 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1967)  ~ (all_580_0_623 = all_580_1_624) &  ~ (all_580_2_625 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_580_0_623 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_580_1_624 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_580_2_625 & sdtlseqdt0(all_580_1_624, all_580_0_623) & sdtlseqdt0(all_580_2_625, all_83_0_38)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (1967) yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1968) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_580_0_623
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1969)  ~ (all_580_2_625 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1970) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_580_2_625
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1971) sdtlseqdt0(all_580_1_624, all_580_0_623)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1972) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_580_1_624
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1973)  ~ (all_580_0_623 = all_580_1_624)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1974) sdtlseqdt0(all_580_2_625, all_83_0_38)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| From (1379) and (1968) follows:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1977) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_580_0_623
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		| (1406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																		|
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.33  																																																			|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.34  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.34  																																																			|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.34  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																			| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.21/81.34  																																																			|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| Instantiating (1433) with all_592_0_628, all_592_1_629, all_592_2_630 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1990)  ~ (all_592_0_628 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (all_592_1_629 = all_592_2_630) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_592_1_629 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_592_0_628 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_592_2_630 & sdtlseqdt0(all_592_0_628, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(all_592_2_630, all_592_1_629)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (1990) yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1991)  ~ (all_592_1_629 = all_592_2_630)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1992) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_592_0_628
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1993) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_592_1_629
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1994)  ~ (all_592_0_628 = all_83_2_40)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1995) sdtlseqdt0(all_592_0_628, all_83_2_40)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1996) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_592_2_630
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1997) sdtlseqdt0(all_592_2_630, all_592_1_629)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| From (1379) and (1993) follows:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (2000) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_592_1_629
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 113.21/81.34  																																																				|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| Instantiating (1502) with all_598_0_631, all_598_1_632, all_598_2_633 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2007)  ~ (all_598_0_631 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_598_1_632 = all_598_2_633) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_598_0_631 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_598_1_632 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_598_2_633 & sdtlseqdt0(all_598_2_633, all_598_1_632) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_598_0_631)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2007) yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2008)  ~ (all_598_1_632 = all_598_2_633)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2009) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_598_1_632
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2010) sdtlseqdt0(all_598_2_633, all_598_1_632)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2011) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_598_0_631
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2012) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_598_0_631)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2013)  ~ (all_598_0_631 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2014) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_598_2_633
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| From (1379) and (2014) follows:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2017) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_598_2_633
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (519), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					| (2022)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																					|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| Instantiating (2022) with all_604_0_634, all_604_1_635 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (2023)  ~ (all_604_0_634 = all_604_1_635) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_604_1_635 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_604_0_634
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2023) yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (2024)  ~ (all_604_0_634 = all_604_1_635)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (2025) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_604_1_635
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (2026) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_604_0_634
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| From (1379) and (2026) follows:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (2029) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_604_0_634
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 113.21/81.34  																																																						|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (569), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| Combining equations (1200,1434) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (1838) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| Simplifying 1838 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							| (1516)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																							|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| Instantiating (1516) with all_615_0_639, all_615_1_640 yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (2045)  ~ (all_615_0_639 = all_615_1_640) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_615_1_640 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_615_0_639
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (2045) yields:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (2046)  ~ (all_615_0_639 = all_615_1_640)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (2047) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_615_1_640
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (2048) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_615_0_639
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| Equations (1200,1336) can reduce 1438 to:
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.34  																																																								| From (1336) and (2048) follows:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								| (2050) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_615_0_639
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (489), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								| (1472)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																								|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| Instantiating (1472) with all_621_0_641, all_621_1_642 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (2057)  ~ (all_621_0_641 = all_621_1_642) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_621_1_642 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_621_0_641
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2057) yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (2058)  ~ (all_621_0_641 = all_621_1_642)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (2059) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_621_1_642
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (2060) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_621_0_641
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| From (1336) and (2060) follows:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (2063) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_621_0_641
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																									|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| Instantiating (1576) with all_627_0_643, all_627_1_644 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (2070)  ~ (all_627_0_643 = all_627_1_644) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_627_1_644 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_627_0_643
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2070) yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (2071)  ~ (all_627_0_643 = all_627_1_644)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (2072) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_627_1_644
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (2073) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_627_0_643
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| From (1336) and (2073) follows:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (2076) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_627_0_643
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (503), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										| (1677)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.21/81.35  																																																										|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| Instantiating (1677) with all_633_0_645, all_633_1_646, all_633_2_647 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2082)  ~ (all_633_0_645 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (all_633_1_646 = all_633_2_647) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_633_0_645 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = all_633_2_647 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_633_1_646 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_645, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_647, all_633_1_646)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2082) yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2083) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_633_1_646
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2084) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_645, all_83_2_40)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2085) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_647, all_633_1_646)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2086)  ~ (all_633_1_646 = all_633_2_647)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2087) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_633_0_645
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2088) sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = all_633_2_647
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2089)  ~ (all_633_0_645 = all_83_2_40)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| From (1379) and (2083) follows:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (2091) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_633_1_646
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (1360) xr = xp
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| Combining equations (1360,1377) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| (1222) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| Simplifying 1222 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											| (1647)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_17_0_11) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																											|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| Equations (1377) can reduce 1590 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| (2098)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| Simplifying 2098 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (546), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												| (1568)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, v0))
% 113.21/81.35  																																																												|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| Instantiating (1568) with all_645_0_650, all_645_1_651, all_645_2_652 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (2106)  ~ (all_645_0_650 = all_645_1_651) &  ~ (all_645_2_652 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_645_0_650 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_645_2_652 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_645_1_651 & sdtlseqdt0(all_645_1_651, all_645_0_650) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, all_645_2_652)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2106) yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (2107) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_645_0_650
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (2108) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_645_2_652
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (2109)  ~ (all_645_0_650 = all_645_1_651)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (2110) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, all_645_2_652)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (2111) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_645_1_651
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (2112)  ~ (all_645_2_652 = all_83_2_40)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (2113) sdtlseqdt0(all_645_1_651, all_645_0_650)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.35  																																																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													| From (1379) and (2111) follows:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													| (2116) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_645_1_651
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													| (1667)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																													|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (469), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														| (2127)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 113.21/81.36  																																																														|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															| (1563)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																															|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																| (2139)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| Instantiating (2139) with all_669_0_660, all_669_1_661 yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (2140)  ~ (all_669_0_660 = all_669_1_661) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_669_1_661 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_669_0_660
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (2140) yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (2141)  ~ (all_669_0_660 = all_669_1_661)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (2142) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_669_1_661
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (2143) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_669_0_660
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| From (1379) and (2143) follows:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (2146) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_669_0_660
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (564), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| Combining equations (1200,1363) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (1605) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| Simplifying 1605 yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (1608)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xn)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	| (2153)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																	|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| Instantiating (2153) with all_675_0_662, all_675_1_663 yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (2154)  ~ (all_675_0_662 = all_675_1_663) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_675_0_662 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_675_1_663
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (2154) yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (2155)  ~ (all_675_0_662 = all_675_1_663)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (2156) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_675_0_662
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (2157) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_675_1_663
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| Equations (1200,1379) can reduce 1608 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| From (1379) and (2157) follows:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (2159) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_675_1_663
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																		|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| Instantiating (1529) with all_681_0_664, all_681_1_665 yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (2166)  ~ (all_681_0_664 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_681_1_665 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_681_1_665 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_681_0_664
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2166) yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (2167)  ~ (all_681_0_664 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (2168)  ~ (all_681_1_665 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (2169) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_681_1_665
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (2170) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_681_0_664
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| From (1336) and (2170) follows:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (2173) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_681_0_664
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (228), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			| (2178)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																			|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (495), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				| (1544)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																				|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (476), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					| (2190)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																					|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																						|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																							| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																							| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																							| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.36  																																																																							| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																						| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																						| (2196)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																						|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| Instantiating (2196) with all_705_0_672, all_705_1_673 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (2197)  ~ (all_705_0_672 = all_705_1_673) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_705_0_672 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_705_1_673
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2197) yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (2198)  ~ (all_705_0_672 = all_705_1_673)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (2199) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_705_0_672
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (2200) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_705_1_673
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| From (1379) and (2200) follows:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (2203) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_705_1_673
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (475), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							| (1707)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																							|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (474), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								| (1624)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																								|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																									|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| Instantiating (1468) with all_723_0_678, all_723_1_679, all_723_2_680 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2222)  ~ (all_723_0_678 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_723_1_679 = all_723_2_680) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_723_1_679 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_723_2_680 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_723_0_678 & sdtlseqdt0(all_723_2_680, all_723_1_679) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_723_0_678)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2222) yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2223) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_723_2_680
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2224)  ~ (all_723_0_678 = all_102_1_48)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2225) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_723_0_678)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2226) sdtlseqdt0(all_723_2_680, all_723_1_679)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2227)  ~ (all_723_1_679 = all_723_2_680)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2228) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_723_0_678
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2229) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_723_1_679
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| From (1336) and (2223) follows:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (2232) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_723_2_680
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																										|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (525), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											| (1638)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																											|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| Instantiating (1638) with all_735_0_684, all_735_1_685, all_735_2_686 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2246)  ~ (all_735_0_684 = all_735_1_685) &  ~ (all_735_2_686 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_735_1_685 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_735_0_684 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = all_735_2_686 & sdtlseqdt0(all_735_1_685, all_735_0_684) & sdtlseqdt0(all_735_2_686, all_83_0_38)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (2246) yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2247) sdtlseqdt0(all_735_1_685, all_735_0_684)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2248) sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = all_735_1_685
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2249) sdtlseqdt0(all_735_2_686, all_83_0_38)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2250)  ~ (all_735_0_684 = all_735_1_685)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2251) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_735_0_684
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2252) sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = all_735_2_686
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2253)  ~ (all_735_2_686 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| From (1379) and (2251) follows:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2254) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_735_0_684
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (518), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												| (2259)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																												|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| Instantiating (2259) with all_741_0_687, all_741_1_688 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (2260)  ~ (all_741_0_687 = all_741_1_688) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_741_0_687 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_741_1_688
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (2260) yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (2261)  ~ (all_741_0_687 = all_741_1_688)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (2262) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_741_0_687
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (2263) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_741_1_688
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| From (1379) and (2263) follows:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (2266) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_741_1_688
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.21/81.37  																																																																													|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| Instantiating (1572) with all_747_0_689, all_747_1_690 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (2273)  ~ (all_747_0_689 = all_747_1_690) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_747_0_689 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_747_1_690
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2273) yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (2274)  ~ (all_747_0_689 = all_747_1_690)
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (2275) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_747_0_689
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (2276) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_747_1_690
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| From (1336) and (2276) follows:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (2279) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_747_1_690
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|-Branch one:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (174) $false
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|-Branch two:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																														|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating (1490) with all_753_0_691, all_753_1_692 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2286)  ~ (all_753_0_691 = all_753_1_692) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_753_0_691 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_753_1_692
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2286) yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2287)  ~ (all_753_0_691 = all_753_1_692)
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2288) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_753_0_691
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2289) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_753_1_692
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Equations (1379) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| From (1336) and (2289) follows:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2292) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_753_1_692
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (87) with all_52_0_18, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_102_2_49), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2293) all_102_2_49 = sz00
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_681_0_664, all_705_1_673 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_705_1_673, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_681_0_664, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2294) all_705_1_673 = all_681_0_664
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_645_1_651, all_681_0_664 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_681_0_664, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_645_1_651, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2295) all_681_0_664 = all_645_1_651
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_633_1_646, all_669_0_660 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_669_0_660, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_633_1_646, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2296) all_669_0_660 = all_633_1_646
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_633_1_646, all_645_1_651 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_645_1_651, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_633_1_646, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2297) all_645_1_651 = all_633_1_646
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_592_1_629, all_747_1_690 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_747_1_690, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_592_1_629, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2298) all_747_1_690 = all_592_1_629
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_592_1_629, all_633_1_646 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_633_1_646, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_592_1_629, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2299) all_633_1_646 = all_592_1_629
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_569_1_618, all_669_0_660 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_669_0_660, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_569_1_618, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2300) all_669_0_660 = all_569_1_618
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_557_1_613, all_645_1_651 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_645_1_651, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_557_1_613, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2301) all_645_1_651 = all_557_1_613
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_557_1_613, all_621_0_641 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_621_0_641, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_557_1_613, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2302) all_621_0_641 = all_557_1_613
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_557_1_613, all_575_0_620 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_575_0_620, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_557_1_613, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2303) all_575_0_620 = all_557_1_613
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (26) with all_557_1_613, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_557_1_613, aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2304) all_557_1_613 = sz10
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_551_0_610, all_575_0_620 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_575_0_620, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_551_0_610, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2305) all_575_0_620 = all_551_0_610
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_511_1_595, all_705_1_673 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_705_1_673, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_511_1_595, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2306) all_705_1_673 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_470_1_578, all_621_0_641 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_621_0_641, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_470_1_578, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2307) all_621_0_641 = all_470_1_578
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_102_2_49, all_747_1_690 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_747_1_690, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2308) all_747_1_690 = all_102_2_49
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_735_0_684, all_753_1_692 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_753_1_692, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_735_0_684, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2309) all_753_1_692 = all_735_0_684
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_723_2_680, all_741_1_688 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_741_1_688, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_723_2_680, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2310) all_741_1_688 = all_723_2_680
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_675_1_663, all_735_0_684 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_735_0_684, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_675_1_663, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2311) all_735_0_684 = all_675_1_663
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_627_0_643, all_753_1_692 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_753_1_692, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_627_0_643, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2312) all_753_1_692 = all_627_0_643
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_615_0_639, all_723_2_680 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_723_2_680, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_615_0_639, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2313) all_723_2_680 = all_615_0_639
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_604_0_634, all_735_0_684 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_735_0_684, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_604_0_634, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2314) all_735_0_684 = all_604_0_634
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_580_0_623, all_604_0_634 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_604_0_634, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_580_0_623, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2315) all_604_0_634 = all_580_0_623
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_575_2_622, all_580_0_623 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_580_0_623, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_575_2_622, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2316) all_580_0_623 = all_575_2_622
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_569_2_619, all_615_0_639 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_615_0_639, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_569_2_619, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2317) all_615_0_639 = all_569_2_619
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_569_2_619, all_575_2_622 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_575_2_622, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_569_2_619, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2318) all_575_2_622 = all_569_2_619
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_563_1_616, all_615_0_639 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_615_0_639, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_563_1_616, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2319) all_615_0_639 = all_563_1_616
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_563_1_616, all_598_2_633 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_598_2_633, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_563_1_616, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2320) all_598_2_633 = all_563_1_616
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_493_0_588, all_741_1_688 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_741_1_688, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_493_0_588, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2321) all_741_1_688 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_464_1_576, all_675_1_663 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_675_1_663, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_464_1_576, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2322) all_675_1_663 = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_102_2_49, all_569_2_619 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_569_2_619, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2323) all_569_2_619 = all_102_2_49
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_83_2_40, all_598_2_633 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_598_2_633, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2324) all_598_2_633 = all_83_2_40
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Combining equations (2309,2312) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2325) all_735_0_684 = all_627_0_643
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Simplifying 2325 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2326) all_735_0_684 = all_627_0_643
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Combining equations (2298,2308) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2327) all_592_1_629 = all_102_2_49
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Simplifying 2327 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2328) all_592_1_629 = all_102_2_49
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Combining equations (2310,2321) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2329) all_723_2_680 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Simplifying 2329 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2330) all_723_2_680 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Combining equations (2314,2326) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2331) all_627_0_643 = all_604_0_634
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Combining equations (2311,2326) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2332) all_675_1_663 = all_627_0_643
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| Simplifying 2332 yields:
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															| (2333) all_675_1_663 = all_627_0_643
% 113.21/81.38  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2313,2330) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2334) all_615_0_639 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2334 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2335) all_615_0_639 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2294,2306) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2336) all_681_0_664 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2336 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2337) all_681_0_664 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2295,2337) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2338) all_645_1_651 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2338 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2339) all_645_1_651 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2333,2322) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2340) all_627_0_643 = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2340 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2341) all_627_0_643 = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2296,2300) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2342) all_633_1_646 = all_569_1_618
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2342 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2343) all_633_1_646 = all_569_1_618
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2301,2339) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2344) all_557_1_613 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2344 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2345) all_557_1_613 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2297,2339) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2346) all_633_1_646 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2346 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2347) all_633_1_646 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2299,2343) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2348) all_592_1_629 = all_569_1_618
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2348 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2349) all_592_1_629 = all_569_1_618
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2347,2343) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2350) all_569_1_618 = all_511_1_595
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2331,2341) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2351) all_604_0_634 = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2351 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2352) all_604_0_634 = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2302,2307) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2353) all_557_1_613 = all_470_1_578
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2353 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2354) all_557_1_613 = all_470_1_578
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2319,2335) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2355) all_563_1_616 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2355 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2356) all_563_1_616 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2317,2335) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2357) all_569_2_619 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2357 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2358) all_569_2_619 = all_493_0_588
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2315,2352) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2359) all_580_0_623 = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2359 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2360) all_580_0_623 = all_464_1_576
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2320,2324) yields a new equation:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2361) all_563_1_616 = all_83_2_40
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2361 yields:
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															| (2362) all_563_1_616 = all_83_2_40
% 113.21/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2349,2328) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2363) all_569_1_618 = all_102_2_49
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2363 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2364) all_569_1_618 = all_102_2_49
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2316,2360) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2365) all_575_2_622 = all_464_1_576
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2365 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2366) all_575_2_622 = all_464_1_576
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2303,2305) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2367) all_557_1_613 = all_551_0_610
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2367 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2368) all_557_1_613 = all_551_0_610
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2318,2366) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2369) all_569_2_619 = all_464_1_576
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2369 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2370) all_569_2_619 = all_464_1_576
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2350,2364) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2371) all_511_1_595 = all_102_2_49
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2371 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2372) all_511_1_595 = all_102_2_49
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2323,2370) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2373) all_464_1_576 = all_102_2_49
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2358,2370) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2374) all_493_0_588 = all_464_1_576
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2374 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2375) all_493_0_588 = all_464_1_576
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2356,2362) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2376) all_493_0_588 = all_83_2_40
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2376 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2377) all_493_0_588 = all_83_2_40
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2354,2368) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2378) all_551_0_610 = all_470_1_578
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2304,2368) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2379) all_551_0_610 = sz10
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2345,2368) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2380) all_551_0_610 = all_511_1_595
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2380,2378) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2381) all_511_1_595 = all_470_1_578
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2381 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2382) all_511_1_595 = all_470_1_578
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2379,2378) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2383) all_470_1_578 = sz10
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2382,2372) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2384) all_470_1_578 = all_102_2_49
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2384 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2385) all_470_1_578 = all_102_2_49
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2375,2377) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2386) all_464_1_576 = all_83_2_40
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2386 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2387) all_464_1_576 = all_83_2_40
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2383,2385) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2388) all_102_2_49 = sz10
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2373,2387) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2389) all_102_2_49 = all_83_2_40
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Simplifying 2389 yields:
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| (2390) all_102_2_49 = all_83_2_40
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.39  																																																																															| Combining equations (2293,2390) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															| (2391) all_83_2_40 = sz00
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															| Combining equations (2388,2390) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															| (2392) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															| Combining equations (2391,2392) yields a new equation:
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															| (174) $false
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															|
% 113.62/81.40  																																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																													|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																													| (2396) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1)
% 113.65/81.40  																													|
% 113.65/81.40  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																														|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																														| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.65/81.40  																														|
% 113.65/81.40  																															| Combining equations (1379,1370) yields a new equation:
% 113.65/81.40  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																															|
% 113.65/81.40  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																															| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																															|
% 113.65/81.40  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																														|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																														| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 113.65/81.40  																														| (1427)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 113.65/81.40  																														|
% 113.65/81.40  																															| Equations (1379) can reduce 1426 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																															|
% 113.65/81.40  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																															|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																															| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.65/81.40  																															|
% 113.65/81.40  																																| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.65/81.40  																																| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																																|
% 113.65/81.40  																																| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																																|
% 113.65/81.40  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																															|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																															| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.65/81.40  																															| (1681)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_13_0_5, v0))
% 113.65/81.40  																															|
% 113.65/81.40  																																| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																																|
% 113.65/81.40  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																																|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																																| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																																|
% 113.65/81.40  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																	| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																																	|
% 113.65/81.40  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																																|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																																| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																																| (1633) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.65/81.40  																																|
% 113.65/81.40  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																																	| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.65/81.40  																																	|
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																																		|
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																																		|
% 113.65/81.40  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																																	| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.65/81.40  																																	| (1628)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 113.65/81.40  																																	|
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																																		|
% 113.65/81.40  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1633), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.65/81.40  																																		|
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																																			|
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																																			|
% 113.65/81.40  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.65/81.40  																																		| (1642)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.65/81.40  																																		|
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																																			|
% 113.65/81.40  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																																			|
% 113.65/81.40  																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																				| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																																				|
% 113.65/81.40  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																																			| (2428) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_3_9, v0))
% 113.65/81.40  																																			|
% 113.65/81.40  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																																				| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.65/81.40  																																				|
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																																					|
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																																					|
% 113.65/81.40  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																																				| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.65/81.40  																																				| (1879)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 113.65/81.40  																																				|
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																																					|
% 113.65/81.40  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																																					|
% 113.65/81.40  																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																						| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																																						|
% 113.65/81.40  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.65/81.40  																																					| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.65/81.40  																																					|
% 113.65/81.40  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1602), into two cases.
% 113.65/81.40  																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.65/81.40  																																						| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.65/81.40  																																						|
% 113.65/81.40  																																							| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.65/81.40  																																							| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.65/81.40  																																							|
% 113.65/81.40  																																							| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.65/81.40  																																							| (174) $false
% 113.65/81.40  																																							|
% 113.65/81.40  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.65/81.40  																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.65/81.40  																																						| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.65/81.40  																																						| (1620)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.68/81.40  																																						|
% 113.68/81.40  																																							| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.68/81.40  																																							| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.68/81.40  																																							|
% 113.68/81.40  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.40  																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.40  																																							| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.40  																																							|
% 113.68/81.40  																																								| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.40  																																								| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.40  																																								|
% 113.68/81.40  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.40  																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.40  																																							| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.40  																																							| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 113.68/81.40  																																							|
% 113.68/81.40  																																								| Combining equations (1379,1477) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.40  																																								| (2449) all_214_0_128 = sz00
% 113.68/81.40  																																								|
% 113.68/81.40  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.40  																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.40  																																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.40  																																								|
% 113.68/81.40  																																									| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.40  																																									| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.40  																																									|
% 113.68/81.40  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.40  																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.40  																																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.40  																																								| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 113.68/81.40  																																								|
% 113.68/81.40  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1346), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.40  																																									|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																																									| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.68/81.41  																																									|
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																										|
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																										|
% 113.68/81.41  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																																									|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																																									| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 113.68/81.41  																																									| (2458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 113.68/81.41  																																									|
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																										|
% 113.68/81.41  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																																										|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																										|
% 113.68/81.41  																																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																											| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																											|
% 113.68/81.41  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																																										|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																										| (2463) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.41  																																										|
% 113.68/81.41  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1299), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																																											|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																											|
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																												|
% 113.68/81.41  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																																											|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																											| (2467) all_214_0_128 = all_212_0_127
% 113.68/81.41  																																											|
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| Combining equations (2467,2449) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| (2468) all_212_0_127 = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																												|
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| Simplifying 2468 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| (2469) all_212_0_127 = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																												|
% 113.68/81.41  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (558), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																																												|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 113.68/81.41  																																												|
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| Combining equations (1200,1363) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| (1605) xp = xn
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| Simplifying 1605 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																																												|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| (1608)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xn)
% 113.68/81.41  																																												| (1784)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 113.68/81.41  																																												|
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| Equations (1200,1379) can reduce 1608 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2463), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| (1360) xr = xp
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| Combining equations (1360,1377) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| (1222) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| Simplifying 1222 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 113.68/81.41  																																													| (2483)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.41  																																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| Equations (1377) can reduce 1590 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| (2098)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| Simplifying 2098 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1301), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																															| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																															|
% 113.68/81.41  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																														| (1340) all_212_0_127 = xp
% 113.68/81.41  																																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																																															| Combining equations (1340,2469) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																															| (1222) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																															|
% 113.68/81.41  																																															| Simplifying 1222 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																															| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																															|
% 113.68/81.41  																																															| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																															| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																															|
% 113.68/81.41  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																											|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																											| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																											| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 113.68/81.41  																											|
% 113.68/81.41  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																												|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																												| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																												|
% 113.68/81.41  																													| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																													| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																												|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																												| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																												| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 113.68/81.41  																												|
% 113.68/81.41  																													| From (1415) and (600) follows:
% 113.68/81.41  																													| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 113.68/81.41  																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																													|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																													| (1377) xr = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																														| Combining equations (1377,310) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																														| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																														| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																														| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																													|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																													| (1381)  ~ (xr = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																													| (1382) xr = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 113.68/81.41  																													|
% 113.68/81.41  																														| Equations (310) can reduce 1381 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																														| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																														|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																														|
% 113.68/81.41  																															| From (1336) and (1172) follows:
% 113.68/81.41  																															| (1762) sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																															|
% 113.68/81.41  																															| From (1336) and (494) follows:
% 113.68/81.41  																															| (1764) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.41  																															|
% 113.68/81.41  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (521), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																															|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																															| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.41  																															|
% 113.68/81.41  																																| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (1378) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																															|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																															| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 113.68/81.41  																															| (1581)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.41  																															|
% 113.68/81.41  																																| Instantiating (1581) with all_476_0_720, all_476_1_721 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (2515)  ~ (all_476_0_720 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (all_476_1_721 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_476_0_720 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_476_1_721
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (2515) yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (2516)  ~ (all_476_0_720 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (2517)  ~ (all_476_1_721 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (2518) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_476_0_720
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (2519) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_476_1_721
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																| From (1336) and (2519) follows:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (2522) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_476_1_721
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																																|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																	|
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																	|
% 113.68/81.41  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																																|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 113.68/81.41  																																| (1497)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.68/81.41  																																|
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.68/81.41  																																	|
% 113.68/81.41  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.41  																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.41  																																	|
% 113.68/81.41  																																		| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.41  																																		| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																		|
% 113.68/81.41  																																		| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.68/81.41  																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.41  																																		|
% 113.68/81.41  																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.41  																																		| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.41  																																		|
% 113.68/81.41  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.41  																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.41  																																	| (2139)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.68/81.41  																																	|
% 113.68/81.42  																																		| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																		| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																		|
% 113.68/81.42  																																		| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																		|
% 113.68/81.42  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.42  																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.42  																																		| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 113.68/81.42  																																		|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| Combining equations (1200,1434) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (1838) xp = xm
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| Simplifying 1838 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.42  																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.42  																																		| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 113.68/81.42  																																		| (1485)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.42  																																		|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| Instantiating (1485) with all_494_0_726, all_494_1_727 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (2544)  ~ (all_494_0_726 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (all_494_1_727 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_494_0_726 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_494_1_727
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2544) yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (2545)  ~ (all_494_0_726 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (2546)  ~ (all_494_1_727 = sz10)
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (2547) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_494_0_726
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (2548) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_494_1_727
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| From (1336) and (2548) follows:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (2549) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_727
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (497), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.42  																																			| (1885)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.68/81.42  																																			|
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|
% 113.68/81.42  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (1378) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 113.68/81.42  																																				| (1427)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 113.68/81.42  																																				|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| Instantiating (1427) with all_506_0_730, all_506_1_731 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (2564)  ~ (all_506_0_730 = all_506_1_731) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_506_0_730 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_506_1_731
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2564) yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (2565)  ~ (all_506_0_730 = all_506_1_731)
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (2566) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_506_0_730
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (2567) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_506_1_731
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| From (1336) and (2566) follows:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (2570) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_730
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.42  																																					| (1769)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 113.68/81.42  																																					|
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|
% 113.68/81.42  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| (1378) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 113.68/81.42  																																						| (1462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 113.68/81.42  																																						|
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|
% 113.68/81.42  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.42  																																							| (2196)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 113.68/81.42  																																							|
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|
% 113.68/81.42  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (518), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.42  																																								| (2259)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 113.68/81.42  																																								|
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|
% 113.68/81.42  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (501), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (1378) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 113.68/81.42  																																									| (1446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.68/81.42  																																									|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| Instantiating (1446) with all_572_0_752, all_572_1_753 yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (2609)  ~ (all_572_0_752 = all_572_1_753) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_572_1_753 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_572_0_752
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2609) yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (2610)  ~ (all_572_0_752 = all_572_1_753)
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (2611) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_572_1_753
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (2612) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_572_0_752
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| From (1336) and (2611) follows:
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (2613) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_753
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| Instantiating formula (87) with all_52_0_18, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_102_2_49), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (2293) all_102_2_49 = sz00
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_494_1_727, all_572_1_753 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_753, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_727, yields:
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| (2615) all_572_1_753 = all_494_1_727
% 113.68/81.42  																																										|
% 113.68/81.42  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_494_1_727, all_506_0_730 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_730, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_727, yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2616) all_506_0_730 = all_494_1_727
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Instantiating formula (26) with all_494_1_727, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_727, aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2617) all_494_1_727 = sz10
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_476_1_721, all_572_1_753 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_753, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_476_1_721, yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2618) all_572_1_753 = all_476_1_721
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_102_2_49, all_506_0_730 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_730, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2619) all_506_0_730 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Combining equations (2615,2618) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2620) all_494_1_727 = all_476_1_721
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Simplifying 2620 yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2621) all_494_1_727 = all_476_1_721
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Combining equations (2616,2619) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2622) all_494_1_727 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Simplifying 2622 yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2623) all_494_1_727 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Combining equations (2617,2621) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2624) all_476_1_721 = sz10
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Combining equations (2623,2621) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2625) all_476_1_721 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Combining equations (2624,2625) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (2388) all_102_2_49 = sz10
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Combining equations (2293,2388) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.43  																																										| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|
% 113.68/81.43  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.43  																														|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.43  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.43  																														| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 113.68/81.43  																														|
% 113.68/81.43  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.43  																															|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.43  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.43  																															|
% 113.68/81.43  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.43  																																| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.43  																																|
% 113.68/81.43  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.43  																															|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.43  																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.43  																															| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 113.68/81.43  																															|
% 113.68/81.43  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.43  																																|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.43  																																| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.43  																																|
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.43  																																|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.43  																																| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.43  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 113.68/81.43  																																|
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| From (1361) and (1213) follows:
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| From (1361) and (540) follows:
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (252) sdtlseqdt0(xn, all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| From (1361) and (479) follows:
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (2643) sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm)
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|
% 113.68/81.43  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.43  																																		|
% 113.68/81.43  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.43  																																	| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 113.68/81.43  																																	|
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_754, all_484_1_755 yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (2648)  ~ (all_484_0_754 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_755 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_755 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_754
% 113.68/81.43  																																		|
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (2648) yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (2649)  ~ (all_484_0_754 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (2650)  ~ (all_484_1_755 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (2651) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (2652) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_754
% 113.68/81.43  																																		|
% 113.68/81.43  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.43  																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.43  																																		|
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.43  																																			|
% 113.68/81.43  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.43  																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.43  																																		| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 113.68/81.43  																																		|
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| Instantiating (1452) with all_490_0_756, all_490_1_757, all_490_2_758 yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (2657)  ~ (all_490_0_756 = all_490_1_757) &  ~ (all_490_2_758 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_758 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_756 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_757 & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_757, all_490_0_756) & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_758, all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.43  																																			|
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2657) yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (2658)  ~ (all_490_2_758 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (2659) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_757
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (2660)  ~ (all_490_0_756 = all_490_1_757)
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (2661) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_758, all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (2662) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_757, all_490_0_756)
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (2663) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_756
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (2664) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_758
% 113.68/81.43  																																			|
% 113.68/81.43  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.43  																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.43  																																			|
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.43  																																				|
% 113.68/81.43  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.43  																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.43  																																			| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 113.68/81.43  																																			|
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| Instantiating (1537) with all_495_0_759, all_495_1_760, all_495_2_761 yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (2669)  ~ (all_495_0_759 = all_495_1_760) &  ~ (all_495_2_761 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_759 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_760 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_761 & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_760, all_495_0_759) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_761, all_83_0_38)
% 113.68/81.43  																																				|
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2669) yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (2670)  ~ (all_495_2_761 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (2671)  ~ (all_495_0_759 = all_495_1_760)
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (2672) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_759
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (2673) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_761, all_83_0_38)
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (2674) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_760
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (2675) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_760, all_495_0_759)
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (2676) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_761
% 113.68/81.43  																																				|
% 113.68/81.43  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.43  																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.43  																																				|
% 113.68/81.43  																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.43  																																					| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.43  																																					|
% 113.68/81.43  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.43  																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.43  																																				| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 113.68/81.43  																																				|
% 113.68/81.43  																																					| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_762, all_501_1_763, all_501_2_764 yields:
% 113.68/81.43  																																					| (2681)  ~ (all_501_0_762 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_763 = all_501_2_764) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_763 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_764 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_762 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_764, all_501_1_763) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_762)
% 113.68/81.44  																																					|
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2681) yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (2682)  ~ (all_501_0_762 = all_102_1_48)
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (2683) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_764, all_501_1_763)
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (2684) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_762
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (2685) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_764
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (2686)  ~ (all_501_1_763 = all_501_2_764)
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (2687) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_763
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (2688) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_762)
% 113.68/81.44  																																					|
% 113.68/81.44  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.44  																																					|
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.44  																																						|
% 113.68/81.44  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.44  																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.44  																																					| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.44  																																					|
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| Instantiating (1572) with all_507_0_765, all_507_1_766 yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| (2693)  ~ (all_507_0_765 = all_507_1_766) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_765 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_766
% 113.68/81.44  																																						|
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (2693) yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| (2694)  ~ (all_507_0_765 = all_507_1_766)
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| (2695) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_765
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| (2696) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_766
% 113.68/81.44  																																						|
% 113.68/81.44  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																						| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.44  																																						|
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| From (2697) and (363) follows:
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| (2698) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46
% 113.68/81.44  																																							|
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| From (2697) and (1274) follows:
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 113.68/81.44  																																							|
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| From (2697) and (252) follows:
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| (2643) sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm)
% 113.68/81.44  																																							|
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 113.68/81.44  																																							|
% 113.68/81.44  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.44  																																							|
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.44  																																								|
% 113.68/81.44  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.44  																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.44  																																							| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 113.68/81.44  																																							|
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| Instantiating (1502) with all_517_0_767, all_517_1_768, all_517_2_769 yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (2706)  ~ (all_517_0_767 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_517_1_768 = all_517_2_769) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_767 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_768 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_769 & sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_769, all_517_1_768) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_767)
% 113.68/81.44  																																								|
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (2706) yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (2707) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_767
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (2708) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_768
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (2709) sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_769, all_517_1_768)
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (2710)  ~ (all_517_1_768 = all_517_2_769)
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (2711)  ~ (all_517_0_767 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (2712) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_767)
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (2713) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_769
% 113.68/81.44  																																								|
% 113.68/81.44  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.44  																																								|
% 113.68/81.44  																																									| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																									| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.44  																																									|
% 113.68/81.44  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.44  																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.44  																																								| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 113.68/81.44  																																								|
% 113.68/81.44  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																									|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.44  																																									|
% 113.68/81.44  																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																										| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.44  																																										|
% 113.68/81.44  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.44  																																									|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.44  																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.44  																																									| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 113.68/81.44  																																									|
% 113.68/81.44  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																										|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.44  																																										|
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.44  																																											|
% 113.68/81.44  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.44  																																										|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.44  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.44  																																										| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 113.68/81.44  																																										|
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| Instantiating (1587) with all_533_0_773, all_533_1_774, all_533_2_775 yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (2726)  ~ (all_533_0_773 = all_533_1_774) &  ~ (all_533_2_775 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_775 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_773 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_774 & sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_774, all_533_0_773) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_775)
% 113.68/81.44  																																											|
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2726) yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (2727) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_775
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (2728) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_774
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (2729) sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_774, all_533_0_773)
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (2730) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_773
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (2731) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_775)
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (2732)  ~ (all_533_0_773 = all_533_1_774)
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (2733)  ~ (all_533_2_775 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.68/81.44  																																											|
% 113.68/81.44  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																											|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.44  																																											|
% 113.68/81.44  																																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																												| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.44  																																												|
% 113.68/81.44  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.44  																																											|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.44  																																											| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 113.68/81.44  																																											|
% 113.68/81.44  																																												| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 113.68/81.44  																																												| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 113.68/81.44  																																												|
% 113.68/81.44  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																												|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.44  																																												|
% 113.68/81.44  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																													| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.44  																																													|
% 113.68/81.44  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.44  																																												|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.44  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.44  																																												| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.68/81.44  																																												|
% 113.68/81.44  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																													|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.44  																																													|
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.44  																																														|
% 113.68/81.44  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.44  																																													|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.44  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.44  																																													| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.68/81.44  																																													|
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| Instantiating (1421) with all_549_0_779, all_549_1_780, all_549_2_781 yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (2747)  ~ (all_549_0_779 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_549_1_780 = all_549_2_781) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_780 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_781 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_779 & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_779, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_781, all_549_1_780)
% 113.68/81.44  																																														|
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (2747) yields:
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (2748)  ~ (all_549_1_780 = all_549_2_781)
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (2749) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_779
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (2750) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_779, all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (2751) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_781, all_549_1_780)
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (2752)  ~ (all_549_0_779 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (2753) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_781
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (2754) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_780
% 113.68/81.44  																																														|
% 113.68/81.44  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1391), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.44  																																														|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.44  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.44  																																														|
% 113.68/81.44  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.44  																																															| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.45  																																															|
% 113.68/81.45  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.45  																																														|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.45  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.45  																																														| (1456)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 113.68/81.45  																																														|
% 113.68/81.45  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.45  																																															|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.45  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																															|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.45  																																																|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.45  																																															|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.45  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.45  																																															| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 113.68/81.45  																																															|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1382), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.45  																																																|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																| (1392) xr = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| Combining equations (310,1392) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| (1371) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.45  																																																|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																| (1396)  ~ (xr = sz10)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																| (1397)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 113.68/81.45  																																																|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| Equations (310) can reduce 1396 to:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 113.68/81.45  																																																		|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating (1411) with all_577_0_789, all_577_1_790, all_577_2_791 yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2778)  ~ (all_577_0_789 = all_577_1_790) &  ~ (all_577_2_791 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_791 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_789 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_790 & sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_790, all_577_0_789) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_791)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (2778) yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2779) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_791
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2780) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_789
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2781) sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_791)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2782)  ~ (all_577_0_789 = all_577_1_790)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2783)  ~ (all_577_2_791 = all_97_2_46)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2784) sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_790, all_577_0_789)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2785) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_790
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| From (2697) and (2785) follows:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2786) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_790
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_517_2_769, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_769, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2787) all_517_2_769 = all_83_2_40
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_759, all_517_2_769 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_769, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_759, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2788) all_517_2_769 = all_495_0_759
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, sz10, all_517_2_769 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_769, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2789) all_517_2_769 = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_549_0_779, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_779, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2790) all_549_0_779 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_533_1_774, all_577_1_790 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_790, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_774, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2791) all_577_1_790 = all_533_1_774
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_533_1_774, all_549_0_779 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_779, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_774, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2792) all_549_0_779 = all_533_1_774
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_766, all_549_0_779 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_779, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_766, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2793) all_549_0_779 = all_507_1_766
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_490_1_757, all_577_1_790 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_790, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_757, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2794) all_577_1_790 = all_490_1_757
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_484_0_754, all_533_1_774 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_774, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_754, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2795) all_533_1_774 = all_484_0_754
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_97_2_46, all_484_0_754 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_754, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2796) all_484_0_754 = all_97_2_46
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn), sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2791,2794) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2798) all_533_1_774 = all_490_1_757
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Simplifying 2798 yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2799) all_533_1_774 = all_490_1_757
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2792,2793) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2800) all_533_1_774 = all_507_1_766
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Simplifying 2800 yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2801) all_533_1_774 = all_507_1_766
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2790,2793) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2802) all_507_1_766 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2801,2799) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2803) all_507_1_766 = all_490_1_757
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Simplifying 2803 yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2804) all_507_1_766 = all_490_1_757
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2795,2799) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2805) all_490_1_757 = all_484_0_754
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2789,2788) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2806) all_495_0_759 = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2787,2788) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2807) all_495_0_759 = all_83_2_40
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2804,2802) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2808) all_490_1_757 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Simplifying 2808 yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2809) all_490_1_757 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2806,2807) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2392) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2805,2809) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2811) all_484_0_754 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Simplifying 2811 yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2812) all_484_0_754 = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Combining equations (2796,2812) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2813) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Equations (2392) can reduce 1158 to:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| From (1370) and (2698) follows:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2816) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_97_2_46
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| From (2392) and (337) follows:
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.45  																																																			| From (2813) and (1198) follows:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			| (2818) aNaturalNumber0(all_97_2_46)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			| From (1370) and (107) follows:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			| From (1370) and (1748) follows:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			| (2820)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (1371) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			| (1769)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| Instantiating (1769) with all_593_0_794, all_593_1_795 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (2827)  ~ (all_593_0_794 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_593_1_795 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_593_0_794 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_593_1_795
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (2827) yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (2828)  ~ (all_593_0_794 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (2829)  ~ (all_593_1_795 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (2830) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_593_0_794
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (2831) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_593_1_795
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| Equations (1370) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (519), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (1371) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				| (2022)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| Instantiating (2022) with all_605_0_796, all_605_1_797 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (2839)  ~ (all_605_0_796 = all_605_1_797) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_605_1_797 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_605_0_796
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (2839) yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (2840)  ~ (all_605_0_796 = all_605_1_797)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (2841) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_605_1_797
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (2842) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_605_0_796
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| Equations (1370) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (497), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| (1371) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					| (1885)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| Equations (1370) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2630), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| (1371) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						| (2856)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 113.68/81.46  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| Equations (1370) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| (1371) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							| (2139)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| Equations (1370) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (518), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (1371) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								| (2259)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Instantiating (2259) with all_628_0_803, all_628_1_804 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2871)  ~ (all_628_0_803 = all_628_1_804) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_628_0_803 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_628_1_804
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (2871) yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2872)  ~ (all_628_0_803 = all_628_1_804)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2873) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_628_0_803
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2874) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_628_1_804
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_628_1_804, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_628_1_804, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2875) all_628_1_804 = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_605_0_796, all_628_1_804 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_628_1_804, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_605_0_796, yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2876) all_628_1_804 = all_605_0_796
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_593_1_795, all_605_0_796 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_605_0_796, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_593_1_795, yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2877) all_605_0_796 = all_593_1_795
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_97_2_46, all_593_1_795 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_593_1_795, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_97_2_46, yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2878) all_593_1_795 = all_97_2_46
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Combining equations (2876,2875) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2879) all_605_0_796 = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Simplifying 2879 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2880) all_605_0_796 = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Combining equations (2877,2880) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2881) all_593_1_795 = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Simplifying 2881 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2882) all_593_1_795 = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Combining equations (2878,2882) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2883) all_97_2_46 = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Simplifying 2883 yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2884) all_97_2_46 = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| From (2884) and (2816) follows:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| From (2884) and (2818) follows:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| Instantiating formula (22) with sz10, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10),  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10), yields:
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									| (1719) $false
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.46  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																						| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.47  																																						| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 113.68/81.47  																																						|
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_809, all_513_1_810, all_513_2_811 yields:
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (2890)  ~ (all_513_0_809 = all_513_1_810) &  ~ (all_513_2_811 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_809 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_810 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_811 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_810, all_513_0_809) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_811)
% 113.68/81.47  																																							|
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (2890) yields:
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (2891) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_811
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (2892)  ~ (all_513_2_811 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (2893) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_810, all_513_0_809)
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (2894) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_811)
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (2895) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_809
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (2896) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_810
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (2897)  ~ (all_513_0_809 = all_513_1_810)
% 113.68/81.47  																																							|
% 113.68/81.47  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.47  																																							|
% 113.68/81.47  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																								| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																								|
% 113.68/81.47  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.47  																																							| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 113.68/81.47  																																							|
% 113.68/81.47  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.47  																																								|
% 113.68/81.47  																																									| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																									| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																									|
% 113.68/81.47  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 113.68/81.47  																																								| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 113.68/81.47  																																								|
% 113.68/81.47  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																									|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.47  																																									|
% 113.68/81.47  																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																										| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																										|
% 113.68/81.47  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																									|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.47  																																									| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 113.68/81.47  																																									|
% 113.68/81.47  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																										|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.47  																																										|
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																											|
% 113.68/81.47  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																										|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.47  																																										| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 113.68/81.47  																																										|
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_818, all_535_1_819, all_535_2_820 yields:
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2914)  ~ (all_535_0_818 = all_535_1_819) &  ~ (all_535_2_820 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_820 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_818 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_819 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_819, all_535_0_818) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_820)
% 113.68/81.47  																																											|
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2914) yields:
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2915) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_820
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2916) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_818
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2917)  ~ (all_535_2_820 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2918)  ~ (all_535_0_818 = all_535_1_819)
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2919) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_819
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2920) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_819, all_535_0_818)
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2921) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_820)
% 113.68/81.47  																																											|
% 113.68/81.47  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																											|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.47  																																											|
% 113.68/81.47  																																												| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																												| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																												|
% 113.68/81.47  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																											|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.47  																																											| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 113.68/81.47  																																											|
% 113.68/81.47  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																												|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																												| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.47  																																												|
% 113.68/81.47  																																													| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																													| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																													|
% 113.68/81.47  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																												|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																												| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.47  																																												| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 113.68/81.47  																																												|
% 113.68/81.47  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																													|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.47  																																													|
% 113.68/81.47  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																														| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																														|
% 113.68/81.47  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																													|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.47  																																													| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.68/81.47  																																													|
% 113.68/81.47  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																														|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.47  																																														|
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																															|
% 113.68/81.47  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																														|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.47  																																														| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 113.68/81.47  																																														|
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_829, all_559_1_830 yields:
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| (2938)  ~ (all_559_0_829 = all_559_1_830) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_830 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_829
% 113.68/81.47  																																															|
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| Applying alpha-rule on (2938) yields:
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| (2939)  ~ (all_559_0_829 = all_559_1_830)
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| (2940) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_830
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| (2941) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_829
% 113.68/81.47  																																															|
% 113.68/81.47  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																															|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.47  																																															|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																																|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																															|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.47  																																															| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.47  																																															|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																																|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.47  																																																|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																																|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.47  																																																| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.68/81.47  																																																|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 113.68/81.47  																																																	|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																			| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.47  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.47  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.47  																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																		| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 113.68/81.48  																																																		|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																			| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.48  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																			| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																			| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 113.68/81.48  																																																			|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																				|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1017), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					| (1739) all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| Combining equations (1287,1739) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| (2967) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| Simplifying 2967 yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					| (1742)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					| (2971) all_214_0_128 = xp
% 113.68/81.48  																																																					|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| Combining equations (1361,2971) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																						|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																							|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 113.68/81.48  																																																								|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																									|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_854, all_623_1_855 yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| (2990)  ~ (all_623_0_854 = all_623_1_855) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_854 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_855
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (2990) yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| (2991)  ~ (all_623_0_854 = all_623_1_855)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| (2992) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_854
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| (2993) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_855
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 113.68/81.48  																																																										|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_856, all_633_1_857, all_633_2_858 yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (2998)  ~ (all_633_0_856 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_857 = all_633_2_858) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_857 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_858 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_856 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_856, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_858, all_633_1_857)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (2998) yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (2999) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_856, all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (3000) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_856
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (3001) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_857
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (3002)  ~ (all_633_1_857 = all_633_2_858)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (3003) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_858, all_633_1_857)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (3004)  ~ (all_633_0_856 = all_0_4_4)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (3005) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_858
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																											|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 113.68/81.48  																																																												|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_854, all_633_1_857 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_857, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_854, yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3014) all_633_1_857 = all_623_0_854
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_830, all_623_0_854 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_854, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_830, yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3015) all_623_0_854 = all_559_1_830
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_820, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_820, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3016) all_535_2_820 = all_0_4_4
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_820, all_559_1_830 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_830, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_820, yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3017) all_559_1_830 = all_535_2_820
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_810, all_535_2_820 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_820, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_810, yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3018) all_535_2_820 = all_513_1_810
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_763, all_535_2_820 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_820, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_763, yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3019) all_535_2_820 = all_501_1_763
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_755, all_633_1_857 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_857, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_755, yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3020) all_633_1_857 = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_513_1_810 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_810, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3021) all_513_1_810 = xm
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn), sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Combining equations (3014,3020) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3023) all_623_0_854 = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| Simplifying 3023 yields:
% 113.68/81.48  																																																													| (3024) all_623_0_854 = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3015,3024) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3025) all_559_1_830 = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Simplifying 3025 yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3026) all_559_1_830 = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3017,3026) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3027) all_535_2_820 = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Simplifying 3027 yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3028) all_535_2_820 = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3018,3019) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3029) all_513_1_810 = all_501_1_763
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Simplifying 3029 yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3030) all_513_1_810 = all_501_1_763
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3016,3019) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3031) all_501_1_763 = all_0_4_4
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3028,3019) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3032) all_501_1_763 = all_484_1_755
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3030,3021) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3033) all_501_1_763 = xm
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Simplifying 3033 yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3034) all_501_1_763 = xm
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3034,3032) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3035) all_484_1_755 = xm
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3031,3032) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3036) all_484_1_755 = all_0_4_4
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (3036,3035) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3037) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Simplifying 3037 yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Combining equations (1370,2697) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (3039) all_0_4_4 = xn
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| Equations (3039,1370) can reduce 2888 to:
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.49  																										|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.49  																										| (3041)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, xr)
% 113.68/81.49  																										| (3042) sdtlseqdt0(xr, all_0_0_0)
% 113.68/81.49  																										|
% 113.68/81.49  																											| From (1287)(310) and (3041) follows:
% 113.68/81.49  																											| (3043)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn)
% 113.68/81.49  																											|
% 113.68/81.49  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.49  																											|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.49  																											| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.49  																											|
% 113.68/81.49  																												| From (1379) and (3043) follows:
% 113.68/81.49  																												| (3045)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz00)
% 113.68/81.49  																												|
% 113.68/81.49  																												| Using (1326) and (3045) yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																												| (1719) $false
% 113.68/81.49  																												|
% 113.68/81.49  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.49  																											|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.49  																											| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.49  																											| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 113.68/81.49  																											|
% 113.68/81.49  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.49  																												|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.49  																												| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.49  																												|
% 113.68/81.49  																													| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.49  																													| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.49  																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.49  																												|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.49  																												| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.49  																												| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 113.68/81.49  																												|
% 113.68/81.49  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.49  																													|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.49  																													| (1377) xr = sz00
% 113.68/81.49  																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																														| Combining equations (1377,310) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																														| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.49  																														|
% 113.68/81.49  																														| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.49  																														| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.49  																														|
% 113.68/81.49  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.49  																													|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.49  																													| (1381)  ~ (xr = sz00)
% 113.68/81.49  																													| (1382) xr = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 113.68/81.49  																													|
% 113.68/81.49  																														| Equations (310) can reduce 1381 to:
% 113.68/81.49  																														| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.49  																														|
% 113.68/81.49  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.49  																														|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.49  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 113.68/81.49  																														|
% 113.68/81.49  																															| From (1336) and (1172) follows:
% 113.68/81.49  																															| (1762) sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00
% 113.68/81.49  																															|
% 113.68/81.49  																															| From (1336) and (494) follows:
% 113.68/81.49  																															| (1764) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_102_2_49
% 113.68/81.49  																															|
% 113.68/81.49  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (521), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.49  																															|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.49  																															| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.49  																															|
% 113.68/81.49  																																| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.49  																																| (1378) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.49  																																|
% 113.68/81.49  																																| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																																| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.49  																																|
% 113.68/81.49  																																| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.49  																																| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.49  																																|
% 113.68/81.49  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.49  																															|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.49  																															| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 113.68/81.49  																															| (1581)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.49  																															|
% 113.68/81.49  																																| Instantiating (1581) with all_476_0_866, all_476_1_867 yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																																| (3068)  ~ (all_476_0_866 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (all_476_1_867 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_476_0_866 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_476_1_867
% 113.68/81.49  																																|
% 113.68/81.49  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (3068) yields:
% 113.68/81.49  																																| (3069)  ~ (all_476_0_866 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.68/81.49  																																| (3070)  ~ (all_476_1_867 = all_83_0_38)
% 113.68/81.49  																																| (3071) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_476_0_866
% 113.68/81.50  																																| (3072) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_476_1_867
% 113.68/81.50  																																|
% 113.68/81.50  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																|
% 113.68/81.50  																																| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																|
% 113.68/81.50  																																| From (1336) and (3072) follows:
% 113.68/81.50  																																| (3075) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_476_1_867
% 113.68/81.50  																																|
% 113.68/81.50  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.50  																																|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.50  																																| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.68/81.50  																																|
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																	|
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.50  																																	|
% 113.68/81.50  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.50  																																|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.50  																																| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 113.68/81.50  																																| (1497)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 113.68/81.50  																																|
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																	|
% 113.68/81.50  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.50  																																	|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.50  																																	|
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.50  																																	|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.50  																																	| (2139)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.68/81.50  																																	|
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|
% 113.68/81.50  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| Combining equations (1200,1434) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (1838) xp = xm
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| Simplifying 1838 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (1368) xp = xm
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (173) xp = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 113.68/81.50  																																		| (1485)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 113.68/81.50  																																		|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| Instantiating (1485) with all_494_0_872, all_494_1_873 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (3097)  ~ (all_494_0_872 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (all_494_1_873 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_494_0_872 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_494_1_873
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (3097) yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (3098)  ~ (all_494_0_872 = all_102_2_49)
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (3099)  ~ (all_494_1_873 = sz10)
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (3100) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_494_0_872
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (3101) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_494_1_873
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| From (1336) and (3101) follows:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (3102) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_873
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (497), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.50  																																			| (1885)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 113.68/81.50  																																			|
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|
% 113.68/81.50  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (1378) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 113.68/81.50  																																				| (1427)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 113.68/81.50  																																				|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| Instantiating (1427) with all_506_0_876, all_506_1_877 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (3117)  ~ (all_506_0_876 = all_506_1_877) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_506_0_876 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_506_1_877
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (3117) yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (3118)  ~ (all_506_0_876 = all_506_1_877)
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (3119) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_506_0_876
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (3120) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_506_1_877
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| From (1336) and (3119) follows:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (3123) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_876
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (1334) xm = sz10
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 113.68/81.50  																																					| (1769)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 113.68/81.50  																																					|
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|
% 113.68/81.50  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|-Branch one:
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| (1370) xm = xn
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|
% 113.68/81.50  																																							| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 113.68/81.50  																																							| (1378) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																							|
% 113.68/81.50  																																							| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 113.68/81.50  																																							| (1379) xn = sz00
% 113.68/81.50  																																							|
% 113.68/81.50  																																							| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 113.68/81.50  																																							| (174) $false
% 113.68/81.50  																																							|
% 113.68/81.50  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 113.68/81.50  																																						|-Branch two:
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 113.68/81.50  																																						| (1462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 114.05/81.50  																																						|
% 114.05/81.50  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 114.05/81.50  																																							| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.05/81.50  																																							|
% 114.05/81.50  																																							| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 114.05/81.50  																																							| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.05/81.50  																																							|
% 114.05/81.50  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.50  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.50  																																							| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.05/81.50  																																							|
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.50  																																								|
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.50  																																								|
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.50  																																								|
% 114.05/81.50  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.50  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.50  																																							| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.05/81.50  																																							| (2196)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 114.05/81.50  																																							|
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.50  																																								|
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.50  																																								|
% 114.05/81.50  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (518), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.50  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.50  																																								| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.05/81.50  																																								|
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.51  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.51  																																								| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.05/81.51  																																								| (2259)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 114.05/81.51  																																								|
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|
% 114.05/81.51  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (501), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (1378) xn = sz00
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 114.05/81.51  																																									| (1446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 114.05/81.51  																																									|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Instantiating (1446) with all_572_0_898, all_572_1_899 yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3162)  ~ (all_572_0_898 = all_572_1_899) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_572_1_899 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_572_0_898
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (3162) yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3163)  ~ (all_572_0_898 = all_572_1_899)
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3164) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_572_1_899
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3165) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_572_0_898
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| From (1336) and (3164) follows:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3166) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_899
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Instantiating formula (87) with all_52_0_18, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_102_2_49), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (2293) all_102_2_49 = sz00
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_506_0_876, all_572_1_899 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_899, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_876, yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3168) all_572_1_899 = all_506_0_876
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_494_1_873, all_506_0_876 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_876, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_873, yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3169) all_506_0_876 = all_494_1_873
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Instantiating formula (26) with all_494_1_873, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_873, aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3170) all_494_1_873 = sz10
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_476_1_867, all_572_1_899 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_899, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_476_1_867, yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3171) all_572_1_899 = all_476_1_867
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_102_2_49, all_494_1_873 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_873, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3172) all_494_1_873 = all_102_2_49
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Combining equations (3168,3171) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3173) all_506_0_876 = all_476_1_867
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Simplifying 3173 yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3174) all_506_0_876 = all_476_1_867
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Combining equations (3169,3174) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3175) all_494_1_873 = all_476_1_867
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Simplifying 3175 yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3176) all_494_1_873 = all_476_1_867
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Combining equations (3172,3176) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3177) all_476_1_867 = all_102_2_49
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Combining equations (3170,3176) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3178) all_476_1_867 = sz10
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Combining equations (3177,3178) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (3179) all_102_2_49 = sz10
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Simplifying 3179 yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (2388) all_102_2_49 = sz10
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Combining equations (2293,2388) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.51  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|
% 114.05/81.51  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.51  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.51  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.05/81.51  																														| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.05/81.51  																														|
% 114.05/81.51  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.51  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.51  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.05/81.51  																															|
% 114.05/81.51  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.05/81.51  																																| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.51  																																|
% 114.05/81.51  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.51  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.51  																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.05/81.51  																															| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 114.05/81.51  																															|
% 114.05/81.51  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.51  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.51  																																| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.05/81.51  																																|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.51  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.51  																																| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.05/81.51  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.05/81.51  																																|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| From (1361) and (584) follows:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (3194) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| From (1361) and (1213) follows:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| From (1361) and (265) follows:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (3197) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| From (1361) and (1330) follows:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.51  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.51  																																		|
% 114.05/81.51  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.51  																																	| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 114.05/81.51  																																	|
% 114.05/81.51  																																		| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_900, all_484_1_901 yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																		| (3203)  ~ (all_484_0_900 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_901 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_901 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.51  																																		|
% 114.05/81.51  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (3203) yields:
% 114.05/81.51  																																		| (3204)  ~ (all_484_0_900 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.51  																																		| (3205)  ~ (all_484_1_901 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.05/81.51  																																		| (3206) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_901
% 114.05/81.52  																																		| (3207) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.52  																																		|
% 114.05/81.52  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.52  																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.52  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.52  																																		|
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.52  																																			|
% 114.05/81.52  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.52  																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.52  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.52  																																		| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 114.05/81.52  																																		|
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| Instantiating (1452) with all_490_0_902, all_490_1_903, all_490_2_904 yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (3212)  ~ (all_490_0_902 = all_490_1_903) &  ~ (all_490_2_904 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_904 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_902 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_903 & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_903, all_490_0_902) & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_904, all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.52  																																			|
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (3212) yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (3213)  ~ (all_490_0_902 = all_490_1_903)
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (3214) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_903
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (3215) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_902
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (3216)  ~ (all_490_2_904 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (3217) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_904
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (3218) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_903, all_490_0_902)
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (3219) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_904, all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.52  																																			|
% 114.05/81.52  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.52  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.52  																																			|
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.52  																																				|
% 114.05/81.52  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.52  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.52  																																			| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 114.05/81.52  																																			|
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| Instantiating (1537) with all_495_0_905, all_495_1_906, all_495_2_907 yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (3224)  ~ (all_495_0_905 = all_495_1_906) &  ~ (all_495_2_907 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_905 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_906 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_907 & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_906, all_495_0_905) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_907, all_83_0_38)
% 114.05/81.52  																																				|
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (3224) yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (3225) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_906, all_495_0_905)
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (3226)  ~ (all_495_2_907 = all_83_0_38)
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (3227) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_905
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (3228)  ~ (all_495_0_905 = all_495_1_906)
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (3229) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_907, all_83_0_38)
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (3230) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_907
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (3231) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_906
% 114.05/81.52  																																				|
% 114.05/81.52  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.52  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.52  																																				|
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.52  																																					|
% 114.05/81.52  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.52  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.52  																																				| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 114.05/81.52  																																				|
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_908, all_501_1_909, all_501_2_910 yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (3236)  ~ (all_501_0_908 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_909 = all_501_2_910) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_909 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_910 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_908 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_910, all_501_1_909) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_908)
% 114.05/81.52  																																					|
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (3236) yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (3237)  ~ (all_501_1_909 = all_501_2_910)
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (3238) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_908)
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (3239) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_910
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (3240)  ~ (all_501_0_908 = all_102_1_48)
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (3241) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_909
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (3242) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_910, all_501_1_909)
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (3243) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_908
% 114.05/81.52  																																					|
% 114.05/81.52  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.52  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.52  																																					|
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.52  																																						|
% 114.05/81.52  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.52  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.52  																																					| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.05/81.52  																																					|
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| Instantiating (1572) with all_507_0_911, all_507_1_912 yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| (3248)  ~ (all_507_0_911 = all_507_1_912) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_911 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_912
% 114.05/81.52  																																						|
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (3248) yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| (3249)  ~ (all_507_0_911 = all_507_1_912)
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| (3250) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_911
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| (3251) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_912
% 114.05/81.52  																																						|
% 114.05/81.52  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.52  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.52  																																						| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.52  																																						|
% 114.05/81.52  																																							| From (2697) and (1274) follows:
% 114.05/81.52  																																							| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 114.05/81.52  																																							|
% 114.05/81.52  																																							| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 114.05/81.52  																																							| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 114.05/81.52  																																							|
% 114.05/81.52  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.52  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.52  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.52  																																							|
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.52  																																								|
% 114.05/81.52  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.52  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.52  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.52  																																							| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 114.05/81.52  																																							|
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| Instantiating (1502) with all_517_0_913, all_517_1_914, all_517_2_915 yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (3259)  ~ (all_517_0_913 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_517_1_914 = all_517_2_915) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_913 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_914 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_915 & sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_915, all_517_1_914) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_913)
% 114.05/81.52  																																								|
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (3259) yields:
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (3260) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_913)
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (3261) sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_915, all_517_1_914)
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (3262) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_914
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (3263)  ~ (all_517_1_914 = all_517_2_915)
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (3264) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_913
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (3265)  ~ (all_517_0_913 = all_83_0_38)
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (3266) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_915
% 114.05/81.52  																																								|
% 114.05/81.52  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.52  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.52  																																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.05/81.52  																																								|
% 114.05/81.53  																																									| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																									|
% 114.05/81.53  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.05/81.53  																																								| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 114.05/81.53  																																								|
% 114.05/81.53  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																									|
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																										|
% 114.05/81.53  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.53  																																									| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 114.05/81.53  																																									|
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| Instantiating (1549) with all_527_0_916, all_527_1_917, all_527_2_918 yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (3275)  ~ (all_527_0_916 = xp) &  ~ (all_527_1_917 = all_527_2_918) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = all_527_1_917 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_918 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = all_527_0_916 & sdtlseqdt0(all_527_2_918, all_527_1_917) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_527_0_916)
% 114.05/81.53  																																										|
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (3275) yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (3276) sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_527_0_916)
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (3277) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = all_527_1_917
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (3278) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_918
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (3279) sdtlseqdt0(all_527_2_918, all_527_1_917)
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (3280)  ~ (all_527_1_917 = all_527_2_918)
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (3281) sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = all_527_0_916
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (3282)  ~ (all_527_0_916 = xp)
% 114.05/81.53  																																										|
% 114.05/81.53  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																										|
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																											|
% 114.05/81.53  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.53  																																										| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 114.05/81.53  																																										|
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| Instantiating (1587) with all_533_0_919, all_533_1_920, all_533_2_921 yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (3287)  ~ (all_533_0_919 = all_533_1_920) &  ~ (all_533_2_921 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_921 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_919 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_920 & sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_920, all_533_0_919) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_921)
% 114.05/81.53  																																											|
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (3287) yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (3288) sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_920, all_533_0_919)
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (3289) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_919
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (3290) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_921
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (3291) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_921)
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (3292)  ~ (all_533_0_919 = all_533_1_920)
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (3293)  ~ (all_533_2_921 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (3294) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_920
% 114.05/81.53  																																											|
% 114.05/81.53  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																											|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.05/81.53  																																											|
% 114.05/81.53  																																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																												| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																												|
% 114.05/81.53  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																											|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.05/81.53  																																											| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 114.05/81.53  																																											|
% 114.05/81.53  																																												| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 114.05/81.53  																																												| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 114.05/81.53  																																												|
% 114.05/81.53  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																												|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																												|
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																													|
% 114.05/81.53  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																												|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.53  																																												| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.05/81.53  																																												|
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| Instantiating (1433) with all_543_0_922, all_543_1_923, all_543_2_924 yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (3304)  ~ (all_543_0_922 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (all_543_1_923 = all_543_2_924) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_543_1_923 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_922 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_924 & sdtlseqdt0(all_543_0_922, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(all_543_2_924, all_543_1_923)
% 114.05/81.53  																																													|
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (3304) yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (3305) sdtlseqdt0(all_543_0_922, all_83_2_40)
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (3306) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_924
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (3307)  ~ (all_543_1_923 = all_543_2_924)
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (3308) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_922
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (3309) sdtlseqdt0(all_543_2_924, all_543_1_923)
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (3310) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_543_1_923
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (3311)  ~ (all_543_0_922 = all_83_2_40)
% 114.05/81.53  																																													|
% 114.05/81.53  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																													|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																													|
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																														|
% 114.05/81.53  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																													|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.53  																																													| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.05/81.53  																																													|
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| Instantiating (1421) with all_549_0_925, all_549_1_926, all_549_2_927 yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (3316)  ~ (all_549_0_925 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_549_1_926 = all_549_2_927) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_926 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_927 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_925 & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_925, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_927, all_549_1_926)
% 114.05/81.53  																																														|
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (3316) yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (3317)  ~ (all_549_1_926 = all_549_2_927)
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (3318)  ~ (all_549_0_925 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (3319) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_926
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (3320) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_927, all_549_1_926)
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (3321) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_927
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (3322) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_925, all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (3323) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_925
% 114.05/81.53  																																														|
% 114.05/81.53  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1391), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																														|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																														|
% 114.05/81.53  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																															| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																															|
% 114.05/81.53  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																														|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.53  																																														| (1456)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.05/81.53  																																														|
% 114.05/81.53  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																															|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																															|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																																|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																															|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.53  																																															| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 114.05/81.53  																																															|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1382), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																																|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																| (1392) xr = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																																|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| Combining equations (310,1392) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| (1371) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																																|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																| (1396)  ~ (xr = sz10)
% 114.05/81.53  																																																| (1397)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.05/81.53  																																																|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| Equations (310) can reduce 1396 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																		| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.53  																																																		|
% 114.05/81.53  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.53  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.54  																																																	| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.05/81.54  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.54  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.54  																																																		|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.54  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.54  																																																		| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 114.05/81.54  																																																		|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating (1411) with all_577_0_935, all_577_1_936, all_577_2_937 yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3347)  ~ (all_577_0_935 = all_577_1_936) &  ~ (all_577_2_937 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_937 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_935 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_936 & sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_936, all_577_0_935) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_937)
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (3347) yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3348) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_936
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3349) sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_936, all_577_0_935)
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3350)  ~ (all_577_0_935 = all_577_1_936)
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3351) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_935
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3352) sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_937)
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3353)  ~ (all_577_2_937 = all_97_2_46)
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3354) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_937
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| From (2697) and (3348) follows:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3355) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_936
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with all_52_0_18, sz10, xn, all_527_2_918 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_918, sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3356) all_527_2_918 = xn
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_905, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_905, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3357) all_495_0_905 = all_83_2_40
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_905, all_517_2_915 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_915, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_905, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3358) all_517_2_915 = all_495_0_905
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, sz10, all_517_2_915 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_915, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3359) all_517_2_915 = sz10
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (77) with xn, all_166_0_68, all_52_0_18, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_166_0_68) = xn, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_166_0_68), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3360) all_166_0_68 = all_52_0_18
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_577_1_936, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_936, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3361) all_577_1_936 = all_102_2_49
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_533_1_920, all_549_0_925 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_925, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_920, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3362) all_549_0_925 = all_533_1_920
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_912, all_577_1_936 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_936, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_912, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3363) all_577_1_936 = all_507_1_912
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_912, all_533_1_920 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_920, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_912, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3364) all_533_1_920 = all_507_1_912
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_490_1_903, all_577_1_936 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_936, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_903, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3365) all_577_1_936 = all_490_1_903
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_484_0_900, all_549_0_925 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_925, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_900, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3366) all_549_0_925 = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_97_2_46, all_577_1_936 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_936, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3367) all_577_1_936 = all_97_2_46
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_543_2_924, all_543_0_922 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_922, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_924, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3368) all_543_0_922 = all_543_2_924
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_495_1_906, all_543_0_922 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_922, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_906, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3369) all_543_0_922 = all_495_1_906
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_495_2_907, all_543_2_924 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_924, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_907, yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3370) all_543_2_924 = all_495_2_907
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3367,3365) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3371) all_490_1_903 = all_97_2_46
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3361,3365) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3372) all_490_1_903 = all_102_2_49
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3363,3365) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3373) all_507_1_912 = all_490_1_903
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Simplifying 3373 yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3374) all_507_1_912 = all_490_1_903
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3362,3366) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3375) all_533_1_920 = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Simplifying 3375 yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3376) all_533_1_920 = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3368,3369) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3377) all_543_2_924 = all_495_1_906
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Simplifying 3377 yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3378) all_543_2_924 = all_495_1_906
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3370,3378) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3379) all_495_1_906 = all_495_2_907
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3364,3376) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3380) all_507_1_912 = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Simplifying 3380 yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3381) all_507_1_912 = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3358,3359) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3382) all_495_0_905 = sz10
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Simplifying 3382 yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3383) all_495_0_905 = sz10
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3374,3381) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3384) all_490_1_903 = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Simplifying 3384 yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3385) all_490_1_903 = all_484_0_900
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3357,3383) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3386) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Simplifying 3386 yields:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (2392) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3371,3385) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3388) all_484_0_900 = all_97_2_46
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| Combining equations (3372,3385) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			| (3389) all_484_0_900 = all_102_2_49
% 114.05/81.54  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Combining equations (3389,3388) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3390) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Simplifying 3390 yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (2813) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (3356) and (3278) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3194) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (2813) and (376) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (2698) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (2392) and (337) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (3360) and (619) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3197) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (2813) and (494) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (2392) and (504) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3397) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = sz10
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (3379) and (3231) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3230) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_907
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (2392) and (1194) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (239) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (3360) and (620) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (266) aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| From (2392) and (1199) follows:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (22) with sz10, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (1366) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (61) with sz00, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3403)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xn, v0) = sz00 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (7) with sz00, sz00, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3404) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz00) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, sz00))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (94) with sz00, sz00, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3405) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz00) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, sz00) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (67) with xn, all_52_0_18, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3406) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (67) with all_97_2_46, xm, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3407) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (67) with sz10, xn, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3408) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v0))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (97) with xn, all_52_0_18, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3409) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (97) with all_97_2_46, xm, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3410) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v2))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (97) with sz10, xn, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = sz10, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3411) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz10) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v2))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (67) with all_495_2_907, sz10, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_907, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3412) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_495_2_907) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_907, v0))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating formula (97) with all_495_2_907, sz10, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_907, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3413) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_495_2_907) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_907, v2))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Instantiating (3403) with all_645_0_965 yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3414) sdtpldt0(xn, all_645_0_965) = sz00 & aNaturalNumber0(all_645_0_965)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (3414) yields:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3415) sdtpldt0(xn, all_645_0_965) = sz00
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3416) aNaturalNumber0(all_645_0_965)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3410), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			| (3420)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v2))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3406), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				| (3424)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 114.05/81.55  																																																				|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3408), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																						| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																						| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.55  																																																						|
% 114.05/81.55  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.55  																																																					| (3428)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v0))
% 114.05/81.56  																																																					|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3405), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																						| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																						|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																						| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.56  																																																						| (3432)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz00) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, sz00) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.05/81.56  																																																						|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3409), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							| (3436)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 114.05/81.56  																																																							|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3404), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								| (3440)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz00) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, sz00))
% 114.05/81.56  																																																								|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3407), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									| (3444)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 114.05/81.56  																																																									|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3412), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										| (3448)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_495_2_907) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_907, v0))
% 114.05/81.56  																																																										|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3413), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											| (3452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_495_2_907) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_907, v2))
% 114.05/81.56  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3411), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												| (3456)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz10) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v2))
% 114.05/81.56  																																																												|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| Instantiating formula (2) with xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| Instantiating formula (87) with all_645_0_965, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_645_0_965) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_645_0_965), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													|
% 114.05/81.56  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																						| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.56  																																						| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 114.05/81.56  																																						|
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_1403, all_513_1_1404, all_513_2_1405 yields:
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (3464)  ~ (all_513_0_1403 = all_513_1_1404) &  ~ (all_513_2_1405 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_1403 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_1404 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_1405 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_1404, all_513_0_1403) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_1405)
% 114.05/81.56  																																							|
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (3464) yields:
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (3465)  ~ (all_513_0_1403 = all_513_1_1404)
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (3466)  ~ (all_513_2_1405 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (3467) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_1405
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (3468) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_1403
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (3469) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_1405)
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (3470) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_1404
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (3471) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_1404, all_513_0_1403)
% 114.05/81.56  																																							|
% 114.05/81.56  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.56  																																							|
% 114.05/81.56  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																								|
% 114.05/81.56  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.56  																																							| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 114.05/81.56  																																							|
% 114.05/81.56  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.56  																																								|
% 114.05/81.56  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																									|
% 114.05/81.56  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.56  																																								| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 114.05/81.56  																																								|
% 114.05/81.56  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.56  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.56  																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.56  																																									|
% 114.05/81.56  																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.56  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.56  																																										|
% 114.05/81.56  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.56  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.56  																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.56  																																									| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 114.05/81.56  																																									|
% 114.05/81.56  																																										| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_1412, all_535_1_1413, all_535_2_1414 yields:
% 114.05/81.56  																																										| (3484)  ~ (all_535_0_1412 = all_535_1_1413) &  ~ (all_535_2_1414 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_1414 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_1412 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_1413 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_1413, all_535_0_1412) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_1414)
% 114.05/81.56  																																										|
% 114.05/81.56  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (3484) yields:
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (3485) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_1412
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (3486)  ~ (all_535_0_1412 = all_535_1_1413)
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (3487) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_1414
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (3488) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_1413
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (3489) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_1414)
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (3490) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_1413, all_535_0_1412)
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (3491)  ~ (all_535_2_1414 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.05/81.57  																																										|
% 114.05/81.57  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.57  																																										|
% 114.05/81.57  																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																											| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																											|
% 114.05/81.57  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.57  																																										| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 114.05/81.57  																																										|
% 114.05/81.57  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																											|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																											| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.57  																																											|
% 114.05/81.57  																																												| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																												| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																												|
% 114.05/81.57  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																											|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																											| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.57  																																											| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.05/81.57  																																											|
% 114.05/81.57  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																												|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.57  																																												|
% 114.05/81.57  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																													| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																													|
% 114.05/81.57  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																												|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.57  																																												| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.05/81.57  																																												|
% 114.05/81.57  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																													|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.57  																																													|
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																														|
% 114.05/81.57  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																													|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.57  																																													| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.05/81.57  																																													|
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_1423, all_559_1_1424 yields:
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| (3508)  ~ (all_559_0_1423 = all_559_1_1424) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_1424 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_1423
% 114.05/81.57  																																														|
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (3508) yields:
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| (3509)  ~ (all_559_0_1423 = all_559_1_1424)
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| (3510) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_1424
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| (3511) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_1423
% 114.05/81.57  																																														|
% 114.05/81.57  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																														|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.57  																																														|
% 114.05/81.57  																																															| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																															| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																															|
% 114.05/81.57  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																														|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.57  																																														| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.05/81.57  																																														|
% 114.05/81.57  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																															|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																															| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.57  																																															|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																															|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																															| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.57  																																															| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.05/81.57  																																															|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																																|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.57  																																																|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																																|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 114.05/81.57  																																																|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 114.05/81.57  																																																	|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 114.05/81.57  																																																		|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																			|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																				|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																					|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 114.05/81.57  																																																						|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.05/81.57  																																																							|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_1448, all_623_1_1449 yields:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								| (3552)  ~ (all_623_0_1448 = all_623_1_1449) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_1448 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_1449
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								|
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (3552) yields:
% 114.05/81.57  																																																								| (3553)  ~ (all_623_0_1448 = all_623_1_1449)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								| (3554) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_1448
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								| (3555) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_1449
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.05/81.58  																																																								|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_1450, all_633_1_1451, all_633_2_1452 yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3560)  ~ (all_633_0_1450 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_1451 = all_633_2_1452) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_1451 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_1452 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_1450 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_1450, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_1452, all_633_1_1451)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (3560) yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3561) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_1450
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3562) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_1452
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3563) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_1451
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3564) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_1452, all_633_1_1451)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3565)  ~ (all_633_0_1450 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3566) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_1450, all_0_4_4)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3567)  ~ (all_633_1_1451 = all_633_2_1452)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																									|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 114.05/81.58  																																																										|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_1448, all_633_1_1451 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_1451, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_1448, yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3576) all_633_1_1451 = all_623_0_1448
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_1424, all_633_1_1451 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_1451, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_1424, yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3577) all_633_1_1451 = all_559_1_1424
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_1414, all_623_0_1448 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_1448, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_1414, yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3578) all_623_0_1448 = all_535_2_1414
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_1404, all_623_0_1448 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_1448, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_1404, yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3579) all_623_0_1448 = all_513_1_1404
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_909, all_623_0_1448 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_1448, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_909, yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3580) all_623_0_1448 = all_501_1_909
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_901, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_901, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3581) all_484_1_901 = all_0_4_4
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_901, all_623_0_1448 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_1448, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_901, yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3582) all_623_0_1448 = all_484_1_901
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_623_0_1448 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_1448, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3583) all_623_0_1448 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3576,3577) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3584) all_623_0_1448 = all_559_1_1424
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Simplifying 3584 yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3585) all_623_0_1448 = all_559_1_1424
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3579,3585) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3586) all_559_1_1424 = all_513_1_1404
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3582,3585) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3587) all_559_1_1424 = all_484_1_901
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3578,3585) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3588) all_559_1_1424 = all_535_2_1414
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3583,3585) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3589) all_559_1_1424 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3580,3585) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3590) all_559_1_1424 = all_501_1_909
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3587,3588) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3591) all_535_2_1414 = all_484_1_901
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3586,3588) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3592) all_535_2_1414 = all_513_1_1404
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3589,3588) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3593) all_535_2_1414 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3590,3588) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3594) all_535_2_1414 = all_501_1_909
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3593,3592) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3595) all_513_1_1404 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3591,3592) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3596) all_513_1_1404 = all_484_1_901
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3594,3592) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3597) all_513_1_1404 = all_501_1_909
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3595,3597) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3598) all_501_1_909 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3596,3597) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3599) all_501_1_909 = all_484_1_901
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3599,3598) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3600) all_484_1_901 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Simplifying 3600 yields:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (3601) all_484_1_901 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| Combining equations (3601,3581) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.05/81.58  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.59  																																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.05/81.59  																																																											| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																																																											|
% 114.05/81.59  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																								|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																								| (3604)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																								| (3605) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xp)
% 114.05/81.59  																								|
% 114.05/81.59  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																									|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																									| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																									|
% 114.05/81.59  																										| From (1336) and (479) follows:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																										| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (1719) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																									|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																									| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																									| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.05/81.59  																									|
% 114.05/81.59  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																										|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.05/81.59  																											| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																											|
% 114.05/81.59  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																										|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																											|
% 114.05/81.59  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.05/81.59  																												| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																												|
% 114.05/81.59  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.05/81.59  																											|
% 114.05/81.59  																												| From (1361) and (3604) follows:
% 114.05/81.59  																												| (3619)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																												|
% 114.05/81.59  																												| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 114.05/81.59  																												| (1719) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																												|
% 114.05/81.59  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																							|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																							| (3621)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xr, sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																							| (3622) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xr)
% 114.05/81.59  																							|
% 114.05/81.59  																								| From (310) and (3622) follows:
% 114.05/81.59  																								| (3623) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xn)
% 114.05/81.59  																								|
% 114.05/81.59  																								| From (310) and (3621) follows:
% 114.05/81.59  																								| (3619)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																								|
% 114.05/81.59  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																								|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																								| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																								|
% 114.05/81.59  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																									|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																									| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																									|
% 114.05/81.59  																										| From (1379) and (3623) follows:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (154) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																										| From (1379) and (3619) follows:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (3628)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																										| Using (154) and (3628) yields:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (1719) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																									|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																									| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																									| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.05/81.59  																									|
% 114.05/81.59  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																										|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																											| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.05/81.59  																											| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																											|
% 114.05/81.59  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																										|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																										| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 114.05/81.59  																										|
% 114.05/81.59  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																											| (1377) xr = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																											|
% 114.05/81.59  																												| Combining equations (1377,310) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.59  																												| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																												|
% 114.05/81.59  																												| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.05/81.59  																												| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																												|
% 114.05/81.59  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																											| (1381)  ~ (xr = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																											| (1382) xr = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.05/81.59  																											|
% 114.05/81.59  																												| Equations (310) can reduce 1381 to:
% 114.05/81.59  																												| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																												|
% 114.05/81.59  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																												|
% 114.05/81.59  																													| From (1336) and (1172) follows:
% 114.05/81.59  																													| (1762) sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																													|
% 114.05/81.59  																													| From (1336) and (494) follows:
% 114.05/81.59  																													| (1764) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_102_2_49
% 114.05/81.59  																													|
% 114.05/81.59  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (521), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.59  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.59  																													| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.05/81.59  																													|
% 114.05/81.59  																														| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (1378) xn = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																														|
% 114.05/81.59  																														| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.05/81.59  																														|
% 114.05/81.59  																														| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.59  																														|
% 114.05/81.59  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.59  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.59  																													| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 114.05/81.59  																													| (1581)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.05/81.59  																													|
% 114.05/81.59  																														| Instantiating (1581) with all_476_0_1604, all_476_1_1605 yields:
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (3651)  ~ (all_476_0_1604 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (all_476_1_1605 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_476_0_1604 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_476_1_1605
% 114.05/81.59  																														|
% 114.05/81.59  																														| Applying alpha-rule on (3651) yields:
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (3652)  ~ (all_476_0_1604 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (3653)  ~ (all_476_1_1605 = all_83_0_38)
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (3654) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_476_0_1604
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (3655) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_476_1_1605
% 114.05/81.59  																														|
% 114.05/81.59  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																														|
% 114.05/81.59  																														| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 114.05/81.59  																														| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.05/81.59  																														|
% 114.05/81.59  																														| From (1336) and (3655) follows:
% 114.05/81.60  																														| (3658) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_476_1_1605
% 114.05/81.60  																														|
% 114.05/81.60  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.60  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.60  																														| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.05/81.60  																														|
% 114.05/81.60  																															| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.60  																															| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.05/81.60  																															|
% 114.05/81.60  																															| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.05/81.60  																															| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.60  																															|
% 114.05/81.60  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.60  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.60  																														| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 114.05/81.60  																														| (1497)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.05/81.60  																														|
% 114.05/81.60  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 114.05/81.60  																															| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.05/81.60  																															|
% 114.05/81.60  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 114.05/81.60  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.05/81.60  																															| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.05/81.60  																															|
% 114.05/81.60  																																| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.05/81.60  																																| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.60  																																|
% 114.05/81.60  																																| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.05/81.60  																																| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.05/81.60  																																|
% 114.05/81.60  																																| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.05/81.60  																																| (174) $false
% 114.05/81.60  																																|
% 114.05/81.60  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.05/81.60  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.05/81.60  																															| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.05/81.60  																															| (2139)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 114.05/81.60  																															|
% 114.05/81.60  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.05/81.60  																																| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.05/81.60  																																|
% 114.05/81.60  																																| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.05/81.60  																																| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																|
% 114.38/81.60  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.60  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.60  																																| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 114.38/81.60  																																|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| Combining equations (1200,1434) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (1838) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| Simplifying 1838 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.60  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.60  																																| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 114.38/81.60  																																| (1485)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.60  																																|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| Instantiating (1485) with all_494_0_1610, all_494_1_1611 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (3680)  ~ (all_494_0_1610 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (all_494_1_1611 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_494_0_1610 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_494_1_1611
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (3680) yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (3681)  ~ (all_494_0_1610 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (3682)  ~ (all_494_1_1611 = sz10)
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (3683) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_494_0_1610
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (3684) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_494_1_1611
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| From (1336) and (3684) follows:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (3685) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_1611
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (497), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.60  																																	| (1885)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 114.38/81.60  																																	|
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|
% 114.38/81.60  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (1378) xn = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 114.38/81.60  																																		| (1427)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 114.38/81.60  																																		|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| Instantiating (1427) with all_506_0_1614, all_506_1_1615 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (3700)  ~ (all_506_0_1614 = all_506_1_1615) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_506_0_1614 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_506_1_1615
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (3700) yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (3701)  ~ (all_506_0_1614 = all_506_1_1615)
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (3702) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_506_0_1614
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (3703) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_506_1_1615
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| From (1336) and (3702) follows:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (3706) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_1614
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.60  																																			| (1769)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.60  																																			|
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|
% 114.38/81.60  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| (1378) xn = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 114.38/81.60  																																				| (1462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 114.38/81.60  																																				|
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1426 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| (2520)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| Simplifying 2520 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|
% 114.38/81.60  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.60  																																					| (2196)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 114.38/81.60  																																					|
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|
% 114.38/81.60  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (518), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.60  																																						| (2259)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.60  																																						|
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|
% 114.38/81.60  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (501), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|
% 114.38/81.60  																																								| Combining equations (1370,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.60  																																								| (1378) xn = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																								|
% 114.38/81.60  																																								| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 114.38/81.60  																																								| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.38/81.60  																																								|
% 114.38/81.60  																																								| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.38/81.60  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.60  																																								|
% 114.38/81.60  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.60  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.60  																																							| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 114.38/81.61  																																							| (1446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 114.38/81.61  																																							|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Instantiating (1446) with all_572_0_1636, all_572_1_1637 yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3745)  ~ (all_572_0_1636 = all_572_1_1637) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_572_1_1637 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_572_0_1636
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (3745) yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3746)  ~ (all_572_0_1636 = all_572_1_1637)
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3747) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_572_1_1637
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3748) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_572_0_1636
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| From (1336) and (3747) follows:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3749) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_1637
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Instantiating formula (87) with all_52_0_18, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_102_2_49), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (2293) all_102_2_49 = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_506_0_1614, all_572_1_1637 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_1637, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_1614, yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3751) all_572_1_1637 = all_506_0_1614
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_494_1_1611, all_506_0_1614 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_506_0_1614, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_1611, yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3752) all_506_0_1614 = all_494_1_1611
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Instantiating formula (26) with all_494_1_1611, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_1611, aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3753) all_494_1_1611 = sz10
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_476_1_1605, all_572_1_1637 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_572_1_1637, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_476_1_1605, yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3754) all_572_1_1637 = all_476_1_1605
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz00, all_102_2_49, all_494_1_1611 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_494_1_1611, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3755) all_494_1_1611 = all_102_2_49
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Combining equations (3751,3754) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3756) all_506_0_1614 = all_476_1_1605
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Simplifying 3756 yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3757) all_506_0_1614 = all_476_1_1605
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Combining equations (3752,3757) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3758) all_494_1_1611 = all_476_1_1605
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Simplifying 3758 yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3759) all_494_1_1611 = all_476_1_1605
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Combining equations (3755,3759) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3760) all_476_1_1605 = all_102_2_49
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Combining equations (3753,3759) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3761) all_476_1_1605 = sz10
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Combining equations (3760,3761) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (3179) all_102_2_49 = sz10
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Simplifying 3179 yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (2388) all_102_2_49 = sz10
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Combining equations (2293,2388) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.61  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																												| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.38/81.61  																												|
% 114.38/81.61  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.61  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.61  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																													|
% 114.38/81.61  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.61  																														| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																														|
% 114.38/81.61  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																													| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 114.38/81.61  																													|
% 114.38/81.61  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.61  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.61  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																														|
% 114.38/81.61  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.61  																															| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																															|
% 114.38/81.61  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.38/81.61  																														|
% 114.38/81.61  																															| From (1361) and (1330) follows:
% 114.38/81.61  																															| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																															|
% 114.38/81.61  																															| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																															| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																															|
% 114.38/81.61  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																								|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																								| (3604)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																								| (3605) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xp)
% 114.38/81.61  																								|
% 114.38/81.61  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (125), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.61  																									|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.61  																									| (1750) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, xr)
% 114.38/81.61  																									|
% 114.38/81.61  																										| From (1287)(310) and (1750) follows:
% 114.38/81.61  																										| (1751) sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn)
% 114.38/81.61  																										|
% 114.38/81.61  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.61  																										|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.61  																										| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																										|
% 114.38/81.61  																											| From (1379) and (9) follows:
% 114.38/81.61  																											| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																											|
% 114.38/81.61  																											| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																											| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																											|
% 114.38/81.61  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																										|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																										| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																										| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.38/81.61  																										|
% 114.38/81.61  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.61  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.61  																											| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																											|
% 114.38/81.61  																												| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.38/81.61  																												| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																												|
% 114.38/81.61  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																											| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																											| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 114.38/81.61  																											|
% 114.38/81.61  																												| From (1415) and (600) follows:
% 114.38/81.61  																												| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 114.38/81.61  																												|
% 114.38/81.61  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.61  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.61  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																												|
% 114.38/81.61  																													| From (1336) and (479) follows:
% 114.38/81.61  																													| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																													|
% 114.38/81.61  																													| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 114.38/81.61  																													| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																													|
% 114.38/81.61  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																												| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.38/81.61  																												|
% 114.38/81.61  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.61  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.61  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																													|
% 114.38/81.61  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.61  																														| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																														|
% 114.38/81.61  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																													| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 114.38/81.61  																													|
% 114.38/81.61  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.61  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.61  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.61  																														|
% 114.38/81.61  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.61  																															| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.61  																															|
% 114.38/81.61  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.61  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.61  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.61  																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.38/81.61  																														|
% 114.38/81.61  																															| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 114.38/81.61  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.61  																															|
% 114.38/81.61  																															| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 114.38/81.62  																															| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 114.38/81.62  																															|
% 114.38/81.62  																															| From (1361) and (540) follows:
% 114.38/81.62  																															| (252) sdtlseqdt0(xn, all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.62  																															|
% 114.38/81.62  																															| From (1361) and (479) follows:
% 114.38/81.62  																															| (2643) sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm)
% 114.38/81.62  																															|
% 114.38/81.62  																															| From (1361) and (3604) follows:
% 114.38/81.62  																															| (3619)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.38/81.62  																															|
% 114.38/81.62  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.62  																															|
% 114.38/81.62  																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																|
% 114.38/81.62  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.62  																															| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 114.38/81.62  																															|
% 114.38/81.62  																																| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_1978, all_484_1_1979 yields:
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (3814)  ~ (all_484_0_1978 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_1979 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_1979 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_1978
% 114.38/81.62  																																|
% 114.38/81.62  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (3814) yields:
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (3815)  ~ (all_484_0_1978 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (3816)  ~ (all_484_1_1979 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (3817) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (3818) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_1978
% 114.38/81.62  																																|
% 114.38/81.62  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.62  																																|
% 114.38/81.62  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																	| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																	|
% 114.38/81.62  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.62  																																| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 114.38/81.62  																																|
% 114.38/81.62  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.62  																																	|
% 114.38/81.62  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																		|
% 114.38/81.62  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.62  																																	| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 114.38/81.62  																																	|
% 114.38/81.62  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.62  																																		|
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																			|
% 114.38/81.62  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.62  																																		| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 114.38/81.62  																																		|
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_1986, all_501_1_1987, all_501_2_1988 yields:
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (3831)  ~ (all_501_0_1986 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_1987 = all_501_2_1988) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_1987 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_1988 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_1986 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_1988, all_501_1_1987) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_1986)
% 114.38/81.62  																																			|
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (3831) yields:
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (3832) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_1987
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (3833) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_1988, all_501_1_1987)
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (3834) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_1988
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (3835)  ~ (all_501_0_1986 = all_102_1_48)
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (3836)  ~ (all_501_1_1987 = all_501_2_1988)
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (3837) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_1986)
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (3838) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_1986
% 114.38/81.62  																																			|
% 114.38/81.62  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.62  																																			|
% 114.38/81.62  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																				|
% 114.38/81.62  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.62  																																			| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.62  																																			|
% 114.38/81.62  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.62  																																				|
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| From (2697) and (252) follows:
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (2643) sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|
% 114.38/81.62  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|
% 114.38/81.62  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn), sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| From (1370) and (1326) follows:
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.62  																																				| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 114.38/81.62  																																				|
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_2018, all_513_1_2019, all_513_2_2020 yields:
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (3860)  ~ (all_513_0_2018 = all_513_1_2019) &  ~ (all_513_2_2020 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_2018 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2019 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_2020 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_2019, all_513_0_2018) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_2020)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (3860) yields:
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (3861) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_2020
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (3862) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_2019, all_513_0_2018)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (3863) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2019
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (3864) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_2020)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (3865)  ~ (all_513_2_2020 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (3866) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_2018
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (3867)  ~ (all_513_0_2018 = all_513_1_2019)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|
% 114.38/81.62  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.62  																																					| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 114.38/81.62  																																					|
% 114.38/81.62  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.62  																																						| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 114.38/81.62  																																						|
% 114.38/81.62  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|
% 114.38/81.62  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																								|
% 114.38/81.62  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.62  																																							| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 114.38/81.62  																																							|
% 114.38/81.62  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.62  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.62  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.62  																																								|
% 114.38/81.62  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.62  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.62  																																									|
% 114.38/81.62  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.62  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.63  																																								| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 114.38/81.63  																																								|
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_2027, all_535_1_2028, all_535_2_2029 yields:
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (3884)  ~ (all_535_0_2027 = all_535_1_2028) &  ~ (all_535_2_2029 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2029 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_2027 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_2028 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_2028, all_535_0_2027) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_2029)
% 114.38/81.63  																																									|
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (3884) yields:
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (3885) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_2027
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (3886) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_2028
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (3887) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_2028, all_535_0_2027)
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (3888)  ~ (all_535_2_2029 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (3889) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2029
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (3890)  ~ (all_535_0_2027 = all_535_1_2028)
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (3891) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_2029)
% 114.38/81.63  																																									|
% 114.38/81.63  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.63  																																									|
% 114.38/81.63  																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																										|
% 114.38/81.63  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.63  																																									| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 114.38/81.63  																																									|
% 114.38/81.63  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.63  																																										|
% 114.38/81.63  																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																											| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																											|
% 114.38/81.63  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																										| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.63  																																										| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.38/81.63  																																										|
% 114.38/81.63  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																											|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.63  																																											|
% 114.38/81.63  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																												| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																												|
% 114.38/81.63  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																											|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.63  																																											| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.38/81.63  																																											|
% 114.38/81.63  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																												|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.63  																																												|
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																													|
% 114.38/81.63  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																												|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.63  																																												| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.38/81.63  																																												|
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_2038, all_559_1_2039 yields:
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| (3908)  ~ (all_559_0_2038 = all_559_1_2039) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2039 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_2038
% 114.38/81.63  																																													|
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (3908) yields:
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| (3909)  ~ (all_559_0_2038 = all_559_1_2039)
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| (3910) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2039
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| (3911) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_2038
% 114.38/81.63  																																													|
% 114.38/81.63  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																													|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.63  																																													|
% 114.38/81.63  																																														| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																														| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																														|
% 114.38/81.63  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																													|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.63  																																													| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.63  																																													|
% 114.38/81.63  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																														|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																														| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.63  																																														|
% 114.38/81.63  																																															| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																															| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																															|
% 114.38/81.63  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																														|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																														| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.63  																																														| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.38/81.63  																																														|
% 114.38/81.63  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																															|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.63  																																															|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																																|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																															|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.63  																																															| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 114.38/81.63  																																															|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																																|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.63  																																																|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																																|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 114.38/81.63  																																																|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 114.38/81.63  																																																	|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																		|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1017), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			| (1739) all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| Combining equations (1287,1739) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| (2967) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| Simplifying 2967 yields:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			| (1742)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			| (2971) all_214_0_128 = xp
% 114.38/81.63  																																																			|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| Combining equations (1361,2971) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.63  																																																					|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																							| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																							| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.63  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.63  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.63  																																																						| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																						| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 114.38/81.64  																																																						|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.64  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.64  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.64  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																							| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_2063, all_623_1_2064 yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| (3960)  ~ (all_623_0_2063 = all_623_1_2064) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2063 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_2064
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (3960) yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| (3961)  ~ (all_623_0_2063 = all_623_1_2064)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| (3962) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2063
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| (3963) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_2064
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.38/81.64  																																																								|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_2065, all_633_1_2066, all_633_2_2067 yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3968)  ~ (all_633_0_2065 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_2066 = all_633_2_2067) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2066 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_2067 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_2065 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_2065, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_2067, all_633_1_2066)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (3968) yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3969)  ~ (all_633_0_2065 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3970) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_2065
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3971) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_2067
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3972) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_2065, all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3973) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_2067, all_633_1_2066)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3974)  ~ (all_633_1_2066 = all_633_2_2067)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3975) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2066
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																									|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 114.38/81.64  																																																										|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_2063, all_633_1_2066 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2066, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2063, yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3984) all_633_1_2066 = all_623_0_2063
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_2039, all_623_0_2063 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2063, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2039, yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3985) all_623_0_2063 = all_559_1_2039
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_2029, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2029, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3986) all_535_2_2029 = all_0_4_4
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_2029, all_559_1_2039 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2039, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2029, yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3987) all_559_1_2039 = all_535_2_2029
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_2019, all_535_2_2029 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2029, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2019, yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3988) all_535_2_2029 = all_513_1_2019
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_1987, all_535_2_2029 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2029, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_1987, yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3989) all_535_2_2029 = all_501_1_1987
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_1979, all_633_1_2066 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2066, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_1979, yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3990) all_633_1_2066 = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_513_1_2019 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2019, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3991) all_513_1_2019 = xm
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn), sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Combining equations (3984,3990) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3993) all_623_0_2063 = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Simplifying 3993 yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3994) all_623_0_2063 = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Combining equations (3985,3994) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3995) all_559_1_2039 = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Simplifying 3995 yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3996) all_559_1_2039 = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Combining equations (3987,3996) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3997) all_535_2_2029 = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Simplifying 3997 yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3998) all_535_2_2029 = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Combining equations (3988,3989) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (3999) all_513_1_2019 = all_501_1_1987
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Simplifying 3999 yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (4000) all_513_1_2019 = all_501_1_1987
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Combining equations (3986,3989) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (4001) all_501_1_1987 = all_0_4_4
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Combining equations (3998,3989) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (4002) all_501_1_1987 = all_484_1_1979
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Combining equations (4000,3991) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (4003) all_501_1_1987 = xm
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| Simplifying 4003 yields:
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											| (4004) all_501_1_1987 = xm
% 114.38/81.64  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| Combining equations (4004,4002) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| (4005) all_484_1_1979 = xm
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| Combining equations (4001,4002) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| (4006) all_484_1_1979 = all_0_4_4
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| Combining equations (4006,4005) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| (3037) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| Simplifying 3037 yields:
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| Combining equations (1370,2697) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| (3039) all_0_4_4 = xn
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| Equations (3039,1370) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.65  																									|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.65  																									| (3041)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, xr)
% 114.38/81.65  																									| (3042) sdtlseqdt0(xr, all_0_0_0)
% 114.38/81.65  																									|
% 114.38/81.65  																										| From (1287)(310) and (3041) follows:
% 114.38/81.65  																										| (3043)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn)
% 114.38/81.65  																										|
% 114.38/81.65  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.65  																										|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.65  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.65  																										|
% 114.38/81.65  																											| From (1336) and (479) follows:
% 114.38/81.65  																											| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 114.38/81.65  																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																											| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 114.38/81.65  																											| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.65  																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.65  																										|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.65  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.65  																										| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.38/81.65  																										|
% 114.38/81.65  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.65  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.65  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.65  																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.65  																												| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.65  																												|
% 114.38/81.65  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.65  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.65  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.65  																											| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 114.38/81.65  																											|
% 114.38/81.65  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.65  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.65  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.65  																												|
% 114.38/81.65  																													| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.65  																													| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.65  																													|
% 114.38/81.65  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.65  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.65  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.65  																												| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.38/81.65  																												|
% 114.38/81.65  																													| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 114.38/81.65  																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.65  																													|
% 114.38/81.65  																													| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 114.38/81.65  																													| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 114.38/81.65  																													|
% 114.38/81.65  																													| From (1361) and (3605) follows:
% 114.38/81.65  																													| (3623) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xn)
% 114.38/81.65  																													|
% 114.38/81.65  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.65  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.65  																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.65  																													|
% 114.38/81.65  																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.65  																														|
% 114.38/81.65  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.65  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.65  																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.65  																													| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 114.38/81.65  																													|
% 114.38/81.65  																														| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_2075, all_484_1_2076 yields:
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (4034)  ~ (all_484_0_2075 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_2076 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2076 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2075
% 114.38/81.65  																														|
% 114.38/81.65  																														| Applying alpha-rule on (4034) yields:
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (4035)  ~ (all_484_0_2075 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (4036)  ~ (all_484_1_2076 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (4037) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2076
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (4038) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2075
% 114.38/81.65  																														|
% 114.38/81.65  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.65  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.65  																														|
% 114.38/81.65  																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.65  																															| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.65  																															|
% 114.38/81.65  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.65  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.65  																														| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 114.38/81.65  																														|
% 114.38/81.65  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.65  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.65  																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.65  																															|
% 114.38/81.65  																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.65  																																| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.65  																																|
% 114.38/81.65  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.65  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.65  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.65  																															| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 114.38/81.65  																															|
% 114.38/81.65  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.65  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.65  																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.65  																																|
% 114.38/81.65  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.65  																																	| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.65  																																	|
% 114.38/81.65  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.65  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.66  																																| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 114.38/81.66  																																|
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_2083, all_501_1_2084, all_501_2_2085 yields:
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (4051)  ~ (all_501_0_2083 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_2084 = all_501_2_2085) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2084 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_2085 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_2083 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_2085, all_501_1_2084) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_2083)
% 114.38/81.66  																																	|
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (4051) yields:
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (4052) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_2083
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (4053) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_2085, all_501_1_2084)
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (4054) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2084
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (4055) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_2083)
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (4056)  ~ (all_501_0_2083 = all_102_1_48)
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (4057) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_2085
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (4058)  ~ (all_501_1_2084 = all_501_2_2085)
% 114.38/81.66  																																	|
% 114.38/81.66  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.66  																																	|
% 114.38/81.66  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																		|
% 114.38/81.66  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.66  																																	| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.66  																																	|
% 114.38/81.66  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																		| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.66  																																		|
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|
% 114.38/81.66  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|
% 114.38/81.66  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| Instantiating formula (71) with xn, sz00, xm and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz00), sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz00),  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn), yields:
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																		| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.66  																																		| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 114.38/81.66  																																		|
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_2115, all_513_1_2116, all_513_2_2117 yields:
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (4077)  ~ (all_513_0_2115 = all_513_1_2116) &  ~ (all_513_2_2117 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_2115 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2116 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_2117 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_2116, all_513_0_2115) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_2117)
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (4077) yields:
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (4078) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2116
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (4079)  ~ (all_513_0_2115 = all_513_1_2116)
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (4080) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_2117
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (4081) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_2117)
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (4082)  ~ (all_513_2_2117 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (4083) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_2115
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (4084) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_2116, all_513_0_2115)
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|
% 114.38/81.66  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.66  																																			| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 114.38/81.66  																																			|
% 114.38/81.66  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.66  																																				| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 114.38/81.66  																																				|
% 114.38/81.66  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																						|
% 114.38/81.66  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.66  																																					| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 114.38/81.66  																																					|
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_2124, all_535_1_2125, all_535_2_2126 yields:
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (4097)  ~ (all_535_0_2124 = all_535_1_2125) &  ~ (all_535_2_2126 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2126 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_2124 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_2125 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_2125, all_535_0_2124) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_2126)
% 114.38/81.66  																																						|
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (4097) yields:
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (4098) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_2124
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (4099) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2126
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (4100) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_2126)
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (4101) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_2125, all_535_0_2124)
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (4102)  ~ (all_535_2_2126 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (4103) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_2125
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (4104)  ~ (all_535_0_2124 = all_535_1_2125)
% 114.38/81.66  																																						|
% 114.38/81.66  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.66  																																						|
% 114.38/81.66  																																							| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																							|
% 114.38/81.66  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.66  																																						| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 114.38/81.66  																																						|
% 114.38/81.66  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																							| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.66  																																							|
% 114.38/81.66  																																								| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																								|
% 114.38/81.66  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.66  																																							| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.66  																																							| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.38/81.66  																																							|
% 114.38/81.66  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.66  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.66  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.66  																																								|
% 114.38/81.66  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.66  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.66  																																									|
% 114.38/81.66  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.66  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.67  																																								| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.38/81.67  																																								|
% 114.38/81.67  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.67  																																									|
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																										|
% 114.38/81.67  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.67  																																									| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.38/81.67  																																									|
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_2135, all_559_1_2136 yields:
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| (4121)  ~ (all_559_0_2135 = all_559_1_2136) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2136 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_2135
% 114.38/81.67  																																										|
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (4121) yields:
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| (4122)  ~ (all_559_0_2135 = all_559_1_2136)
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| (4123) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2136
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| (4124) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_2135
% 114.38/81.67  																																										|
% 114.38/81.67  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.67  																																										|
% 114.38/81.67  																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																											| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																											|
% 114.38/81.67  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.67  																																										| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.67  																																										|
% 114.38/81.67  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																											|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																											| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.67  																																											|
% 114.38/81.67  																																												| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																												| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																												|
% 114.38/81.67  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																											|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																											| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.67  																																											| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.38/81.67  																																											|
% 114.38/81.67  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																												|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.67  																																												|
% 114.38/81.67  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																													| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																													|
% 114.38/81.67  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																												|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.67  																																												| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 114.38/81.67  																																												|
% 114.38/81.67  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																													|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.67  																																													|
% 114.38/81.67  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																														| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																														|
% 114.38/81.67  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																													|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.67  																																													| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 114.38/81.67  																																													|
% 114.38/81.67  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																														|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																														| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.67  																																														|
% 114.38/81.67  																																															| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																															| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																															|
% 114.38/81.67  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																														|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																														| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.67  																																														| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 114.38/81.67  																																														|
% 114.38/81.67  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																															|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.67  																																															|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																																|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																															|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.67  																																															| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.38/81.67  																																															|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																																|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.67  																																																|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																																|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																	|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 114.38/81.67  																																																		|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																			|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_2160, all_623_1_2161 yields:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| (4165)  ~ (all_623_0_2160 = all_623_1_2161) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2160 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_2161
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (4165) yields:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| (4166)  ~ (all_623_0_2160 = all_623_1_2161)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| (4167) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2160
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| (4168) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_2161
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.38/81.67  																																																				|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_2162, all_633_1_2163, all_633_2_2164 yields:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (4173)  ~ (all_633_0_2162 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_2163 = all_633_2_2164) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2163 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_2164 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_2162 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_2162, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_2164, all_633_1_2163)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (4173) yields:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (4174) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_2164
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (4175)  ~ (all_633_0_2162 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (4176)  ~ (all_633_1_2163 = all_633_2_2164)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (4177) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_2164, all_633_1_2163)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (4178) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2163
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (4179) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_2162
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (4180) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_2162, all_0_4_4)
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																						| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																						| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.67  																																																						|
% 114.38/81.67  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.67  																																																					| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.68  																																																					| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 114.38/81.68  																																																					|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.68  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																						| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																						|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.68  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																						| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.38/81.68  																																																						| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 114.38/81.68  																																																						|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_2160, all_633_1_2163 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2163, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2160, yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4189) all_633_1_2163 = all_623_0_2160
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_2136, all_633_1_2163 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2163, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2136, yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4190) all_633_1_2163 = all_559_1_2136
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_2126, all_623_0_2160 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2160, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2126, yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4191) all_623_0_2160 = all_535_2_2126
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_2116, all_623_0_2160 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2160, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2116, yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4192) all_623_0_2160 = all_513_1_2116
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_2084, all_623_0_2160 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2160, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2084, yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4193) all_623_0_2160 = all_501_1_2084
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_2076, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2076, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4194) all_484_1_2076 = all_0_4_4
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_2076, all_623_0_2160 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2160, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2076, yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4195) all_623_0_2160 = all_484_1_2076
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_623_0_2160 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2160, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4196) all_623_0_2160 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4189,4190) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4197) all_623_0_2160 = all_559_1_2136
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Simplifying 4197 yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4198) all_623_0_2160 = all_559_1_2136
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4192,4198) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4199) all_559_1_2136 = all_513_1_2116
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4195,4198) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4200) all_559_1_2136 = all_484_1_2076
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4191,4198) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4201) all_559_1_2136 = all_535_2_2126
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4196,4198) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4202) all_559_1_2136 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4193,4198) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4203) all_559_1_2136 = all_501_1_2084
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4200,4201) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4204) all_535_2_2126 = all_484_1_2076
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4199,4201) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4205) all_535_2_2126 = all_513_1_2116
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4202,4201) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4206) all_535_2_2126 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4203,4201) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4207) all_535_2_2126 = all_501_1_2084
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4206,4205) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4208) all_513_1_2116 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4204,4205) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4209) all_513_1_2116 = all_484_1_2076
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4207,4205) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4210) all_513_1_2116 = all_501_1_2084
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4208,4210) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4211) all_501_1_2084 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4209,4210) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4212) all_501_1_2084 = all_484_1_2076
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4212,4211) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4213) all_484_1_2076 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Simplifying 4213 yields:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (4214) all_484_1_2076 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Combining equations (4214,4194) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|
% 114.38/81.68  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																						|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																						| (1723)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																						| (4218) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz10)
% 114.38/81.69  																						|
% 114.38/81.69  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (148), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																							|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																							| (1331) sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10)
% 114.38/81.69  																							|
% 114.38/81.69  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (123), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																								|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																								| (1332) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 114.38/81.69  																								|
% 114.38/81.69  																									| From (1287) and (1332) follows:
% 114.38/81.69  																									| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																									|
% 114.38/81.69  																									| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																									| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.69  																									|
% 114.38/81.69  																									| From (1334) and (1326) follows:
% 114.38/81.69  																									| (1327) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																									|
% 114.38/81.69  																									| Using (1327) and (1723) yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																									| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																									|
% 114.38/81.69  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																								|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																								| (1715)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 114.38/81.69  																								| (1716) all_0_0_0 = sz10 | all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																								|
% 114.38/81.69  																									| From (1287) and (1715) follows:
% 114.38/81.69  																									| (1717)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																									|
% 114.38/81.69  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (136), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																									|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																									| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																									|
% 114.38/81.69  																										| Using (1333) and (1717) yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																										| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																										|
% 114.38/81.69  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																									|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																									| (1717)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																									| (1721) xm = sz10 | xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																									|
% 114.38/81.69  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																										|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																										|
% 114.38/81.69  																											| From (1336) and (1172) follows:
% 114.38/81.69  																											| (1762) sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																											|
% 114.38/81.69  																											| From (1336) and (376) follows:
% 114.38/81.69  																											| (1763) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_102_2_49
% 114.38/81.69  																											|
% 114.38/81.69  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (495), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																											| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.69  																											|
% 114.38/81.69  																												| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																												| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																												|
% 114.38/81.69  																												| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																												| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																												|
% 114.38/81.69  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																											| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																											| (1544)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.69  																											|
% 114.38/81.69  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																												| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																												|
% 114.38/81.69  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																												| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.69  																												|
% 114.38/81.69  																													| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																													| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																													|
% 114.38/81.69  																													| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																													| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																													|
% 114.38/81.69  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																												| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																												| (1375)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) &  ~ (v0 = all_17_0_11) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 114.38/81.69  																												|
% 114.38/81.69  																													| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																													| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																													|
% 114.38/81.69  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (519), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																													| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.69  																													|
% 114.38/81.69  																														| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																														| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																														|
% 114.38/81.69  																														| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																														| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																														|
% 114.38/81.69  																														| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																														| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																														|
% 114.38/81.69  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																													| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.69  																													| (2022)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 114.38/81.69  																													|
% 114.38/81.69  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																														| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																														|
% 114.38/81.69  																														| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																														| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																														|
% 114.38/81.69  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (520), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																														| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.69  																														|
% 114.38/81.69  																															| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																															| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																															|
% 114.38/81.69  																															| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																															| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																															|
% 114.38/81.69  																															| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																															| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																															|
% 114.38/81.69  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																														| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.69  																														| (1769)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.69  																														|
% 114.38/81.69  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																															| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																															|
% 114.38/81.69  																															| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																															| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																															|
% 114.38/81.69  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																															| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.69  																															|
% 114.38/81.69  																																| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																																| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																																|
% 114.38/81.69  																																| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																																| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																																|
% 114.38/81.69  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																															| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																															| (1524)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 114.38/81.69  																															|
% 114.38/81.69  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																																| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																																|
% 114.38/81.69  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																																| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.69  																																|
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																																	|
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																																	|
% 114.38/81.69  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																																| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																																| (1563)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.69  																																|
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																																	|
% 114.38/81.69  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (518), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.69  																																	|
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.69  																																	| (2259)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.69  																																	|
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|
% 114.38/81.69  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (563), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| Combining equations (1200,1434) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (1838) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.69  																																			|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| Simplifying 1838 yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.69  																																			|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.69  																																			|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.69  																																			|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 114.38/81.69  																																		| (1439)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.38/81.69  																																		|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| Instantiating (1439) with all_577_0_2282, all_577_1_2283 yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (4290)  ~ (all_577_0_2282 = all_577_1_2283) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_577_0_2282 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_577_1_2283
% 114.38/81.69  																																			|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (4290) yields:
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (4291)  ~ (all_577_0_2282 = all_577_1_2283)
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (4292) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_577_0_2282
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (4293) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_577_1_2283
% 114.38/81.69  																																			|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| Equations (1200,1336) can reduce 1438 to:
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.38/81.69  																																			|
% 114.38/81.69  																																			| From (1336) and (4293) follows:
% 114.38/81.70  																																			| (4295) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_577_1_2283
% 114.38/81.70  																																			|
% 114.38/81.70  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																																			| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.70  																																			|
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																				|
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																																				|
% 114.38/81.70  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																																			| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 114.38/81.70  																																			| (1406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 114.38/81.70  																																			|
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																				|
% 114.38/81.70  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 114.38/81.70  																																				|
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| Combining equations (1200,1434) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| (1838) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| Simplifying 1838 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 114.38/81.70  																																				| (1485)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.38/81.70  																																				|
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| Equations (1200,1336) can reduce 1438 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|
% 114.38/81.70  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																						|
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																																						|
% 114.38/81.70  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 114.38/81.70  																																					| (1497)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.38/81.70  																																					|
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1374 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																						|
% 114.38/81.70  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (569), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 114.38/81.70  																																						|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| Combining equations (1200,1434) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (1838) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| Simplifying 1838 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (1368) xp = xm
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| Combining equations (1336,1368) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 114.38/81.70  																																						| (1516)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.38/81.70  																																						|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| Instantiating (1516) with all_607_0_2293, all_607_1_2294 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (4323)  ~ (all_607_0_2293 = all_607_1_2294) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_607_1_2294 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_607_0_2293
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (4323) yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (4324)  ~ (all_607_0_2293 = all_607_1_2294)
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (4325) sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = all_607_1_2294
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (4326) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_607_0_2293
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| From (1336) and (4326) follows:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (4327) sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_607_0_2293
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (498), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.70  																																							| (2196)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 114.38/81.70  																																							|
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|
% 114.38/81.70  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (497), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.70  																																								| (1885)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 114.38/81.70  																																								|
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|
% 114.38/81.70  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (499), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Combining equations (1334,1336) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| (1768)  ~ (xm = sz10)
% 114.38/81.70  																																									| (2139)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 114.38/81.70  																																									|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Equations (1336) can reduce 1768 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (1775)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Simplifying 1775 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Instantiating formula (87) with all_52_0_18, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_102_2_49, all_52_0_18) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_102_2_49), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (2293) all_102_2_49 = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_577_1_2283, all_607_0_2293 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_607_0_2293, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_577_1_2283, yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (4353) all_607_0_2293 = all_577_1_2283
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Instantiating formula (50) with all_577_1_2283, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_577_1_2283, aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (4354) all_577_1_2283 = sz10
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with sz00, sz10, all_102_2_49, all_607_0_2293 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_607_0_2293, sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (4355) all_607_0_2293 = all_102_2_49
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Combining equations (4353,4355) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (4356) all_577_1_2283 = all_102_2_49
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Simplifying 4356 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (4357) all_577_1_2283 = all_102_2_49
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Combining equations (4357,4354) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (3179) all_102_2_49 = sz10
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Simplifying 3179 yields:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (2388) all_102_2_49 = sz10
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Combining equations (2293,2388) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																										|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																										| (1726) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1)
% 114.38/81.70  																										|
% 114.38/81.70  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																											|
% 114.38/81.70  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																												| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																												|
% 114.38/81.70  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																											| (1672) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 114.38/81.70  																											|
% 114.38/81.70  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																												|
% 114.38/81.70  																													| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.70  																													| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.70  																													|
% 114.38/81.70  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.70  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.70  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.70  																												| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 114.38/81.70  																												|
% 114.38/81.70  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.70  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.70  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.70  																													|
% 114.38/81.71  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.71  																														| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.71  																														|
% 114.38/81.71  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.71  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.71  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.71  																													| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.38/81.71  																													|
% 114.38/81.71  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1716), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.71  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.71  																														| (1739) all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 114.38/81.71  																														|
% 114.38/81.71  																															| Combining equations (1739,1287) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.71  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.71  																															|
% 114.38/81.71  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.71  																															| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.71  																															|
% 114.38/81.71  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.71  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.71  																														| (1742)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = sz00)
% 114.38/81.71  																														| (1743) all_0_0_0 = sz10
% 114.38/81.71  																														|
% 114.38/81.71  																															| Combining equations (1743,1287) yields a new equation:
% 114.38/81.71  																															| (1334) xm = sz10
% 114.38/81.71  																															|
% 114.38/81.71  																															| From (1334) and (1331) follows:
% 114.38/81.71  																															| (149) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 114.38/81.71  																															|
% 114.38/81.71  																															| From (1334) and (1717) follows:
% 114.38/81.71  																															| (1746)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 114.38/81.71  																															|
% 114.38/81.71  																															| Using (149) and (1746) yields:
% 114.38/81.71  																															| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.71  																															|
% 114.38/81.71  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.71  																							|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.71  																							| (1748)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10)
% 114.38/81.71  																							| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 114.38/81.71  																							|
% 114.38/81.71  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.71  																								|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.71  																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.71  																								|
% 114.38/81.71  																									| From (1336) and (1748) follows:
% 114.38/81.71  																									| (4388)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz10)
% 114.38/81.71  																									|
% 114.38/81.71  																									| Using (4218) and (4388) yields:
% 114.38/81.71  																									| (1719) $false
% 114.38/81.71  																									|
% 114.38/81.71  																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.71  																								|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.71  																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.71  																								| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.38/81.71  																								|
% 114.38/81.71  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.71  																									|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.71  																									| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.71  																									|
% 114.38/81.71  																										| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.71  																										| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.71  																										|
% 114.38/81.71  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.71  																									|-Branch two:
% 114.38/81.71  																									| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.38/81.71  																									| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 114.38/81.71  																									|
% 114.38/81.71  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 114.38/81.71  																										|-Branch one:
% 114.38/81.71  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.38/81.71  																										|
% 114.38/81.71  																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.38/81.71  																											| (174) $false
% 114.38/81.71  																											|
% 114.38/81.71  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.38/81.71  																										|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.71  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.71  																										| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.71  																										|
% 114.77/81.71  																											| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 114.77/81.71  																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.71  																											|
% 114.77/81.71  																											| From (1361) and (1213) follows:
% 114.77/81.71  																											| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 114.77/81.71  																											|
% 114.77/81.71  																											| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 114.77/81.71  																											| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 114.77/81.71  																											|
% 114.77/81.71  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.71  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.71  																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.71  																											|
% 114.77/81.71  																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.71  																												|
% 114.77/81.71  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.71  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.71  																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.71  																											| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 114.77/81.71  																											|
% 114.77/81.71  																												| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_2446, all_484_1_2447 yields:
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (4407)  ~ (all_484_0_2446 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_2447 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2447 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2446
% 114.77/81.71  																												|
% 114.77/81.71  																												| Applying alpha-rule on (4407) yields:
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (4408)  ~ (all_484_0_2446 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (4409)  ~ (all_484_1_2447 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (4410) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2447
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (4411) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2446
% 114.77/81.71  																												|
% 114.77/81.71  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.71  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.71  																												|
% 114.77/81.71  																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.71  																													| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.71  																													|
% 114.77/81.71  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.71  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.71  																												| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 114.77/81.71  																												|
% 114.77/81.71  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.71  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.71  																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.71  																													|
% 114.77/81.71  																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.71  																														|
% 114.77/81.71  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.71  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.71  																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.71  																													| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 114.77/81.71  																													|
% 114.77/81.71  																														| Instantiating (1537) with all_495_0_2451, all_495_1_2452, all_495_2_2453 yields:
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (4420)  ~ (all_495_0_2451 = all_495_1_2452) &  ~ (all_495_2_2453 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_2451 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_2452 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_2453 & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_2452, all_495_0_2451) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_2453, all_83_0_38)
% 114.77/81.71  																														|
% 114.77/81.71  																														| Applying alpha-rule on (4420) yields:
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (4421) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_2453, all_83_0_38)
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (4422) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_2451
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (4423) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_2452
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (4424) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_2452, all_495_0_2451)
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (4425)  ~ (all_495_0_2451 = all_495_1_2452)
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (4426) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_2453
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (4427)  ~ (all_495_2_2453 = all_83_0_38)
% 114.77/81.71  																														|
% 114.77/81.71  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.71  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.71  																														|
% 114.77/81.71  																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.71  																															| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.71  																															|
% 114.77/81.71  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.71  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.71  																														| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 114.77/81.71  																														|
% 114.77/81.71  																															| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_2454, all_501_1_2455, all_501_2_2456 yields:
% 114.77/81.71  																															| (4432)  ~ (all_501_0_2454 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_2455 = all_501_2_2456) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2455 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_2456 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_2454 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_2456, all_501_1_2455) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_2454)
% 114.77/81.71  																															|
% 114.77/81.71  																															| Applying alpha-rule on (4432) yields:
% 114.77/81.71  																															| (4433) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_2454)
% 114.77/81.71  																															| (4434)  ~ (all_501_0_2454 = all_102_1_48)
% 114.77/81.71  																															| (4435)  ~ (all_501_1_2455 = all_501_2_2456)
% 114.77/81.71  																															| (4436) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2455
% 114.77/81.71  																															| (4437) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_2456
% 114.77/81.71  																															| (4438) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_2456, all_501_1_2455)
% 114.77/81.72  																															| (4439) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_2454
% 114.77/81.72  																															|
% 114.77/81.72  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.72  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.72  																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																															|
% 114.77/81.72  																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.72  																																| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.72  																																|
% 114.77/81.72  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.72  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.72  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.72  																															| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.77/81.72  																															|
% 114.77/81.72  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.72  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.72  																																| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.72  																																|
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|
% 114.77/81.72  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Instantiating (1502) with all_517_0_2459, all_517_1_2460, all_517_2_2461 yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4450)  ~ (all_517_0_2459 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_517_1_2460 = all_517_2_2461) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_2459 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_2460 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_2461 & sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_2461, all_517_1_2460) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_2459)
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (4450) yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4451)  ~ (all_517_1_2460 = all_517_2_2461)
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4452)  ~ (all_517_0_2459 = all_83_0_38)
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4453) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_2460
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4454) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_2459
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4455) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_2459)
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4456) sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_2461, all_517_1_2460)
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4457) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_2461
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_2451, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_2451, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4458) all_495_0_2451 = all_83_2_40
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_2451, all_517_2_2461 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_2461, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_2451, yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4459) all_517_2_2461 = all_495_0_2451
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, sz10, all_517_2_2461 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_2461, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4460) all_517_2_2461 = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Combining equations (4459,4460) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4461) all_495_0_2451 = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Simplifying 4461 yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (4462) all_495_0_2451 = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Combining equations (4458,4462) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (3386) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Simplifying 3386 yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (2392) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| From (2392) and (1199) follows:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Instantiating formula (71) with sz10, sz00, xm and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz00), sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz10), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00),  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10), yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (1719) $false
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.72  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.72  																																| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.72  																																| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 114.77/81.72  																																|
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_2486, all_513_1_2487, all_513_2_2488 yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (4469)  ~ (all_513_0_2486 = all_513_1_2487) &  ~ (all_513_2_2488 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_2486 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2487 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_2488 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_2487, all_513_0_2486) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_2488)
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (4469) yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (4470) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_2486
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (4471) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_2488)
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (4472) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_2487, all_513_0_2486)
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (4473)  ~ (all_513_2_2488 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (4474)  ~ (all_513_0_2486 = all_513_1_2487)
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (4475) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_2488
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (4476) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2487
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|
% 114.77/81.72  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.72  																																	| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 114.77/81.72  																																	|
% 114.77/81.72  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.72  																																			| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.72  																																			|
% 114.77/81.72  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.72  																																		| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 114.77/81.72  																																		|
% 114.77/81.72  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.72  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.72  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.72  																																			|
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.72  																																				|
% 114.77/81.72  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.72  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.72  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.72  																																			| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 114.77/81.72  																																			|
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_2495, all_535_1_2496, all_535_2_2497 yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| (4489)  ~ (all_535_0_2495 = all_535_1_2496) &  ~ (all_535_2_2497 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2497 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_2495 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_2496 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_2496, all_535_0_2495) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_2497)
% 114.77/81.72  																																				|
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (4489) yields:
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| (4490) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_2495
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| (4491)  ~ (all_535_0_2495 = all_535_1_2496)
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| (4492) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_2496
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| (4493) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_2496, all_535_0_2495)
% 114.77/81.72  																																				| (4494)  ~ (all_535_2_2497 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.77/81.73  																																				| (4495) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2497
% 114.77/81.73  																																				| (4496) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_2497)
% 114.77/81.73  																																				|
% 114.77/81.73  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.73  																																				|
% 114.77/81.73  																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																					| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																					|
% 114.77/81.73  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.73  																																				| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 114.77/81.73  																																				|
% 114.77/81.73  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																					| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.73  																																					|
% 114.77/81.73  																																						| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																						|
% 114.77/81.73  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																					| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.73  																																					| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.77/81.73  																																					|
% 114.77/81.73  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.73  																																						|
% 114.77/81.73  																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																							|
% 114.77/81.73  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.73  																																						| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.73  																																						|
% 114.77/81.73  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.73  																																							|
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																								|
% 114.77/81.73  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.73  																																							| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.77/81.73  																																							|
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_2506, all_559_1_2507 yields:
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| (4513)  ~ (all_559_0_2506 = all_559_1_2507) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2507 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_2506
% 114.77/81.73  																																								|
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (4513) yields:
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| (4514)  ~ (all_559_0_2506 = all_559_1_2507)
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| (4515) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2507
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| (4516) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_2506
% 114.77/81.73  																																								|
% 114.77/81.73  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.73  																																								|
% 114.77/81.73  																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																									|
% 114.77/81.73  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.73  																																								| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.77/81.73  																																								|
% 114.77/81.73  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.73  																																									|
% 114.77/81.73  																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																										|
% 114.77/81.73  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.73  																																									| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.73  																																									|
% 114.77/81.73  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.73  																																										|
% 114.77/81.73  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																											| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																											|
% 114.77/81.73  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.73  																																										| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 114.77/81.73  																																										|
% 114.77/81.73  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																											|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.73  																																											|
% 114.77/81.73  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																												| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																												|
% 114.77/81.73  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																											|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.73  																																											| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 114.77/81.73  																																											|
% 114.77/81.73  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																												|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																												| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.73  																																												|
% 114.77/81.73  																																													| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																													| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																													|
% 114.77/81.73  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																												|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																												| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.73  																																												| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 114.77/81.73  																																												|
% 114.77/81.73  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																													|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.73  																																													|
% 114.77/81.73  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																														| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																														|
% 114.77/81.73  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																													|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.73  																																													| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.77/81.73  																																													|
% 114.77/81.73  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																														|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																														| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.73  																																														|
% 114.77/81.73  																																															| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																															| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																															|
% 114.77/81.73  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																														|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																														| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.73  																																														| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.77/81.73  																																														|
% 114.77/81.73  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																															|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																															| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.73  																																															|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																																|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																															|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																															| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.73  																																															| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.77/81.73  																																															|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																																|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.73  																																																|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																																|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.73  																																																| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 114.77/81.73  																																																|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.77/81.73  																																																	|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_2531, all_623_1_2532 yields:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| (4557)  ~ (all_623_0_2531 = all_623_1_2532) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2531 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_2532
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (4557) yields:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| (4558)  ~ (all_623_0_2531 = all_623_1_2532)
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| (4559) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2531
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| (4560) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_2532
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																			| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.73  																																																			|
% 114.77/81.73  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.73  																																																		| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.74  																																																		|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_2533, all_633_1_2534, all_633_2_2535 yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (4565)  ~ (all_633_0_2533 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_2534 = all_633_2_2535) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2534 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_2535 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_2533 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_2533, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_2535, all_633_1_2534)
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (4565) yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (4566) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_2535, all_633_1_2534)
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (4567) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_2533
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (4568)  ~ (all_633_0_2533 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (4569) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2534
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (4570)  ~ (all_633_1_2534 = all_633_2_2535)
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (4571) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_2533, all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (4572) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_2535
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 114.77/81.74  																																																			|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 114.77/81.74  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_2531, all_633_1_2534 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2534, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2531, yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4581) all_633_1_2534 = all_623_0_2531
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_2507, all_633_1_2534 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2534, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2507, yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4582) all_633_1_2534 = all_559_1_2507
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_2497, all_623_0_2531 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2531, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2497, yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4583) all_623_0_2531 = all_535_2_2497
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_2487, all_623_0_2531 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2531, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2487, yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4584) all_623_0_2531 = all_513_1_2487
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_2455, all_623_0_2531 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2531, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2455, yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4585) all_623_0_2531 = all_501_1_2455
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_2447, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2447, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4586) all_484_1_2447 = all_0_4_4
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_2447, all_623_0_2531 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2531, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2447, yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4587) all_623_0_2531 = all_484_1_2447
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_623_0_2531 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2531, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4588) all_623_0_2531 = xm
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4581,4582) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4589) all_623_0_2531 = all_559_1_2507
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Simplifying 4589 yields:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4590) all_623_0_2531 = all_559_1_2507
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4584,4590) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4591) all_559_1_2507 = all_513_1_2487
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4587,4590) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4592) all_559_1_2507 = all_484_1_2447
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4583,4590) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4593) all_559_1_2507 = all_535_2_2497
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4588,4590) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4594) all_559_1_2507 = xm
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4585,4590) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4595) all_559_1_2507 = all_501_1_2455
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4592,4593) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4596) all_535_2_2497 = all_484_1_2447
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4591,4593) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4597) all_535_2_2497 = all_513_1_2487
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4594,4593) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4598) all_535_2_2497 = xm
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4595,4593) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4599) all_535_2_2497 = all_501_1_2455
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4598,4597) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4600) all_513_1_2487 = xm
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| Combining equations (4596,4597) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					| (4601) all_513_1_2487 = all_484_1_2447
% 114.77/81.74  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| Combining equations (4599,4597) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| (4602) all_513_1_2487 = all_501_1_2455
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| Combining equations (4600,4602) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| (4603) all_501_1_2455 = xm
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| Combining equations (4601,4602) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| (4604) all_501_1_2455 = all_484_1_2447
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| Combining equations (4604,4603) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| (4605) all_484_1_2447 = xm
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| Simplifying 4605 yields:
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| (4606) all_484_1_2447 = xm
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| Combining equations (4606,4586) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.75  																					|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.75  																					| (3045)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																					| (4610) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm)
% 114.77/81.75  																					|
% 114.77/81.75  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (153), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																						|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																						| (1327) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																						|
% 114.77/81.75  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (150), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																							|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																							| (1328) sdtlseqdt0(xr, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																							|
% 114.77/81.75  																								| From (310) and (1328) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																								| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																								|
% 114.77/81.75  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																								|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																								| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																								|
% 114.77/81.75  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (125), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																									|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																									| (1750) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, xr)
% 114.77/81.75  																									|
% 114.77/81.75  																										| From (1287)(310) and (1750) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																										| (1751) sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn)
% 114.77/81.75  																										|
% 114.77/81.75  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																										|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																										| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.77/81.75  																										|
% 114.77/81.75  																											| From (1379) and (1751) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																											| (1326) sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																											|
% 114.77/81.75  																											| Using (1326) and (3045) yields:
% 114.77/81.75  																											| (1719) $false
% 114.77/81.75  																											|
% 114.77/81.75  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.75  																										|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.75  																										| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																										| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.77/81.75  																										|
% 114.77/81.75  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																											| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.77/81.75  																											|
% 114.77/81.75  																												| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.77/81.75  																												| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.75  																												|
% 114.77/81.75  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.75  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.75  																											| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																											| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 114.77/81.75  																											|
% 114.77/81.75  																												| From (1415) and (600) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																												| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 114.77/81.75  																												|
% 114.77/81.75  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.75  																												|
% 114.77/81.75  																													| From (1336) and (4610) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																													| (154) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																													|
% 114.77/81.75  																													| From (1336) and (3045) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																													| (3628)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																													|
% 114.77/81.75  																													| Using (154) and (3628) yields:
% 114.77/81.75  																													| (1719) $false
% 114.77/81.75  																													|
% 114.77/81.75  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.75  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.75  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																												| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.77/81.75  																												|
% 114.77/81.75  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.75  																													|
% 114.77/81.75  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.75  																														| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.75  																														|
% 114.77/81.75  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.75  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.75  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																													| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 114.77/81.75  																													|
% 114.77/81.75  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.75  																														|
% 114.77/81.75  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.75  																															|
% 114.77/81.75  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.75  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.75  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.75  																														|
% 114.77/81.75  																															| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.75  																															|
% 114.77/81.75  																															| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 114.77/81.75  																															|
% 114.77/81.75  																															| From (1361) and (540) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (252) sdtlseqdt0(xn, all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.75  																															|
% 114.77/81.75  																															| From (1361) and (479) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (2643) sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm)
% 114.77/81.75  																															|
% 114.77/81.75  																															| From (1361) and (1330) follows:
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.77/81.75  																															|
% 114.77/81.75  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.75  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.75  																															|
% 114.77/81.75  																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.75  																																| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.75  																																|
% 114.77/81.75  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.75  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.75  																															| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 114.77/81.75  																															|
% 114.77/81.75  																																| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_2628, all_484_1_2629 yields:
% 114.77/81.75  																																| (4650)  ~ (all_484_0_2628 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_2629 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2629 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2628
% 114.77/81.75  																																|
% 114.77/81.75  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (4650) yields:
% 114.77/81.75  																																| (4651)  ~ (all_484_0_2628 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.76  																																| (4652)  ~ (all_484_1_2629 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.77/81.76  																																| (4653) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.76  																																| (4654) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2628
% 114.77/81.76  																																|
% 114.77/81.76  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.76  																																|
% 114.77/81.76  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																	| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																	|
% 114.77/81.76  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.76  																																| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 114.77/81.76  																																|
% 114.77/81.76  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.76  																																	|
% 114.77/81.76  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																		|
% 114.77/81.76  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.76  																																	| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 114.77/81.76  																																	|
% 114.77/81.76  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.76  																																		|
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																			|
% 114.77/81.76  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.76  																																		| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 114.77/81.76  																																		|
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_2636, all_501_1_2637, all_501_2_2638 yields:
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (4667)  ~ (all_501_0_2636 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_2637 = all_501_2_2638) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2637 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_2638 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_2636 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_2638, all_501_1_2637) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_2636)
% 114.77/81.76  																																			|
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (4667) yields:
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (4668) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_2638, all_501_1_2637)
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (4669) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_2638
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (4670)  ~ (all_501_1_2637 = all_501_2_2638)
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (4671) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2637
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (4672)  ~ (all_501_0_2636 = all_102_1_48)
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (4673) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_2636
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (4674) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_2636)
% 114.77/81.76  																																			|
% 114.77/81.76  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.76  																																			|
% 114.77/81.76  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																				|
% 114.77/81.76  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.76  																																			| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.77/81.76  																																			|
% 114.77/81.76  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.76  																																				|
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| From (2697) and (252) follows:
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (2643) sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|
% 114.77/81.76  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|
% 114.77/81.76  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn), sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| From (1370) and (3045) follows:
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (3619)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (1719) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.76  																																				| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 114.77/81.76  																																				|
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_2668, all_513_1_2669, all_513_2_2670 yields:
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (4696)  ~ (all_513_0_2668 = all_513_1_2669) &  ~ (all_513_2_2670 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_2668 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2669 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_2670 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_2669, all_513_0_2668) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_2670)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (4696) yields:
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (4697) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_2670
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (4698) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_2669, all_513_0_2668)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (4699)  ~ (all_513_2_2670 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (4700) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_2670)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (4701) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2669
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (4702)  ~ (all_513_0_2668 = all_513_1_2669)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (4703) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_2668
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|
% 114.77/81.76  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.76  																																					| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 114.77/81.76  																																					|
% 114.77/81.76  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.76  																																						| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 114.77/81.76  																																						|
% 114.77/81.76  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|
% 114.77/81.76  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																								|
% 114.77/81.76  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.76  																																							| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 114.77/81.76  																																							|
% 114.77/81.76  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.76  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.76  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.76  																																								|
% 114.77/81.76  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.76  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.76  																																									|
% 114.77/81.76  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.76  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.76  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.76  																																								| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 114.77/81.76  																																								|
% 114.77/81.76  																																									| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_2677, all_535_1_2678, all_535_2_2679 yields:
% 114.77/81.76  																																									| (4720)  ~ (all_535_0_2677 = all_535_1_2678) &  ~ (all_535_2_2679 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2679 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_2677 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_2678 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_2678, all_535_0_2677) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_2679)
% 114.77/81.76  																																									|
% 114.77/81.76  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (4720) yields:
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (4721) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_2678, all_535_0_2677)
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (4722) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_2679)
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (4723) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_2678
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (4724)  ~ (all_535_0_2677 = all_535_1_2678)
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (4725) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_2677
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (4726) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2679
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (4727)  ~ (all_535_2_2679 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.77/81.77  																																									|
% 114.77/81.77  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.77  																																									|
% 114.77/81.77  																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																										|
% 114.77/81.77  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.77  																																									| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 114.77/81.77  																																									|
% 114.77/81.77  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.77  																																										|
% 114.77/81.77  																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																											| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																											|
% 114.77/81.77  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																										| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.77  																																										| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.77/81.77  																																										|
% 114.77/81.77  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																											|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.77  																																											|
% 114.77/81.77  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																												| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																												|
% 114.77/81.77  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																											|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.77  																																											| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.77  																																											|
% 114.77/81.77  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																												|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.77  																																												|
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																													|
% 114.77/81.77  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																												|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.77  																																												| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 114.77/81.77  																																												|
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_2688, all_559_1_2689 yields:
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| (4744)  ~ (all_559_0_2688 = all_559_1_2689) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2689 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_2688
% 114.77/81.77  																																													|
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (4744) yields:
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| (4745)  ~ (all_559_0_2688 = all_559_1_2689)
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| (4746) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2689
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| (4747) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_2688
% 114.77/81.77  																																													|
% 114.77/81.77  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																													|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.77  																																													|
% 114.77/81.77  																																														| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																														| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																														|
% 114.77/81.77  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																													|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.77  																																													| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.77/81.77  																																													|
% 114.77/81.77  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																														|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																														| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.77  																																														|
% 114.77/81.77  																																															| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																															| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																															|
% 114.77/81.77  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																														|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																														| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.77  																																														| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.77  																																														|
% 114.77/81.77  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																															|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.77  																																															|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																																|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																															|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.77  																																															| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 114.77/81.77  																																															|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																																|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.77  																																																|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																																|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 114.77/81.77  																																																|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 114.77/81.77  																																																	|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																		|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1017), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			| (1739) all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| Combining equations (1287,1739) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| (2967) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| Simplifying 2967 yields:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			| (1742)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = sz00)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			| (2971) all_214_0_128 = xp
% 114.77/81.77  																																																			|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| Combining equations (1361,2971) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																				|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																					|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																							| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																							| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.77  																																																							|
% 114.77/81.77  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.77  																																																						| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 114.77/81.78  																																																						|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.78  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.78  																																																							|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.78  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																							| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																							|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_2713, all_623_1_2714 yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| (4796)  ~ (all_623_0_2713 = all_623_1_2714) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2713 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_2714
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (4796) yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| (4797)  ~ (all_623_0_2713 = all_623_1_2714)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| (4798) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2713
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| (4799) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_2714
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.78  																																																								|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_2715, all_633_1_2716, all_633_2_2717 yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (4804)  ~ (all_633_0_2715 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_2716 = all_633_2_2717) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2716 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_2717 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_2715 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_2715, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_2717, all_633_1_2716)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (4804) yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (4805)  ~ (all_633_0_2715 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (4806)  ~ (all_633_1_2716 = all_633_2_2717)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (4807) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_2715, all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (4808) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2716
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (4809) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_2717
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (4810) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_2717, all_633_1_2716)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (4811) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_2715
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																									|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 114.77/81.78  																																																										|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_2713, all_633_1_2716 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2716, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2713, yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4820) all_633_1_2716 = all_623_0_2713
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_2689, all_623_0_2713 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_2713, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2689, yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4821) all_623_0_2713 = all_559_1_2689
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_2679, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2679, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4822) all_535_2_2679 = all_0_4_4
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_2679, all_559_1_2689 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_2689, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2679, yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4823) all_559_1_2689 = all_535_2_2679
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_2669, all_535_2_2679 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2679, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2669, yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4824) all_535_2_2679 = all_513_1_2669
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_2637, all_535_2_2679 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_2679, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2637, yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4825) all_535_2_2679 = all_501_1_2637
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_2629, all_633_1_2716 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_2716, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2629, yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4826) all_633_1_2716 = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_513_1_2669 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_2669, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4827) all_513_1_2669 = xm
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn), sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Combining equations (4820,4826) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4829) all_623_0_2713 = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Simplifying 4829 yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4830) all_623_0_2713 = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Combining equations (4821,4830) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4831) all_559_1_2689 = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Simplifying 4831 yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4832) all_559_1_2689 = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Combining equations (4823,4832) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4833) all_535_2_2679 = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Simplifying 4833 yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4834) all_535_2_2679 = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Combining equations (4824,4825) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4835) all_513_1_2669 = all_501_1_2637
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Simplifying 4835 yields:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4836) all_513_1_2669 = all_501_1_2637
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Combining equations (4822,4825) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4837) all_501_1_2637 = all_0_4_4
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| Combining equations (4834,4825) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											| (4838) all_501_1_2637 = all_484_1_2629
% 114.77/81.78  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| Combining equations (4836,4827) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| (4839) all_501_1_2637 = xm
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| Simplifying 4839 yields:
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| (4840) all_501_1_2637 = xm
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| Combining equations (4840,4838) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| (4841) all_484_1_2629 = xm
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| Combining equations (4837,4838) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| (4842) all_484_1_2629 = all_0_4_4
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| Combining equations (4842,4841) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| (3037) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| Simplifying 3037 yields:
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| Combining equations (1370,2697) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| (3039) all_0_4_4 = xn
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| Equations (3039,1370) can reduce 2888 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.79  																									|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.79  																									| (3041)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, xr)
% 114.77/81.79  																									| (3042) sdtlseqdt0(xr, all_0_0_0)
% 114.77/81.79  																									|
% 114.77/81.79  																										| From (310)(1287) and (3042) follows:
% 114.77/81.79  																										| (2643) sdtlseqdt0(xn, xm)
% 114.77/81.79  																										|
% 114.77/81.79  																										| From (1287)(310) and (3041) follows:
% 114.77/81.79  																										| (3043)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, xn)
% 114.77/81.79  																										|
% 114.77/81.79  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.79  																										|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.79  																										| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																										|
% 114.77/81.79  																											| Combining equations (1379,310) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																											| (1377) xr = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																											| From (1379) and (2643) follows:
% 114.77/81.79  																											| (4610) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm)
% 114.77/81.79  																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																											| From (1379) and (3043) follows:
% 114.77/81.79  																											| (3045)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (142), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.79  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.79  																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.79  																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																												| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																												| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																												|
% 114.77/81.79  																												| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																												| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.79  																												|
% 114.77/81.79  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.79  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.79  																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 114.77/81.79  																											| (1597)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.79  																											|
% 114.77/81.79  																												| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																												| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																												|
% 114.77/81.79  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (191), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.79  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.79  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																												|
% 114.77/81.79  																													| From (1336) and (4610) follows:
% 114.77/81.79  																													| (154) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																													|
% 114.77/81.79  																													| From (1336) and (3045) follows:
% 114.77/81.79  																													| (3628)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																													|
% 114.77/81.79  																													| Using (154) and (3628) yields:
% 114.77/81.79  																													| (1719) $false
% 114.77/81.79  																													|
% 114.77/81.79  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.79  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.79  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																												| (2396) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1)
% 114.77/81.79  																												|
% 114.77/81.79  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.79  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.79  																													| (1370) xm = xn
% 114.77/81.79  																													|
% 114.77/81.79  																														| Combining equations (1379,1370) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																														|
% 114.77/81.79  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																														| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.79  																														|
% 114.77/81.79  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.79  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.79  																													| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 114.77/81.79  																													| (1427)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 114.77/81.79  																													|
% 114.77/81.79  																														| Equations (1379) can reduce 1426 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																														|
% 114.77/81.79  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.79  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.79  																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.79  																														|
% 114.77/81.79  																															| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																															| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																															|
% 114.77/81.79  																															| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																															| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.79  																															|
% 114.77/81.79  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.79  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.79  																														| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 114.77/81.79  																														| (1681)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_13_0_5, v0))
% 114.77/81.79  																														|
% 114.77/81.79  																															| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																															| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																															|
% 114.77/81.79  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.79  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.79  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																															|
% 114.77/81.79  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																																| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.79  																																|
% 114.77/81.79  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.79  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.79  																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																															| (1633) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.77/81.79  																															|
% 114.77/81.79  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.79  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.79  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.79  																																|
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																																	|
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.79  																																	|
% 114.77/81.79  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.79  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.79  																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 114.77/81.79  																																| (1628)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 114.77/81.79  																																|
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.79  																																	|
% 114.77/81.79  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1633), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.79  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.79  																																	|
% 114.77/81.79  																																		| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.79  																																		| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.79  																																		|
% 114.77/81.79  																																		| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.79  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.79  																																		|
% 114.77/81.79  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.79  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 114.77/81.79  																																	| (1642)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 114.77/81.80  																																	|
% 114.77/81.80  																																		| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																		| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																		|
% 114.77/81.80  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (200), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																		|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																		| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																		|
% 114.77/81.80  																																			| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																			| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																			|
% 114.77/81.80  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																		|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																		| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																		| (2428) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_3_9, v0))
% 114.77/81.80  																																		|
% 114.77/81.80  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (230), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																			|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																			| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.80  																																			|
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																				|
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																				|
% 114.77/81.80  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																			|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																			| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 114.77/81.80  																																			| (1879)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 114.77/81.80  																																			|
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																				|
% 114.77/81.80  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																				|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																				|
% 114.77/81.80  																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																					| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																					|
% 114.77/81.80  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																				|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																				| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.80  																																				|
% 114.77/81.80  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1602), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																					|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.80  																																					|
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																						|
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																						|
% 114.77/81.80  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																					|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 114.77/81.80  																																					| (1620)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 114.77/81.80  																																					|
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																						|
% 114.77/81.80  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																						|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																						|
% 114.77/81.80  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																							| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																							|
% 114.77/81.80  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																						|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																						| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 114.77/81.80  																																						|
% 114.77/81.80  																																							| Combining equations (1379,1477) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																							| (2449) all_214_0_128 = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																							|
% 114.77/81.80  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																							|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																							| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																							|
% 114.77/81.80  																																								| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																								| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																								|
% 114.77/81.80  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																							|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																							| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																							| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 114.77/81.80  																																							|
% 114.77/81.80  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1346), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																								|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																								| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.80  																																								|
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																									|
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																									|
% 114.77/81.80  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																								|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																								| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 114.77/81.80  																																								| (2458)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 114.77/81.80  																																								|
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| Equations (1379) can reduce 1593 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																									|
% 114.77/81.80  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (204), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																									|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																									|
% 114.77/81.80  																																										| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																										| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																										|
% 114.77/81.80  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																									|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																									| (2463) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 114.77/81.80  																																									|
% 114.77/81.80  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1299), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																										|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																										|
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																											|
% 114.77/81.80  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																										|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																										| (2467) all_214_0_128 = all_212_0_127
% 114.77/81.80  																																										|
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| Combining equations (2467,2449) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| (2468) all_212_0_127 = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																											|
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| Simplifying 2468 yields:
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| (2469) all_212_0_127 = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																											|
% 114.77/81.80  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (558), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																											|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 114.77/81.80  																																											|
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| Combining equations (1200,1363) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| (1605) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| Simplifying 1605 yields:
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| Combining equations (1379,1361) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																											|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| (1608)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xn)
% 114.77/81.80  																																											| (1784)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 114.77/81.80  																																											|
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| Equations (1200,1379) can reduce 1608 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (2463), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| (1360) xr = xp
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| Combining equations (1360,1377) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| (1222) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| Simplifying 1222 yields:
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 114.77/81.80  																																												| (2483)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 114.77/81.80  																																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| Equations (1377) can reduce 1590 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| (2098)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| Simplifying 2098 yields:
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1301), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																														| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																																													| (1340) all_212_0_127 = xp
% 114.77/81.80  																																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																																														| Combining equations (1340,2469) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																																														| (1222) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																																														| Simplifying 1222 yields:
% 114.77/81.80  																																														| (173) xp = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																																														| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																														| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																										|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																										| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																										| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.77/81.80  																										|
% 114.77/81.80  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																											|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																											| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																											|
% 114.77/81.80  																												| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																												| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																											|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																											| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																											| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 114.77/81.80  																											|
% 114.77/81.80  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																												|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																												| (1377) xr = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																													| Combining equations (1377,310) yields a new equation:
% 114.77/81.80  																													| (1379) xn = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																													| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																													| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																												|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																												| (1381)  ~ (xr = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																												| (1382) xr = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.77/81.80  																												|
% 114.77/81.80  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																													|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																														| From (1336) and (4610) follows:
% 114.77/81.80  																														| (154) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																														| From (1336) and (3045) follows:
% 114.77/81.80  																														| (3628)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																														| Using (154) and (3628) yields:
% 114.77/81.80  																														| (1719) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																													|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																													| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 114.77/81.80  																													|
% 114.77/81.80  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																														|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																															| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																															|
% 114.77/81.80  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																														|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																														| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 114.77/81.80  																														|
% 114.77/81.80  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.80  																															|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.80  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 114.77/81.80  																															|
% 114.77/81.80  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.80  																																|
% 114.77/81.80  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.80  																															|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.80  																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 114.77/81.80  																															| (1361) xp = xn
% 114.77/81.80  																															|
% 114.77/81.80  																																| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 114.77/81.80  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.80  																																|
% 114.77/81.80  																																| From (1361) and (584) follows:
% 114.77/81.81  																																| (3194) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn
% 114.77/81.81  																																|
% 114.77/81.81  																																| From (1361) and (1213) follows:
% 114.77/81.81  																																| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 114.77/81.81  																																|
% 114.77/81.81  																																| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 114.77/81.81  																																| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 114.77/81.81  																																|
% 114.77/81.81  																																| From (1361) and (265) follows:
% 114.77/81.81  																																| (3197) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn
% 114.77/81.81  																																|
% 114.77/81.81  																																| From (1361) and (1330) follows:
% 114.77/81.81  																																| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 114.77/81.81  																																|
% 114.77/81.81  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.81  																																|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.81  																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.81  																																|
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.81  																																	|
% 114.77/81.81  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.81  																																|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.81  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.81  																																| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 114.77/81.81  																																|
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_2755, all_484_1_2756 yields:
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (4998)  ~ (all_484_0_2755 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_2756 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2756 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2755
% 114.77/81.81  																																	|
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (4998) yields:
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (4999)  ~ (all_484_0_2755 = all_0_4_4)
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (5000)  ~ (all_484_1_2756 = all_102_2_49)
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (5001) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2756
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (5002) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2755
% 114.77/81.81  																																	|
% 114.77/81.81  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 114.77/81.81  																																	|-Branch one:
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 114.77/81.81  																																	|
% 114.77/81.81  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 114.77/81.81  																																		| (174) $false
% 114.77/81.81  																																		|
% 114.77/81.81  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 114.77/81.81  																																	|-Branch two:
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 114.77/81.81  																																	| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 114.77/81.81  																																	|
% 114.77/81.81  																																		| Instantiating (1452) with all_490_0_2757, all_490_1_2758, all_490_2_2759 yields:
% 114.77/81.81  																																		| (5007)  ~ (all_490_0_2757 = all_490_1_2758) &  ~ (all_490_2_2759 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_2759 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_2757 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_2758 & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_2758, all_490_0_2757) & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_2759, all_0_4_4)
% 115.15/81.81  																																		|
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (5007) yields:
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (5008) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_2757
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (5009)  ~ (all_490_0_2757 = all_490_1_2758)
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (5010) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_2759
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (5011) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_2759, all_0_4_4)
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (5012) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_2758
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (5013) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_2758, all_490_0_2757)
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (5014)  ~ (all_490_2_2759 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.15/81.81  																																		|
% 115.15/81.81  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 115.15/81.81  																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.15/81.81  																																		|
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (174) $false
% 115.15/81.81  																																			|
% 115.15/81.81  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.15/81.81  																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.15/81.81  																																		| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 115.15/81.81  																																		|
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| Instantiating (1537) with all_495_0_2760, all_495_1_2761, all_495_2_2762 yields:
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (5019)  ~ (all_495_0_2760 = all_495_1_2761) &  ~ (all_495_2_2762 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_2760 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_2761 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_2762 & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_2761, all_495_0_2760) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_2762, all_83_0_38)
% 115.15/81.81  																																			|
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (5019) yields:
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (5020) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_2762, all_83_0_38)
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (5021) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_2761, all_495_0_2760)
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (5022) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_2761
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (5023) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_2760
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (5024)  ~ (all_495_2_2762 = all_83_0_38)
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (5025)  ~ (all_495_0_2760 = all_495_1_2761)
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (5026) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_2762
% 115.15/81.81  																																			|
% 115.15/81.81  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 115.15/81.81  																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.15/81.81  																																			|
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (174) $false
% 115.15/81.81  																																				|
% 115.15/81.81  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.15/81.81  																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.15/81.81  																																			| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 115.15/81.81  																																			|
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_2763, all_501_1_2764, all_501_2_2765 yields:
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (5031)  ~ (all_501_0_2763 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_2764 = all_501_2_2765) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2764 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_2765 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_2763 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_2765, all_501_1_2764) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_2763)
% 115.15/81.81  																																				|
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (5031) yields:
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (5032) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_2763)
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (5033)  ~ (all_501_0_2763 = all_102_1_48)
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (5034) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_2763
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (5035) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2764
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (5036)  ~ (all_501_1_2764 = all_501_2_2765)
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (5037) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_2765, all_501_1_2764)
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (5038) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_2765
% 115.15/81.81  																																				|
% 115.15/81.81  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 115.15/81.81  																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.15/81.81  																																				|
% 115.15/81.81  																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.15/81.81  																																					| (174) $false
% 115.15/81.81  																																					|
% 115.15/81.81  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.15/81.81  																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.15/81.81  																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.15/81.82  																																				| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.15/81.82  																																				|
% 115.15/81.82  																																					| Instantiating (1572) with all_507_0_2766, all_507_1_2767 yields:
% 115.15/81.82  																																					| (5043)  ~ (all_507_0_2766 = all_507_1_2767) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_2766 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_2767
% 115.17/81.82  																																					|
% 115.17/81.82  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (5043) yields:
% 115.17/81.82  																																					| (5044)  ~ (all_507_0_2766 = all_507_1_2767)
% 115.17/81.82  																																					| (5045) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_2766
% 115.17/81.82  																																					| (5046) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_2767
% 115.17/81.82  																																					|
% 115.17/81.82  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.82  																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.82  																																					| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.82  																																					|
% 115.17/81.82  																																						| From (2697) and (1274) follows:
% 115.17/81.82  																																						| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 115.17/81.82  																																						|
% 115.17/81.82  																																						| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 115.17/81.82  																																						| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 115.17/81.82  																																						|
% 115.17/81.82  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.82  																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.82  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.82  																																						|
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.82  																																							|
% 115.17/81.82  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.82  																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.82  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.82  																																						| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 115.17/81.82  																																						|
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| Instantiating (1502) with all_517_0_2768, all_517_1_2769, all_517_2_2770 yields:
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (5054)  ~ (all_517_0_2768 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_517_1_2769 = all_517_2_2770) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_2768 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_2769 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_2770 & sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_2770, all_517_1_2769) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_2768)
% 115.17/81.82  																																							|
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (5054) yields:
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (5055) sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_2770, all_517_1_2769)
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (5056)  ~ (all_517_1_2769 = all_517_2_2770)
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (5057)  ~ (all_517_0_2768 = all_83_0_38)
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (5058) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_2769
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (5059) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_2770
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (5060) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_2768
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (5061) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_2768)
% 115.17/81.82  																																							|
% 115.17/81.82  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.82  																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.82  																																							|
% 115.17/81.82  																																								| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.17/81.82  																																								| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.82  																																								|
% 115.17/81.82  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.82  																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.82  																																							| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 115.17/81.82  																																							|
% 115.17/81.82  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.82  																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.82  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.82  																																								|
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.82  																																									|
% 115.17/81.82  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.82  																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.82  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.82  																																								| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 115.17/81.82  																																								|
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| Instantiating (1549) with all_527_0_2771, all_527_1_2772, all_527_2_2773 yields:
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (5070)  ~ (all_527_0_2771 = xp) &  ~ (all_527_1_2772 = all_527_2_2773) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = all_527_1_2772 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_2773 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = all_527_0_2771 & sdtlseqdt0(all_527_2_2773, all_527_1_2772) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_527_0_2771)
% 115.17/81.82  																																									|
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (5070) yields:
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (5071) sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_527_0_2771)
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (5072) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = all_527_1_2772
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (5073) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_2773
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (5074)  ~ (all_527_0_2771 = xp)
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (5075) sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = all_527_0_2771
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (5076)  ~ (all_527_1_2772 = all_527_2_2773)
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (5077) sdtlseqdt0(all_527_2_2773, all_527_1_2772)
% 115.17/81.82  																																									|
% 115.17/81.82  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.82  																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.82  																																									|
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.82  																																										|
% 115.17/81.82  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.82  																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.82  																																									| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 115.17/81.82  																																									|
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| Instantiating (1587) with all_533_0_2774, all_533_1_2775, all_533_2_2776 yields:
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (5082)  ~ (all_533_0_2774 = all_533_1_2775) &  ~ (all_533_2_2776 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_2776 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_2774 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_2775 & sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_2775, all_533_0_2774) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_2776)
% 115.17/81.82  																																										|
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| Applying alpha-rule on (5082) yields:
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (5083) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_2776
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (5084)  ~ (all_533_0_2774 = all_533_1_2775)
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (5085)  ~ (all_533_2_2776 = all_102_2_49)
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (5086) sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_2775, all_533_0_2774)
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (5087) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_2776)
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (5088) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_2775
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (5089) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_2774
% 115.17/81.82  																																										|
% 115.17/81.82  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.82  																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.82  																																										|
% 115.17/81.82  																																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.17/81.82  																																											| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.82  																																											|
% 115.17/81.82  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.82  																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.82  																																										| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 115.17/81.82  																																										|
% 115.17/81.82  																																											| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 115.17/81.82  																																											| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 115.17/81.82  																																											|
% 115.17/81.82  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.82  																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.82  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.82  																																											|
% 115.17/81.82  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.82  																																												| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.82  																																												|
% 115.17/81.82  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.82  																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.82  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.82  																																											| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.17/81.82  																																											|
% 115.17/81.82  																																												| Instantiating (1433) with all_543_0_2777, all_543_1_2778, all_543_2_2779 yields:
% 115.17/81.82  																																												| (5099)  ~ (all_543_0_2777 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (all_543_1_2778 = all_543_2_2779) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_543_1_2778 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_2777 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_2779 & sdtlseqdt0(all_543_0_2777, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(all_543_2_2779, all_543_1_2778)
% 115.17/81.82  																																												|
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (5099) yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (5100) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_2777
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (5101) sdtlseqdt0(all_543_2_2779, all_543_1_2778)
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (5102) sdtlseqdt0(all_543_0_2777, all_83_2_40)
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (5103) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_543_1_2778
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (5104) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_2779
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (5105)  ~ (all_543_0_2777 = all_83_2_40)
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (5106)  ~ (all_543_1_2778 = all_543_2_2779)
% 115.17/81.83  																																												|
% 115.17/81.83  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.83  																																												|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																												|
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.83  																																													|
% 115.17/81.83  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.83  																																												|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.83  																																												| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.17/81.83  																																												|
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| Instantiating (1421) with all_549_0_2780, all_549_1_2781, all_549_2_2782 yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (5111)  ~ (all_549_0_2780 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_549_1_2781 = all_549_2_2782) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_2781 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_2782 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_2780 & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_2780, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_2782, all_549_1_2781)
% 115.17/81.83  																																													|
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (5111) yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (5112) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_2782
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (5113)  ~ (all_549_1_2781 = all_549_2_2782)
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (5114) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_2780
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (5115) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_2781
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (5116) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_2780, all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (5117) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_2782, all_549_1_2781)
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (5118)  ~ (all_549_0_2780 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.83  																																													|
% 115.17/81.83  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1391), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.83  																																													|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																													|
% 115.17/81.83  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.83  																																														| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.83  																																														|
% 115.17/81.83  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.83  																																													|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.83  																																													| (1456)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.17/81.83  																																													|
% 115.17/81.83  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.83  																																														|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.83  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																														|
% 115.17/81.83  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.83  																																															| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.83  																																															|
% 115.17/81.83  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.83  																																														|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.83  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.83  																																														| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 115.17/81.83  																																														|
% 115.17/81.83  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1382), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.83  																																															|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.83  																																															| (1392) xr = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																															|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| Combining equations (310,1392) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.83  																																															|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.83  																																															| (1396)  ~ (xr = sz10)
% 115.17/81.83  																																															| (1397)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.17/81.83  																																															|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| Equations (310) can reduce 1396 to:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.17/81.83  																																																	|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating (1411) with all_577_0_2790, all_577_1_2791, all_577_2_2792 yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5142)  ~ (all_577_0_2790 = all_577_1_2791) &  ~ (all_577_2_2792 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_2792 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_2790 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_2791 & sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_2791, all_577_0_2790) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_2792)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (5142) yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5143) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_2790
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5144)  ~ (all_577_2_2792 = all_97_2_46)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5145)  ~ (all_577_0_2790 = all_577_1_2791)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5146) sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_2791, all_577_0_2790)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5147) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_2791
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5148) sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_2792)
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5149) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_2792
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| From (2697) and (5147) follows:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5150) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_2791
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with all_52_0_18, sz10, xn, all_527_2_2773 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_2773, sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn, yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5151) all_527_2_2773 = xn
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_2760, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_2760, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5152) all_495_0_2760 = all_83_2_40
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_2760, all_517_2_2770 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_2770, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_2760, yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5153) all_517_2_2770 = all_495_0_2760
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, sz10, all_517_2_2770 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_2770, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5154) all_517_2_2770 = sz10
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating formula (77) with xn, all_166_0_68, all_52_0_18, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_166_0_68) = xn, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_166_0_68), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (3360) all_166_0_68 = all_52_0_18
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_577_1_2791, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_2791, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5156) all_577_1_2791 = all_102_2_49
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_533_1_2775, all_549_0_2780 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_2780, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_2775, yields:
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| (5157) all_549_0_2780 = all_533_1_2775
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.83  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_2767, all_577_1_2791 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_2791, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_2767, yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5158) all_577_1_2791 = all_507_1_2767
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_2767, all_533_1_2775 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_2775, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_2767, yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5159) all_533_1_2775 = all_507_1_2767
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_490_1_2758, all_577_1_2791 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_2791, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_2758, yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5160) all_577_1_2791 = all_490_1_2758
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_484_0_2755, all_549_0_2780 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_2780, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_2755, yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5161) all_549_0_2780 = all_484_0_2755
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_97_2_46, all_577_1_2791 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_2791, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5162) all_577_1_2791 = all_97_2_46
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_543_2_2779, all_543_0_2777 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_2777, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_2779, yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5163) all_543_0_2777 = all_543_2_2779
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_495_1_2761, all_543_0_2777 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_2777, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_2761, yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5164) all_543_0_2777 = all_495_1_2761
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_495_2_2762, all_543_2_2779 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_2779, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_2762, yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5165) all_543_2_2779 = all_495_2_2762
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5162,5160) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5166) all_490_1_2758 = all_97_2_46
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5156,5160) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5167) all_490_1_2758 = all_102_2_49
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5158,5160) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5168) all_507_1_2767 = all_490_1_2758
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Simplifying 5168 yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5169) all_507_1_2767 = all_490_1_2758
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5157,5161) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5170) all_533_1_2775 = all_484_0_2755
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Simplifying 5170 yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5171) all_533_1_2775 = all_484_0_2755
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5163,5164) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5172) all_543_2_2779 = all_495_1_2761
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Simplifying 5172 yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5173) all_543_2_2779 = all_495_1_2761
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5165,5173) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5174) all_495_1_2761 = all_495_2_2762
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5159,5171) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5175) all_507_1_2767 = all_484_0_2755
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Simplifying 5175 yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5176) all_507_1_2767 = all_484_0_2755
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5153,5154) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5177) all_495_0_2760 = sz10
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Simplifying 5177 yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5178) all_495_0_2760 = sz10
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5169,5176) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5179) all_490_1_2758 = all_484_0_2755
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Simplifying 5179 yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5180) all_490_1_2758 = all_484_0_2755
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5152,5178) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (3386) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Simplifying 3386 yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (2392) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5166,5180) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5183) all_484_0_2755 = all_97_2_46
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5167,5180) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (5184) all_484_0_2755 = all_102_2_49
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Combining equations (5184,5183) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (3390) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| Simplifying 3390 yields:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (2813) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| From (5151) and (5073) follows:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (3194) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| From (2813) and (376) follows:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (2698) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| From (2392) and (337) follows:
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.84  																																																		| From (3360) and (619) follows:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3197) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| From (2813) and (494) follows:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| From (2392) and (504) follows:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3397) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = sz10
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| From (5174) and (5022) follows:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (5026) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_2762
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| From (2392) and (1194) follows:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (239) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| From (3360) and (620) follows:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (266) aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| From (2392) and (1199) follows:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (22) with sz10, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (1366) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (61) with sz00, xn and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3403)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(xn, v0) = sz00 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (7) with sz00, sz00, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3404) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz00) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, sz00))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (94) with sz00, sz00, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3405) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz00) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, sz00) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (67) with xn, all_52_0_18, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3406) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (67) with all_97_2_46, xm, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3407) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (67) with sz10, xn, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3408) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v0))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (97) with xn, all_52_0_18, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3409) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (97) with all_97_2_46, xm, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3410) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v2))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (97) with sz10, xn, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = sz10, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3411) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz10) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v2))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (67) with all_495_2_2762, sz10, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_2762, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (5207) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_495_2_2762) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_2762, v0))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating formula (97) with all_495_2_2762, sz10, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_2762, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (5208) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_495_2_2762) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_2762, v2))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Instantiating (3403) with all_747_0_2925 yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (5209) sdtpldt0(xn, all_747_0_2925) = sz00 & aNaturalNumber0(all_747_0_2925)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (5209) yields:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (5210) sdtpldt0(xn, all_747_0_2925) = sz00
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (5211) aNaturalNumber0(all_747_0_2925)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3404), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		| (3440)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz00) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, sz00))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3405), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			| (3432)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz00) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, sz00) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																			|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3406), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				| (3424)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																				|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3407), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					| (3444)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																					|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3410), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						| (3420)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v2))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																						|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3408), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																								| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.85  																																																								|
% 115.17/81.85  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							| (3428)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v0))
% 115.17/81.85  																																																							|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3409), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.86  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.86  																																																								|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.86  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.86  																																																								| (3436)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 115.17/81.86  																																																								|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3411), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									| (3456)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz10) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v2))
% 115.17/81.86  																																																									|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (5207), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										| (5247)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_495_2_2762) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_2762, v0))
% 115.17/81.86  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (5208), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											| (5251)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_495_2_2762) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_2762, v2))
% 115.17/81.86  																																																											|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| Instantiating formula (2) with xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| Instantiating formula (87) with all_747_0_2925, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_747_0_2925) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_747_0_2925), aNaturalNumber0(xn), yields:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| Combining equations (1372,1379) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| (1793) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| Simplifying 1793 yields:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												|
% 115.17/81.86  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.86  																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.86  																																					| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.86  																																					| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 115.17/81.86  																																					|
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_3252, all_513_1_3253, all_513_2_3254 yields:
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (5259)  ~ (all_513_0_3252 = all_513_1_3253) &  ~ (all_513_2_3254 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_3252 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_3253 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_3254 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_3253, all_513_0_3252) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_3254)
% 115.17/81.86  																																						|
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (5259) yields:
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (5260) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_3253
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (5261) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_3254)
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (5262) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_3252
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (5263)  ~ (all_513_2_3254 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (5264)  ~ (all_513_0_3252 = all_513_1_3253)
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (5265) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_3254
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (5266) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_3253, all_513_0_3252)
% 115.17/81.86  																																						|
% 115.17/81.86  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.86  																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.86  																																						|
% 115.17/81.86  																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.86  																																							| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.86  																																							|
% 115.17/81.86  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.86  																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.86  																																						| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 115.17/81.86  																																						|
% 115.17/81.86  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.86  																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.86  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.86  																																							|
% 115.17/81.86  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.86  																																								| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.86  																																								|
% 115.17/81.86  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.86  																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.86  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.86  																																							| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 115.17/81.86  																																							|
% 115.17/81.86  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.86  																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.86  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.86  																																								|
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.86  																																									|
% 115.17/81.86  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.86  																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.86  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.86  																																								| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 115.17/81.86  																																								|
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_3261, all_535_1_3262, all_535_2_3263 yields:
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (5279)  ~ (all_535_0_3261 = all_535_1_3262) &  ~ (all_535_2_3263 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_3263 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_3261 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_3262 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_3262, all_535_0_3261) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_3263)
% 115.17/81.86  																																									|
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (5279) yields:
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (5280) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_3261
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (5281) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_3263
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (5282)  ~ (all_535_2_3263 = all_102_2_49)
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (5283)  ~ (all_535_0_3261 = all_535_1_3262)
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (5284) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_3263)
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (5285) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_3262, all_535_0_3261)
% 115.17/81.86  																																									| (5286) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_3262
% 115.17/81.86  																																									|
% 115.17/81.86  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.86  																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.87  																																									|
% 115.17/81.87  																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																										| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																										|
% 115.17/81.87  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.87  																																									| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 115.17/81.87  																																									|
% 115.17/81.87  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.87  																																										|
% 115.17/81.87  																																											| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																											| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																											|
% 115.17/81.87  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																										| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.87  																																										| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 115.17/81.87  																																										|
% 115.17/81.87  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.87  																																											|
% 115.17/81.87  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																												| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																												|
% 115.17/81.87  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.87  																																											| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.17/81.87  																																											|
% 115.17/81.87  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																												|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.87  																																												|
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																													|
% 115.17/81.87  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																												|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.87  																																												| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 115.17/81.87  																																												|
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_3272, all_559_1_3273 yields:
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| (5303)  ~ (all_559_0_3272 = all_559_1_3273) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_3273 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_3272
% 115.17/81.87  																																													|
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| Applying alpha-rule on (5303) yields:
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| (5304)  ~ (all_559_0_3272 = all_559_1_3273)
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| (5305) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_3273
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| (5306) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_3272
% 115.17/81.87  																																													|
% 115.17/81.87  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																													|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.87  																																													|
% 115.17/81.87  																																														| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																														| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																														|
% 115.17/81.87  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																													|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.87  																																													| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.17/81.87  																																													|
% 115.17/81.87  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																														|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																														| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.87  																																														|
% 115.17/81.87  																																															| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																															| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																															|
% 115.17/81.87  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																														|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																														| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.87  																																														| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.17/81.87  																																														|
% 115.17/81.87  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																															|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.87  																																															|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																															|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.87  																																															| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 115.17/81.87  																																															|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																																|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.87  																																																|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																																|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.17/81.87  																																																|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 115.17/81.87  																																																	|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																		|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																			|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																				|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 115.17/81.87  																																																					|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																						|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_3297, all_623_1_3298 yields:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| (5347)  ~ (all_623_0_3297 = all_623_1_3298) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_3297 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_3298
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (5347) yields:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| (5348)  ~ (all_623_0_3297 = all_623_1_3298)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| (5349) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_3297
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| (5350) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_3298
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																								| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.87  																																																								|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.17/81.87  																																																							|
% 115.17/81.87  																																																								| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_3299, all_633_1_3300, all_633_2_3301 yields:
% 115.17/81.87  																																																								| (5355)  ~ (all_633_0_3299 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_3300 = all_633_2_3301) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_3300 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_3301 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_3299 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_3299, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_3301, all_633_1_3300)
% 115.17/81.87  																																																								|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (5355) yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (5356) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_3299, all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (5357) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_3301
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (5358)  ~ (all_633_1_3300 = all_633_2_3301)
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (5359) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_3301, all_633_1_3300)
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (5360) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_3299
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (5361)  ~ (all_633_0_3299 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (5362) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_3300
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 115.17/81.88  																																																								|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 115.17/81.88  																																																									|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_3297, all_633_1_3300 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_3300, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_3297, yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5371) all_633_1_3300 = all_623_0_3297
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_3273, all_633_1_3300 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_3300, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_3273, yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5372) all_633_1_3300 = all_559_1_3273
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_3263, all_623_0_3297 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_3297, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_3263, yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5373) all_623_0_3297 = all_535_2_3263
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_3253, all_623_0_3297 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_3297, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_3253, yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5374) all_623_0_3297 = all_513_1_3253
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_2764, all_623_0_3297 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_3297, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_2764, yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5375) all_623_0_3297 = all_501_1_2764
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_2756, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2756, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5376) all_484_1_2756 = all_0_4_4
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_2756, all_623_0_3297 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_3297, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_2756, yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5377) all_623_0_3297 = all_484_1_2756
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_623_0_3297 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_3297, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5378) all_623_0_3297 = xm
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5371,5372) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5379) all_623_0_3297 = all_559_1_3273
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Simplifying 5379 yields:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5380) all_623_0_3297 = all_559_1_3273
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5374,5380) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5381) all_559_1_3273 = all_513_1_3253
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5377,5380) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5382) all_559_1_3273 = all_484_1_2756
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5373,5380) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5383) all_559_1_3273 = all_535_2_3263
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5378,5380) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5384) all_559_1_3273 = xm
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5375,5380) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5385) all_559_1_3273 = all_501_1_2764
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5382,5383) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5386) all_535_2_3263 = all_484_1_2756
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5381,5383) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5387) all_535_2_3263 = all_513_1_3253
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5384,5383) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5388) all_535_2_3263 = xm
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5385,5383) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5389) all_535_2_3263 = all_501_1_2764
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5388,5387) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5390) all_513_1_3253 = xm
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| Combining equations (5386,5387) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										| (5391) all_513_1_3253 = all_484_1_2756
% 115.17/81.88  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| Combining equations (5389,5387) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| (5392) all_513_1_3253 = all_501_1_2764
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| Combining equations (5390,5392) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| (5393) all_501_1_2764 = xm
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| Combining equations (5391,5392) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| (5394) all_501_1_2764 = all_484_1_2756
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| Combining equations (5394,5393) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| (5395) all_484_1_2756 = xm
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| Simplifying 5395 yields:
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| (5396) all_484_1_2756 = xm
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| Combining equations (5396,5376) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																								|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.89  																								| (3604)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																								| (3605) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xp)
% 115.17/81.89  																								|
% 115.17/81.89  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.89  																									|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.89  																									| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.89  																									|
% 115.17/81.89  																										| From (1336) and (479) follows:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																										| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (1719) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																									|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.89  																									| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																									| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.17/81.89  																									|
% 115.17/81.89  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.89  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.17/81.89  																											| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																											|
% 115.17/81.89  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.89  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.89  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.89  																											|
% 115.17/81.89  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.17/81.89  																												| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																												|
% 115.17/81.89  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.89  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.17/81.89  																											|
% 115.17/81.89  																												| From (1361) and (3604) follows:
% 115.17/81.89  																												| (3619)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																												|
% 115.17/81.89  																												| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 115.17/81.89  																												| (1719) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																												|
% 115.17/81.89  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																							|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.89  																							| (3621)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xr, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																							| (3622) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xr)
% 115.17/81.89  																							|
% 115.17/81.89  																								| From (310) and (3621) follows:
% 115.17/81.89  																								| (3619)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																								|
% 115.17/81.89  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.89  																								|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.89  																								| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																								|
% 115.17/81.89  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.89  																									|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.89  																									| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.89  																									|
% 115.17/81.89  																										| From (1336) and (4610) follows:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (154) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																										| From (1336) and (3045) follows:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (3628)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																										| Using (154) and (3628) yields:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (1719) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																									|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.89  																									| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																									| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.17/81.89  																									|
% 115.17/81.89  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.89  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.17/81.89  																											| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																											|
% 115.17/81.89  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																										| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 115.17/81.89  																										|
% 115.17/81.89  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.89  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.89  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.89  																											|
% 115.17/81.89  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.17/81.89  																												| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																												|
% 115.17/81.89  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.89  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.17/81.89  																											|
% 115.17/81.89  																												| From (1361) and (1330) follows:
% 115.17/81.89  																												| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.17/81.89  																												|
% 115.17/81.89  																												| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 115.17/81.89  																												| (1719) $false
% 115.17/81.89  																												|
% 115.17/81.89  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.89  																								|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																								| (3604)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																								| (3605) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xp)
% 115.17/81.90  																								|
% 115.17/81.90  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																									|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																									| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.17/81.90  																									|
% 115.17/81.90  																										| From (1379) and (9) follows:
% 115.17/81.90  																										| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																										|
% 115.17/81.90  																										| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 115.17/81.90  																										| (1719) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																										|
% 115.17/81.90  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																									|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																									| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																									| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.17/81.90  																									|
% 115.17/81.90  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																										| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.17/81.90  																										|
% 115.17/81.90  																											| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 115.17/81.90  																											| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																											|
% 115.17/81.90  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																										| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																										| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 115.17/81.90  																										|
% 115.17/81.90  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																											| (1377) xr = sz00
% 115.17/81.90  																											|
% 115.17/81.90  																												| Combining equations (1377,310) yields a new equation:
% 115.17/81.90  																												| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.17/81.90  																												|
% 115.17/81.90  																												| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 115.17/81.90  																												| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																												|
% 115.17/81.90  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																											| (1381)  ~ (xr = sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																											| (1382) xr = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.17/81.90  																											|
% 115.17/81.90  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																												|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.90  																												|
% 115.17/81.90  																													| From (1336) and (479) follows:
% 115.17/81.90  																													| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																													|
% 115.17/81.90  																													| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 115.17/81.90  																													| (1719) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																													|
% 115.17/81.90  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																												|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																												| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.17/81.90  																												|
% 115.17/81.90  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																													|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.90  																													|
% 115.17/81.90  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.17/81.90  																														| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																														|
% 115.17/81.90  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																													|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																													| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 115.17/81.90  																													|
% 115.17/81.90  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																														|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.17/81.90  																														|
% 115.17/81.90  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																															|
% 115.17/81.90  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																														|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.17/81.90  																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.17/81.90  																														|
% 115.17/81.90  																															| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.90  																															|
% 115.17/81.90  																															| From (1361) and (584) follows:
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (3194) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn
% 115.17/81.90  																															|
% 115.17/81.90  																															| From (1361) and (1213) follows:
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 115.17/81.90  																															|
% 115.17/81.90  																															| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 115.17/81.90  																															|
% 115.17/81.90  																															| From (1361) and (265) follows:
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (3197) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn
% 115.17/81.90  																															|
% 115.17/81.90  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																															|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.90  																															|
% 115.17/81.90  																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																																|
% 115.17/81.90  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																															|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.90  																															| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 115.17/81.90  																															|
% 115.17/81.90  																																| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_3548, all_484_1_3549 yields:
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (5474)  ~ (all_484_0_3548 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_3549 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_3549 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_3548
% 115.17/81.90  																																|
% 115.17/81.90  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (5474) yields:
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (5475)  ~ (all_484_0_3548 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (5476)  ~ (all_484_1_3549 = all_102_2_49)
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (5477) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_3549
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (5478) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_3548
% 115.17/81.90  																																|
% 115.17/81.90  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																																|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.90  																																|
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																																	|
% 115.17/81.90  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																																|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.90  																																| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 115.17/81.90  																																|
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| Instantiating (1452) with all_490_0_3550, all_490_1_3551, all_490_2_3552 yields:
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (5483)  ~ (all_490_0_3550 = all_490_1_3551) &  ~ (all_490_2_3552 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_3552 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_3550 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_3551 & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_3551, all_490_0_3550) & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_3552, all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.90  																																	|
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (5483) yields:
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (5484) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_3551
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (5485) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_3552, all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (5486) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_3550
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (5487)  ~ (all_490_2_3552 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (5488) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_3552
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (5489)  ~ (all_490_0_3550 = all_490_1_3551)
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (5490) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_3551, all_490_0_3550)
% 115.17/81.90  																																	|
% 115.17/81.90  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 115.17/81.90  																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.17/81.90  																																	|
% 115.17/81.90  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.17/81.90  																																		| (174) $false
% 115.17/81.90  																																		|
% 115.17/81.90  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.17/81.90  																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.17/81.90  																																	| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 115.17/81.90  																																	|
% 115.17/81.90  																																		| Instantiating (1537) with all_495_0_3553, all_495_1_3554, all_495_2_3555 yields:
% 115.17/81.90  																																		| (5495)  ~ (all_495_0_3553 = all_495_1_3554) &  ~ (all_495_2_3555 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_3553 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_3554 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_3555 & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_3554, all_495_0_3553) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_3555, all_83_0_38)
% 115.17/81.90  																																		|
% 115.17/81.90  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (5495) yields:
% 115.17/81.90  																																		| (5496) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_3555, all_83_0_38)
% 115.47/81.90  																																		| (5497) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_3554, all_495_0_3553)
% 115.47/81.90  																																		| (5498) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_3554
% 115.47/81.90  																																		| (5499)  ~ (all_495_0_3553 = all_495_1_3554)
% 115.47/81.90  																																		| (5500)  ~ (all_495_2_3555 = all_83_0_38)
% 115.47/81.90  																																		| (5501) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_3555
% 115.47/81.90  																																		| (5502) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_3553
% 115.47/81.90  																																		|
% 115.47/81.90  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.90  																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.91  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.91  																																		|
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.91  																																			|
% 115.47/81.91  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.91  																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.91  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.91  																																		| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 115.47/81.91  																																		|
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_3556, all_501_1_3557, all_501_2_3558 yields:
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (5507)  ~ (all_501_0_3556 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_3557 = all_501_2_3558) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_3557 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_3558 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_3556 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_3558, all_501_1_3557) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_3556)
% 115.47/81.91  																																			|
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (5507) yields:
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (5508) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_3558, all_501_1_3557)
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (5509) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_3556
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (5510)  ~ (all_501_1_3557 = all_501_2_3558)
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (5511) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_3558
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (5512)  ~ (all_501_0_3556 = all_102_1_48)
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (5513) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_3556)
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (5514) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_3557
% 115.47/81.91  																																			|
% 115.47/81.91  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.91  																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.91  																																			|
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.91  																																				|
% 115.47/81.91  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.91  																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.91  																																			| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.47/81.91  																																			|
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| Instantiating (1572) with all_507_0_3559, all_507_1_3560 yields:
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| (5519)  ~ (all_507_0_3559 = all_507_1_3560) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_3559 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_3560
% 115.47/81.91  																																				|
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (5519) yields:
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| (5520)  ~ (all_507_0_3559 = all_507_1_3560)
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| (5521) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_3559
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| (5522) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_3560
% 115.47/81.91  																																				|
% 115.47/81.91  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.91  																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.91  																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.91  																																				|
% 115.47/81.91  																																					| From (2697) and (1274) follows:
% 115.47/81.91  																																					| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 115.47/81.91  																																					|
% 115.47/81.91  																																					| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 115.47/81.91  																																					| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 115.47/81.91  																																					|
% 115.47/81.91  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.91  																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.91  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.91  																																					|
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.91  																																						|
% 115.47/81.91  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.91  																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.91  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.91  																																					| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 115.47/81.91  																																					|
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| Instantiating (1502) with all_517_0_3561, all_517_1_3562, all_517_2_3563 yields:
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (5530)  ~ (all_517_0_3561 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_517_1_3562 = all_517_2_3563) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_3561 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_3562 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_3563 & sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_3563, all_517_1_3562) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_3561)
% 115.47/81.91  																																						|
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (5530) yields:
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (5531) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_3563
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (5532) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_3562
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (5533)  ~ (all_517_1_3562 = all_517_2_3563)
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (5534) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_3561)
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (5535)  ~ (all_517_0_3561 = all_83_0_38)
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (5536) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_3561
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (5537) sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_3563, all_517_1_3562)
% 115.47/81.91  																																						|
% 115.47/81.91  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.91  																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.47/81.91  																																						|
% 115.47/81.91  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.47/81.91  																																							| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.91  																																							|
% 115.47/81.91  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.91  																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.47/81.91  																																						| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 115.47/81.91  																																						|
% 115.47/81.91  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.91  																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.91  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.91  																																							|
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.91  																																								|
% 115.47/81.91  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.91  																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.91  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.91  																																							| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 115.47/81.91  																																							|
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| Instantiating (1549) with all_527_0_3564, all_527_1_3565, all_527_2_3566 yields:
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (5546)  ~ (all_527_0_3564 = xp) &  ~ (all_527_1_3565 = all_527_2_3566) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = all_527_1_3565 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_3566 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = all_527_0_3564 & sdtlseqdt0(all_527_2_3566, all_527_1_3565) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_527_0_3564)
% 115.47/81.91  																																								|
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (5546) yields:
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (5547) sdtlseqdt0(xp, all_527_0_3564)
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (5548) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = all_527_1_3565
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (5549) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_3566
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (5550) sdtlseqdt0(all_527_2_3566, all_527_1_3565)
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (5551) sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = all_527_0_3564
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (5552)  ~ (all_527_1_3565 = all_527_2_3566)
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (5553)  ~ (all_527_0_3564 = xp)
% 115.47/81.91  																																								|
% 115.47/81.91  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.91  																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.91  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																								|
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.92  																																									|
% 115.47/81.92  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.92  																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.92  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.92  																																								| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 115.47/81.92  																																								|
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| Instantiating (1587) with all_533_0_3567, all_533_1_3568, all_533_2_3569 yields:
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (5558)  ~ (all_533_0_3567 = all_533_1_3568) &  ~ (all_533_2_3569 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_3569 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_3567 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_3568 & sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_3568, all_533_0_3567) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_3569)
% 115.47/81.92  																																									|
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (5558) yields:
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (5559) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_3568
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (5560)  ~ (all_533_0_3567 = all_533_1_3568)
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (5561) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_3569)
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (5562)  ~ (all_533_2_3569 = all_102_2_49)
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (5563) sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_3568, all_533_0_3567)
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (5564) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_3567
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (5565) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_3569
% 115.47/81.92  																																									|
% 115.47/81.92  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.92  																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.47/81.92  																																									|
% 115.47/81.92  																																										| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																										| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.92  																																										|
% 115.47/81.92  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.92  																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.47/81.92  																																									| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 115.47/81.92  																																									|
% 115.47/81.92  																																										| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 115.47/81.92  																																										| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 115.47/81.92  																																										|
% 115.47/81.92  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.92  																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.92  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																										|
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.92  																																											|
% 115.47/81.92  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.92  																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.92  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.92  																																										| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.47/81.92  																																										|
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| Instantiating (1433) with all_543_0_3570, all_543_1_3571, all_543_2_3572 yields:
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (5575)  ~ (all_543_0_3570 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (all_543_1_3571 = all_543_2_3572) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_543_1_3571 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_3570 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_3572 & sdtlseqdt0(all_543_0_3570, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(all_543_2_3572, all_543_1_3571)
% 115.47/81.92  																																											|
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| Applying alpha-rule on (5575) yields:
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (5576)  ~ (all_543_0_3570 = all_83_2_40)
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (5577) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_3570
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (5578)  ~ (all_543_1_3571 = all_543_2_3572)
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (5579) sdtlseqdt0(all_543_2_3572, all_543_1_3571)
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (5580) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_3572
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (5581) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = all_543_1_3571
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (5582) sdtlseqdt0(all_543_0_3570, all_83_2_40)
% 115.47/81.92  																																											|
% 115.47/81.92  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.92  																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																											|
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.92  																																												|
% 115.47/81.92  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.92  																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.92  																																											| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.47/81.92  																																											|
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| Instantiating (1421) with all_549_0_3573, all_549_1_3574, all_549_2_3575 yields:
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (5587)  ~ (all_549_0_3573 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_549_1_3574 = all_549_2_3575) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_3574 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_3575 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_3573 & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_3573, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_3575, all_549_1_3574)
% 115.47/81.92  																																												|
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (5587) yields:
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (5588) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_3575, all_549_1_3574)
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (5589) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_3574
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (5590)  ~ (all_549_0_3573 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (5591) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_3573, all_0_4_4)
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (5592)  ~ (all_549_1_3574 = all_549_2_3575)
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (5593) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_3573
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (5594) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_3575
% 115.47/81.92  																																												|
% 115.47/81.92  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1391), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.92  																																												|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																												|
% 115.47/81.92  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																													| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.92  																																													|
% 115.47/81.92  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.92  																																												|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.92  																																												| (1456)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.47/81.92  																																												|
% 115.47/81.92  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.92  																																													|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.92  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																													|
% 115.47/81.92  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																														| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.92  																																														|
% 115.47/81.92  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.92  																																													|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.92  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.92  																																													| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 115.47/81.92  																																													|
% 115.47/81.92  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1382), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.92  																																														|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.92  																																														| (1392) xr = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																														|
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| Combining equations (310,1392) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																															|
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																															|
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.92  																																															|
% 115.47/81.92  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.92  																																														|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.92  																																														| (1396)  ~ (xr = sz10)
% 115.47/81.92  																																														| (1397)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.47/81.92  																																														|
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| Equations (310) can reduce 1396 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.92  																																															|
% 115.47/81.92  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.92  																																															|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.92  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.92  																																															|
% 115.47/81.92  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.92  																																																| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.92  																																																|
% 115.47/81.92  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.92  																																															|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.93  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.93  																																															| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.47/81.93  																																															|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.93  																																																|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.93  																																																|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.93  																																																|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.93  																																																| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.47/81.93  																																																|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating (1411) with all_577_0_3583, all_577_1_3584, all_577_2_3585 yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5618)  ~ (all_577_0_3583 = all_577_1_3584) &  ~ (all_577_2_3585 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_3585 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_3583 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_3584 & sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_3584, all_577_0_3583) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_3585)
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (5618) yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5619)  ~ (all_577_2_3585 = all_97_2_46)
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5620) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_3584
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5621) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_3585
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5622)  ~ (all_577_0_3583 = all_577_1_3584)
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5623) sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_3585)
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5624) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_3583
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5625) sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_3584, all_577_0_3583)
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| From (2697) and (5620) follows:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5626) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_3584
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with all_52_0_18, sz10, xn, all_527_2_3566 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = all_527_2_3566, sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5627) all_527_2_3566 = xn
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_3553, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_3553, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5628) all_495_0_3553 = all_83_2_40
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_3553, all_517_2_3563 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_3563, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_3553, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5629) all_517_2_3563 = all_495_0_3553
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, sz10, all_517_2_3563 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_3563, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5630) all_517_2_3563 = sz10
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (77) with xn, all_166_0_68, all_52_0_18, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_166_0_68) = xn, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_166_0_68), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (3360) all_166_0_68 = all_52_0_18
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_577_1_3584, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_3584, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5632) all_577_1_3584 = all_102_2_49
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_533_1_3568, all_549_0_3573 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_3573, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_3568, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5633) all_549_0_3573 = all_533_1_3568
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_3560, all_577_1_3584 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_3584, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_3560, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5634) all_577_1_3584 = all_507_1_3560
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_3560, all_533_1_3568 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_3568, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_3560, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5635) all_533_1_3568 = all_507_1_3560
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_490_1_3551, all_577_1_3584 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_3584, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_3551, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5636) all_577_1_3584 = all_490_1_3551
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_484_0_3548, all_549_0_3573 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_3573, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_3548, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5637) all_549_0_3573 = all_484_0_3548
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_97_2_46, all_577_1_3584 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_3584, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5638) all_577_1_3584 = all_97_2_46
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_543_2_3572, all_543_0_3570 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_3570, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_3572, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5639) all_543_0_3570 = all_543_2_3572
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_495_1_3554, all_543_0_3570 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_0_3570, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_3554, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5640) all_543_0_3570 = all_495_1_3554
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, sz10, all_495_2_3555, all_543_2_3572 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_543_2_3572, sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_3555, yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5641) all_543_2_3572 = all_495_2_3555
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Combining equations (5638,5636) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5642) all_490_1_3551 = all_97_2_46
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Combining equations (5632,5636) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5643) all_490_1_3551 = all_102_2_49
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Combining equations (5634,5636) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5644) all_507_1_3560 = all_490_1_3551
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Simplifying 5644 yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5645) all_507_1_3560 = all_490_1_3551
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Combining equations (5633,5637) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5646) all_533_1_3568 = all_484_0_3548
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Simplifying 5646 yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5647) all_533_1_3568 = all_484_0_3548
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Combining equations (5639,5640) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5648) all_543_2_3572 = all_495_1_3554
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| Simplifying 5648 yields:
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	| (5649) all_543_2_3572 = all_495_1_3554
% 115.47/81.93  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Combining equations (5641,5649) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5650) all_495_1_3554 = all_495_2_3555
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Combining equations (5635,5647) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5651) all_507_1_3560 = all_484_0_3548
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Simplifying 5651 yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5652) all_507_1_3560 = all_484_0_3548
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Combining equations (5629,5630) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5653) all_495_0_3553 = sz10
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Simplifying 5653 yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5654) all_495_0_3553 = sz10
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Combining equations (5645,5652) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5655) all_490_1_3551 = all_484_0_3548
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Simplifying 5655 yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5656) all_490_1_3551 = all_484_0_3548
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Combining equations (5628,5654) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3386) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Simplifying 3386 yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (2392) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Combining equations (5642,5656) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5659) all_484_0_3548 = all_97_2_46
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Combining equations (5643,5656) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5660) all_484_0_3548 = all_102_2_49
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Combining equations (5660,5659) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3390) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Simplifying 3390 yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (2813) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (5627) and (5549) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3194) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (2813) and (376) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (2698) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (2392) and (337) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (3360) and (619) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3197) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (2813) and (494) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (2392) and (504) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3397) sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = sz10
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (5650) and (5498) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (5501) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_3555
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (3360) and (620) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (266) aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18)
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| From (2392) and (1199) follows:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Instantiating formula (7) with sz00, sz00, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3404) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz00) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, sz00))
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Instantiating formula (94) with sz00, sz00, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3405) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz00) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, sz00) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Instantiating formula (67) with xn, all_52_0_18, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3406) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Instantiating formula (67) with all_97_2_46, xm, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3407) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Instantiating formula (67) with sz10, xn, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3408) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v0))
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Instantiating formula (97) with xn, all_52_0_18, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| (3409) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.94  																																																	| Instantiating formula (97) with all_97_2_46, xm, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (3410) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v2))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| Instantiating formula (97) with sz10, xn, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = sz10, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (3411) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz10) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v2))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| Instantiating formula (67) with all_495_2_3555, sz10, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_3555, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (5680) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_495_2_3555) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_3555, v0))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| Instantiating formula (97) with all_495_2_3555, sz10, sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_3555, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (5681) sz10 = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_495_2_3555) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_3555, v2))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| Instantiating formula (61) with sz00, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (5682)  ? [v0] : (sdtpldt0(sz10, v0) = sz00 & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| Instantiating (5682) with all_715_0_3706 yields:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (5683) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_715_0_3706) = sz00 & aNaturalNumber0(all_715_0_3706)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (5683) yields:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (5684) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_715_0_3706) = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (5685) aNaturalNumber0(all_715_0_3706)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3410), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	| (3420)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v2))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3408), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		| (3428)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v0))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																		|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3409), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			| (3436)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																			|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3411), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				| (3456)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz10) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz10, v2))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																				|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (5680), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					| (5705)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_495_2_3555) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_3555, v0))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																					|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (5681), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						| (5709)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_495_2_3555) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_3555, v2))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																						|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3407), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							| (3444)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																							|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3406), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								| (3424)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																								|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3405), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									| (3432)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz00) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, sz00) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (3404), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										| (3440)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz00) & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, sz00))
% 115.47/81.95  																																																										|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											| Instantiating formula (87) with all_715_0_3706, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_715_0_3706) = sz00, aNaturalNumber0(all_715_0_3706), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											|
% 115.47/81.95  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.95  																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.96  																																				| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 115.47/81.96  																																				|
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_4049, all_513_1_4050, all_513_2_4051 yields:
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (5730)  ~ (all_513_0_4049 = all_513_1_4050) &  ~ (all_513_2_4051 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_4049 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_4050 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_4051 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_4050, all_513_0_4049) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_4051)
% 115.47/81.96  																																					|
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (5730) yields:
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (5731) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_4051
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (5732) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_4050
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (5733) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_4049
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (5734) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_4050, all_513_0_4049)
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (5735)  ~ (all_513_0_4049 = all_513_1_4050)
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (5736)  ~ (all_513_2_4051 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (5737) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_4051)
% 115.47/81.96  																																					|
% 115.47/81.96  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.96  																																					|
% 115.47/81.96  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																						| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																						|
% 115.47/81.96  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.96  																																					| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 115.47/81.96  																																					|
% 115.47/81.96  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.96  																																						|
% 115.47/81.96  																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																							| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																							|
% 115.47/81.96  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.96  																																						| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 115.47/81.96  																																						|
% 115.47/81.96  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.96  																																							|
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																								|
% 115.47/81.96  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.96  																																							| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 115.47/81.96  																																							|
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_4058, all_535_1_4059, all_535_2_4060 yields:
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (5750)  ~ (all_535_0_4058 = all_535_1_4059) &  ~ (all_535_2_4060 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_4060 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_4058 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_4059 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_4059, all_535_0_4058) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_4060)
% 115.47/81.96  																																								|
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (5750) yields:
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (5751) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_4059, all_535_0_4058)
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (5752) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_4060)
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (5753) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_4059
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (5754)  ~ (all_535_0_4058 = all_535_1_4059)
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (5755) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_4060
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (5756)  ~ (all_535_2_4060 = all_102_2_49)
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (5757) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_4058
% 115.47/81.96  																																								|
% 115.47/81.96  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.96  																																								|
% 115.47/81.96  																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																									| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																									|
% 115.47/81.96  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.96  																																								| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 115.47/81.96  																																								|
% 115.47/81.96  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.96  																																									|
% 115.47/81.96  																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																										| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																										|
% 115.47/81.96  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.96  																																									| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 115.47/81.96  																																									|
% 115.47/81.96  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.96  																																										|
% 115.47/81.96  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																											| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																											|
% 115.47/81.96  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.96  																																										| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.47/81.96  																																										|
% 115.47/81.96  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.96  																																											|
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																												|
% 115.47/81.96  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.96  																																											| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 115.47/81.96  																																											|
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_4069, all_559_1_4070 yields:
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| (5774)  ~ (all_559_0_4069 = all_559_1_4070) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_4070 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_4069
% 115.47/81.96  																																												|
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (5774) yields:
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| (5775)  ~ (all_559_0_4069 = all_559_1_4070)
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| (5776) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_4070
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| (5777) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_4069
% 115.47/81.96  																																												|
% 115.47/81.96  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																												|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.96  																																												|
% 115.47/81.96  																																													| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																													| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																													|
% 115.47/81.96  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																												|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.96  																																												| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.47/81.96  																																												|
% 115.47/81.96  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.96  																																													|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.96  																																													| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.96  																																													|
% 115.47/81.96  																																														| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.96  																																														| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.96  																																														|
% 115.47/81.96  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.96  																																													|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.96  																																													| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.96  																																													| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.47/81.97  																																													|
% 115.47/81.97  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																														|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.97  																																														|
% 115.47/81.97  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																															| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																															|
% 115.47/81.97  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																														|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.97  																																														| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 115.47/81.97  																																														|
% 115.47/81.97  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																															|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.97  																																															|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																															|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.97  																																															| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.47/81.97  																																															|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.97  																																																|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 115.47/81.97  																																																|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																	|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																		|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																			|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 115.47/81.97  																																																				|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																					|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_4094, all_623_1_4095 yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| (5818)  ~ (all_623_0_4094 = all_623_1_4095) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_4094 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_4095
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (5818) yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| (5819)  ~ (all_623_0_4094 = all_623_1_4095)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| (5820) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_4094
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| (5821) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_4095
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.47/81.97  																																																						|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_4096, all_633_1_4097, all_633_2_4098 yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (5826)  ~ (all_633_0_4096 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_4097 = all_633_2_4098) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_4097 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_4098 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_4096 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_4096, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_4098, all_633_1_4097)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (5826) yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (5827) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_4096
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (5828)  ~ (all_633_1_4097 = all_633_2_4098)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (5829)  ~ (all_633_0_4096 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (5830) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_4096, all_0_4_4)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (5831) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_4098, all_633_1_4097)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (5832) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_4098
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (5833) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_4097
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																							|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 115.47/81.97  																																																								|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_4094, all_633_1_4097 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_4097, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_4094, yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| (5842) all_633_1_4097 = all_623_0_4094
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_4070, all_633_1_4097 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_4097, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_4070, yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| (5843) all_633_1_4097 = all_559_1_4070
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_4060, all_623_0_4094 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_4094, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_4060, yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| (5844) all_623_0_4094 = all_535_2_4060
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_4050, all_623_0_4094 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_4094, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_4050, yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| (5845) all_623_0_4094 = all_513_1_4050
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_3557, all_623_0_4094 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_4094, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_3557, yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| (5846) all_623_0_4094 = all_501_1_3557
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_3549, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_3549, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 115.47/81.97  																																																									| (5847) all_484_1_3549 = all_0_4_4
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_3549, all_623_0_4094 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_4094, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_3549, yields:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5848) all_623_0_4094 = all_484_1_3549
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_623_0_4094 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_4094, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5849) all_623_0_4094 = xm
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5842,5843) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5850) all_623_0_4094 = all_559_1_4070
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Simplifying 5850 yields:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5851) all_623_0_4094 = all_559_1_4070
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5845,5851) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5852) all_559_1_4070 = all_513_1_4050
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5848,5851) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5853) all_559_1_4070 = all_484_1_3549
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5844,5851) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5854) all_559_1_4070 = all_535_2_4060
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5849,5851) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5855) all_559_1_4070 = xm
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5846,5851) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5856) all_559_1_4070 = all_501_1_3557
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5853,5854) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5857) all_535_2_4060 = all_484_1_3549
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5852,5854) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5858) all_535_2_4060 = all_513_1_4050
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5855,5854) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5859) all_535_2_4060 = xm
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5856,5854) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5860) all_535_2_4060 = all_501_1_3557
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5859,5858) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5861) all_513_1_4050 = xm
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5857,5858) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5862) all_513_1_4050 = all_484_1_3549
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5860,5858) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5863) all_513_1_4050 = all_501_1_3557
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5861,5863) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5864) all_501_1_3557 = xm
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5862,5863) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5865) all_501_1_3557 = all_484_1_3549
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5865,5864) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5866) all_484_1_3549 = xm
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Simplifying 5866 yields:
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| (5867) all_484_1_3549 = xm
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									|
% 115.47/81.98  																																																									| Combining equations (5867,5847) yields a new equation:
% 115.47/81.99  																																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 115.47/81.99  																																																									|
% 115.77/81.99  																																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																																																									|
% 115.77/81.99  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																						|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																						| (1723)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																						| (4218) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz10)
% 115.77/81.99  																						|
% 115.77/81.99  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (150), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																							|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																							| (1328) sdtlseqdt0(xr, sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																							|
% 115.77/81.99  																								| From (310) and (1328) follows:
% 115.77/81.99  																								| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																								|
% 115.77/81.99  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																								|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																								| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																								|
% 115.77/81.99  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (148), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																									|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																									| (1331) sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10)
% 115.77/81.99  																									|
% 115.77/81.99  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (123), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																										| (1332) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 115.77/81.99  																										|
% 115.77/81.99  																											| From (1287) and (1332) follows:
% 115.77/81.99  																											| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/81.99  																											|
% 115.77/81.99  																											| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 115.77/81.99  																											| (1334) xm = sz10
% 115.77/81.99  																											|
% 115.77/81.99  																											| From (1334) and (479) follows:
% 115.77/81.99  																											| (1335) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz10)
% 115.77/81.99  																											|
% 115.77/81.99  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1301), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																											|
% 115.77/81.99  																												| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																												| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																												|
% 115.77/81.99  																												| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																												|
% 115.77/81.99  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																											| (1340) all_212_0_127 = xp
% 115.77/81.99  																											|
% 115.77/81.99  																												| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																												| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																												|
% 115.77/81.99  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																												|
% 115.77/81.99  																													| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																													|
% 115.77/81.99  																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																													| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																													|
% 115.77/81.99  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																												| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/81.99  																												|
% 115.77/81.99  																													| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																													|
% 115.77/81.99  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																													|
% 115.77/81.99  																														| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																														| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																														|
% 115.77/81.99  																														| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																														|
% 115.77/81.99  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																													| (1352) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/81.99  																													|
% 115.77/81.99  																														| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																														| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																														|
% 115.77/81.99  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																														|
% 115.77/81.99  																															| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																															| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																															|
% 115.77/81.99  																															| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																															|
% 115.77/81.99  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																														| (1358) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_0_6) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 115.77/81.99  																														|
% 115.77/81.99  																															| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																															| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																															|
% 115.77/81.99  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1358), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																															| (1360) xr = xp
% 115.77/81.99  																															|
% 115.77/81.99  																																| Combining equations (310,1360) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																| Combining equations (1361,1360) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (310) xr = xn
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																| Combining equations (1361,1200) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																| Equations (1361) can reduce 37 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																| From (1361) and (1335) follows:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (1366) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10)
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																| From (1361) and (172) follows:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (239) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn)
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (216), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (1368) xp = xm
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| Combining equations (1368,1361) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (1369) xm = xn
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| Simplifying 1369 yields:
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 115.77/81.99  																																| (1375)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) &  ~ (v0 = all_17_0_11) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 115.77/81.99  																																|
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|
% 115.77/81.99  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (1377) xr = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| Combining equations (310,1377) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| (1378) xn = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| Simplifying 1378 yields:
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (1381)  ~ (xr = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																																	| (1382) xr = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/81.99  																																	|
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| Equations (310) can reduce 1381 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|
% 115.77/81.99  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|
% 115.77/81.99  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																			| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																																			|
% 115.77/81.99  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/81.99  																																		| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/81.99  																																		|
% 115.77/81.99  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																																			| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.77/81.99  																																			|
% 115.77/81.99  																																				| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 115.77/81.99  																																				| (174) $false
% 115.77/81.99  																																				|
% 115.77/81.99  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/81.99  																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.77/81.99  																																			| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 115.77/81.99  																																			| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/81.99  																																			|
% 115.77/81.99  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1382), into two cases.
% 115.77/81.99  																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.77/81.99  																																				| (1392) xr = sz10
% 115.77/81.99  																																				|
% 115.77/81.99  																																					| Combining equations (310,1392) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																				| (1396)  ~ (xr = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																				| (1397)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/82.00  																																				|
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| Equations (310) can reduce 1396 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (217), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| (1368) xp = xm
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| Combining equations (1368,1361) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (1369) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| Simplifying 1369 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 115.77/82.00  																																					| (1406)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 115.77/82.00  																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																							| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																							|
% 115.77/82.00  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																						| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 115.77/82.00  																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																							| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.77/82.00  																																							|
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																								|
% 115.77/82.00  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																							| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 115.77/82.00  																																							| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 115.77/82.00  																																							|
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| Combining equations (1334,1415) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| (1416) all_146_0_54 = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																								|
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| From (1416) and (600) follows:
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																								|
% 115.77/82.00  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																								|
% 115.77/82.00  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																									|
% 115.77/82.00  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																								| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.00  																																								|
% 115.77/82.00  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (500), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																									| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																									|
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																									| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 115.77/82.00  																																									| (1427)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.00  																																									|
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|
% 115.77/82.00  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|
% 115.77/82.00  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																											| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																											|
% 115.77/82.00  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																										| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.00  																																										|
% 115.77/82.00  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (563), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																											| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 115.77/82.00  																																											|
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| Combining equations (1363,1434) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																											| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 115.77/82.00  																																											| (1439)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 115.77/82.00  																																											|
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| Equations (1363,1334) can reduce 1438 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|
% 115.77/82.00  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (501), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 115.77/82.00  																																												| (1446)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1)
% 115.77/82.00  																																												|
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|
% 115.77/82.00  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|
% 115.77/82.00  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																														|
% 115.77/82.00  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																													| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 115.77/82.00  																																													|
% 115.77/82.00  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1391), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																														|
% 115.77/82.00  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																															|
% 115.77/82.00  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																														| (1456)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/82.00  																																														|
% 115.77/82.00  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (514), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																															| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																															|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																															| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 115.77/82.00  																																															| (1462)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.00  																																															|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 115.77/82.00  																																																|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (489), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	| (1472)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (557), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| Combining equations (1434,1363) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| (1369) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| Simplifying 1369 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			| (1485)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = sz10) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| Equations (1363,1334) can reduce 1438 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (481), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					| (1368) xp = xm
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| Combining equations (1361,1368) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					| (1497)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.00  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																						| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 115.77/82.01  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (524), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							| (1507)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (569), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| (1434) all_54_0_19 = xm
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| Combining equations (1434,1363) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| (1369) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| Simplifying 1369 yields:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| (1438)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xm)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								| (1516)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| Equations (1363,1334) can reduce 1438 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (218), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| (1368) xp = xm
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| Combining equations (1361,1368) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									| (1524)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v1)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																										|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 115.77/82.01  																																																											|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 115.77/82.01  																																																												|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (495), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													| (1368) xp = xm
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| Combining equations (1361,1368) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													| (1544)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xp, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																													|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 115.77/82.01  																																																														|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (523), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															| (1554)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																															|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (480), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| (1368) xp = xm
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| Combining equations (1361,1368) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| Combining equations (1370,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| (1371) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| (1374)  ~ (xp = xm)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																| (1563)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| Equations (1361,1334) can reduce 1374 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (546), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	| (1568)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_2_40) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_2_40, v0))
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																	|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																		|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																			|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (521), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				| (1370) xm = xn
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| Combining equations (1334,1370) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				| (1426)  ~ (xm = xn)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				| (1581)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																				|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| Equations (1334) can reduce 1426 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																					|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						| Instantiating formula (2) with xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						|
% 115.77/82.01  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																															| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 115.77/82.02  																															| (1591)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_0_6) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 115.77/82.02  																															|
% 115.77/82.02  																																| Equations (310) can reduce 1590 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																| (1592)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																| Simplifying 1592 yields:
% 115.77/82.02  																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (142), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																	| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																	|
% 115.77/82.02  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																| (1597)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.02  																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																	| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																	|
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																		|
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																		|
% 115.77/82.02  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																	| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																	| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.02  																																	|
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																		|
% 115.77/82.02  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (571), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																		|
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| Combining equations (1200,1363) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| (1605) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| Simplifying 1605 yields:
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| (1608)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																		| (1609)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 115.77/82.02  																																		|
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| Equations (1200) can reduce 1608 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|
% 115.77/82.02  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																				|
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																				|
% 115.77/82.02  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																			| (1615) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.02  																																			|
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																				|
% 115.77/82.02  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1602), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																				|
% 115.77/82.02  																																					| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																					| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																					|
% 115.77/82.02  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																				| (1620)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.02  																																				|
% 115.77/82.02  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (474), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																					|
% 115.77/82.02  																																						| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																						| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																						|
% 115.77/82.02  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																					| (1624)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.02  																																					|
% 115.77/82.02  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																						| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																						|
% 115.77/82.02  																																							| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																							| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																							|
% 115.77/82.02  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																						| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																						| (1628)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 115.77/82.02  																																						|
% 115.77/82.02  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																							| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																							|
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																								|
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																								|
% 115.77/82.02  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																							| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																							| (1633) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.02  																																							|
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																								|
% 115.77/82.02  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (525), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																								|
% 115.77/82.02  																																									| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																									|
% 115.77/82.02  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																								| (1638)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 115.77/82.02  																																								|
% 115.77/82.02  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1633), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																									| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																									|
% 115.77/82.02  																																										| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																										| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																										|
% 115.77/82.02  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																									| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																									| (1642)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.02  																																									|
% 115.77/82.02  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																										| (1360) xr = xp
% 115.77/82.02  																																										|
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| Combining equations (310,1360) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																										| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 115.77/82.02  																																										| (1647)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_17_0_11) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 115.77/82.02  																																										|
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| Equations (310) can reduce 1590 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| (1592)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| Simplifying 1592 yields:
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|
% 115.77/82.02  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1352), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|
% 115.77/82.02  																																												| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																												|
% 115.77/82.02  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																											| (1653)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.02  																																											|
% 115.77/82.02  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																												|
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																													|
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																													|
% 115.77/82.02  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																												| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																												|
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																													|
% 115.77/82.02  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																													|
% 115.77/82.02  																																														| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																														|
% 115.77/82.02  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																													| (1663)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.02  																																													|
% 115.77/82.02  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																														|
% 115.77/82.02  																																															| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																															|
% 115.77/82.02  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																														| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																														| (1667)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.02  																																														|
% 115.77/82.02  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																															|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.02  																																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																															| (1672) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 115.77/82.02  																																															|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.02  																																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (503), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																																| (1677)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.02  																																																|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	| (1681)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_13_0_5, v0))
% 115.77/82.02  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1672), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																			| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																			| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.02  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.02  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.02  																																																		| (1685)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 115.77/82.03  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																			| (1690) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1615), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				| (1695)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.03  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					| (1699)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 115.77/82.03  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						| (1703)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_3_3) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_3_3, v0))
% 115.77/82.03  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (475), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							| (1707)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 115.77/82.03  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									| Combining equations (1712,1340) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.03  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																										| (1715)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 115.77/82.03  																										| (1716) all_0_0_0 = sz10 | all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																										|
% 115.77/82.03  																											| From (1287) and (1715) follows:
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (1717)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.03  																											|
% 115.77/82.03  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (136), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.03  																											|
% 115.77/82.03  																												| Using (1333) and (1717) yields:
% 115.77/82.03  																												| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																												|
% 115.77/82.03  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (1717)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (1721) xm = sz10 | xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																											|
% 115.77/82.03  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																												|
% 115.77/82.03  																													| From (1336) and (4610) follows:
% 115.77/82.03  																													| (154) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																													|
% 115.77/82.03  																													| From (1336) and (3045) follows:
% 115.77/82.03  																													| (3628)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																													|
% 115.77/82.03  																													| Using (154) and (3628) yields:
% 115.77/82.03  																													| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																													|
% 115.77/82.03  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																												| (1726) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.03  																												|
% 115.77/82.03  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																													|
% 115.77/82.03  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																														|
% 115.77/82.03  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																													| (1672) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 115.77/82.03  																													|
% 115.77/82.03  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																														|
% 115.77/82.03  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																															|
% 115.77/82.03  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																														| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.03  																														|
% 115.77/82.03  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																															|
% 115.77/82.03  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																|
% 115.77/82.03  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																															| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.03  																															|
% 115.77/82.03  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1716), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																																| (1739) all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																																|
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| Combining equations (1739,1287) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																																	|
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																	|
% 115.77/82.03  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																																| (1742)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																																| (1743) all_0_0_0 = sz10
% 115.77/82.03  																																|
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| Combining equations (1743,1287) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| (1334) xm = sz10
% 115.77/82.03  																																	|
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| From (1334) and (1331) follows:
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| (149) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 115.77/82.03  																																	|
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| From (1334) and (1717) follows:
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| (1746)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 115.77/82.03  																																	|
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| Using (149) and (1746) yields:
% 115.77/82.03  																																	| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																																	|
% 115.77/82.03  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																									|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																									| (1748)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10)
% 115.77/82.03  																									| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.03  																									|
% 115.77/82.03  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																										|
% 115.77/82.03  																											| From (1336) and (1748) follows:
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (4388)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz10)
% 115.77/82.03  																											|
% 115.77/82.03  																											| Using (4218) and (4388) yields:
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																											|
% 115.77/82.03  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																										| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/82.03  																										|
% 115.77/82.03  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.03  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.03  																											|
% 115.77/82.03  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.03  																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.03  																												|
% 115.77/82.03  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.03  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.03  																											| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 115.77/82.04  																											|
% 115.77/82.04  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.04  																												|
% 115.77/82.04  																													| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																													| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																													|
% 115.77/82.04  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.04  																												| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.04  																												|
% 115.77/82.04  																													| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.04  																													|
% 115.77/82.04  																													| From (1361) and (1213) follows:
% 115.77/82.04  																													| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																													|
% 115.77/82.04  																													| From (1361) and (1330) follows:
% 115.77/82.04  																													| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.77/82.04  																													|
% 115.77/82.04  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																													|
% 115.77/82.04  																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																														|
% 115.77/82.04  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.04  																													| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.04  																													|
% 115.77/82.04  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																														|
% 115.77/82.04  																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																															|
% 115.77/82.04  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.04  																														| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 115.77/82.04  																														|
% 115.77/82.04  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																															|
% 115.77/82.04  																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																																|
% 115.77/82.04  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.04  																															| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 115.77/82.04  																															|
% 115.77/82.04  																																| Instantiating (1537) with all_495_0_4548, all_495_1_4549, all_495_2_4550 yields:
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (6323)  ~ (all_495_0_4548 = all_495_1_4549) &  ~ (all_495_2_4550 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_4548 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_4549 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_4550 & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_4549, all_495_0_4548) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_4550, all_83_0_38)
% 115.77/82.04  																																|
% 115.77/82.04  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (6323) yields:
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (6324) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_4549
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (6325) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_4549, all_495_0_4548)
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (6326) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_4550, all_83_0_38)
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (6327)  ~ (all_495_0_4548 = all_495_1_4549)
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (6328) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_4548
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (6329)  ~ (all_495_2_4550 = all_83_0_38)
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (6330) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_4550
% 115.77/82.04  																																|
% 115.77/82.04  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																																|
% 115.77/82.04  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																																	|
% 115.77/82.04  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.04  																																| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 115.77/82.04  																																|
% 115.77/82.04  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																																	|
% 115.77/82.04  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																																		| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																																		|
% 115.77/82.04  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.04  																																	| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 115.77/82.04  																																	|
% 115.77/82.04  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																																		|
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																																			|
% 115.77/82.04  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.04  																																		| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 115.77/82.04  																																		|
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| Instantiating (1502) with all_517_0_4556, all_517_1_4557, all_517_2_4558 yields:
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (6343)  ~ (all_517_0_4556 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_517_1_4557 = all_517_2_4558) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_4556 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_4557 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_4558 & sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_4558, all_517_1_4557) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_4556)
% 115.77/82.04  																																			|
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (6343) yields:
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (6344) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_4556
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (6345) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_4557
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (6346)  ~ (all_517_1_4557 = all_517_2_4558)
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (6347) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_4558
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (6348)  ~ (all_517_0_4556 = all_83_0_38)
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (6349) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_4556)
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (6350) sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_4558, all_517_1_4557)
% 115.77/82.04  																																			|
% 115.77/82.04  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.04  																																			|
% 115.77/82.04  																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																																				| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																																				|
% 115.77/82.04  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.04  																																			| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 115.77/82.04  																																			|
% 115.77/82.04  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.04  																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.04  																																				| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.04  																																				|
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.04  																																					|
% 115.77/82.04  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.04  																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.04  																																				| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.04  																																				| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 115.77/82.04  																																				|
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 115.77/82.04  																																					|
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_4548, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_4548, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| (6360) all_495_0_4548 = all_83_2_40
% 115.77/82.04  																																					|
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_4548, all_517_2_4558 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_4558, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_4548, yields:
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| (6361) all_517_2_4558 = all_495_0_4548
% 115.77/82.04  																																					|
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, sz10, all_517_2_4558 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_4558, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| (6362) all_517_2_4558 = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																																					|
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| Combining equations (6361,6362) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.04  																																					| (6363) all_495_0_4548 = sz10
% 115.77/82.04  																																					|
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| Simplifying 6363 yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| (6364) all_495_0_4548 = sz10
% 115.77/82.05  																																					|
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| Combining equations (6360,6364) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| (3386) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 115.77/82.05  																																					|
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| Simplifying 3386 yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| (2392) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 115.77/82.05  																																					|
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| From (2392) and (1194) follows:
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| (239) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn)
% 115.77/82.05  																																					|
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| From (2392) and (1199) follows:
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 115.77/82.05  																																					|
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| Instantiating formula (71) with sz00, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00),  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz00), yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																																					| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																																					|
% 115.77/82.05  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																								|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																								| (3604)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																								| (3605) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xp)
% 115.77/82.05  																								|
% 115.77/82.05  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																									|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																									| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																									|
% 115.77/82.05  																										| From (1336) and (479) follows:
% 115.77/82.05  																										| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																										|
% 115.77/82.05  																										| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																										| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																										|
% 115.77/82.05  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																									|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																									| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																									| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/82.05  																									|
% 115.77/82.05  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																										|
% 115.77/82.05  																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																											|
% 115.77/82.05  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																										| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 115.77/82.05  																										|
% 115.77/82.05  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																											|
% 115.77/82.05  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																												|
% 115.77/82.05  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.05  																											|
% 115.77/82.05  																												| From (1361) and (3604) follows:
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (3619)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																												|
% 115.77/82.05  																												| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																												|
% 115.77/82.05  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																							|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																							| (3621)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xr, sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																							| (3622) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xr)
% 115.77/82.05  																							|
% 115.77/82.05  																								| From (310) and (3621) follows:
% 115.77/82.05  																								| (3619)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																								|
% 115.77/82.05  																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (151), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																								|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																								| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																								|
% 115.77/82.05  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (148), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																									|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																									| (1331) sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10)
% 115.77/82.05  																									|
% 115.77/82.05  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (123), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																										| (1332) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 115.77/82.05  																										|
% 115.77/82.05  																											| From (1287) and (1332) follows:
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.05  																											|
% 115.77/82.05  																											| Instantiating formula (2) with xm, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (1334) xm = sz10
% 115.77/82.05  																											|
% 115.77/82.05  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1301), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																											|
% 115.77/82.05  																												| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																												|
% 115.77/82.05  																												| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																												|
% 115.77/82.05  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																											| (1340) all_212_0_127 = xp
% 115.77/82.05  																											|
% 115.77/82.05  																												| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																												|
% 115.77/82.05  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																												|
% 115.77/82.05  																													| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																													|
% 115.77/82.05  																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																													| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																													|
% 115.77/82.05  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																												| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.05  																												|
% 115.77/82.05  																													| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																													|
% 115.77/82.05  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (210), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																													|
% 115.77/82.05  																														| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																														| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																														|
% 115.77/82.05  																														| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																														|
% 115.77/82.05  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																													| (1352) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.05  																													|
% 115.77/82.05  																														| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																														| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																														|
% 115.77/82.05  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (203), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																														|
% 115.77/82.05  																															| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																															| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																															|
% 115.77/82.05  																															| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																															|
% 115.77/82.05  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																														| (1358) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_0_6) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 115.77/82.05  																														|
% 115.77/82.05  																															| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																															| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																															|
% 115.77/82.05  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1358), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																															| (1360) xr = xp
% 115.77/82.05  																															|
% 115.77/82.05  																																| Combining equations (310,1360) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.05  																																|
% 115.77/82.05  																																| From (1361) and (1330) follows:
% 115.77/82.05  																																| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																																|
% 115.77/82.05  																																| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																																| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																																|
% 115.77/82.05  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																															| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 115.77/82.05  																															| (1591)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_0_6) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 115.77/82.05  																															|
% 115.77/82.05  																																| Equations (310) can reduce 1590 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																																| (1592)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.05  																																|
% 115.77/82.05  																																| Simplifying 1592 yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.05  																																|
% 115.77/82.05  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (142), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.05  																																|
% 115.77/82.05  																																	| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																																	|
% 115.77/82.05  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.05  																																| (1597)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.05  																																|
% 115.77/82.05  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																																	| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																																	|
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																																		|
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																																		|
% 115.77/82.05  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																																	| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																																	| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.05  																																	|
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.05  																																		|
% 115.77/82.05  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (571), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| (1363) all_54_0_19 = xn
% 115.77/82.05  																																		|
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| Combining equations (1200,1363) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| (1605) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.05  																																			|
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| Simplifying 1605 yields:
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.05  																																			|
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																																			|
% 115.77/82.05  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| (1608)  ~ (all_54_0_19 = xn)
% 115.77/82.05  																																		| (1609)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_54_0_19, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v1)
% 115.77/82.05  																																		|
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| Equations (1200) can reduce 1608 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.05  																																			|
% 115.77/82.05  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (190), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.05  																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.05  																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																																			|
% 115.77/82.05  																																				| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.05  																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.05  																																				|
% 115.77/82.05  																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.05  																																				| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.05  																																				|
% 115.77/82.05  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.05  																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																			| (1615) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.06  																																			|
% 115.77/82.06  																																				| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																				|
% 115.77/82.06  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1602), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																				| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																				|
% 115.77/82.06  																																					| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																					| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																					|
% 115.77/82.06  																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																				| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																				| (1620)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.06  																																				|
% 115.77/82.06  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (474), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																					|
% 115.77/82.06  																																						| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																						| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																						|
% 115.77/82.06  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																					| (1624)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.06  																																					|
% 115.77/82.06  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (141), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																						| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																						|
% 115.77/82.06  																																							| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																							| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																							|
% 115.77/82.06  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																						| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																						| (1628)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xn) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xr, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v2))
% 115.77/82.06  																																						|
% 115.77/82.06  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (208), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																							| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																							|
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																								|
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																								|
% 115.77/82.06  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																							| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																							| (1633) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.06  																																							|
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																								|
% 115.77/82.06  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (525), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																								|
% 115.77/82.06  																																									| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																									|
% 115.77/82.06  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																								| (1638)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 115.77/82.06  																																								|
% 115.77/82.06  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1633), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																									|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																									| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																									|
% 115.77/82.06  																																										| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																										| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																										|
% 115.77/82.06  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																									|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																									| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																									| (1642)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.06  																																									|
% 115.77/82.06  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (221), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																										| (1360) xr = xp
% 115.77/82.06  																																										|
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| Combining equations (310,1360) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																										| (1590)  ~ (xr = xp)
% 115.77/82.06  																																										| (1647)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_17_0_11) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xr) = v0)
% 115.77/82.06  																																										|
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| Equations (310) can reduce 1590 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| (1592)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| Simplifying 1592 yields:
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|
% 115.77/82.06  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1352), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|
% 115.77/82.06  																																												| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																												|
% 115.77/82.06  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																											| (1653)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.06  																																											|
% 115.77/82.06  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																												|
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																													|
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																													|
% 115.77/82.06  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																												| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																												|
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																													|
% 115.77/82.06  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (229), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																													|
% 115.77/82.06  																																														| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																														|
% 115.77/82.06  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																													| (1663)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.06  																																													|
% 115.77/82.06  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (220), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																														|
% 115.77/82.06  																																															| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																															|
% 115.77/82.06  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																														| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																														| (1667)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.06  																																														|
% 115.77/82.06  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																															|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																																|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																															| (1672) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 115.77/82.06  																																															|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (503), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																| (1677)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xp, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xp) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.06  																																																|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (222), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	| (1681)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_13_0_5) & sdtpldt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_13_0_5, v0))
% 115.77/82.06  																																																	|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1672), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		| (1685)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 115.77/82.06  																																																		|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (193), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			| (1690) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																			|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| Equations (1334) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| (88)  ~ (sz10 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1615), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				| (1695)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.06  																																																				|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (214), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					| (1699)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, xr) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xr) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(xn, v0))
% 115.77/82.06  																																																					|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (248), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						| (1703)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_3_3) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xp, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_3_3, v0))
% 115.77/82.06  																																																						|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (475), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							| (1593)  ~ (xp = xn)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							| (1707)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xp) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																							|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									| Combining equations (1336,1334) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									| (1337) sz10 = sz00
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									| Equations (1337) can reduce 88 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																								|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									| Combining equations (1712,1340) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									| Equations (1361) can reduce 1593 to:
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									|
% 115.77/82.06  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1715)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, all_0_0_0)
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1716) all_0_0_0 = sz10 | all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																										|
% 115.77/82.07  																											| From (1287) and (1715) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1717)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (136), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																												| Using (1333) and (1717) yields:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1717)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1721) xm = sz10 | xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (205), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																													| From (1336) and (4610) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (154) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																													| From (1336) and (3045) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (3628)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																													| Using (154) and (3628) yields:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1726) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xr, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (207), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																														|
% 115.77/82.07  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1672) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_1_7) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_15_1_7, v1))
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (201), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																														|
% 115.77/82.07  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																															|
% 115.77/82.07  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																														| (1346) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_3_9) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0)
% 115.77/82.07  																														|
% 115.77/82.07  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (209), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																															|
% 115.77/82.07  																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																																| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																																|
% 115.77/82.07  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																															| (1602) xp = xn |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 115.77/82.07  																															|
% 115.77/82.07  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1716), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																																|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																																| (1739) all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																																|
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| Combining equations (1739,1287) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																																	|
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																																	|
% 115.77/82.07  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																																|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																																| (1742)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																																| (1743) all_0_0_0 = sz10
% 115.77/82.07  																																|
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| Combining equations (1743,1287) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| (1334) xm = sz10
% 115.77/82.07  																																	|
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| From (1334) and (1331) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| (149) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 115.77/82.07  																																	|
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| From (1334) and (1717) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| (1746)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, sz10)
% 115.77/82.07  																																	|
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| Using (149) and (1746) yields:
% 115.77/82.07  																																	| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																																	|
% 115.77/82.07  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																									|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																									| (1748)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, sz10)
% 115.77/82.07  																									| (1333) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xm)
% 115.77/82.07  																									|
% 115.77/82.07  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																										|
% 115.77/82.07  																											| From (1336) and (1748) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (4388)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz00, sz10)
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																											| Using (4218) and (4388) yields:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/82.07  																										|
% 115.77/82.07  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																												| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																													| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																													| From (1361) and (1330) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1329) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																													| Using (1329) and (3619) yields:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																								|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																								| (3604)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																								| (3605) sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xp)
% 115.77/82.07  																								|
% 115.77/82.07  																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (147), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																									|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																									| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																									|
% 115.77/82.07  																										| From (1379) and (9) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																										|
% 115.77/82.07  																										| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																										|
% 115.77/82.07  																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																									|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																									| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																									| (1391) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/82.07  																									|
% 115.77/82.07  																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1021), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																										|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																										|
% 115.77/82.07  																											| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																										|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1365)  ~ (xn = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																										| (1415) all_146_0_54 = xm
% 115.77/82.07  																										|
% 115.77/82.07  																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (127), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																											|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1377) xr = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																												| Combining equations (1377,310) yields a new equation:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1379) xn = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																												| Equations (1379) can reduce 1365 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																											|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1381)  ~ (xr = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																											| (1382) xr = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/82.07  																											|
% 115.77/82.07  																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (137), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																													| From (1336) and (479) follows:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1330) sdtlseqdt0(xp, sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																													| Using (1330) and (3604) yields:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1719) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																												|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																												| (2630) xm = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xm) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 115.77/82.07  																												|
% 115.77/82.07  																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (194), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.07  																													|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.07  																														| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.07  																														| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.07  																														|
% 115.77/82.07  																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.07  																													|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.07  																													| (2634) xr = xp |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xr) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 115.77/82.07  																													|
% 115.77/82.08  																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1302), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.08  																														|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.08  																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 115.77/82.08  																														|
% 115.77/82.08  																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.08  																															|
% 115.77/82.08  																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.08  																														|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.08  																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 115.77/82.08  																														| (1361) xp = xn
% 115.77/82.08  																														|
% 115.77/82.08  																															| Equations (1361) can reduce 18 to:
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.08  																															|
% 115.77/82.08  																															| From (1361) and (1277) follows:
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (53) sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2
% 115.77/82.08  																															|
% 115.77/82.08  																															| From (1361) and (1213) follows:
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 115.77/82.08  																															|
% 115.77/82.08  																															| From (1361) and (451) follows:
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 115.77/82.08  																															|
% 115.77/82.08  																															| From (1361) and (265) follows:
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (3197) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn
% 115.77/82.08  																															|
% 115.77/82.08  																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (490), into two cases.
% 115.77/82.08  																															|-Branch one:
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 115.77/82.08  																															|
% 115.77/82.08  																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 115.77/82.08  																																| (174) $false
% 115.77/82.08  																																|
% 115.77/82.08  																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 115.77/82.08  																															|-Branch two:
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 115.77/82.08  																															| (1529)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 115.77/82.08  																															|
% 115.77/82.08  																																| Instantiating (1529) with all_484_0_5179, all_484_1_5180 yields:
% 115.77/82.08  																																| (6637)  ~ (all_484_0_5179 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_484_1_5180 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_5180 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_5179
% 115.77/82.08  																																|
% 115.77/82.08  																																| Applying alpha-rule on (6637) yields:
% 115.77/82.08  																																| (6638)  ~ (all_484_0_5179 = all_0_4_4)
% 115.77/82.08  																																| (6639)  ~ (all_484_1_5180 = all_102_2_49)
% 115.77/82.08  																																| (6640) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_5180
% 116.00/82.08  																																| (6641) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_5179
% 116.00/82.08  																																|
% 116.00/82.08  																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (542), into two cases.
% 116.00/82.08  																																|-Branch one:
% 116.00/82.08  																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.00/82.08  																																|
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (174) $false
% 116.00/82.08  																																	|
% 116.00/82.08  																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.00/82.08  																																|-Branch two:
% 116.00/82.08  																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.00/82.08  																																| (1452)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_4_4))
% 116.00/82.08  																																|
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| Instantiating (1452) with all_490_0_5181, all_490_1_5182, all_490_2_5183 yields:
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (6646)  ~ (all_490_0_5181 = all_490_1_5182) &  ~ (all_490_2_5183 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_5183 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_5181 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_5182 & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_5182, all_490_0_5181) & sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_5183, all_0_4_4)
% 116.00/82.08  																																	|
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (6646) yields:
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (6647)  ~ (all_490_0_5181 = all_490_1_5182)
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (6648) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_1_5182, all_490_0_5181)
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (6649) sdtlseqdt0(all_490_2_5183, all_0_4_4)
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (6650) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_490_2_5183
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (6651) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_5181
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (6652) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_5182
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (6653)  ~ (all_490_2_5183 = all_0_4_4)
% 116.00/82.08  																																	|
% 116.00/82.08  																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (550), into two cases.
% 116.00/82.08  																																	|-Branch one:
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.00/82.08  																																	|
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (174) $false
% 116.00/82.08  																																		|
% 116.00/82.08  																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.00/82.08  																																	|-Branch two:
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.00/82.08  																																	| (1537)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_83_0_38))
% 116.00/82.08  																																	|
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| Instantiating (1537) with all_495_0_5184, all_495_1_5185, all_495_2_5186 yields:
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (6658)  ~ (all_495_0_5184 = all_495_1_5185) &  ~ (all_495_2_5186 = all_83_0_38) & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_5184 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_5185 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_5186 & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_5185, all_495_0_5184) & sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_5186, all_83_0_38)
% 116.00/82.08  																																		|
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (6658) yields:
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (6659) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_2_5186
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (6660) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_5184
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (6661)  ~ (all_495_0_5184 = all_495_1_5185)
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (6662) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_2_5186, all_83_0_38)
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (6663) sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = all_495_1_5185
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (6664)  ~ (all_495_2_5186 = all_83_0_38)
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (6665) sdtlseqdt0(all_495_1_5185, all_495_0_5184)
% 116.00/82.08  																																		|
% 116.00/82.08  																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (549), into two cases.
% 116.00/82.08  																																		|-Branch one:
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.00/82.08  																																		|
% 116.00/82.08  																																			| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.00/82.08  																																			| (174) $false
% 116.00/82.08  																																			|
% 116.00/82.08  																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.00/82.08  																																		|-Branch two:
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.00/82.08  																																		| (1468)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v2))
% 116.00/82.08  																																		|
% 116.00/82.08  																																			| Instantiating (1468) with all_501_0_5187, all_501_1_5188, all_501_2_5189 yields:
% 116.00/82.08  																																			| (6670)  ~ (all_501_0_5187 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_501_1_5188 = all_501_2_5189) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_5188 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_5189 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_5187 & sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_5189, all_501_1_5188) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_5187)
% 116.00/82.08  																																			|
% 116.00/82.08  																																			| Applying alpha-rule on (6670) yields:
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (6671)  ~ (all_501_0_5187 = all_102_1_48)
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (6672) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_5187
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (6673) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, all_501_0_5187)
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (6674) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_501_2_5189
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (6675) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_5188
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (6676)  ~ (all_501_1_5188 = all_501_2_5189)
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (6677) sdtlseqdt0(all_501_2_5189, all_501_1_5188)
% 116.00/82.09  																																			|
% 116.00/82.09  																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (488), into two cases.
% 116.00/82.09  																																			|-Branch one:
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.00/82.09  																																			|
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| (174) $false
% 116.00/82.09  																																				|
% 116.00/82.09  																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.00/82.09  																																			|-Branch two:
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.00/82.09  																																			| (1572)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 116.00/82.09  																																			|
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| Instantiating (1572) with all_507_0_5190, all_507_1_5191 yields:
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| (6682)  ~ (all_507_0_5190 = all_507_1_5191) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_5190 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_5191
% 116.00/82.09  																																				|
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| Applying alpha-rule on (6682) yields:
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| (6683)  ~ (all_507_0_5190 = all_507_1_5191)
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| (6684) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_5190
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| (6685) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_5191
% 116.00/82.09  																																				|
% 116.00/82.09  																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (534), into two cases.
% 116.00/82.09  																																				|-Branch one:
% 116.00/82.09  																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.00/82.09  																																				|
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| From (2697) and (759) follows:
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| (6687) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_240_0_145
% 116.00/82.09  																																					|
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| From (2697) and (143) follows:
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 116.00/82.09  																																					|
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| From (2697) and (12) follows:
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| (6689) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = xm
% 116.00/82.09  																																					|
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| From (2697) and (1274) follows:
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 116.00/82.09  																																					|
% 116.00/82.09  																																					| From (2697) and (144) follows:
% 116.02/82.09  																																					| (107) aNaturalNumber0(xm)
% 116.02/82.09  																																					|
% 116.02/82.09  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.09  																																					|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.09  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.09  																																					|
% 116.02/82.09  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.09  																																						| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.09  																																						|
% 116.02/82.09  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.09  																																					|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.09  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.09  																																					| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 116.02/82.09  																																					|
% 116.02/82.09  																																						| Instantiating (1502) with all_517_0_5192, all_517_1_5193, all_517_2_5194 yields:
% 116.02/82.09  																																						| (6696)  ~ (all_517_0_5192 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (all_517_1_5193 = all_517_2_5194) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_5192 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_5193 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_5194 & sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_5194, all_517_1_5193) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_5192)
% 116.02/82.09  																																						|
% 116.02/82.09  																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (6696) yields:
% 116.02/82.09  																																						| (6697)  ~ (all_517_0_5192 = all_83_0_38)
% 116.02/82.09  																																						| (6698)  ~ (all_517_1_5193 = all_517_2_5194)
% 116.02/82.09  																																						| (6699) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_1_5193
% 116.02/82.10  																																						| (6700) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_5194
% 116.02/82.10  																																						| (6701) sdtlseqdt0(all_517_2_5194, all_517_1_5193)
% 116.02/82.10  																																						| (6702) sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = all_517_0_5192
% 116.02/82.10  																																						| (6703) sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, all_517_0_5192)
% 116.02/82.10  																																						|
% 116.02/82.10  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1018), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.10  																																						|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.10  																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.02/82.10  																																						|
% 116.02/82.10  																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.02/82.10  																																							| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.10  																																							|
% 116.02/82.10  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.10  																																						|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.10  																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.02/82.10  																																						| (1712) all_212_0_127 = xn
% 116.02/82.10  																																						|
% 116.02/82.10  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.10  																																							|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.10  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.10  																																							|
% 116.02/82.10  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.10  																																								| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.10  																																								|
% 116.02/82.10  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.10  																																							|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.10  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.10  																																							| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 116.02/82.10  																																							|
% 116.02/82.10  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.10  																																								|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.10  																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.10  																																								|
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.10  																																									|
% 116.02/82.10  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.10  																																								|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.10  																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.10  																																								| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 116.02/82.10  																																								|
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| Instantiating (1587) with all_533_0_5198, all_533_1_5199, all_533_2_5200 yields:
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (6716)  ~ (all_533_0_5198 = all_533_1_5199) &  ~ (all_533_2_5200 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_5200 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_5198 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_5199 & sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_5199, all_533_0_5198) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_5200)
% 116.02/82.10  																																									|
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| Applying alpha-rule on (6716) yields:
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (6717) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_533_2_5200)
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (6718) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_5199
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (6719) sdtlseqdt0(all_533_1_5199, all_533_0_5198)
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (6720) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_5198
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (6721) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_5200
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (6722)  ~ (all_533_0_5198 = all_533_1_5199)
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (6723)  ~ (all_533_2_5200 = all_102_2_49)
% 116.02/82.10  																																									|
% 116.02/82.10  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1300), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.10  																																									|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.02/82.10  																																									|
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.10  																																										|
% 116.02/82.10  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.10  																																									|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.02/82.10  																																									| (1477) all_214_0_128 = xn
% 116.02/82.10  																																									|
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| From (1477) and (1288) follows:
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| (138) sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2
% 116.02/82.10  																																										|
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| From (1477) and (725) follows:
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| (113) aNaturalNumber0(xn)
% 116.02/82.10  																																										|
% 116.02/82.10  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.10  																																										|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.10  																																										|
% 116.02/82.10  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.10  																																											| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.10  																																											|
% 116.02/82.10  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.10  																																										|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.10  																																										| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.02/82.10  																																										|
% 116.02/82.10  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.10  																																											|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.10  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.10  																																											|
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.10  																																												|
% 116.02/82.10  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.10  																																											|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.10  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.10  																																											| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.02/82.10  																																											|
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| Instantiating (1421) with all_549_0_5204, all_549_1_5205, all_549_2_5206 yields:
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (6738)  ~ (all_549_0_5204 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_549_1_5205 = all_549_2_5206) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_5205 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_5206 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_5204 & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_5204, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_5206, all_549_1_5205)
% 116.02/82.10  																																												|
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (6738) yields:
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (6739) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_0_5204, all_0_4_4)
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (6740)  ~ (all_549_0_5204 = all_0_4_4)
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (6741)  ~ (all_549_1_5205 = all_549_2_5206)
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (6742) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_5204
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (6743) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_5205
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (6744) sdtlseqdt0(all_549_2_5206, all_549_1_5205)
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (6745) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_549_2_5206
% 116.02/82.10  																																												|
% 116.02/82.10  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1391), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.10  																																												|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.10  																																												|
% 116.02/82.10  																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.10  																																													| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.10  																																													|
% 116.02/82.10  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.10  																																												|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.10  																																												| (1456)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xn) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 116.02/82.10  																																												|
% 116.02/82.10  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.10  																																													|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.10  																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.10  																																													|
% 116.02/82.10  																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.10  																																														| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.10  																																														|
% 116.02/82.10  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.10  																																													|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.10  																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.10  																																													| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 116.02/82.10  																																													|
% 116.02/82.10  																																														| Instantiating (1533) with all_560_0_5208, all_560_1_5209, all_560_2_5210 yields:
% 116.02/82.10  																																														| (6754)  ~ (all_560_0_5208 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (all_560_1_5209 = all_560_2_5210) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_560_1_5209 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_560_2_5210 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_560_0_5208 & sdtlseqdt0(all_560_2_5210, all_560_1_5209) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, all_560_0_5208)
% 116.02/82.10  																																														|
% 116.02/82.10  																																														| Applying alpha-rule on (6754) yields:
% 116.02/82.10  																																														| (6755) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = all_560_2_5210
% 116.02/82.10  																																														| (6756) sdtlseqdt0(all_560_2_5210, all_560_1_5209)
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (6757) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_560_1_5209
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (6758) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_560_0_5208
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (6759)  ~ (all_560_0_5208 = all_97_1_45)
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (6760) sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, all_560_0_5208)
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (6761)  ~ (all_560_1_5209 = all_560_2_5210)
% 116.02/82.11  																																														|
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| From (2697) and (6757) follows:
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (6762) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_560_1_5209
% 116.02/82.11  																																														|
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| From (2697) and (6758) follows:
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (6763) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_560_0_5208
% 116.02/82.11  																																														|
% 116.02/82.11  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1382), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.11  																																														|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (1392) xr = sz10
% 116.02/82.11  																																														|
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| Combining equations (310,1392) yields a new equation:
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| (1371) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| Simplifying 1371 yields:
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.11  																																														|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (1396)  ~ (xr = sz10)
% 116.02/82.11  																																														| (1397)  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xr) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 116.02/82.11  																																														|
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| Equations (310) can reduce 1396 to:
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|
% 116.02/82.11  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|-Branch one:
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|
% 116.02/82.11  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.02/82.11  																																																| (174) $false
% 116.02/82.11  																																																|
% 116.02/82.11  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|-Branch two:
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.02/82.11  																																															| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 116.02/82.11  																																															|
% 116.02/82.11  																																																| Instantiating (1387) with all_571_0_5212, all_571_1_5213 yields:
% 116.02/82.11  																																																| (6775)  ~ (all_571_0_5212 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (all_571_1_5213 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_571_1_5213 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_571_0_5212
% 116.02/82.11  																																																|
% 116.02/82.11  																																																| Applying alpha-rule on (6775) yields:
% 116.02/82.11  																																																| (6776)  ~ (all_571_0_5212 = all_102_1_48)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																| (6777)  ~ (all_571_1_5213 = all_0_4_4)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																| (6778) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_571_1_5213
% 116.08/82.11  																																																| (6779) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_571_0_5212
% 116.08/82.11  																																																|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 116.08/82.11  																																																|-Branch one:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.08/82.11  																																																|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (174) $false
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.08/82.11  																																																|-Branch two:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 116.08/82.11  																																																|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| Instantiating (1411) with all_577_0_5214, all_577_1_5215, all_577_2_5216 yields:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6784)  ~ (all_577_0_5214 = all_577_1_5215) &  ~ (all_577_2_5216 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_5216 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_5214 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_5215 & sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_5215, all_577_0_5214) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_5216)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| Applying alpha-rule on (6784) yields:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6785) sdtlseqdt0(all_577_1_5215, all_577_0_5214)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6786) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_577_2_5216
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6787)  ~ (all_577_2_5216 = all_97_2_46)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6788) sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, all_577_2_5216)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6789) sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = all_577_1_5215
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6790) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_577_0_5214
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6791)  ~ (all_577_0_5214 = all_577_1_5215)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| From (2697) and (6786) follows:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6792) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_577_2_5216
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| From (2697) and (6790) follows:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6793) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_577_0_5214
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| From (2697) and (6789) follows:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (6794) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_5215
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| (174) $false
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																	|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| Instantiating (1576) with all_583_0_5217, all_583_1_5218 yields:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| (6799)  ~ (all_583_0_5217 = all_583_1_5218) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_583_1_5218 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_583_0_5217
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| Applying alpha-rule on (6799) yields:
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| (6800)  ~ (all_583_0_5217 = all_583_1_5218)
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| (6801) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_583_1_5218
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| (6802) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_583_0_5217
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		|
% 116.08/82.11  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with all_52_0_18, xm, all_240_0_145, all_228_0_135 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_240_0_145, sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_228_0_135, yields:
% 116.08/82.12  																																																		| (6803) all_240_0_145 = all_228_0_135
% 116.08/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.08/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_560_1_5209, all_583_1_5218 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_583_1_5218, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_560_1_5209, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6804) all_583_1_5218 = all_560_1_5209
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_560_1_5209, all_577_2_5216 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_577_2_5216, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_560_1_5209, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6805) all_577_2_5216 = all_560_1_5209
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_549_1_5205, all_577_2_5216 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_577_2_5216, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_549_1_5205, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6806) all_577_2_5216 = all_549_1_5205
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_533_2_5200, all_583_1_5218 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_583_1_5218, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_533_2_5200, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6807) all_583_1_5218 = all_533_2_5200
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_5188, all_560_1_5209 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_560_1_5209, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_5188, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6808) all_560_1_5209 = all_501_1_5188
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_5180, all_501_1_5188 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_5188, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_5180, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6809) all_501_1_5188 = all_484_1_5180
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_560_1_5209 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_560_1_5209, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6810) all_560_1_5209 = xm
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xm, all_571_0_5212, all_577_0_5214 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_577_0_5214, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_571_0_5212, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6811) all_577_0_5214 = all_571_0_5212
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xm, all_533_0_5198, all_560_0_5208 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_560_0_5208, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_5198, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6812) all_560_0_5208 = all_533_0_5198
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xm, all_507_0_5190, all_571_0_5212 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_571_0_5212, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_5190, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6813) all_571_0_5212 = all_507_0_5190
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xm, all_507_0_5190, all_533_0_5198 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_533_0_5198, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_507_0_5190, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6814) all_533_0_5198 = all_507_0_5190
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xm, all_501_0_5187, all_577_0_5214 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_577_0_5214, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_501_0_5187, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6815) all_577_0_5214 = all_501_0_5187
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xm, all_490_0_5181, all_560_0_5208 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_560_0_5208, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_490_0_5181, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6816) all_560_0_5208 = all_490_0_5181
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, xm, xm, all_571_0_5212 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_571_0_5212, sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = xm, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6817) all_571_0_5212 = xm
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_5184, all_83_2_40 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_5184, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_83_2_40, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6818) all_495_0_5184 = all_83_2_40
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, all_495_0_5184, all_517_2_5194 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_5194, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_495_0_5184, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6819) all_517_2_5194 = all_495_0_5184
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with xn, sz10, sz10, all_517_2_5194 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = all_517_2_5194, sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6820) all_517_2_5194 = sz10
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (77) with xn, all_166_0_68, all_52_0_18, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, all_166_0_68) = xn, sdtpldt0(sz10, all_52_0_18) = xn, aNaturalNumber0(all_166_0_68), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (3360) all_166_0_68 = all_52_0_18
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_577_1_5215, all_102_2_49 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_5215, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_102_2_49, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6822) all_577_1_5215 = all_102_2_49
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_533_1_5199, all_549_0_5204 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_5204, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_5199, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6823) all_549_0_5204 = all_533_1_5199
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_5191, all_577_1_5215 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_5215, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_5191, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6824) all_577_1_5215 = all_507_1_5191
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_507_1_5191, all_533_1_5199 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_533_1_5199, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_507_1_5191, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6825) all_533_1_5199 = all_507_1_5191
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_490_1_5182, all_577_1_5215 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_5215, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_490_1_5182, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6826) all_577_1_5215 = all_490_1_5182
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_484_0_5179, all_549_0_5204 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_549_0_5204, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_484_0_5179, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6827) all_549_0_5204 = all_484_0_5179
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Instantiating formula (16) with sz10, xm, all_97_2_46, all_577_1_5215 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_577_1_5215, sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6828) all_577_1_5215 = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Combining equations (6804,6807) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6829) all_560_1_5209 = all_533_2_5200
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Simplifying 6829 yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6830) all_560_1_5209 = all_533_2_5200
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Combining equations (6811,6815) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6831) all_571_0_5212 = all_501_0_5187
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Simplifying 6831 yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6832) all_571_0_5212 = all_501_0_5187
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Combining equations (6828,6826) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6833) all_490_1_5182 = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Combining equations (6822,6826) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6834) all_490_1_5182 = all_102_2_49
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Combining equations (6824,6826) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6835) all_507_1_5191 = all_490_1_5182
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Simplifying 6835 yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6836) all_507_1_5191 = all_490_1_5182
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Combining equations (6805,6806) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6837) all_560_1_5209 = all_549_1_5205
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Simplifying 6837 yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6838) all_560_1_5209 = all_549_1_5205
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Combining equations (6813,6832) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6839) all_507_0_5190 = all_501_0_5187
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| Simplifying 6839 yields:
% 116.10/82.12  																																																		| (6840) all_507_0_5190 = all_501_0_5187
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6817,6832) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6841) all_501_0_5187 = xm
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6812,6816) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6842) all_533_0_5198 = all_490_0_5181
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6842 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6843) all_533_0_5198 = all_490_0_5181
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6810,6838) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6844) all_549_1_5205 = xm
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6830,6838) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6845) all_549_1_5205 = all_533_2_5200
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6808,6838) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6846) all_549_1_5205 = all_501_1_5188
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6823,6827) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6847) all_533_1_5199 = all_484_0_5179
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6847 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6848) all_533_1_5199 = all_484_0_5179
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6846,6845) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6849) all_533_2_5200 = all_501_1_5188
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6844,6845) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6850) all_533_2_5200 = xm
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6814,6843) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6851) all_507_0_5190 = all_490_0_5181
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6851 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6852) all_507_0_5190 = all_490_0_5181
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6825,6848) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6853) all_507_1_5191 = all_484_0_5179
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6853 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6854) all_507_1_5191 = all_484_0_5179
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6849,6850) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6855) all_501_1_5188 = xm
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6855 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6856) all_501_1_5188 = xm
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6819,6820) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6857) all_495_0_5184 = sz10
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6857 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6858) all_495_0_5184 = sz10
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6840,6852) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6859) all_501_0_5187 = all_490_0_5181
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6859 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6860) all_501_0_5187 = all_490_0_5181
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6836,6854) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6861) all_490_1_5182 = all_484_0_5179
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6861 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6862) all_490_1_5182 = all_484_0_5179
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6841,6860) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6863) all_490_0_5181 = xm
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6809,6856) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6864) all_484_1_5180 = xm
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 6864 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6865) all_484_1_5180 = xm
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6818,6858) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (3386) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Simplifying 3386 yields:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (2392) all_83_2_40 = sz10
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6833,6862) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| (6868) all_484_0_5179 = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.13  																																																		| Combining equations (6834,6862) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (6869) all_484_0_5179 = all_102_2_49
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| Combining equations (6869,6868) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (3390) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| Simplifying 3390 yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (2813) all_102_2_49 = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| Equations (2392) can reduce 1158 to:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (1428)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| Simplifying 1428 yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (2813) and (1173) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (6874) sdtpldt0(all_97_2_46, xn) = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (6803) and (6687) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (736) sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_228_0_135
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (6865) and (6640) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (2641) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (2813) and (376) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (2698) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (2813) and (1187) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (6878) sdtpldt0(xn, all_97_2_46) = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (6863) and (6651) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (6689) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = xm
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (2392) and (337) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (2640) sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (2813) and (494) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (2699) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (2392) and (1194) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (239) sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (3360) and (620) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (266) aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (2813) and (1198) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (2818) aNaturalNumber0(all_97_2_46)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| From (2392) and (1199) follows:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (52) aNaturalNumber0(sz10)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (124), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (1739) all_0_0_0 = sz00
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Combining equations (1287,1739) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (2967) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Simplifying 2967 yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (1742)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = sz00)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		| (6891) all_0_0_0 = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, all_0_0_0) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 116.10/82.14  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Equations (1287) can reduce 1742 to:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (4) with all_0_2_2, xm, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = xm, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6893) xm = sz00 | xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (11) with xm, all_0_2_2, sz10, xn, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6894) xm = sz00 | xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (65) with all_0_2_2, xm, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = xm, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6895) xm = sz00 | xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = xm) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(xm, v0))
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (115) with all_0_2_2, xm, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = xm, sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6896) xm = sz00 | xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = xm) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (114) with xm, all_0_2_2, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = xm, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6897) xm = sz00 | xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(xm, v1))
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (101) with xm, all_0_2_2, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = xm, aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6898) xm = sz00 | xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (104) with all_0_2_2, xm, xn, sz10, xm and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = all_0_2_2, sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = xm, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6899) xm = sz00 | xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (22) with sz10, sz10, xn and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = sz10, aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (1366) sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10)
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (67) with sz00, sz00, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6901) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz00) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(sz00, v0))
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (97) with sz00, sz00, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = sz00, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6902) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz00) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz00, v2))
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (7) with all_228_0_135, all_52_0_18, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xm) = all_228_0_135, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(all_52_0_18), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6903) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_228_0_135) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_228_0_135))
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| Instantiating formula (7) with all_302_3_207, xm, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = all_302_3_207, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.14  																																																			| (6904) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_302_3_207) & sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_302_3_207))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| Instantiating formula (94) with all_302_3_207, xm, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = all_302_3_207, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6905) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_302_3_207) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_302_3_207) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| Instantiating formula (94) with xm, xn, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6906) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xm) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, xm) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| Instantiating formula (94) with all_97_2_46, sz10, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6907) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| Instantiating formula (7) with xm, xn, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = xm, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6908) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xm) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, xm))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| Instantiating formula (7) with all_97_2_46, sz10, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6909) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_2_46))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| Instantiating formula (94) with all_0_2_2, all_142_0_52, xm, sz00 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, all_142_0_52) = all_0_2_2, sdtlseqdt0(sz00, xm), aNaturalNumber0(all_142_0_52), aNaturalNumber0(xm), aNaturalNumber0(sz00), yields:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6910) xm = sz00 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_142_0_52, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_142_0_52, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_142_0_52) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| Instantiating formula (7) with all_97_2_46, all_97_2_46, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(all_97_2_46, xn) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(all_97_2_46), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6911) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_97_2_46, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_97_2_46) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_97_2_46) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_2_46))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| Instantiating formula (94) with all_97_2_46, all_97_2_46, xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xn, all_97_2_46) = all_97_2_46, sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(all_97_2_46), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6912) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_97_2_46, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_97_2_46, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_97_2_46) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6895), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			| (6916) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = xm) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(xm, v0))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6916), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				| (6920)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = xm) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(xm, v0))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																				|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6898), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					| (6924) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																					|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6910), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						| (6928)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_142_0_52, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_142_0_52, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_142_0_52) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																						|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6924), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							| (6932)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																							|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6894), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								| (6936) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																								|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6936), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									| (6940)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6896), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										| (6944) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = xm) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																										|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6944), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											| (6948)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = xm) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																											|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6899), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												| (6952) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																												|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6952), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																														| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																														| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.15  																																																														|
% 116.10/82.15  																																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													| (6956)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.15  																																																													|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6908), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																														|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																														| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																														|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																														|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																														| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																														| (6960)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = xm) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, xm))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																														|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6906), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															| (6964)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xm) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xn) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, xm) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																															|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6904), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																| (6968)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_302_3_207) & sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_302_3_207))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6903), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	| (6972)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_228_0_135) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, all_52_0_18) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_228_0_135))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																	|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6902), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		| (6976)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = sz00) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(sz00, v2))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																		|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6901), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			| (6980)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = sz00) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz00) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(sz00, v0))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																			|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6905), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				| (6984)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_302_3_207) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_302_3_207) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																				|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6907), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					| (6988)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																					|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6909), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						| (6992)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz00) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz00, sz10) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_2_46))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																						|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6893), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							| (6996) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																							|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6996), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								| (7000)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtasdt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																								|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6912), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									| (7004)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_97_2_46, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_97_2_46, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_97_2_46) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																									|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6897), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										| (1336) xm = sz00
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											| Equations (1336) can reduce 1339 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										| (1339)  ~ (xm = sz00)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										| (7008) xn = sz10 |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(xm, v1))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																										|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (6911), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											| (7012)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_97_2_46, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_97_2_46) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_97_2_46) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_2_46))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																											|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (7008), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												| (7016)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xm) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xn, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_0_2_2) & sdtlseqdt0(xm, v1))
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																												|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													| Instantiating formula (2) with xn, sz10 and discharging atoms sdtlseqdt0(xn, sz10), sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xn), aNaturalNumber0(xn), aNaturalNumber0(sz10), yields:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													|
% 116.10/82.16  																																																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.17  																																				|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.17  																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.17  																																				| (2889)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v0))
% 116.10/82.17  																																				|
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| Instantiating (2889) with all_513_0_5678, all_513_1_5679, all_513_2_5680 yields:
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (7021)  ~ (all_513_0_5678 = all_513_1_5679) &  ~ (all_513_2_5680 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_5678 & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_5679 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_5680 & sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_5679, all_513_0_5678) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_5680)
% 116.10/82.17  																																					|
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| Applying alpha-rule on (7021) yields:
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (7022) sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, all_513_2_5680)
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (7023) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_5679
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (7024) sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = all_513_2_5680
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (7025) sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = all_513_0_5678
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (7026)  ~ (all_513_2_5680 = all_0_4_4)
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (7027)  ~ (all_513_0_5678 = all_513_1_5679)
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (7028) sdtlseqdt0(all_513_1_5679, all_513_0_5678)
% 116.10/82.17  																																					|
% 116.10/82.17  																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (551), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.17  																																					|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.17  																																					|
% 116.10/82.17  																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.17  																																						| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.17  																																						|
% 116.10/82.17  																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.17  																																					|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.17  																																					| (1502)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_0_38) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_83_0_38, v2))
% 116.10/82.17  																																					|
% 116.10/82.17  																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (583), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.17  																																						|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.17  																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.17  																																						|
% 116.10/82.17  																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.17  																																							| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.17  																																							|
% 116.10/82.17  																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.17  																																						|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.17  																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.17  																																						| (1549)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = xp) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_52_0_18, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_52_0_18) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(xp, v2))
% 116.10/82.17  																																						|
% 116.10/82.17  																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (545), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.17  																																							|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.17  																																							| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.17  																																							|
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.17  																																								|
% 116.10/82.17  																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.17  																																							|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.17  																																							| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.17  																																							| (1587)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v0))
% 116.10/82.17  																																							|
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| Instantiating (1587) with all_535_0_5687, all_535_1_5688, all_535_2_5689 yields:
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (7041)  ~ (all_535_0_5687 = all_535_1_5688) &  ~ (all_535_2_5689 = all_102_2_49) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_5689 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_5687 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_5688 & sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_5688, all_535_0_5687) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_5689)
% 116.10/82.17  																																								|
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| Applying alpha-rule on (7041) yields:
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (7042)  ~ (all_535_2_5689 = all_102_2_49)
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (7043) sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, all_535_2_5689)
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (7044) sdtlseqdt0(all_535_1_5688, all_535_0_5687)
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (7045) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_5689
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (7046)  ~ (all_535_0_5687 = all_535_1_5688)
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (7047) sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = all_535_0_5687
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (7048) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_535_1_5688
% 116.10/82.17  																																								|
% 116.10/82.17  																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (533), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.17  																																								|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.17  																																								| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.17  																																								|
% 116.10/82.18  																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																									| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																									|
% 116.10/82.18  																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																								|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																								| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.18  																																								| (2925)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_0_4_4, v2))
% 116.10/82.18  																																								|
% 116.10/82.18  																																									+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (516), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																									|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.18  																																									|
% 116.10/82.18  																																										| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																										| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																										|
% 116.10/82.18  																																										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																									|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																									| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.18  																																									| (2929)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 116.10/82.18  																																									|
% 116.10/82.18  																																										+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (547), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																										|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																										| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.18  																																										|
% 116.10/82.18  																																											| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																											| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																											|
% 116.10/82.18  																																											|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																										|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																										| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.18  																																										| (1433)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_83_2_40) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, sz10) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_83_2_40) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.18  																																										|
% 116.10/82.18  																																											+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (511), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																											|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																											| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.18  																																											|
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																												|
% 116.10/82.18  																																												|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																											|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																											| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.18  																																											| (1576)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1)
% 116.10/82.18  																																											|
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| Instantiating (1576) with all_559_0_5698, all_559_1_5699 yields:
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| (7065)  ~ (all_559_0_5698 = all_559_1_5699) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_5699 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_5698
% 116.10/82.18  																																												|
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| Applying alpha-rule on (7065) yields:
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| (7066)  ~ (all_559_0_5698 = all_559_1_5699)
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| (7067) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_5699
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| (7068) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_559_0_5698
% 116.10/82.18  																																												|
% 116.10/82.18  																																												+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (491), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																												|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.18  																																												|
% 116.10/82.18  																																													| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																													| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																													|
% 116.10/82.18  																																													|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																												|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.18  																																												| (2945)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 116.10/82.18  																																												|
% 116.10/82.18  																																													+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (535), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																													|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																													| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.18  																																													|
% 116.10/82.18  																																														| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																														| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																														|
% 116.10/82.18  																																														|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																													|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																													| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.18  																																													| (2949)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_97_2_46) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.18  																																													|
% 116.10/82.18  																																														+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (548), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																														|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																														| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.18  																																														|
% 116.10/82.18  																																															| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																															| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																															|
% 116.10/82.18  																																															|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																														|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																														| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.18  																																														| (1533)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_97_1_45) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_1_45, v2))
% 116.10/82.18  																																														|
% 116.10/82.18  																																															+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (544), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																															|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																															| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.18  																																															|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																																|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																															|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																															| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.18  																																															| (1411)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_2_46) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, xn) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, all_0_4_4) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_97_2_46, v0))
% 116.10/82.18  																																															|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (536), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																																|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.18  																																																|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																																|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																| (2961)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_2_49, v2))
% 116.10/82.18  																																																|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (509), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	| (1387)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_1_48) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_4_4) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(xn, xm) = v1)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																	|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (515), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		| (2977)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																		|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (507), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			| (2981)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_102_2_49) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																			|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (538), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				| (2985)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(all_102_1_48, v0))
% 116.10/82.18  																																																				|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (510), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					| (1490)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																					|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| Instantiating (1490) with all_623_0_5723, all_623_1_5724 yields:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| (7109)  ~ (all_623_0_5723 = all_623_1_5724) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_5723 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_5724
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| Applying alpha-rule on (7109) yields:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| (7110)  ~ (all_623_0_5723 = all_623_1_5724)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| (7111) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_5723
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| (7112) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_623_1_5724
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (543), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| (1372) xn = sz10
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							| Equations (1372) can reduce 1364 to:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| (1364)  ~ (xn = sz10)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						| (1421)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = v1 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v0 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v2 & sdtlseqdt0(v2, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, v1))
% 116.10/82.18  																																																						|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							| Instantiating (1421) with all_633_0_5725, all_633_1_5726, all_633_2_5727 yields:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							| (7117)  ~ (all_633_0_5725 = all_0_4_4) &  ~ (all_633_1_5726 = all_633_2_5727) & sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_5726 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_5727 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_5725 & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_5725, all_0_4_4) & sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_5727, all_633_1_5726)
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							|
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							| Applying alpha-rule on (7117) yields:
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							| (7118) sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = all_633_0_5725
% 116.10/82.18  																																																							| (7119)  ~ (all_633_1_5726 = all_633_2_5727)
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							| (7120)  ~ (all_633_0_5725 = all_0_4_4)
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							| (7121) sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = all_633_2_5727
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							| (7122) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_2_5727, all_633_1_5726)
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							| (7123) sdtlseqdt0(all_633_0_5725, all_0_4_4)
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							| (7124) sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_5726
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (512), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							| (3009)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_97_2_46) &  ~ (v0 = all_102_1_48) & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, all_0_4_4) = v0)
% 116.10/82.19  																																																							|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (537), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								| (2888)  ~ (all_0_4_4 = xm)
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								| (3013)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] :  ? [v2] : ( ~ (v2 = v1) &  ~ (v0 = all_97_1_45) & sdtpldt0(all_0_4_4, sz10) = v2 & sdtpldt0(xm, sz10) = v1 & sdtpldt0(sz10, xm) = v0 & sdtlseqdt0(v1, v2) & sdtlseqdt0(v0, all_97_1_45))
% 116.10/82.19  																																																								|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_623_0_5723, all_633_1_5726 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_5726, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_5723, yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7133) all_633_1_5726 = all_623_0_5723
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_559_1_5699, all_633_1_5726 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_633_1_5726, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_559_1_5699, yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7134) all_633_1_5726 = all_559_1_5699
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_535_2_5689, all_623_0_5723 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_5723, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_535_2_5689, yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7135) all_623_0_5723 = all_535_2_5689
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_513_1_5679, all_623_0_5723 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_5723, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_513_1_5679, yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7136) all_623_0_5723 = all_513_1_5679
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_501_1_5188, all_623_0_5723 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_5723, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_501_1_5188, yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7137) all_623_0_5723 = all_501_1_5188
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_5180, all_0_4_4 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_5180, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_0_4_4, yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7138) all_484_1_5180 = all_0_4_4
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, all_484_1_5180, all_623_0_5723 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_5723, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_484_1_5180, yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7139) all_623_0_5723 = all_484_1_5180
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Instantiating formula (16) with xm, xn, xm, all_623_0_5723 and discharging atoms sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = all_623_0_5723, sdtpldt0(xm, xn) = xm, yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7140) all_623_0_5723 = xm
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7133,7134) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7141) all_623_0_5723 = all_559_1_5699
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Simplifying 7141 yields:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7142) all_623_0_5723 = all_559_1_5699
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7136,7142) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7143) all_559_1_5699 = all_513_1_5679
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7139,7142) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7144) all_559_1_5699 = all_484_1_5180
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7135,7142) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7145) all_559_1_5699 = all_535_2_5689
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7140,7142) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7146) all_559_1_5699 = xm
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7137,7142) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7147) all_559_1_5699 = all_501_1_5188
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7144,7145) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7148) all_535_2_5689 = all_484_1_5180
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7143,7145) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7149) all_535_2_5689 = all_513_1_5679
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7146,7145) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7150) all_535_2_5689 = xm
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7147,7145) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7151) all_535_2_5689 = all_501_1_5188
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| Combining equations (7150,7149) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									| (7152) all_513_1_5679 = xm
% 116.10/82.19  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| Combining equations (7148,7149) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| (7153) all_513_1_5679 = all_484_1_5180
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| Combining equations (7151,7149) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| (7154) all_513_1_5679 = all_501_1_5188
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| Combining equations (7152,7154) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| (6856) all_501_1_5188 = xm
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| Combining equations (7153,7154) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| (6809) all_501_1_5188 = all_484_1_5180
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| Combining equations (6809,6856) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| (6864) all_484_1_5180 = xm
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| Simplifying 6864 yields:
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| (6865) all_484_1_5180 = xm
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| Combining equations (6865,7138) yields a new equation:
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| (2697) all_0_4_4 = xm
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| Equations (2697) can reduce 2888 to:
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|
% 116.10/82.20  																																																									|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.20  																		|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.20  																		| (7161)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = xm)
% 116.10/82.20  																		| (7162)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 116.10/82.20  																		|
% 116.10/82.20  																			| Instantiating (7162) with all_372_0_5735, all_372_1_5736 yields:
% 116.10/82.20  																			| (7163)  ~ (all_372_0_5735 = all_372_1_5736) & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_372_0_5735 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_372_1_5736
% 116.10/82.20  																			|
% 116.10/82.20  																			| Applying alpha-rule on (7163) yields:
% 116.10/82.20  																			| (7164)  ~ (all_372_0_5735 = all_372_1_5736)
% 116.10/82.20  																			| (7165) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_372_0_5735
% 116.10/82.20  																			| (7166) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_372_1_5736
% 116.10/82.20  																			|
% 116.10/82.20  																			+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (1286), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.20  																			|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.20  																			| (1287) all_0_0_0 = xm
% 116.10/82.20  																			|
% 116.10/82.20  																				| Equations (1287) can reduce 7161 to:
% 116.10/82.20  																				| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.20  																				|
% 116.10/82.20  																				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.20  																			|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.20  																			| (7161)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = xm)
% 116.10/82.20  																			| (7170)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v0)
% 116.10/82.20  																			|
% 116.10/82.20  																				+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (192), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.20  																				|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.20  																				| (173) xp = sz00
% 116.10/82.20  																				|
% 116.10/82.20  																					| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 116.10/82.20  																					| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.20  																					|
% 116.10/82.20  																					|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.20  																				|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.20  																				| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 116.10/82.20  																				| (7174) all_0_0_0 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_1_7) & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 116.10/82.20  																				|
% 116.10/82.20  																					+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (199), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.20  																					|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.20  																					| (173) xp = sz00
% 116.10/82.20  																					|
% 116.10/82.20  																						| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 116.10/82.20  																						| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.20  																						|
% 116.10/82.20  																						|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.20  																					|-Branch two:
% 116.10/82.20  																					| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 116.10/82.20  																					| (7178) all_0_0_0 = xm |  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_3_9) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 116.10/82.20  																					|
% 116.10/82.20  																						+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (7178), into two cases.
% 116.10/82.20  																						|-Branch one:
% 116.10/82.20  																						| (1287) all_0_0_0 = xm
% 116.10/82.20  																						|
% 116.10/82.20  																							| Equations (1287) can reduce 7161 to:
% 116.10/82.20  																							| (174) $false
% 116.10/82.20  																							|
% 116.10/82.20  																							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.10/82.20  																						|-Branch two:
% 116.38/82.20  																						| (7161)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = xm)
% 116.38/82.20  																						| (7182)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_15_3_9) &  ~ (v0 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = v1 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = v0)
% 116.38/82.20  																						|
% 116.38/82.20  																							| Instantiating (7182) with all_392_0_5739, all_392_1_5740 yields:
% 116.38/82.20  																							| (7183)  ~ (all_392_0_5739 = all_15_3_9) &  ~ (all_392_1_5740 = all_0_2_2) & sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_392_0_5739 & sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_392_1_5740
% 116.38/82.20  																							|
% 116.38/82.20  																							| Applying alpha-rule on (7183) yields:
% 116.38/82.20  																							| (7184)  ~ (all_392_0_5739 = all_15_3_9)
% 116.38/82.20  																							| (7185)  ~ (all_392_1_5740 = all_0_2_2)
% 116.38/82.21  																							| (7186) sdtasdt0(all_0_0_0, xp) = all_392_0_5739
% 116.38/82.21  																							| (7187) sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_392_1_5740
% 116.38/82.21  																							|
% 116.38/82.21  																							+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (7174), into two cases.
% 116.38/82.21  																							|-Branch one:
% 116.38/82.21  																							| (1287) all_0_0_0 = xm
% 116.38/82.21  																							|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Equations (1287) can reduce 7161 to:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (174) $false
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.38/82.21  																							|-Branch two:
% 116.38/82.21  																							| (7161)  ~ (all_0_0_0 = xm)
% 116.38/82.21  																							| (7191)  ? [v0] :  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (v0 = all_15_1_7) & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = v0 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = v1)
% 116.38/82.21  																							|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Instantiating (7191) with all_398_0_5741, all_398_1_5742 yields:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7192)  ~ (all_398_0_5741 = all_0_2_2) &  ~ (all_398_1_5742 = all_15_1_7) & sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_398_1_5742 & sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_398_0_5741
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Applying alpha-rule on (7192) yields:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7193)  ~ (all_398_0_5741 = all_0_2_2)
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7194)  ~ (all_398_1_5742 = all_15_1_7)
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7195) sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_398_1_5742
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7196) sdtasdt0(xm, xp) = all_398_0_5741
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_398_1_5742, all_0_2_2 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_398_1_5742, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7197) all_398_1_5742 = all_0_2_2
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, all_0_0_0, all_372_0_5735, all_398_1_5742 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_398_1_5742, sdtasdt0(xp, all_0_0_0) = all_372_0_5735, yields:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7198) all_398_1_5742 = all_372_0_5735
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_372_1_5736, all_392_1_5740 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_392_1_5740, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_372_1_5736, yields:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7199) all_392_1_5740 = all_372_1_5736
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Instantiating formula (49) with xp, xm, all_0_2_2, all_392_1_5740 and discharging atoms sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_392_1_5740, sdtasdt0(xp, xm) = all_0_2_2, yields:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7200) all_392_1_5740 = all_0_2_2
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Combining equations (7197,7198) yields a new equation:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7201) all_372_0_5735 = all_0_2_2
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Combining equations (7200,7199) yields a new equation:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (7202) all_372_1_5736 = all_0_2_2
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								| Equations (7201,7202) can reduce 7164 to:
% 116.38/82.21  																								| (174) $false
% 116.38/82.21  																								|
% 116.38/82.21  																								|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.38/82.21  									|-Branch two:
% 116.38/82.21  									| (7204)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(all_0_0_0, all_0_2_2)
% 116.38/82.21  									| (173) xp = sz00
% 116.38/82.21  									|
% 116.38/82.21  										| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 116.38/82.21  										| (174) $false
% 116.38/82.21  										|
% 116.38/82.21  										|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.38/82.21  						|-Branch two:
% 116.38/82.21  						| (7207)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xm, all_15_3_9)
% 116.38/82.21  						| (173) xp = sz00
% 116.38/82.21  						|
% 116.38/82.21  							| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 116.38/82.21  							| (174) $false
% 116.38/82.21  							|
% 116.38/82.21  							|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.38/82.21  			|-Branch two:
% 116.38/82.21  			| (7210)  ~ (xr = xn)
% 116.38/82.21  			| (7211)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xr, xn) &  ! [v0] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, v0) = v1))
% 116.38/82.21  			|
% 116.38/82.21  				| Applying alpha-rule on (7211) yields:
% 116.38/82.21  				| (7212)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(xr, xn)
% 116.38/82.21  				| (7213)  ! [v0] : ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(v0) |  ? [v1] : ( ~ (v1 = xn) & sdtpldt0(xr, v0) = v1))
% 116.38/82.21  				|
% 116.38/82.21  				| Using (215) and (7212) yields:
% 116.38/82.21  				| (1719) $false
% 116.38/82.21  				|
% 116.38/82.21  				|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.38/82.21  |-Branch two:
% 116.38/82.21  | (7215)  ~ sdtlseqdt0(sz10, xp)
% 116.38/82.21  | (7216) xp = sz10 | xp = sz00
% 116.38/82.21  |
% 116.38/82.21  	+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (132), into two cases.
% 116.38/82.21  	|-Branch one:
% 116.38/82.21  	| (173) xp = sz00
% 116.38/82.21  	|
% 116.38/82.21  		| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 116.38/82.21  		| (174) $false
% 116.38/82.21  		|
% 116.38/82.21  		|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.38/82.21  	|-Branch two:
% 116.38/82.21  	| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 116.38/82.21  	| (176) xp = sz10 |  ? [v0] : (isPrime0(v0) & doDivides0(v0, xp) & aNaturalNumber0(v0))
% 116.38/82.21  	|
% 116.38/82.21  		+-Applying beta-rule and splitting (7216), into two cases.
% 116.38/82.21  		|-Branch one:
% 116.38/82.21  		| (173) xp = sz00
% 116.38/82.21  		|
% 116.38/82.21  			| Equations (173) can reduce 37 to:
% 116.38/82.21  			| (174) $false
% 116.38/82.21  			|
% 116.38/82.21  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.38/82.21  		|-Branch two:
% 116.38/82.21  		| (37)  ~ (xp = sz00)
% 116.38/82.21  		| (177) xp = sz10
% 116.38/82.21  		|
% 116.38/82.21  			| Equations (177) can reduce 18 to:
% 116.38/82.21  			| (174) $false
% 116.38/82.21  			|
% 116.38/82.21  			|-The branch is then unsatisfiable
% 116.38/82.21  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 116.38/82.21  
% 116.38/82.21  81625ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------