↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM505+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:49:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 5.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   89 (  32   ~;  28   |;  23   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0 sgn  10   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mLETotal,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aNaturalNumber0(X2)
        & aNaturalNumber0(X1) )
     => ( ( sdtlseqdt0(X2,X1)
          & X2 != X1 )
        | sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mLETotal) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( ~ ( sdtlseqdt0(xp,xk)
        | ? [X1] :
            ( sdtpldt0(xp,X1) = xk
            & aNaturalNumber0(X1) ) )
   => ( ( sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp)
        | ? [X1] :
            ( sdtpldt0(xk,X1) = xp
            & aNaturalNumber0(X1) ) )
      & xk != xp ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(m__2306,hypothesis,
    ( xk = sdtsldt0(sdtasdt0(xn,xm),xp)
    & sdtasdt0(xn,xm) = sdtasdt0(xp,xk)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xk) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2306) ).

fof(m_AddZero,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aNaturalNumber0(X1)
     => ( X1 = sdtpldt0(sz00,X1)
        & sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m_AddZero) ).

fof(m__1837,hypothesis,
    ( aNaturalNumber0(xp)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xm)
    & aNaturalNumber0(xn) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1837) ).

fof(mSortsC,axiom,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSortsC) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aNaturalNumber0(X2)
        & aNaturalNumber0(X1) )
     => ( ( sdtlseqdt0(X2,X1)
          & X2 != X1 )
        | sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mLETotal]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( sdtlseqdt0(xp,xk)
          | ? [X1] :
              ( sdtpldt0(xp,X1) = xk
              & aNaturalNumber0(X1) ) )
     => ( ( sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp)
          | ? [X1] :
              ( sdtpldt0(xk,X1) = xp
              & aNaturalNumber0(X1) ) )
        & xk != xp ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X102,X103] :
      ( ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X103)
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X102)
        | sdtlseqdt0(X102,X103)
        | sdtlseqdt0(X103,X102) )
      & ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X103)
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X102)
        | sdtlseqdt0(X102,X103)
        | X103 != X102 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( sdtlseqdt0(xp,xk)
          | ? [X1] :
              ( sdtpldt0(xp,X1) = xk
              & aNaturalNumber0(X1) ) )
     => ( ( sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp)
          | ? [X1] :
              ( sdtpldt0(xk,X1) = xp
              & aNaturalNumber0(X1) ) )
        & xk != xp ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X2)
    | sdtlseqdt0(X2,X1)
    | sdtlseqdt0(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xk),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2306]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X26,X27] :
      ( ( xk = xp
        | ~ sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp) )
      & ( xk = xp
        | sdtpldt0(xk,X27) != xp
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X27) )
      & ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp,xk)
      & ( sdtpldt0(xp,X26) != xk
        | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X26) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X76] :
      ( ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X76)
        | X76 = sdtpldt0(sz00,X76) )
      & ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X76)
        | sdtpldt0(X76,sz00) = X76 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m_AddZero])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtlseqdt0(X1,xk)
    | sdtlseqdt0(xk,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aNaturalNumber0(xp),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__1837]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdtlseqdt0(xp,xk),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtpldt0(xp,X1) != xk
    | ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ aNaturalNumber0(X1)
    | sdtpldt0(X1,sz00) = X1 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    aNaturalNumber0(sz00),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mSortsC]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp)
    | xk = xp ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    sdtlseqdt0(xk,xp),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    xk != xp,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]),c_0_22]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUM505+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.44  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.15/5.44  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/5.44  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/5.44  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/5.44  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/5.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/5.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/5.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:38:42 UTC 2026
% 0.15/5.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/5.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/5.53  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.21/5.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % new_bool_3 with pid 1185962 completed with status 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/5.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.21/5.53  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/5.53  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.53  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1185965 completed with status 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.21/5.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.21/5.53  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/5.53  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.53  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/5.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.53  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.21/5.53  
% 0.21/5.53  % Proof found!
% 0.21/5.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/5.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/5.53  % Parsed axioms                        : 50
% 0.21/5.53  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 1
% 0.21/5.53  % Initial clauses                      : 241
% 0.21/5.53  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.21/5.53  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 238
% 0.21/5.53  % Processed clauses                    : 193
% 0.21/5.53  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.21/5.53  % ...subsumed                          : 34
% 0.21/5.53  % ...remaining for further processing  : 157
% 0.21/5.53  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.21/5.53  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.21/5.53  % Generated clauses                    : 200
% 0.21/5.53  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 186
% 0.21/5.53  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Paramodulations                      : 197
% 0.21/5.53  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.21/5.53  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Total rewrite steps                  : 73
% 0.21/5.53  % ...of those cached                   : 55
% 0.21/5.53  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/5.53  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/5.53  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/5.53  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/5.53  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/5.53  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/5.53  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/5.53  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/5.53  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/5.53  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/5.53  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/5.53  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/5.53  % Current number of processed clauses  : 151
% 0.21/5.53  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 38
% 0.21/5.53  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/5.53  %    Negative unit clauses             : 15
% 0.21/5.53  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 98
% 0.21/5.53  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 231
% 0.21/5.53  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1738
% 0.21/5.53  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Current number of archived clauses   : 3
% 0.21/5.53  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1807
% 0.21/5.53  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1701
% 0.21/5.53  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 22
% 0.21/5.53  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 352
% 0.21/5.53  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.21/5.53  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.21/5.53  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/5.53  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 18527
% 0.21/5.53  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2389
% 0.21/5.53  
% 0.21/5.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/5.53  % User time                : 0.021 s
% 0.21/5.53  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.21/5.53  % Total time               : 0.027 s
% 0.21/5.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4216 pages
% 0.21/5.53  
% 0.21/5.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/5.53  % User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.21/5.53  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.21/5.53  % Total time               : 0.034 s
% 0.21/5.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.21/5.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------