%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NUM520+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:49:24 PM UTC 2026
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 0.26s 0.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 11 ~; 3 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__2327,hypothesis,
~ ( xk != sz10
& xk != sz00 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2327) ).
fof(m__2315,hypothesis,
~ ( xk = sz10
| xk = sz00 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2315) ).
fof(c_0_2,hypothesis,
~ ( xk != sz10
& xk != sz00 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__2327]) ).
fof(c_0_3,hypothesis,
( xk = sz10
| xk = sz00 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2]) ).
fof(c_0_4,hypothesis,
( xk != sz10
& xk != sz00 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__2315])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
( xk = sz10
| xk = sz00 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
xk != sz00,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
xk != sz10,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : NUM520+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.43 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:36:18 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.53 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2365912 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.53 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.53 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S3S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with pid 2365920 completed with status 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.53 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.53 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.53 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2m with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_S3S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_RG_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.53 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % Proof found!
% 0.26/0.53 % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 0.26/0.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.53 % Parsed axioms : 48
% 0.26/0.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Initial clauses : 88
% 0.26/0.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.26/0.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 85
% 0.26/0.53 % Processed clauses : 20
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.26/0.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % NegExts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.26/0.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.26/0.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.26/0.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 65
% 0.26/0.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 298
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.26/0.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.26/0.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.26/0.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 6724
% 0.26/0.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1363
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.53 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 3940 pages
% 0.26/0.53
% 0.26/0.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.53 % User time : 0.021 s
% 0.26/0.53 % System time : 0.017 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.26/0.53 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------