↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : NUM535+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:48:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 19.06s 3.33s
% Output   : Proof 19.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM535+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.17/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 15:40:15 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.61  ________       _____
% 0.20/0.61  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.20/0.61  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.20/0.61  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.20/0.61  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.20/0.61  (2023-06-19)
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.20/0.61  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.20/0.61                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.20/0.61  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.20/0.61  
% 0.20/0.61  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.20/0.62  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.20/0.64  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.20/0.65  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 2.19/1.04  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.19/1.04  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.08  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.08  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.08  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.08  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 2.92/1.08  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.94/1.51  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.94/1.52  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.94/1.54  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 5.94/1.55  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 6.39/1.60  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 7.49/1.77  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.58/1.89  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 9.10/2.09  Prover 1: gave up
% 9.10/2.11  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 10.56/2.17  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 11.63/2.30  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.32/2.38  Prover 3: gave up
% 12.32/2.39  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 12.63/2.46  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 13.27/2.55  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.27/2.55  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 15.77/2.94  Prover 8: gave up
% 16.46/2.97  Prover 9: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1423531889
% 16.79/3.00  Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 18.08/3.20  Prover 9: Constructing countermodel ...
% 19.06/3.32  Prover 7: Found proof (size 61)
% 19.06/3.32  Prover 7: proved (1211ms)
% 19.06/3.32  Prover 5: stopped
% 19.06/3.32  Prover 2: stopped
% 19.06/3.32  Prover 4: stopped
% 19.06/3.32  Prover 0: stopped
% 19.06/3.32  Prover 6: stopped
% 19.06/3.33  Prover 9: stopped
% 19.06/3.33  
% 19.06/3.33  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 19.06/3.33  
% 19.06/3.34  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.06/3.34  Assumptions after simplification:
% 19.06/3.34  ---------------------------------
% 19.06/3.34  
% 19.06/3.34    (mDefCons)
% 19.37/3.37     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v2 |  ~
% 19.37/3.37      (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 19.37/3.37      aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v3) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |  ? [v4: $i] : ($i(v4) & ( ~
% 19.37/3.37          aElementOf0(v4, v3) |  ~ aElement0(v4) | ( ~ (v4 = v1) &  ~
% 19.37/3.37            aElementOf0(v4, v0))) & (aElementOf0(v4, v3) | (aElement0(v4) & (v4 =
% 19.37/3.37              v1 | aElementOf0(v4, v0)))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2:
% 19.37/3.37      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v1 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~
% 19.37/3.37      $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v2) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |
% 19.37/3.37       ~ aSet0(v0) | aElementOf0(v3, v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2:
% 19.37/3.37      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 19.37/3.37      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v2) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.37      aSet0(v0) | aElement0(v3)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  !
% 19.37/3.37    [v3: $i] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) | 
% 19.37/3.37      ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v0) |  ~ aElement0(v3) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.37      aSet0(v0) | aElementOf0(v3, v2)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :
% 19.37/3.37    ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 19.37/3.37      aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aElementOf0(v1, v2)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 19.37/3.37      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.37      $i(v0) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aSet0(v2))
% 19.37/3.37  
% 19.37/3.37    (mDefDiff)
% 19.37/3.38     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v2 |  ~
% 19.37/3.38      (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 19.37/3.38      aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v3) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |  ? [v4: $i] : ($i(v4) & (v4 =
% 19.37/3.38          v1 |  ~ aElementOf0(v4, v3) |  ~ aElementOf0(v4, v0) |  ~ aElement0(v4))
% 19.37/3.38        & (aElementOf0(v4, v3) | ( ~ (v4 = v1) & aElementOf0(v4, v0) &
% 19.37/3.38            aElement0(v4))))) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 19.37/3.38      $i] : (v3 = v1 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 19.37/3.38      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v0) |  ~ aElement0(v3) |  ~
% 19.37/3.38      aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aElementOf0(v3, v2)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 19.37/3.38      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) | 
% 19.37/3.38      ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v2) |  ~ aElement0(v1)
% 19.37/3.38      |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aElementOf0(v3, v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2:
% 19.37/3.38      $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 19.37/3.38      $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v2) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.38      aSet0(v0) | aElement0(v3)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 19.37/3.38      (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 19.37/3.38      aElementOf0(v1, v2) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 19.37/3.38    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |
% 19.37/3.38       ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aSet0(v2))
% 19.37/3.38  
% 19.37/3.38    (mDefSub)
% 19.37/3.38     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |
% 19.37/3.38       ~ aSubsetOf0(v1, v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v2, v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |
% 19.37/3.38      aElementOf0(v2, v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) | 
% 19.37/3.38      ~ aSubsetOf0(v1, v0) |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aSet0(v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i]
% 19.37/3.38    : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aSet0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aSubsetOf0(v1, v0) | 
% 19.37/3.38      ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & aElementOf0(v2, v1) &  ~ aElementOf0(v2, v0)))
% 19.37/3.38  
% 19.37/3.38    (mEOfElem)
% 19.37/3.38     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v1, v0) | 
% 19.37/3.38      ~ aSet0(v0) | aElement0(v1))
% 19.37/3.38  
% 19.37/3.38    (m__)
% 19.37/3.38    $i(xx) & $i(xS) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (sdtmndt0(xS, xx) = v0 &
% 19.37/3.38      sdtpldt0(v0, xx) = v1 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~ aSubsetOf0(v1, xS) |  ~
% 19.37/3.38        aSubsetOf0(xS, v1)))
% 19.37/3.38  
% 19.37/3.38    (m__617)
% 19.37/3.38    $i(xS) & aSet0(xS)
% 19.37/3.38  
% 19.37/3.38    (m__617_02)
% 19.37/3.38    $i(xx) & $i(xS) & aElementOf0(xx, xS)
% 19.37/3.38  
% 19.37/3.38  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 19.37/3.38  --------------------------------------------
% 19.37/3.38  mCntRel, mCountNFin, mCountNFin_01, mDefEmp, mElmSort, mEmpFin, mFinRel,
% 19.37/3.38  mSetSort, mSubASymm, mSubFSet, mSubRefl, mSubTrans
% 19.37/3.38  
% 19.37/3.38  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 19.37/3.38  ---------------------------------
% 19.37/3.38  
% 19.37/3.38  Begin of proof
% 19.37/3.38  | 
% 19.37/3.39  | ALPHA: (mDefSub) implies:
% 19.37/3.39  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aSet0(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          aSet0(v0) | aSubsetOf0(v1, v0) |  ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) &
% 19.37/3.39  |            aElementOf0(v2, v1) &  ~ aElementOf0(v2, v0)))
% 19.37/3.39  | 
% 19.37/3.39  | ALPHA: (mDefCons) implies:
% 19.37/3.39  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 19.37/3.39  |           ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |
% 19.37/3.39  |          aSet0(v2))
% 19.37/3.39  |   (3)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 19.37/3.39  |           ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |
% 19.37/3.39  |          aElementOf0(v1, v2))
% 19.37/3.39  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v0) |  ~ aElement0(v3) |  ~ aElement0(v1)
% 19.37/3.39  |          |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aElementOf0(v3, v2))
% 19.37/3.39  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v1 |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          (sdtpldt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v2) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |
% 19.37/3.39  |          aElementOf0(v3, v0))
% 19.37/3.39  | 
% 19.37/3.39  | ALPHA: (mDefDiff) implies:
% 19.37/3.39  |   (6)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 19.37/3.39  |           ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |
% 19.37/3.39  |          aSet0(v2))
% 19.37/3.39  |   (7)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |
% 19.37/3.39  |           ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v1, v2) |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0))
% 19.37/3.39  |   (8)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v2) |  ~ aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |
% 19.37/3.39  |          aElementOf0(v3, v0))
% 19.37/3.39  |   (9)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v1 |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |          $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v0) |  ~ aElement0(v3) |  ~ aElement0(v1)
% 19.37/3.39  |          |  ~ aSet0(v0) | aElementOf0(v3, v2))
% 19.37/3.39  |   (10)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v2 |  ~
% 19.37/3.39  |           (sdtmndt0(v0, v1) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 19.37/3.40  |           aElement0(v1) |  ~ aSet0(v3) |  ~ aSet0(v0) |  ? [v4: $i] : ($i(v4)
% 19.37/3.40  |             & (v4 = v1 |  ~ aElementOf0(v4, v3) |  ~ aElementOf0(v4, v0) |  ~
% 19.37/3.40  |               aElement0(v4)) & (aElementOf0(v4, v3) | ( ~ (v4 = v1) &
% 19.37/3.40  |                 aElementOf0(v4, v0) & aElement0(v4)))))
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | ALPHA: (m__617) implies:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (11)  aSet0(xS)
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | ALPHA: (m__617_02) implies:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (12)  aElementOf0(xx, xS)
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | ALPHA: (m__) implies:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (13)  $i(xS)
% 19.37/3.40  |   (14)  $i(xx)
% 19.37/3.40  |   (15)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (sdtmndt0(xS, xx) = v0 & sdtpldt0(v0, xx)
% 19.37/3.40  |           = v1 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ( ~ aSubsetOf0(v1, xS) |  ~ aSubsetOf0(xS,
% 19.37/3.40  |               v1)))
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | DELTA: instantiating (15) with fresh symbols all_14_0, all_14_1 gives:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (16)  sdtmndt0(xS, xx) = all_14_1 & sdtpldt0(all_14_1, xx) = all_14_0 &
% 19.37/3.40  |         $i(all_14_0) & $i(all_14_1) & ( ~ aSubsetOf0(all_14_0, xS) |  ~
% 19.37/3.40  |           aSubsetOf0(xS, all_14_0))
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | ALPHA: (16) implies:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (17)  $i(all_14_1)
% 19.37/3.40  |   (18)  $i(all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.40  |   (19)  sdtpldt0(all_14_1, xx) = all_14_0
% 19.37/3.40  |   (20)  sdtmndt0(xS, xx) = all_14_1
% 19.37/3.40  |   (21)   ~ aSubsetOf0(all_14_0, xS) |  ~ aSubsetOf0(xS, all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (mEOfElem) with xS, xx, simplifying with (11),
% 19.37/3.40  |              (12), (13), (14) gives:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (22)  aElement0(xx)
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (10) with xS, xx, all_14_1, xS, simplifying with
% 19.37/3.40  |              (11), (13), (14), (20), (22) gives:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (23)  all_14_1 = xS |  ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & aElementOf0(v0, xS) & (v0 = xx
% 19.37/3.40  |             |  ~ aElement0(v0)))
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with xS, xx, all_14_1, simplifying with (11),
% 19.37/3.40  |              (13), (14), (17), (20), (22) gives:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (24)  aSet0(all_14_1)
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with xS, xx, xS, simplifying with (11), (12),
% 19.37/3.40  |              (13), (14), (22) gives:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (25)   ~ (sdtmndt0(xS, xx) = xS)
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | PRED_UNIFY: (20), (25) imply:
% 19.37/3.40  |   (26)   ~ (all_14_1 = xS)
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | BETA: splitting (23) gives:
% 19.37/3.40  | 
% 19.37/3.40  | Case 1:
% 19.37/3.40  | | 
% 19.37/3.40  | |   (27)  all_14_1 = xS
% 19.37/3.40  | | 
% 19.37/3.40  | | REDUCE: (26), (27) imply:
% 19.37/3.40  | |   (28)  $false
% 19.37/3.40  | | 
% 19.37/3.40  | | CLOSE: (28) is inconsistent.
% 19.37/3.40  | | 
% 19.37/3.40  | Case 2:
% 19.37/3.40  | | 
% 19.37/3.40  | |   (29)   ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & aElementOf0(v0, xS) & (v0 = xx |  ~
% 19.37/3.40  | |             aElement0(v0)))
% 19.37/3.40  | | 
% 19.37/3.40  | | DELTA: instantiating (29) with fresh symbol all_50_0 gives:
% 19.37/3.40  | |   (30)  $i(all_50_0) & aElementOf0(all_50_0, xS) & (all_50_0 = xx |  ~
% 19.37/3.40  | |           aElement0(all_50_0))
% 19.37/3.40  | | 
% 19.37/3.40  | | ALPHA: (30) implies:
% 19.37/3.41  | |   (31)  aElementOf0(all_50_0, xS)
% 19.37/3.41  | |   (32)  $i(all_50_0)
% 19.37/3.41  | |   (33)  all_50_0 = xx |  ~ aElement0(all_50_0)
% 19.37/3.41  | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (3) with all_14_1, xx, all_14_0, simplifying with
% 19.37/3.41  | |              (14), (17), (18), (19), (22), (24) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | |   (34)  aElementOf0(xx, all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.41  | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_14_1, xx, all_14_0, simplifying with
% 19.37/3.41  | |              (14), (17), (18), (19), (22), (24) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | |   (35)  aSet0(all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.41  | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (mEOfElem) with xS, all_50_0, simplifying with
% 19.37/3.41  | |              (11), (13), (31), (32) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | |   (36)  aElement0(all_50_0)
% 19.37/3.41  | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | BETA: splitting (33) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | Case 1:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | |   (37)   ~ aElement0(all_50_0)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | PRED_UNIFY: (36), (37) imply:
% 19.37/3.41  | | |   (38)  $false
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | CLOSE: (38) is inconsistent.
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | Case 2:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | |   (39)  all_50_0 = xx
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with xS, all_14_0, simplifying with (11),
% 19.37/3.41  | | |              (13), (18), (35) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | |   (40)  aSubsetOf0(all_14_0, xS) |  ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & aElementOf0(v0,
% 19.37/3.41  | | |             all_14_0) &  ~ aElementOf0(v0, xS))
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_14_0, xS, simplifying with (11),
% 19.37/3.41  | | |              (13), (18), (35) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | |   (41)  aSubsetOf0(xS, all_14_0) |  ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & aElementOf0(v0,
% 19.37/3.41  | | |             xS) &  ~ aElementOf0(v0, all_14_0))
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | BETA: splitting (21) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | Case 1:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | |   (42)   ~ aSubsetOf0(all_14_0, xS)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | BETA: splitting (40) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | Case 1:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (43)  aSubsetOf0(all_14_0, xS)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (42), (43) imply:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (44)  $false
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | CLOSE: (44) is inconsistent.
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | Case 2:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (45)   ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & aElementOf0(v0, all_14_0) &  ~
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |           aElementOf0(v0, xS))
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (45) with fresh symbol all_120_0 gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (46)  $i(all_120_0) & aElementOf0(all_120_0, all_14_0) &  ~
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |         aElementOf0(all_120_0, xS)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | ALPHA: (46) implies:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (47)   ~ aElementOf0(all_120_0, xS)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (48)  aElementOf0(all_120_0, all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (49)  $i(all_120_0)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (12), (47) imply:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (50)   ~ (all_120_0 = xx)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_14_1, xx, all_14_0, all_120_0,
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |              simplifying with (14), (17), (18), (19), (22), (24),
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |              (48), (49) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | |   (51)  all_120_0 = xx | aElementOf0(all_120_0, all_14_1)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | BETA: splitting (51) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | Case 1:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | |   (52)  aElementOf0(all_120_0, all_14_1)
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (8) with xS, xx, all_14_1, all_120_0,
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | |              simplifying with (11), (13), (14), (17), (20), (22),
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | |              (47), (49), (52) gives:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | |   (53)  $false
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | CLOSE: (53) is inconsistent.
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | Case 2:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | |   (54)  all_120_0 = xx
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | REDUCE: (50), (54) imply:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | |   (55)  $false
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | CLOSE: (55) is inconsistent.
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | End of split
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | End of split
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | Case 2:
% 19.37/3.41  | | | | 
% 19.37/3.41  | | | |   (56)   ~ aSubsetOf0(xS, all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | BETA: splitting (41) gives:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | Case 1:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (57)  aSubsetOf0(xS, all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (56), (57) imply:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (58)  $false
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | CLOSE: (58) is inconsistent.
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | Case 2:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (59)   ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & aElementOf0(v0, xS) &  ~
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |           aElementOf0(v0, all_14_0))
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | DELTA: instantiating (59) with fresh symbol all_120_0 gives:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (60)  $i(all_120_0) & aElementOf0(all_120_0, xS) &  ~
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |         aElementOf0(all_120_0, all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | ALPHA: (60) implies:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (61)   ~ aElementOf0(all_120_0, all_14_0)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (62)  aElementOf0(all_120_0, xS)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (63)  $i(all_120_0)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | PRED_UNIFY: (34), (61) imply:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (64)   ~ (all_120_0 = xx)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (mEOfElem) with xS, all_120_0, simplifying
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |              with (11), (13), (62), (63) gives:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (65)  aElement0(all_120_0)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (9) with xS, xx, all_14_1, all_120_0,
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |              simplifying with (11), (13), (14), (17), (20), (22),
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |              (62), (63), (65) gives:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | |   (66)  all_120_0 = xx | aElementOf0(all_120_0, all_14_1)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | BETA: splitting (66) gives:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | Case 1:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | |   (67)  aElementOf0(all_120_0, all_14_1)
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_14_1, xx, all_14_0,
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | |              all_120_0, simplifying with (14), (17), (18), (19),
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | |              (22), (24), (61), (63), (65), (67) gives:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | |   (68)  $false
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | CLOSE: (68) is inconsistent.
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | Case 2:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | |   (69)  all_120_0 = xx
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | REDUCE: (64), (69) imply:
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | |   (70)  $false
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | CLOSE: (70) is inconsistent.
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | End of split
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | End of split
% 19.37/3.42  | | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | | End of split
% 19.37/3.42  | | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | | End of split
% 19.37/3.42  | | 
% 19.37/3.42  | End of split
% 19.37/3.42  | 
% 19.37/3.42  End of proof
% 19.37/3.42  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 19.37/3.42  
% 19.37/3.42  2807ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------