↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM540+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:55:25 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   93 (  21 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   32 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  117 (  52   ~;  48   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0 sgn  15   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mDefSeg,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( X2 = slbdtrb0(X1)
        <=> ( ! [X3] :
                ( aElementOf0(X3,X2)
              <=> ( sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X3),X1)
                  & aElementOf0(X3,szNzAzT0) ) )
            & aSet0(X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSeg) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    slbdtrb0(sz00) = slcrc0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(mNoScLessZr,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
     => ~ sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X1),sz00) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mNoScLessZr) ).

fof(mZeroNum,axiom,
    aElementOf0(sz00,szNzAzT0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mZeroNum) ).

fof(mDefEmp,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = slcrc0
    <=> ( ~ ? [X2] : aElementOf0(X2,X1)
        & aSet0(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefEmp) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X104,X105,X106,X107,X108] :
      ( ( ~ aElementOf0(X104,szNzAzT0)
        | X108 = slbdtrb0(X104)
        | ~ aSet0(X108)
        | aElementOf0(esk9_2(X104,X108),X108)
        | sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(esk9_2(X104,X108)),X104) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X104,szNzAzT0)
        | X108 = slbdtrb0(X104)
        | ~ aSet0(X108)
        | aElementOf0(esk9_2(X104,X108),X108)
        | aElementOf0(esk9_2(X104,X108),szNzAzT0) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X104,szNzAzT0)
        | X108 = slbdtrb0(X104)
        | ~ aSet0(X108)
        | ~ sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(esk9_2(X104,X108)),X104)
        | ~ aElementOf0(esk9_2(X104,X108),szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aElementOf0(esk9_2(X104,X108),X108) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X104,szNzAzT0)
        | X105 != slbdtrb0(X104)
        | aElementOf0(X107,X105)
        | ~ sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X107),X104)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X107,szNzAzT0) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X104,szNzAzT0)
        | X105 != slbdtrb0(X104)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X106,X105)
        | sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X106),X104) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X104,szNzAzT0)
        | X105 != slbdtrb0(X104)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X106,X105)
        | aElementOf0(X106,szNzAzT0) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X104,szNzAzT0)
        | X105 != slbdtrb0(X104)
        | aSet0(X105) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSeg])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    slbdtrb0(sz00) != slcrc0,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
    | X3 != slbdtrb0(X2)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X3)
    | sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X1),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
    | X1 != slbdtrb0(X2)
    | aSet0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    slbdtrb0(sz00) != slcrc0,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X3,szNzAzT0)
    | X2 != slbdtrb0(X3)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X2)
    | aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
     => ~ sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X1),sz00) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mNoScLessZr]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(X2))
    | sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X1),X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    aElementOf0(sz00,szNzAzT0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mZeroNum]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12] :
      ( ( X12 = slcrc0
        | aElementOf0(esk1_1(X12),X12)
        | ~ aSet0(X12) )
      & ( X10 != slcrc0
        | ~ aElementOf0(X11,X10) )
      & ( X10 != slcrc0
        | aSet0(X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefEmp])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
    | aSet0(slbdtrb0(X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    slbdtrb0(sz00) != slcrc0,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(X2))
    | aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X65] :
      ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X65),sz00)
      | ~ aElementOf0(X65,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00))
    | sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X1),sz00) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(X1)
    | X1 = slcrc0
    | aElementOf0(esk1_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    aSet0(slbdtrb0(sz00)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    slbdtrb0(sz00) != slcrc0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00))
    | aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(X1),sz00)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    sdtlseqdt0(szszuzczcdt0(esk1_1(slbdtrb0(sz00))),sz00),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    aElementOf0(esk1_1(slbdtrb0(sz00)),szNzAzT0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : NUM540+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.20/0.46  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.20/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.20/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.20/0.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.20/0.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.20/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.20/0.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:36:35 UTC 2026
% 0.20/0.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.47  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.57  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.57  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.65  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.24/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 4181590 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.24/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.65  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % new_bool_1 with pid 4181599 completed with status 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.24/0.65  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.24/0.65  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.24/0.65  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.24/0.65  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.24/0.65  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.24/0.65  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.24/0.65  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.24/0.65  
% 0.24/0.65  % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.65  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/0.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/0.65  % Parsed axioms                        : 52
% 0.24/0.65  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Initial clauses                      : 92
% 0.24/0.65  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 6
% 0.24/0.65  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 86
% 0.24/0.65  % Processed clauses                    : 203
% 0.24/0.65  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.24/0.65  % ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.24/0.65  % ...remaining for further processing  : 198
% 0.24/0.65  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 24
% 0.24/0.65  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Generated clauses                    : 143
% 0.24/0.65  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 128
% 0.24/0.65  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 12
% 0.24/0.65  % Paramodulations                      : 120
% 0.24/0.65  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Equation resolutions                 : 25
% 0.24/0.65  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Total rewrite steps                  : 52
% 0.24/0.65  % ...of those cached                   : 42
% 0.24/0.65  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.24/0.65  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.24/0.65  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.24/0.65  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.24/0.65  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.24/0.65  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.24/0.65  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.24/0.65  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.24/0.65  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.24/0.65  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.24/0.65  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.24/0.65  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.24/0.65  % Current number of processed clauses  : 90
% 0.24/0.65  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 30
% 0.24/0.65  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/0.65  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.24/0.65  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 56
% 0.24/0.65  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 97
% 0.24/0.65  % ...number of literals in the above   : 331
% 0.24/0.65  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Current number of archived clauses   : 86
% 0.24/0.65  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2382
% 0.24/0.65  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 567
% 0.24/0.65  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 14
% 0.24/0.65  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 140
% 0.24/0.65  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.24/0.65  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/0.65  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 10570
% 0.24/0.65  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1884
% 0.24/0.65  
% 0.24/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.65  % User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.24/0.65  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.24/0.65  % Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.24/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 3432 pages
% 0.24/0.65  
% 0.24/0.65  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/0.65  % User time                : 0.077 s
% 0.24/0.65  % System time              : 0.032 s
% 0.24/0.65  % Total time               : 0.108 s
% 0.24/0.65  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.24/0.65  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------