%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NUM540+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:49:29 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 11 ~; 3 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 1 sgn 4 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
( ( ! [X1] : ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00))
& aSet0(slbdtrb0(sz00)) )
=> ( slbdtrb0(sz00) = slcrc0
| ~ ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(c_0_1,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X1] : ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00))
& aSet0(slbdtrb0(sz00)) )
=> ( slbdtrb0(sz00) = slcrc0
| ~ ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ! [X1] : ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00))
& aSet0(slbdtrb0(sz00)) )
=> ( slbdtrb0(sz00) = slcrc0
| ~ ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00)) ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X5] :
( slbdtrb0(sz00) != slcrc0
& aElementOf0(esk1_0,slbdtrb0(sz00))
& ~ aElementOf0(X5,slbdtrb0(sz00))
& aSet0(slbdtrb0(sz00)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
aElementOf0(esk1_0,slbdtrb0(sz00)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtrb0(sz00)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : NUM540+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:38:50 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % sh5l with pid 2967740 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/0.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2967741 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.15/0.44 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.44 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 52
% 0.15/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3
% 0.15/0.44 % Initial clauses : 89
% 0.15/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 5
% 0.15/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 84
% 0.15/0.44 % Processed clauses : 8
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.15/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Generated clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 76
% 0.15/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 321
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.15/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7322
% 0.15/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1809
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.44 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3948 pages
% 0.15/0.44
% 0.15/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.44 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.44 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------