↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM549+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:25:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.26s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  109 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  113 (  48   ~;  41   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn  31   !;   6   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( aSet0(X0)
     => ! [X1] :
          ( aElementOf0(X1,X0)
         => aElement0(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mEOfElem) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = slcrc0
    <=> ( ~ ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,X0)
        & aSet0(X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefEmp) ).

fof(f42,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( aSet0(X0)
     => ( sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
      <=> X0 = slcrc0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mCardEmpty) ).

fof(f62,axiom,
    ( xk != sz00
    & aSet0(xT)
    & aSet0(xS) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2202_02) ).

fof(f66,axiom,
    ( sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk
    & isFinite0(xQ)
    & aSet0(xQ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2291) ).

fof(f67,conjecture,
    ? [X0] :
      ( aElementOf0(X0,xQ)
      & aElement0(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(f68,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ( aElementOf0(X0,xQ)
        & aElement0(X0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f67]) ).

fof(f76,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | ! [X1] :
          ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,X0)
          | aElement0(X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f77,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = slcrc0
    <=> ( ! [X1] : ~ aElementOf0(X1,X0)
        & aSet0(X0) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | ( sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
      <=> X0 = slcrc0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f157,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aElementOf0(X0,xQ)
      | ~ aElement0(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

fof(f164,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( slcrc0 != X0
        | ( ! [X1] : ~ aElementOf0(X1,X0)
          & aSet0(X0) ) )
      & ( ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,X0)
        | ~ aSet0(X0)
        | X0 = slcrc0 ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f77]) ).

fof(f165,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( slcrc0 != X0
        | ( ! [X1] : ~ aElementOf0(X1,X0)
          & aSet0(X0) ) )
      & ( ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,X0)
        | ~ aSet0(X0)
        | X0 = slcrc0 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f164]) ).

fof(f166,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( slcrc0 != X0
        | ( ! [X2] : ~ aElementOf0(X2,X0)
          & aSet0(X0) ) )
      & ( ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,X0)
        | ~ aSet0(X0)
        | X0 = slcrc0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f165]) ).

fof(f167,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( slcrc0 != X0
        | ( ! [X2] : ~ aElementOf0(X2,X0)
          & aSet0(X0) ) )
      & ( aElementOf0(sK4(X0),X0)
        | ~ aSet0(X0)
        | X0 = slcrc0 ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK4]),skolemize(X1,sK4(X0))],[f166]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | ( ( sz00 != sbrdtbr0(X0)
          | X0 = slcrc0 )
        & ( slcrc0 != X0
          | sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f125]) ).

fof(f209,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X0)
      | aElement0(X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f76]) ).

fof(f211,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( slcrc0 != X0
      | aSet0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

fof(f212,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( aElementOf0(sK4(X0),X0)
      | ~ aSet0(X0)
      | slcrc0 = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).

fof(f276,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | slcrc0 != X0
      | sz00 = sbrdtbr0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).

fof(f319,plain,
    sz00 != xk,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f326,plain,
    xk = sbrdtbr0(xQ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f328,plain,
    aSet0(xQ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f329,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aElementOf0(X0,xQ)
      | ~ aElement0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f157]) ).

fof(f330,plain,
    aSet0(slcrc0),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f211]) ).

fof(f337,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(slcrc0)
    | sz00 = sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f276]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( aElement0(X0)
      | ~ aSet0(X1)
      | ~ aElementOf0(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f209]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( aElementOf0(sK4(X0),X0)
      | ( X0 = slcrc0 )
      | ~ aSet0(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f212]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    aSet0(slcrc0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f330]) ).

tcf(c_115,plain,
    ( ( sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = sz00 )
    | ~ aSet0(slcrc0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f337]) ).

tcf(c_161,plain,
    sz00 != xk,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f319]) ).

tcf(c_166,plain,
    aSet0(xQ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f328]) ).

tcf(c_168,plain,
    sbrdtbr0(xQ) = xk,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f326]) ).

tcf(c_169,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ aElement0(X0)
      | ~ aElementOf0(X0,xQ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f329]) ).

tcf(c_251,plain,
    sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = sz00,
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_115,c_51,c_115]) ).

tcf(c_8937,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ aElement0(X0)
      | ~ aElementOf0(X0,xQ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_169]) ).

tcf(c_11040,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( aElement0(sK4(X0))
      | ( X0 = slcrc0 )
      | ~ aSet0(X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).

tcf(c_11048,plain,
    ( ( slcrc0 = xQ )
    | ~ aSet0(xQ)
    | ~ aElement0(sK4(xQ)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_8937]) ).

tcf(c_11052,plain,
    ( ( slcrc0 = xQ )
    | ~ aElement0(sK4(xQ)) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11048,c_166]) ).

tcf(c_11179,plain,
    ( ( slcrc0 = xQ )
    | ~ aSet0(xQ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_11040,c_11052]) ).

tcf(c_11180,plain,
    slcrc0 = xQ,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11179,c_166]) ).

tcf(c_11183,plain,
    sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = xk,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_168,c_11180]) ).

tcf(c_11188,plain,
    sz00 = xk,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_11183,c_251]) ).

tcf(c_11189,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11188,c_161]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM549+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 04:37:09 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.38  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.38  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.40  % Proving...
% 4.26/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.26/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.26/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % 
% 4.26/1.26  % clauses                               119
% 4.26/1.26  % conjectures                           1
% 4.26/1.26  % EPR                                   37
% 4.26/1.26  % Horn                                  89
% 4.26/1.26  % unary                                 20
% 4.26/1.26  % binary                                17
% 4.26/1.26  % lits                                  390
% 4.26/1.26  % lits eq                               58
% 4.26/1.26  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.26/1.26  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.26/1.26  % fd_cond                               9
% 4.26/1.26  % fd_pseudo_cond                        18
% 4.26/1.26  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ 
% 4.26/1.26  % Current options:
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ 
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % 
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 4.26/1.26  % 
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/1.26  
% 4.26/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.26/1.27  
% 4.26/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------