↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM560+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:09:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.47s 2.67s
% Output   : Refutation 7.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (  11 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  257 (  15   ~;  12   |;  18   &; 197   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0   ^;  14   !;   0   ?;  15   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(aSet0_decl,type,
    aSet0: $i > $o ).

thf(aElementOf0_decl,type,
    aElementOf0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(aSubsetOf0_decl,type,
    aSubsetOf0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sdtlbdtrb0_decl,type,
    sdtlbdtrb0: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(szDzozmdt0_decl,type,
    szDzozmdt0: $i > $i ).

thf(sdtlpdtrp0_decl,type,
    sdtlpdtrp0: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(xF_decl,type,
    xF: $i ).

thf(xy_decl,type,
    xy: $i ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: $i ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: $i] :
          ~ ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
           => ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
        <=> ( ( ( A @ ( xF @ sdtlpdtrp0 ) )
              = xy )
            & ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) )
      & ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSet0 ) )
   => ( ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSubsetOf0 ) )
      | ! [A: $i] :
          ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
         => ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
          <=> ( ( ( A @ ( xF @ sdtlpdtrp0 ) )
                = xy )
              & ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) )
        & ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSet0 ) )
     => ( ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSubsetOf0 ) )
        | ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
           => ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(70,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( ( A @ ( xF @ sdtlpdtrp0 ) )
                  = xy )
                & ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
             => ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
            & ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
             => ( ( ( A @ ( xF @ sdtlpdtrp0 ) )
                  = xy )
                & ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) ) )
        & ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSet0 ) )
     => ( ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSubsetOf0 ) )
        | ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
           => ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(71,plain,
    ~ ( ( ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( ( ( A @ ( xF @ sdtlpdtrp0 ) )
                = xy )
              & ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
           => ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
        & ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
           => ( ( ( A @ ( xF @ sdtlpdtrp0 ) )
                = xy )
              & ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) )
        & ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSet0 ) )
     => ( ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSubsetOf0 ) )
        | ! [A: $i] :
            ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
           => ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[70]) ).

thf(72,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ~ ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSubsetOf0 ) )
      & ~ ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( sk1 @ aElementOf0 ) )
      & ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( sk1 @ aElementOf0 ) )
      & ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) )
        | ( ( B @ ( xF @ sdtlpdtrp0 ) )
         != xy )
        | ~ ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( B @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( ( ( A @ ( xF @ sdtlpdtrp0 ) )
          = xy )
        | ~ ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
        | ~ ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ aSet0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[71]) ).

thf(76,plain,
    xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( sk1 @ aElementOf0 ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[72]) ).

thf(77,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
      | ~ ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[72]) ).

thf(607,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( sk1 @ aElementOf0 ) )
       != ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      | ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
      | ~ $true ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[76,77]) ).

thf(608,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( sk1 @ aElementOf0 ) )
       != ( xy @ ( xF @ sdtlbdtrb0 ) @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      | ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[607]) ).

thf(609,plain,
    xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( sk1 @ aElementOf0 ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[608:[bind(A,$thf( sk1 ))]]) ).

thf(79,plain,
    ~ ( xF @ szDzozmdt0 @ ( sk1 @ aElementOf0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[72]) ).

thf(619,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[609,79]) ).

thf(620,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[619]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM560+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.60  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.60  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.60  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.60  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.60  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.60  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.60  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.60  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 03:15:39 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.60  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.60  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.17/0.90  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.07/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (139ms). 
% 1.07/1.05  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.74/1.25  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.74/1.26  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.74/1.29  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.30  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.33  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.33  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.34  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.00/1.35  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 67 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.33/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 67 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.33/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.43  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.44  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.45  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.46  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 2.33/1.46  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.33/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.33/1.47  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 7.47/2.66  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 7.47/2.67  % Time passed: 1967ms (effective reasoning time: 1607ms)
% 7.47/2.67  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 7.47/2.67  % Axioms used in derivation (0): 
% 7.47/2.67  % No. of inferences in proof: 13
% 7.47/2.67  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1967 ms resp. 1607 ms w/o parsing
% 7.93/2.71  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.93/2.71  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------