↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM561+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:49:34 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   39 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  103 (  45   ~;  44   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   21 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   2 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn  16   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(mDefSImg,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aFunction0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X1))
         => ! [X3] :
              ( X3 = sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X2)
            <=> ( ! [X4] :
                    ( aElementOf0(X4,X3)
                  <=> ? [X5] :
                        ( sdtlpdtrp0(X1,X5) = X4
                        & aElementOf0(X5,X2) ) )
                & aSet0(X3) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSImg) ).

fof(mDomSet,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aFunction0(X1)
     => aSet0(szDzozmdt0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDomSet) ).

fof(m__2911,hypothesis,
    aFunction0(xF),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2911) ).

fof(m__2911_02,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,szDzozmdt0(xF)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2911_02) ).

fof(mSubRefl,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => aSubsetOf0(X1,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mSubRefl) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X8,X9,X10,X11,X13,X14,X15,X17] :
      ( ( ~ aFunction0(X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X9,szDzozmdt0(X8))
        | X15 = sdtlcdtrc0(X8,X9)
        | ~ aSet0(X15)
        | aElementOf0(esk2_3(X8,X9,X15),X15)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(X8,esk3_3(X8,X9,X15)) = esk2_3(X8,X9,X15) )
      & ( ~ aFunction0(X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X9,szDzozmdt0(X8))
        | X15 = sdtlcdtrc0(X8,X9)
        | ~ aSet0(X15)
        | aElementOf0(esk2_3(X8,X9,X15),X15)
        | aElementOf0(esk3_3(X8,X9,X15),X9) )
      & ( ~ aFunction0(X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X9,szDzozmdt0(X8))
        | X15 = sdtlcdtrc0(X8,X9)
        | ~ aSet0(X15)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(X8,X17) != esk2_3(X8,X9,X15)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X17,X9)
        | ~ aElementOf0(esk2_3(X8,X9,X15),X15) )
      & ( ~ aFunction0(X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X9,szDzozmdt0(X8))
        | X10 != sdtlcdtrc0(X8,X9)
        | aElementOf0(X13,X10)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(X8,X14) != X13
        | ~ aElementOf0(X14,X9) )
      & ( ~ aFunction0(X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X9,szDzozmdt0(X8))
        | X10 != sdtlcdtrc0(X8,X9)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X11,X10)
        | sdtlpdtrp0(X8,esk1_4(X8,X9,X10,X11)) = X11 )
      & ( ~ aFunction0(X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X9,szDzozmdt0(X8))
        | X10 != sdtlcdtrc0(X8,X9)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X11,X10)
        | aElementOf0(esk1_4(X8,X9,X10,X11),X9) )
      & ( ~ aFunction0(X8)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X9,szDzozmdt0(X8))
        | X10 != sdtlcdtrc0(X8,X9)
        | aSet0(X10) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSImg])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ aFunction0(X3)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,szDzozmdt0(X3))
    | X5 != sdtlcdtrc0(X3,X2)
    | sdtlpdtrp0(X3,X1) != X4
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X2)
    | aElementOf0(X4,X5) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X7] :
      ( aSet0(szDzozmdt0(X7))
      | ~ aFunction0(X7) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDomSet])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,X3)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X3,szDzozmdt0(X1))
    | ~ aFunction0(X1)
    | aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(X1,X2),sdtlcdtrc0(X1,X3)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    aFunction0(xF),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2911]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xx,szDzozmdt0(xF)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2911_02]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X29] :
      ( aSubsetOf0(X29,X29)
      | ~ aSet0(X29) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mSubRefl])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ aFunction0(X1)
    | aSet0(szDzozmdt0(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(szDzozmdt0(xF),szDzozmdt0(xF)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(X1)
    | aSubsetOf0(X1,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    aSet0(szDzozmdt0(xF)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM561+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:40:14 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % new_bool_3 with pid 1828874 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.11/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.42  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1828877 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.42  % Search class: FGUSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42  % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 71
% 0.11/0.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55
% 0.11/0.42  % Initial clauses                      : 25
% 0.11/0.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 0.11/0.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 21
% 0.11/0.42  % Processed clauses                    : 24
% 0.11/0.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.11/0.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 23
% 0.11/0.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.11/0.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Generated clauses                    : 14
% 0.11/0.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 9
% 0.11/0.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.11/0.42  % Paramodulations                      : 11
% 0.11/0.42  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.11/0.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4
% 0.11/0.42  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.11/0.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.11/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
% 0.11/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.11/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.11/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.11/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 33
% 0.11/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42
% 0.11/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.11/0.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 4
% 0.11/0.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.11/0.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3061
% 0.11/0.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 965
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.42  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.42  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.42  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 3972 pages
% 0.11/0.42  
% 0.11/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.42  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.42  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.42  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.11/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------