%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NUM561+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:49:34 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 14 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 13 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
( aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF)))
| ? [X1] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xF,X1) = sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx)
& aElementOf0(X1,szDzozmdt0(xF)) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__2911_02,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,szDzozmdt0(xF)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__2911_02) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF)))
| ? [X1] :
( sdtlpdtrp0(xF,X1) = sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx)
& aElementOf0(X1,szDzozmdt0(xF)) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
! [X6] :
( ~ aElementOf0(sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx),sdtlcdtrc0(xF,szDzozmdt0(xF)))
& ( sdtlpdtrp0(xF,X6) != sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx)
| ~ aElementOf0(X6,szDzozmdt0(xF)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( sdtlpdtrp0(xF,X1) != sdtlpdtrp0(xF,xx)
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szDzozmdt0(xF)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xx,szDzozmdt0(xF)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__2911_02]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : NUM561+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:40:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 2075939 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2075942 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 71
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 55
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses : 26
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 22
% 0.14/0.43 % Processed clauses : 13
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.14/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Generated clauses : 5
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.14/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11
% 0.14/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 57
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5
% 0.14/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.14/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2982
% 0.14/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 995
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3716 pages
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------