↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM565+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:26:02 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.88s 6.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   97 (  38 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  102 (  31   ~;  15   |;  44   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn  20   !;   6   ?;   1   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f42,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( aSet0(X0)
     => ( sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
      <=> X0 = slcrc0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mCardEmpty) ).

fof(f78,axiom,
    xK = sz00,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3462) ).

fof(f80,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( aElementOf0(X0,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,sz00))
        & sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
        & aSubsetOf0(X0,xS)
        & ! [X1] :
            ( aElementOf0(X1,X0)
           => aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
        & aSet0(X0) )
     => ( ( ~ ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,slcrc0)
          & aSet0(slcrc0) )
       => sdtlpdtrp0(xc,X0) = sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(f81,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ( aElementOf0(X0,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,sz00))
          & sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
          & aSubsetOf0(X0,xS)
          & ! [X1] :
              ( aElementOf0(X1,X0)
             => aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
          & aSet0(X0) )
       => ( ( ~ ? [X1] : aElementOf0(X1,slcrc0)
            & aSet0(slcrc0) )
         => sdtlpdtrp0(xc,X0) = sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f80]) ).

fof(f85,plain,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ( aElementOf0(X0,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,sz00))
          & sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
          & aSubsetOf0(X0,xS)
          & ! [X1] :
              ( aElementOf0(X1,X0)
             => aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
          & aSet0(X0) )
       => ( ( ~ ? [X2] : aElementOf0(X2,slcrc0)
            & aSet0(slcrc0) )
         => sdtlpdtrp0(xc,X0) = sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f81]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( aElementOf0(X0,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,sz00))
      & sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
      & aSubsetOf0(X0,xS)
      & ! [X1] :
          ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,X0)
          | aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
      & aSet0(X0)
      & ! [X2] : ~ aElementOf0(X2,slcrc0)
      & aSet0(slcrc0)
      & sdtlpdtrp0(xc,X0) != sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f85]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( aElementOf0(X0,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,sz00))
      & sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
      & aSubsetOf0(X0,xS)
      & ! [X1] :
          ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,X0)
          | aElementOf0(X1,xS) )
      & aSet0(X0)
      & ! [X2] : ~ aElementOf0(X2,slcrc0)
      & aSet0(slcrc0)
      & sdtlpdtrp0(xc,X0) != sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f102]) ).

fof(f124,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | ( sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
      <=> X0 = slcrc0 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( aElementOf0(X0,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,sz00))
      & sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00
      & aSubsetOf0(X0,xS)
      & ! [X2] :
          ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,X0)
          | aElementOf0(X2,xS) )
      & aSet0(X0)
      & ! [X1] : ~ aElementOf0(X1,slcrc0)
      & aSet0(slcrc0)
      & sdtlpdtrp0(xc,X0) != sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f103]) ).

fof(f181,plain,
    ( aElementOf0(sK14,slbdtsldtrb0(xS,sz00))
    & sz00 = sbrdtbr0(sK14)
    & aSubsetOf0(sK14,xS)
    & ! [X2] :
        ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,sK14)
        | aElementOf0(X2,xS) )
    & aSet0(sK14)
    & ! [X1] : ~ aElementOf0(X1,slcrc0)
    & aSet0(slcrc0)
    & sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) != sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sK14) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK14]),skolemize(X0,sK14)],[f180]) ).

fof(f191,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | ( ( sz00 != sbrdtbr0(X0)
          | X0 = slcrc0 )
        & ( slcrc0 != X0
          | sbrdtbr0(X0) = sz00 ) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f124]) ).

fof(f258,plain,
    sz00 = xK,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f78]) ).

fof(f265,plain,
    sz00 = sbrdtbr0(sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f181]) ).

fof(f268,plain,
    aSet0(sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f181]) ).

fof(f271,plain,
    sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) != sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f181]) ).

fof(f295,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | sz00 != sbrdtbr0(X0)
      | slcrc0 = X0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f191]) ).

fof(f340,plain,
    xK = sbrdtbr0(sK14),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f265,f258]) ).

fof(f344,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ aSet0(X0)
      | sbrdtbr0(X0) != xK
      | slcrc0 = X0 ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f295,f258]) ).

tcf(c_107,negated_conjecture,
    sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) != sdtlpdtrp0(xc,sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f271]) ).

tcf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
    aSet0(sK14),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f268]) ).

tcf(c_113,negated_conjecture,
    sbrdtbr0(sK14) = xK,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f340]) ).

tcf(c_139,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = slcrc0 )
      | ~ aSet0(X0)
      | ( sbrdtbr0(X0) != xK ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f344]) ).

tcf(c_5099,plain,
    ( ( slcrc0 = sK14 )
    | ~ aSet0(sK14) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_113,c_139]) ).

tcf(c_5102,plain,
    slcrc0 = sK14,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5099,c_110]) ).

tcf(c_5114,plain,
    sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0) != sdtlpdtrp0(xc,slcrc0),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_107,c_5102]) ).

tcf(c_5119,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_5114]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM565+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 04:40:24 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/5.43  
% 0.13/5.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/5.43  
% 0.13/5.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/5.45  % Proving...
% 2.88/6.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.88/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.88/6.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.88/6.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 2  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 5 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % 
% 2.88/6.30  % clauses                               93
% 2.88/6.30  % conjectures                           7
% 2.88/6.30  % EPR                                   28
% 2.88/6.30  % Horn                                  78
% 2.88/6.30  % unary                                 24
% 2.88/6.30  % binary                                18
% 2.88/6.30  % lits                                  273
% 2.88/6.30  % lits eq                               40
% 2.88/6.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.88/6.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.88/6.30  % fd_cond                               5
% 2.88/6.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        9
% 2.88/6.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ 
% 2.88/6.30  % Current options:
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ 
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % 
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 2.88/6.30  % 
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.88/6.30  
% 2.88/6.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------