%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : NUM568+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:55:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.29s 0.65s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 16 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 14 ~; 11 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 3 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
? [X1] :
( szszuzczcdt0(X1) = xK
& aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).
fof(m__3462,hypothesis,
xK != sz00,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3462) ).
fof(mNatExtra,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
=> ( ? [X2] :
( X1 = szszuzczcdt0(X2)
& aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0) )
| X1 = sz00 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mNatExtra) ).
fof(m__3418,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3418) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X1] :
( szszuzczcdt0(X1) = xK
& aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).
fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
xK != sz00,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__3462]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X183] :
( szszuzczcdt0(X183) != xK
| ~ aElementOf0(X183,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X61] :
( ( ~ aElementOf0(X61,szNzAzT0)
| X61 = sz00
| X61 = szszuzczcdt0(esk5_1(X61)) )
& ( ~ aElementOf0(X61,szNzAzT0)
| X61 = sz00
| aElementOf0(esk5_1(X61),szNzAzT0) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mNatExtra])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,hypothesis,
xK != sz00,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( szszuzczcdt0(X1) != xK
| ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
| X1 = sz00
| X1 = szszuzczcdt0(esk5_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3418]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
xK != sz00,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ aElementOf0(esk5_1(xK),szNzAzT0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),c_0_11])]),c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0)
| X1 = sz00
| aElementOf0(esk5_1(X1),szNzAzT0) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_11])]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : NUM568+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.48 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:40:34 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.24/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.24/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/0.65 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.29/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2076360 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.29/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.29/0.65 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.29/0.65 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.65 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0U with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2076365 completed with status 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.29/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.29/0.65 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.29/0.65 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.65 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.29/0.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.65 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.29/0.65
% 0.29/0.65 % Proof found!
% 0.29/0.65 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.29/0.65 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.29/0.65 % Parsed axioms : 80
% 0.29/0.65 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Initial clauses : 159
% 0.29/0.65 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 7
% 0.29/0.65 % Initial clauses in saturation : 152
% 0.29/0.65 % Processed clauses : 66
% 0.29/0.65 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.29/0.65 % ...remaining for further processing : 63
% 0.29/0.65 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 0.29/0.65 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.29/0.65 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.29/0.65 % Generated clauses : 44
% 0.29/0.65 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 28
% 0.29/0.65 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Paramodulations : 37
% 0.29/0.65 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % NegExts : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Equation resolutions : 7
% 0.29/0.65 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Total rewrite steps : 38
% 0.29/0.65 % ...of those cached : 27
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.65 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.65 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.65 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.65 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.65 % Current number of processed clauses : 56
% 0.29/0.65 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.29/0.65 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.29/0.65 % Non-unit-clauses : 30
% 0.29/0.65 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 113
% 0.29/0.65 % ...number of literals in the above : 574
% 0.29/0.65 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.29/0.65 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 267
% 0.29/0.65 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 221
% 0.29/0.65 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.29/0.65 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.29/0.65 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.29/0.65 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.29/0.65 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/0.65 % Termbank termtop insertions : 13929
% 0.29/0.65 % Search garbage collected termcells : 3388
% 0.29/0.65
% 0.29/0.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.65 % User time : 0.017 s
% 0.29/0.65 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.29/0.65 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.29/0.65 % Maximum resident set size: 3988 pages
% 0.29/0.65
% 0.29/0.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.65 % User time : 0.033 s
% 0.29/0.65 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.29/0.65 % Total time : 0.049 s
% 0.29/0.65 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.29/0.65 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------