↑ Up

Princess---230619.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : NUM594+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:48:50 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 23.45s 4.02s
% Output   : Proof 47.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem  : NUM594+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 16:12:03 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.63  ________       _____
% 0.22/0.63  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.22/0.63  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.22/0.63  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.22/0.63  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.22/0.63  (2023-06-19)
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.22/0.63  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.22/0.63                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.22/0.63  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.22/0.63  
% 0.22/0.63  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.22/0.64  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.22/0.67  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 0.22/0.68  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 6.03/1.68  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 6.03/1.68  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 6.57/1.73  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 6.57/1.73  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 6.57/1.73  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 6.57/1.73  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 6.57/1.73  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 17.95/3.26  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.95/3.26  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 18.23/3.29  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 20.25/3.73  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 23.45/4.02  Prover 3: proved (3357ms)
% 23.45/4.02  
% 23.45/4.02  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 23.45/4.02  
% 23.45/4.02  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 23.45/4.04  Prover 5: stopped
% 23.45/4.05  Prover 6: stopped
% 23.45/4.06  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 23.45/4.06  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 25.09/4.29  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 25.09/4.29  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 25.09/4.41  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 30.75/5.01  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 30.75/5.04  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 35.21/5.54  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 36.17/5.70  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 38.80/6.02  Prover 10: Found proof (size 16)
% 38.80/6.02  Prover 10: proved (1963ms)
% 38.80/6.02  Prover 7: stopped
% 38.80/6.03  Prover 1: stopped
% 38.80/6.03  Prover 8: stopped
% 44.99/7.04  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 44.99/7.08  Prover 4: stopped
% 47.27/7.48  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 47.27/7.51  Prover 2: stopped
% 47.27/7.52  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 47.72/7.54  Prover 0: stopped
% 47.72/7.55  
% 47.72/7.55  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 47.72/7.55  
% 47.72/7.55  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 47.72/7.55  Assumptions after simplification:
% 47.72/7.55  ---------------------------------
% 47.72/7.56  
% 47.72/7.56    (m__)
% 47.72/7.59    $i(xx) & $i(xd) & $i(szNzAzT0) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v0) = xx) |
% 47.72/7.59       ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v0, szNzAzT0))
% 47.72/7.59  
% 47.94/7.59    (m__4730)
% 47.94/7.60    szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0 & $i(xd) & $i(xC) & $i(xN) & $i(xk) & $i(szNzAzT0) &
% 47.94/7.60    aFunction0(xd) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v0) = v1) | 
% 47.94/7.60      ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v0, szNzAzT0) |  ? [v2: $i] :  ? [v3: $i] :  ?
% 47.94/7.60      [v4: $i] :  ? [v5: $i] : (sdtlpdtrp0(xC, v0) = v5 & sdtlpdtrp0(xN, v2) = v3
% 47.94/7.60        & slbdtsldtrb0(v3, xk) = v4 & szszuzczcdt0(v0) = v2 & $i(v5) & $i(v4) &
% 47.94/7.60        $i(v3) & $i(v2) &  ! [v6: $i] :  ! [v7: $i] : (v7 = v1 |  ~
% 47.94/7.61          (sdtlpdtrp0(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ $i(v6) |  ~ aSubsetOf0(v6, v3) |  ~
% 47.94/7.61          aSet0(v6) |  ? [v8: $i] : ( ~ (v8 = xk) & sbrdtbr0(v6) = v8 & $i(v8))) &
% 47.94/7.61         ! [v6: $i] :  ! [v7: $i] : (v7 = v1 |  ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~
% 47.94/7.61          $i(v6) |  ~ aElementOf0(v6, v4) |  ~ aSet0(v6)) &  ! [v6: $i] :  ! [v7:
% 47.94/7.61          $i] : (v7 = v1 |  ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(v5, v6) = v7) |  ~ $i(v6) |  ~ aSet0(v6)
% 47.94/7.61          |  ? [v8: $i] :  ? [v9: $i] : ($i(v9) & (( ~ (v8 = xk) & sbrdtbr0(v6) =
% 47.94/7.61                v8 & $i(v8)) | (aElementOf0(v9, v6) &  ~ aElementOf0(v9, v3)))))))
% 47.94/7.61  
% 47.94/7.61    (m__4769)
% 47.94/7.61    $i(xd) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (sdtlcdtrc0(xd, v0) = v1 & szDzozmdt0(xd)
% 47.94/7.61      = v0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & aSet0(v1) &  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 47.94/7.61        (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v3) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~ aElementOf0(v3, v0)
% 47.94/7.61        | aElementOf0(v2, v1)) &  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~ $i(v2) |  ~ aElementOf0(v2, v1)
% 47.94/7.61        |  ? [v3: $i] : (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v3) = v2 & $i(v3) & aElementOf0(v3, v0))))
% 47.94/7.61  
% 47.94/7.61    (m__4781)
% 47.94/7.61    $i(xx) & $i(xd) &  ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (sdtlcdtrc0(xd,
% 47.94/7.61        v0) = v1 & sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v2) = xx & szDzozmdt0(xd) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1)
% 47.94/7.61      & $i(v0) & aElementOf0(v2, v0) & aElementOf0(xx, v1))
% 47.94/7.61  
% 47.94/7.61    (function-axioms)
% 47.94/7.62     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 47.94/7.62      (sdtexdt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtexdt0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 47.94/7.62    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtlcdtrc0(v3, v2) = v1)
% 47.94/7.62      |  ~ (sdtlcdtrc0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : 
% 47.94/7.62    ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtlbdtrb0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtlbdtrb0(v3, v2)
% 47.94/7.62        = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0
% 47.94/7.62      |  ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 47.94/7.62    :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (slbdtsldtrb0(v3,
% 47.94/7.62          v2) = v1) |  ~ (slbdtsldtrb0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i]
% 47.94/7.62    :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtmndt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~
% 47.94/7.62      (sdtmndt0(v3, v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3:
% 47.94/7.62      $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v1) |  ~ (sdtpldt0(v3, v2) = v0)) & 
% 47.94/7.62    ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (szDzizrdt0(v2) = v1) |
% 47.94/7.62       ~ (szDzizrdt0(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 =
% 47.94/7.62      v0 |  ~ (szDzozmdt0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (szDzozmdt0(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 47.94/7.62    [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (slbdtrb0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (slbdtrb0(v2)
% 47.94/7.62        = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 47.94/7.62      (szmzazxdt0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (szmzazxdt0(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 47.94/7.62      $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (szmzizndt0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (szmzizndt0(v2)
% 47.94/7.62        = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~
% 47.94/7.62      (sbrdtbr0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (sbrdtbr0(v2) = v0)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : 
% 47.94/7.62    ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (szszuzczcdt0(v2) = v1) |  ~ (szszuzczcdt0(v2) =
% 47.94/7.62        v0))
% 47.94/7.62  
% 47.94/7.62  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 47.94/7.62  --------------------------------------------
% 47.94/7.62  mCConsSet, mCDiffSet, mCardCons, mCardDiff, mCardEmpty, mCardNum, mCardS,
% 47.94/7.62  mCardSeg, mCardSub, mCardSubEx, mCntRel, mConsDiff, mCountNFin, mCountNFin_01,
% 47.94/7.62  mDefCons, mDefDiff, mDefEmp, mDefMax, mDefMin, mDefPtt, mDefRst, mDefSImg,
% 47.94/7.62  mDefSeg, mDefSel, mDefSub, mDiffCons, mDirichlet, mDomSet, mEOfElem, mElmSort,
% 47.94/7.62  mEmpFin, mFConsSet, mFDiffSet, mFinRel, mFinSubSeg, mFunSort, mIH, mIHSort,
% 47.94/7.62  mImgCount, mImgElm, mImgRng, mLessASymm, mLessRefl, mLessRel, mLessSucc,
% 47.94/7.62  mLessTotal, mLessTrans, mMinMin, mNATSet, mNatExtra, mNatNSucc, mNoScLessZr,
% 47.94/7.62  mPttSet, mSegFin, mSegLess, mSegSucc, mSegZero, mSelCSet, mSelExtra, mSelFSet,
% 47.94/7.62  mSelNSet, mSelSub, mSetSort, mSubASymm, mSubFSet, mSubRefl, mSubTrans,
% 47.94/7.62  mSuccEquSucc, mSuccLess, mSuccNum, mZeroLess, mZeroNum, m__3291, m__3398,
% 47.94/7.62  m__3418, m__3435, m__3453, m__3462, m__3520, m__3533, m__3623, m__3671, m__3754,
% 47.94/7.62  m__3821, m__3965, m__4151, m__4182, m__4331, m__4411, m__4618, m__4660
% 47.94/7.62  
% 47.94/7.62  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 47.94/7.62  ---------------------------------
% 47.94/7.62  
% 47.94/7.62  Begin of proof
% 47.94/7.62  | 
% 47.94/7.62  | ALPHA: (m__4730) implies:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (1)  szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | ALPHA: (m__4769) implies:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (2)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : (sdtlcdtrc0(xd, v0) = v1 & szDzozmdt0(xd) =
% 47.94/7.63  |          v0 & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & aSet0(v1) &  ! [v2: $i] :  ! [v3: $i] : ( ~
% 47.94/7.63  |            (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v3) = v2) |  ~ $i(v3) |  ~ $i(v2) |  ~
% 47.94/7.63  |            aElementOf0(v3, v0) | aElementOf0(v2, v1)) &  ! [v2: $i] : ( ~
% 47.94/7.63  |            $i(v2) |  ~ aElementOf0(v2, v1) |  ? [v3: $i] : (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v3)
% 47.94/7.63  |              = v2 & $i(v3) & aElementOf0(v3, v0))))
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | ALPHA: (m__4781) implies:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (3)   ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] :  ? [v2: $i] : (sdtlcdtrc0(xd, v0) = v1 &
% 47.94/7.63  |          sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v2) = xx & szDzozmdt0(xd) = v0 & $i(v2) & $i(v1) &
% 47.94/7.63  |          $i(v0) & aElementOf0(v2, v0) & aElementOf0(xx, v1))
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | ALPHA: (m__) implies:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (4)   ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v0) = xx) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 47.94/7.63  |          aElementOf0(v0, szNzAzT0))
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | ALPHA: (function-axioms) implies:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (5)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] :  ! [v2: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ (szDzozmdt0(v2)
% 47.94/7.63  |            = v1) |  ~ (szDzozmdt0(v2) = v0))
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | DELTA: instantiating (3) with fresh symbols all_78_0, all_78_1, all_78_2
% 47.94/7.63  |        gives:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (6)  sdtlcdtrc0(xd, all_78_2) = all_78_1 & sdtlpdtrp0(xd, all_78_0) = xx &
% 47.94/7.63  |        szDzozmdt0(xd) = all_78_2 & $i(all_78_0) & $i(all_78_1) & $i(all_78_2)
% 47.94/7.63  |        & aElementOf0(all_78_0, all_78_2) & aElementOf0(xx, all_78_1)
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | ALPHA: (6) implies:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (7)  aElementOf0(all_78_0, all_78_2)
% 47.94/7.63  |   (8)  $i(all_78_0)
% 47.94/7.63  |   (9)  szDzozmdt0(xd) = all_78_2
% 47.94/7.63  |   (10)  sdtlpdtrp0(xd, all_78_0) = xx
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | DELTA: instantiating (2) with fresh symbols all_80_0, all_80_1 gives:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (11)  sdtlcdtrc0(xd, all_80_1) = all_80_0 & szDzozmdt0(xd) = all_80_1 &
% 47.94/7.63  |         $i(all_80_0) & $i(all_80_1) & aSet0(all_80_0) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1:
% 47.94/7.63  |           $i] : ( ~ (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v1) = v0) |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 47.94/7.63  |           aElementOf0(v1, all_80_1) | aElementOf0(v0, all_80_0)) &  ! [v0: $i]
% 47.94/7.63  |         : ( ~ $i(v0) |  ~ aElementOf0(v0, all_80_0) |  ? [v1: $i] :
% 47.94/7.63  |           (sdtlpdtrp0(xd, v1) = v0 & $i(v1) & aElementOf0(v1, all_80_1)))
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | ALPHA: (11) implies:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (12)  szDzozmdt0(xd) = all_80_1
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with all_78_2, all_80_1, xd, simplifying with
% 47.94/7.63  |              (9), (12) gives:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (13)  all_80_1 = all_78_2
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (5) with szNzAzT0, all_80_1, xd, simplifying with
% 47.94/7.63  |              (1), (12) gives:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (14)  all_80_1 = szNzAzT0
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | COMBINE_EQS: (13), (14) imply:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (15)  all_78_2 = szNzAzT0
% 47.94/7.63  | 
% 47.94/7.63  | REDUCE: (7), (15) imply:
% 47.94/7.63  |   (16)  aElementOf0(all_78_0, szNzAzT0)
% 47.94/7.64  | 
% 47.94/7.64  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (4) with all_78_0, simplifying with (8), (10), (16)
% 47.94/7.64  |              gives:
% 47.94/7.64  |   (17)  $false
% 47.94/7.64  | 
% 47.94/7.64  | CLOSE: (17) is inconsistent.
% 47.94/7.64  | 
% 47.94/7.64  End of proof
% 47.94/7.64  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 47.94/7.64  
% 47.94/7.64  7005ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------