↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : NUM594+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:26:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.41s 6.31s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  26   ~;  17   |;  25   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn  12   !;   5   ?;   1   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f92,axiom,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0)
       => ! [X1] :
            ( ( ( aElementOf0(X1,slbdtsldtrb0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0)),xk))
                | ( sbrdtbr0(X1) = xk
                  & ( aSubsetOf0(X1,sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0)))
                    | ! [X2] :
                        ( aElementOf0(X2,X1)
                       => aElementOf0(X2,sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0))) ) ) ) )
              & aSet0(X1) )
           => sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) = sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X0),X1) ) )
    & szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0
    & aFunction0(xd) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__4730) ).

fof(f94,axiom,
    ( aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(xd,szDzozmdt0(xd)))
    & ? [X0] :
        ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) = xx
        & aElementOf0(X0,szDzozmdt0(xd)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__4781) ).

fof(f95,conjecture,
    ? [X0] :
      ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) = xx
      & aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(f96,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) = xx
        & aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f95]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0)
        | ! [X1] :
            ( ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtsldtrb0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0)),xk))
              & ( sbrdtbr0(X1) != xk
                | ( ~ aSubsetOf0(X1,sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0)))
                  & ? [X2] :
                      ( aElementOf0(X2,X1)
                      & ~ aElementOf0(X2,sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0))) ) ) ) )
            | ~ aSet0(X1)
            | sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) = sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X0),X1) ) )
    & szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0
    & aFunction0(xd) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f237,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0)
        | ! [X1] :
            ( ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtsldtrb0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0)),xk))
              & ( sbrdtbr0(X1) != xk
                | ( ~ aSubsetOf0(X1,sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0)))
                  & ? [X2] :
                      ( aElementOf0(X2,X1)
                      & ~ aElementOf0(X2,sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0))) ) ) ) )
            | ~ aSet0(X1)
            | sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) = sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X0),X1) ) )
    & szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0
    & aFunction0(xd) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f236]) ).

fof(f238,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) != xx
      | ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f407,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0)
        | ! [X1] :
            ( ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtsldtrb0(sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0)),xk))
              & ( sbrdtbr0(X1) != xk
                | ( ~ aSubsetOf0(X1,sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0)))
                  & aElementOf0(sK67(X0,X1),X1)
                  & ~ aElementOf0(sK67(X0,X1),sdtlpdtrp0(xN,szszuzczcdt0(X0))) ) ) )
            | ~ aSet0(X1)
            | sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) = sdtlpdtrp0(sdtlpdtrp0(xC,X0),X1) ) )
    & szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0
    & aFunction0(xd) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK67]),skolemize(X2,sK67(X0,X1))],[f237]) ).

fof(f411,plain,
    ( aElementOf0(xx,sdtlcdtrc0(xd,szDzozmdt0(xd)))
    & xx = sdtlpdtrp0(xd,sK69)
    & aElementOf0(sK69,szDzozmdt0(xd)) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK69]),skolemize(X0,sK69)],[f94]) ).

fof(f770,plain,
    szNzAzT0 = szDzozmdt0(xd),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f407]) ).

fof(f777,plain,
    xx = sdtlpdtrp0(xd,sK69),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f411]) ).

fof(f778,plain,
    aElementOf0(sK69,szDzozmdt0(xd)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f411]) ).

fof(f779,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) != xx
      | ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f238]) ).

tcf(c_404,plain,
    szDzozmdt0(xd) = szNzAzT0,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f770]) ).

tcf(c_413,plain,
    aElementOf0(sK69,szDzozmdt0(xd)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f778]) ).

tcf(c_414,plain,
    sdtlpdtrp0(xd,sK69) = xx,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f777]) ).

tcf(c_416,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ aElementOf0(X0,szNzAzT0)
      | ( sdtlpdtrp0(xd,X0) != xx ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f779]) ).

tcf(c_464,plain,
    ~ aElementOf0(sK69,szNzAzT0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_414,c_416]) ).

tcf(c_530,plain,
    aElementOf0(sK69,szNzAzT0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_404,c_413]) ).

tcf(c_531,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_530,c_464]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM594+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.39  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 04:52:03 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.45  % Proving...
% 4.41/6.31  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.41/6.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % ------  iProver source info
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.41/6.31  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.41/6.31  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ Parsing...
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ Proving...
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % 
% 4.41/6.31  % clauses                               368
% 4.41/6.31  % conjectures                           1
% 4.41/6.31  % EPR                                   59
% 4.41/6.31  % Horn                                  284
% 4.41/6.31  % unary                                 34
% 4.41/6.31  % binary                                100
% 4.41/6.31  % lits                                  1224
% 4.41/6.31  % lits eq                               157
% 4.41/6.31  % fd_pure                               0
% 4.41/6.31  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 4.41/6.31  % fd_cond                               10
% 4.41/6.31  % fd_pseudo_cond                        47
% 4.41/6.31  % AC symbols                            0
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ 
% 4.41/6.31  % Current options:
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ 
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % 
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ Proving...
% 4.41/6.31  % 
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % ------ Proving...
% 4.41/6.31  % 
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.41/6.31  
% 4.41/6.31  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------