↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM605+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:49:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   98 (  39 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   39 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  124 (  54   ~;  50   |;  14   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   8 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn  16   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    xQ != slcrc0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(mDefEmp,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 = slcrc0
    <=> ( ~ ? [X2] : aElementOf0(X2,X1)
        & aSet0(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefEmp) ).

fof(mDefSel,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
        & aSet0(X1) )
     => ! [X3] :
          ( X3 = slbdtsldtrb0(X1,X2)
        <=> ( ! [X4] :
                ( aElementOf0(X4,X3)
              <=> ( sbrdtbr0(X4) = X2
                  & aSubsetOf0(X4,X1) ) )
            & aSet0(X3) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSel) ).

fof(mCardEmpty,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ( sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00
      <=> X1 = slcrc0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mCardEmpty) ).

fof(m__3462,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3462) ).

fof(m__5078,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__5078) ).

fof(m__3418,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3418) ).

fof(m__4891,hypothesis,
    ( xO = sdtlcdtrc0(xe,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
    & aSet0(xO) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__4891) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( xQ != slcrc0 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( X14 = slcrc0
        | aElementOf0(esk1_1(X14),X14)
        | ~ aSet0(X14) )
      & ( X12 != slcrc0
        | ~ aElementOf0(X13,X12) )
      & ( X12 != slcrc0
        | aSet0(X12) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefEmp])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X120,X121,X122,X123,X124,X125] :
      ( ( ~ aElementOf0(X121,szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aSet0(X120)
        | X125 = slbdtsldtrb0(X120,X121)
        | ~ aSet0(X125)
        | aElementOf0(esk11_3(X120,X121,X125),X125)
        | sbrdtbr0(esk11_3(X120,X121,X125)) = X121 )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X121,szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aSet0(X120)
        | X125 = slbdtsldtrb0(X120,X121)
        | ~ aSet0(X125)
        | aElementOf0(esk11_3(X120,X121,X125),X125)
        | aSubsetOf0(esk11_3(X120,X121,X125),X120) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X121,szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aSet0(X120)
        | X125 = slbdtsldtrb0(X120,X121)
        | ~ aSet0(X125)
        | sbrdtbr0(esk11_3(X120,X121,X125)) != X121
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(esk11_3(X120,X121,X125),X120)
        | ~ aElementOf0(esk11_3(X120,X121,X125),X125) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X121,szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aSet0(X120)
        | X122 != slbdtsldtrb0(X120,X121)
        | aElementOf0(X124,X122)
        | sbrdtbr0(X124) != X121
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X124,X120) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X121,szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aSet0(X120)
        | X122 != slbdtsldtrb0(X120,X121)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X123,X122)
        | sbrdtbr0(X123) = X121 )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X121,szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aSet0(X120)
        | X122 != slbdtsldtrb0(X120,X121)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X123,X122)
        | aSubsetOf0(X123,X120) )
      & ( ~ aElementOf0(X121,szNzAzT0)
        | ~ aSet0(X120)
        | X122 != slbdtsldtrb0(X120,X121)
        | aSet0(X122) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSel])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    xQ = slcrc0,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X84] :
      ( ( ~ aSet0(X84)
        | sbrdtbr0(X84) = sz00
        | X84 != slcrc0 )
      & ( ~ aSet0(X84)
        | X84 = slcrc0
        | sbrdtbr0(X84) != sz00 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mCardEmpty])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( X1 != slcrc0
    | aSet0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__3462]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aSet0(X4)
    | X3 != slbdtsldtrb0(X4,X2)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X3)
    | sbrdtbr0(X1) = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__5078]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    xQ = slcrc0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(X1)
    | X1 != slcrc0
    | sbrdtbr0(X1) = sz00 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    aSet0(slcrc0),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(X3)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X2,szNzAzT0)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,slbdtsldtrb0(X3,X2))
    | sbrdtbr0(X1) = X2 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(slcrc0,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    sbrdtbr0(slcrc0) = sz00,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    aElementOf0(xK,szNzAzT0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3418]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xO),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4891]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    xK != sz00,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM605+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:39:26 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.44  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.53  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1246433 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.20/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.53  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.53  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1246438 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.20/0.53  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.53  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.53  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.53  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.53  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.53  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.53  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.53  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53  % Parsed axioms                        : 100
% 0.20/0.53  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Initial clauses                      : 202
% 0.20/0.53  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.20/0.53  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 195
% 0.20/0.53  % Processed clauses                    : 807
% 0.20/0.53  % ...of these trivial                  : 5
% 0.20/0.53  % ...subsumed                          : 294
% 0.20/0.53  % ...remaining for further processing  : 508
% 0.20/0.53  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 47
% 0.20/0.53  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Backward-subsumed                    : 15
% 0.20/0.53  % Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 0.20/0.53  % Generated clauses                    : 1633
% 0.20/0.53  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1437
% 0.20/0.53  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 34
% 0.20/0.53  % Paramodulations                      : 1589
% 0.20/0.53  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Equation resolutions                 : 49
% 0.20/0.53  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1069
% 0.20/0.53  % ...of those cached                   : 1003
% 0.20/0.53  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.53  % Current number of processed clauses  : 441
% 0.20/0.53  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 74
% 0.20/0.53  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.53  %    Negative unit clauses             : 18
% 0.20/0.53  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 349
% 0.20/0.53  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 796
% 0.20/0.53  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4190
% 0.20/0.53  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Current number of archived clauses   : 30
% 0.20/0.53  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 22374
% 0.20/0.53  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12131
% 0.20/0.53  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 238
% 0.20/0.53  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1573
% 0.20/0.53  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 10
% 0.20/0.53  % BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 0.20/0.53  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.53  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 42232
% 0.20/0.53  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 3730
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % User time                : 0.044 s
% 0.20/0.53  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.53  % Total time               : 0.051 s
% 0.20/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4020 pages
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % User time                : 0.089 s
% 0.20/0.53  % System time              : 0.020 s
% 0.20/0.53  % Total time               : 0.110 s
% 0.20/0.53  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.20/0.53  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------