↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : NUM605+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:36:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 28.44s 28.60s
% Output   : Refutation 28.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem  : NUM605+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.15  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.16/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.37  % DateTime : Wed May  8 15:45:23 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 28.44/28.60  % Version:  1.5
% 28.44/28.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 28.44/28.60  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 28.44/28.60  fof(m__3520,plain,xK!=sz00,file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__3520)).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c860,plain,xK!=sz00,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3520])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(symmetry,axiom,X288!=X289|X289=X288,theory(equality)).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(mZeroNum,axiom,aElementOf0(sz00,szNzAzT0),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mZeroNum)).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c5116,plain,aElementOf0(sz00,szNzAzT0),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mZeroNum])).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(mCardSeg,axiom,(![W0]:(aElementOf0(W0,szNzAzT0)=>sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(W0))=W0)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mCardSeg)).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(c4973,plain,(![W0]:(~aElementOf0(W0,szNzAzT0)|sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(W0))=W0)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mCardSeg])).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(c4974,plain,(![X182]:(~aElementOf0(X182,szNzAzT0)|sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(X182))=X182)),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c4973])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c4975,plain,~aElementOf0(X1078,szNzAzT0)|sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(X1078))=X1078,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c4974])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c9756,plain,sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(sz00))=sz00,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4975, c5116])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c9825,plain,sz00=sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(sz00)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9756, symmetry])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(transitivity,axiom,X290!=X291|X291!=X292|X290=X292,theory(equality)).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(m__5078,plain,((((aSet0(xQ)&(![W0]:(aElementOf0(W0,xQ)=>aElementOf0(W0,xO))))&aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO))&sbrdtbr0(xQ)=xK)&aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__5078)).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(c29,plain,((((aSet0(xQ)&(![W0]:(~aElementOf0(W0,xQ)|aElementOf0(W0,xO))))&aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO))&sbrdtbr0(xQ)=xK)&aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[m__5078])).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(c31,plain,(![X3]:((((aSet0(xQ)&(~aElementOf0(X3,xQ)|aElementOf0(X3,xO)))&aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO))&sbrdtbr0(xQ)=xK)&aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK)))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c30,plain,((((aSet0(xQ)&(![X3]:(~aElementOf0(X3,xQ)|aElementOf0(X3,xO))))&aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO))&sbrdtbr0(xQ)=xK)&aElementOf0(xQ,slbdtsldtrb0(xO,xK))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c29])).])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c35,plain,sbrdtbr0(xQ)=xK,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c31])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c5260,plain,X533!=sbrdtbr0(xQ)|X533=xK,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c35, transitivity])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c3,axiom,X305!=X306|sbrdtbr0(X305)=sbrdtbr0(X306),theory(equality)).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(mSegZero,axiom,slbdtrb0(sz00)=slcrc0,file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mSegZero)).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c4993,plain,slbdtrb0(sz00)=slcrc0,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mSegZero])).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(m__,conjecture,(~((~(?[W0]:aElementOf0(W0,xQ)))&xQ=slcrc0)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', m__)).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(c23,negated_conjecture,(~(~((~(?[W0]:aElementOf0(W0,xQ)))&xQ=slcrc0))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__])).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(c24,negated_conjecture,((![W0]:~aElementOf0(W0,xQ))&xQ=slcrc0),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c23])).
% 28.44/28.60  fof(c26,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:(~aElementOf0(X2,xQ)&xQ=slcrc0)),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c25,negated_conjecture,((![X2]:~aElementOf0(X2,xQ))&xQ=slcrc0),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c24])).])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c28,negated_conjecture,xQ=slcrc0,inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c26])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c5232,plain,slcrc0=xQ,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c28, symmetry])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c5242,plain,X413!=slcrc0|X413=xQ,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5232, transitivity])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c5764,plain,slbdtrb0(sz00)=xQ,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5242, c4993])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c5775,plain,sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(sz00))=sbrdtbr0(xQ),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5764, c3])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c8984,plain,sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(sz00))=xK,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c5775, c5260])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c9017,plain,X2582!=sbrdtbr0(slbdtrb0(sz00))|X2582=xK,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c8984, transitivity])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c22884,plain,sz00=xK,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9017, c9825])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c22900,plain,xK=sz00,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c22884, symmetry])).
% 28.44/28.60  cnf(c22961,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c22900, c860])).
% 28.44/28.60  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 28.44/28.60  
% 28.44/28.60  % Initial clauses    : 4905
% 28.44/28.60  % Processed clauses  : 2074
% 28.44/28.60  % Factors computed   : 27
% 28.44/28.60  % Resolvents computed: 17737
% 28.44/28.60  % Tautologies deleted: 30
% 28.44/28.60  % Forward subsumed   : 1204
% 28.44/28.60  % Backward subsumed  : 42
% 28.44/28.60  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 28.44/28.60  % User time          : 28.147 s
% 28.44/28.60  % System time        : 0.079 s
% 28.44/28.60  % Total time         : 28.226 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------