↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM606+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:49:44 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   15 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  33   ~;  30   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn   7   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mDefSub,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aSet0(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( aSubsetOf0(X2,X1)
        <=> ( ! [X3] :
                ( aElementOf0(X3,X2)
               => aElementOf0(X3,X1) )
            & aSet0(X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDefSub) ).

fof(m__5093,hypothesis,
    ( xQ != slcrc0
    & aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__5093) ).

fof(m__3435,hypothesis,
    ( isCountable0(xS)
    & aSubsetOf0(xS,szNzAzT0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__3435) ).

fof(mNATSet,axiom,
    ( isCountable0(szNzAzT0)
    & aSet0(szNzAzT0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mNATSet) ).

fof(m__4998,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(xO,xS),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__4998) ).

fof(m__4891,hypothesis,
    ( xO = sdtlcdtrc0(xe,sdtlbdtrb0(xd,szDzizrdt0(xd)))
    & aSet0(xO) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__4891) ).

fof(m__,conjecture,
    aSubsetOf0(xQ,szNzAzT0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X19,X20,X21,X22] :
      ( ( ~ aSet0(X19)
        | aSubsetOf0(X22,X19)
        | ~ aSet0(X22)
        | ~ aElementOf0(esk2_2(X19,X22),X19) )
      & ( ~ aSet0(X19)
        | aSubsetOf0(X22,X19)
        | ~ aSet0(X22)
        | aElementOf0(esk2_2(X19,X22),X22) )
      & ( ~ aSet0(X19)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X20,X19)
        | aElementOf0(X21,X19)
        | ~ aElementOf0(X21,X20) )
      & ( ~ aSet0(X19)
        | ~ aSubsetOf0(X20,X19)
        | aSet0(X20) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mDefSub])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    ( xQ != slcrc0
    & aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m__5093]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(X2)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X1,X2)
    | aSet0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(xS,szNzAzT0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__3435]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    aSet0(szNzAzT0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[mNATSet]) ).

fof(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    ( xQ != slcrc0
    & aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(X3)
    | ~ aSubsetOf0(X2,X3)
    | ~ aElementOf0(X1,X2)
    | aElementOf0(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(xO,xS),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4998]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xS),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    aSubsetOf0(xQ,xO),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xO),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__4891]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(xQ,szNzAzT0),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xS)
    | aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO)
    | aElementOf0(X1,xS) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xQ)
    | aElementOf0(X1,xO) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(X1)
    | ~ aSet0(X2)
    | aSubsetOf0(X2,X1)
    | aElementOf0(esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    aSet0(xQ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(xQ,szNzAzT0),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aElementOf0(X1,xO)
    | aElementOf0(X1,szNzAzT0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aSet0(X1)
    | aElementOf0(esk2_2(X1,xQ),xO)
    | aSubsetOf0(xQ,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

fof(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(xQ,szNzAzT0),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ aSet0(X1)
    | ~ aSet0(X2)
    | ~ aElementOf0(esk2_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | aSubsetOf0(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    ( ~ aSet0(X1)
    | aElementOf0(esk2_2(X1,xQ),szNzAzT0)
    | aSubsetOf0(xQ,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aSubsetOf0(xQ,szNzAzT0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_23]),c_0_11])]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM606+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:44:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1521428 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1521437 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 101
% 0.14/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 204
% 0.14/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
% 0.14/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 197
% 0.14/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 240
% 0.14/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.14/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 27
% 0.14/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 212
% 0.14/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 18
% 0.14/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.14/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.14/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 247
% 0.14/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 197
% 0.14/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 4
% 0.14/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 229
% 0.14/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 19
% 0.14/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 192
% 0.14/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 157
% 0.14/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 192
% 0.14/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 55
% 0.14/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 12
% 0.14/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 125
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 151
% 0.14/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 742
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.14/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2300
% 0.14/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1715
% 0.14/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 21
% 0.14/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 522
% 0.14/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.14/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.14/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 19779
% 0.14/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 3734
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.45  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Total time               : 0.026 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4276 pages
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  % User time                : 0.058 s
% 0.14/0.45  % System time              : 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Total time               : 0.078 s
% 0.14/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------