↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.CAX-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM626+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:09:20 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 17.80s 5.66s
% Output   : Refutation 17.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   33 (  14 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (   6   ~;   1   |;  15   &;  44   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(aElementOf0_decl,type,
    aElementOf0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(aElement0_decl,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

thf(szmzizndt0_decl,type,
    szmzizndt0: $i > $i ).

thf(sdtlseqdt0_decl,type,
    sdtlseqdt0: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(xx_decl,type,
    xx: $i ).

thf(xP_decl,type,
    xP: $i ).

thf(xp_decl,type,
    xp: $i ).

thf(xQ_decl,type,
    xQ: $i ).

thf(97,axiom,
    ( ( xp
      = ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( xQ @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
       => ( A @ ( xp @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xQ @ ( xp @ aElementOf0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__5147) ).

thf(878,plain,
    ( ( xp
      = ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 ) )
    & ! [A: $i] :
        ( ( xQ @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) )
       => ( A @ ( xp @ sdtlseqdt0 ) ) )
    & ( xQ @ ( xp @ aElementOf0 ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[97]) ).

thf(879,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( xp
        = ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 ) )
      & ( ( A @ ( xp @ sdtlseqdt0 ) )
        | ~ ( xQ @ ( A @ aElementOf0 ) ) )
      & ( xQ @ ( xp @ aElementOf0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[878]) ).

thf(882,plain,
    ( xp
    = ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[879]) ).

thf(883,plain,
    ( ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 )
    = xp ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[882]) ).

thf(108,axiom,
    xp = xx,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__5496) ).

thf(1003,plain,
    xp = xx,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[108]) ).

thf(1004,plain,
    xp = xx,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[1003]) ).

thf(1463,plain,
    ( ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 )
    = xx ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[883,1004]) ).

thf(77,axiom,
    ( ( xP @ ( xx @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xx
     != ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 ) )
    & ( xQ @ ( xx @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xx @ aElement0 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__5348) ).

thf(601,plain,
    ( ( xP @ ( xx @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xx
     != ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 ) )
    & ( xQ @ ( xx @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xx @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[77]) ).

thf(602,plain,
    ( ( xP @ ( xx @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xx
     != ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 ) )
    & ( xQ @ ( xx @ aElementOf0 ) )
    & ( xx @ aElement0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[601]) ).

thf(605,plain,
    ( xx
   != ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[602]) ).

thf(607,plain,
    ( ( xQ @ szmzizndt0 )
   != xx ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[605]) ).

thf(1464,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[1463,607]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM626+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.41  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.41  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 03:30:55 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.84/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.89/1.31  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (317ms). 
% 1.89/1.32  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.83/1.72  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.83/1.73  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.83/1.79  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.82  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.82  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.84  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.84  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.85  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.86  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.86  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.87  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.02/1.87  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.26/1.93  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 121 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.60/2.06  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 120 axioms (removed 1 axioms). 
% 3.60/2.09  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.60/2.13  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.98/2.14  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.98/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.98/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.98/2.15  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.98/2.17  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.98/2.18  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.98/2.18  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 3.98/2.19  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 4.11/2.20  % [INFO] 	 Definitions in FOF are currently treated as axioms. 
% 4.11/2.21  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 4.11/2.23  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 4.11/2.23  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 17.80/5.65  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 17.80/5.66  % Time passed: 5097ms (effective reasoning time: 4321ms)
% 17.80/5.66  % Axioms used in derivation (3): m__5147, m__5496, m__5348
% 17.80/5.66  % No. of inferences in proof: 15
% 17.80/5.66  % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 5097 ms resp. 4321 ms w/o parsing
% 17.80/5.68  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 17.80/5.68  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------