↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : NUM635^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:24:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.63s 1.46s
% Output   : Refutation 1.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (  15 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (   8   ~;   3   |;   0   &;  16   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    5 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0   ^;   7   !;   0   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    suc: nat > nat ).

thf(f15,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    x != y,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    x != y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uTmcxHNKbZ/DTF2THF_21489.p',n) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    x = y,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( ( suc @ X0 )
       != ( suc @ x ) )
      | ( y = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f9,f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( suc @ x )
    = ( suc @ y ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ( ( suc @ x )
    = ( suc @ y ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ( ( suc @ x )
       != ( suc @ y ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,conjecture,
    ( ( suc @ x )
   != ( suc @ y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uTmcxHNKbZ/DTF2THF_21489.p',satz1) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( suc @ X0 )
       != ( suc @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( suc @ X0 )
       != ( suc @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( ( suc @ X0 )
        = ( suc @ X1 ) )
     => ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uTmcxHNKbZ/DTF2THF_21489.p',ax4) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : NUM635^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:08:30 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.28/0.49  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.28/0.49  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.28/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.49  % File     : NUM635^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.28/0.49  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 0.28/0.49  % Problem  : Landau theorem 1
% 0.28/0.49  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.28/0.49  % English  : ~(suc x = suc y)
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  % Refs     : [Lan30] Landau (1930), Grundlagen der Analysis
% 0.28/0.49  %          : [vBJ79] van Benthem Jutting (1979), Checking Landau's "Grundla
% 0.28/0.49  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.28/0.49  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.28/0.49  % Names    : satz1 [Lan30]
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.28/0.49  %          : Without extensionality : Theorem
% 0.28/0.49  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.28/0.49  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    7 (   2 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
% 0.28/0.49  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.28/0.49  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.28/0.49  %            Number of connectives :    7 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   4   @)
% 0.28/0.49  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.28/0.49  %            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
% 0.28/0.49  %            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
% 0.28/0.49  %            Number of type conns  :    1 (   1   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.28/0.49  %            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.28/0.49  %            Number of variables   :    2 (   0   ^;   2   !;   0   ?;   2   :)
% 0.28/0.49  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  % Comments : 
% 0.28/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.49  thf(nat_type,type,
% 0.28/0.49      nat: $tType ).
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  thf(x,type,
% 0.28/0.49      x: nat ).
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  thf(y,type,
% 0.28/0.49      y: nat ).
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  thf(n,axiom,
% 0.28/0.49      x != y ).
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  thf(suc,type,
% 0.28/0.49      suc: nat > nat ).
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  thf(ax4,axiom,
% 0.28/0.49      ! [Xx: nat,Xy: nat] :
% 0.28/0.49        ( ( ( suc @ Xx )
% 0.28/0.49          = ( suc @ Xy ) )
% 0.28/0.49       => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  thf(satz1,conjecture,
% 0.28/0.49      ( ( suc @ x )
% 0.28/0.49     != ( suc @ y ) ) ).
% 0.28/0.49  
% 0.28/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.49  ------------------------
% 1.63/1.43  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.63/1.43  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.63/1.43  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:08:31 EST 2026
% 1.63/1.43  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.63/1.43  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.63/1.43  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.63/1.43  
% 1.63/1.43  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uTmcxHNKbZ/DTF2DTF21489.p
% See solution above
% 1.63/1.43  ------------------------
% 1.63/1.44  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.63/1.44  thf(nat_type,type,
% 1.63/1.44      nat: $tType ).
% 1.63/1.44  
% 1.63/1.44  thf(x,type,
% 1.63/1.44      x: nat ).
% 1.63/1.44  
% 1.63/1.44  thf(y,type,
% 1.63/1.44      y: nat ).
% 1.63/1.44  
% 1.63/1.44  thf(n,axiom,
% 1.63/1.44      x != y ).
% 1.63/1.44  
% 1.63/1.44  thf(suc,type,
% 1.63/1.44      suc: nat > nat ).
% 1.63/1.44  
% 1.63/1.44  thf(ax4,axiom,
% 1.63/1.44      ! [Xx: nat,Xy: nat] :
% 1.63/1.44        ( ( ( suc @ Xx )
% 1.63/1.44          = ( suc @ Xy ) )
% 1.63/1.44       => ( Xx = Xy ) ) ).
% 1.63/1.44  
% 1.63/1.44  thf(satz1,conjecture,
% 1.63/1.44      ( ( suc @ x )
% 1.63/1.44     != ( suc @ y ) ) ).
% 1.63/1.44  ------------------------
% 1.63/1.46  % (21595)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_21489 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21599)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_21489 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_21489 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21594)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_21489 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21596)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_21489 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21593)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_21489 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_21489 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.63/1.46  
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.46  % (21597)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)First to succeed.
% 1.63/1.46  % (21599)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.63/1.46  % (21593)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.63/1.46  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_21489
% 1.63/1.46  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_21489
% 1.63/1.46  thf(type_def_5, type, nat: $tType).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(func_def_0, type, nat: $tType).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(func_def_1, type, x: nat).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(func_def_2, type, y: nat).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(func_def_3, type, suc: nat > nat).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.63/1.46    $false),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f14,f8])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.63/1.46    (x != y)),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.63/1.46    (x != y)),
% 1.63/1.46    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uTmcxHNKbZ/DTF2THF_21489.p',n)).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.63/1.46    (x = y)),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.63/1.46    ( ! [X0 : nat] : (((suc @ X0) != (suc @ x)) | (y = X0)) )),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f9,f10])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.63/1.46    ((suc @ x) = (suc @ y))),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.63/1.46    ((suc @ x) = (suc @ y))),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.63/1.46    ~((suc @ x) != (suc @ y))),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f3,conjecture,(
% 1.63/1.46    ((suc @ x) != (suc @ y))),
% 1.63/1.46    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uTmcxHNKbZ/DTF2THF_21489.p',satz1)).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.63/1.46    ( ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : (((suc @ X0) != (suc @ X1)) | (X0 = X1)) )),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f7])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.63/1.46    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : (((suc @ X0) != (suc @ X1)) | (X0 = X1))),
% 1.63/1.46    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.63/1.46  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.63/1.46    ! [X1 : nat,X0 : nat] : (((suc @ X0) = (suc @ X1)) => (X0 = X1))),
% 1.63/1.46    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.uTmcxHNKbZ/DTF2THF_21489.p',ax4)).
% 1.63/1.46  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_21489
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.63/1.46  
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.46  % (21598)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.46  % (21592)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------