%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NUM635^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:16:38 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 0.32s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 16 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 10 ~; 3 |; 0 &; 16 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 ^; 7 !; 0 ?; 7 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(decl_23,type,
x: nat ).
thf(decl_24,type,
y: nat ).
thf(decl_25,type,
suc: nat > nat ).
thf(satz1,conjecture,
( ( suc @ x )
!= ( suc @ y ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KUmyRE7CIo/E---3.1_1598871.p',satz1) ).
thf(ax4,axiom,
! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ X1 )
= ( suc @ X2 ) )
=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KUmyRE7CIo/E---3.1_1598871.p',ax4) ).
thf(n,axiom,
x != y,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KUmyRE7CIo/E---3.1_1598871.p',n) ).
thf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( ( ( suc @ x )
!= ( suc @ y ) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz1]) ).
thf(c_0_4,plain,
! [X5: nat,X6: nat] :
( ( ( suc @ X5 )
!= ( suc @ X6 ) )
| ( X5 = X6 ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4])])]) ).
thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ( suc @ x )
= ( suc @ y ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
thf(c_0_6,plain,
x != y,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[n]) ).
thf(c_0_7,plain,
! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
( ( X1 = X2 )
| ( ( suc @ X1 )
!= ( suc @ X2 ) ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
thf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ( suc @ x )
= ( suc @ y ) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
thf(c_0_9,plain,
x != y,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X1: nat] :
( ( X1 = y )
| ( ( suc @ X1 )
!= ( suc @ x ) ) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
thf(c_0_11,plain,
x != y,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
thf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : NUM635^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.21 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.21 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.21 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.21 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.21 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.21 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.21 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.21 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:31:01 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.21 % CPUTime :
% 0.07/0.21 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.28 Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.30 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.KUmyRE7CIo/E---3.1_1598871.p
% 0.27/0.32 % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.27/0.32 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.32 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % sh4l with pid 1598886 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Result found by sh4l
% 0.27/0.32 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.32 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.32 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.32 % Search class: HHUPF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.32 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1598891 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.27/0.32 % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.32 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting sh4l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.32 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.32 % Search class: HHUPF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.32 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.32 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.32 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.27/0.32
% 0.27/0.32 % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.32 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/0.32 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.32 % Parsed axioms : 7
% 0.27/0.32 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.27/0.32 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.27/0.32 % Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.27/0.32 % Processed clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.32 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % ...remaining for further processing : 4
% 0.27/0.32 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.32 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.27/0.32 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.27/0.32 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.27/0.32 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.32 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.32 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.32 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.32 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.32 % Current number of processed clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.32 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.32 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.32 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.27/0.32 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.27/0.32 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.27/0.32 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.27/0.32 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.27/0.32 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.32 % Termbank termtop insertions : 201
% 0.27/0.32 % Search garbage collected termcells : 25
% 0.27/0.32
% 0.27/0.32 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.32 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/0.32 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.27/0.32 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/0.32 % Maximum resident set size: 3576 pages
% 0.27/0.32
% 0.27/0.32 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.32 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/0.32 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/0.32 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.27/0.32 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/0.32 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------