↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : NUM635^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:24:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.50s 1.27s
% Output   : Refutation 1.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   4 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  29 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   60 (  18   ~;   4   |;   5   &;  28   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (   0   ^;  15   !;   6   ?;  21   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_1,type,
    succ: $i > $i ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK0: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(f33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f32,f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    sK1 != sK2,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( ( succ @ sK2 )
      = ( succ @ sK1 ) )
    & ( sK1 != sK2 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2])],[f16,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
        ( ( ( succ @ X0 )
          = ( succ @ X1 ) )
        & ( X0 != X1 ) )
   => ( ( ( succ @ sK2 )
        = ( succ @ sK1 ) )
      & ( sK1 != sK2 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ? [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X0 )
        = ( succ @ X1 ) )
      & ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ? [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X0 )
        = ( succ @ X1 ) )
      & ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
       => ( ( succ @ X0 )
         != ( succ @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
       => ( ( succ @ X0 )
         != ( succ @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 != X1 )
     => ( ( succ @ X0 )
       != ( succ @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d3A1ln8vne/DTF2THF_21468.p',satz1) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    sK1 = sK2,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f28]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X0 )
       != ( succ @ sK1 ) )
      | ( sK2 = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f25,f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( succ @ sK2 )
    = ( succ @ sK1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X0 )
       != ( succ @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X0 )
       != ( succ @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X0: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X0 )
       != ( succ @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X0 )
        = ( succ @ X1 ) )
     => ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d3A1ln8vne/DTF2THF_21468.p',succ_injective) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM635^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:09:34 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.29/0.46  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.29/0.46  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  % File     : NUM635^2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.29/0.46  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 0.29/0.46  % Problem  : Landau theorem 1
% 0.29/0.46  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.29/0.46  % English  :
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Refs     : [Lan30] Landau (1930), Grundlagen der Analysis
% 0.29/0.46  %          : [vBJ79] van Benthem Jutting (1979), Checking Landau's "Grundla
% 0.29/0.46  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.29/0.46  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 0.29/0.46  % Names    : satz1 [Lan30]
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.29/0.46  % Rating   : 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.0, 0.33 v3.7.0
% 0.29/0.46  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    6 (   1 unt;   2 typ;   0 def)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of atoms       :    5 (   5 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of connectives :   18 (   3   ~;   0   |;   1   &;  10   @)
% 0.29/0.46  %                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of symbols     :    3 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.29/0.46  %            Number of variables   :    8 (   0   ^;   8   !;   0   ?;   8   :)
% 0.29/0.46  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  % Comments : 
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  thf(one_type,type,
% 0.29/0.46      one: $i ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  thf(succ_type,type,
% 0.29/0.46      succ: $i > $i ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  thf(one_is_first,axiom,
% 0.29/0.46      ! [X: $i] :
% 0.29/0.46        ( ( succ @ X )
% 0.29/0.46       != one ) ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  thf(succ_injective,axiom,
% 0.29/0.46      ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 0.29/0.46        ( ( ( succ @ X )
% 0.29/0.46          = ( succ @ Y ) )
% 0.29/0.46       => ( X = Y ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  thf(induction,axiom,
% 0.29/0.46      ! [M: $i > $o] :
% 0.29/0.46        ( ( ( M @ one )
% 0.29/0.46          & ! [X: $i] :
% 0.29/0.46              ( ( M @ X )
% 0.29/0.46             => ( M @ ( succ @ X ) ) ) )
% 0.29/0.46       => ! [Y: $i] : ( M @ Y ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  thf(satz1,conjecture,
% 0.29/0.46      ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 0.29/0.46        ( ( X != Y )
% 0.29/0.46       => ( ( succ @ X )
% 0.29/0.46         != ( succ @ Y ) ) ) ).
% 0.29/0.46  
% 0.29/0.46  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.46  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.25  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.50/1.25  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.50/1.25  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:09:35 EST 2026
% 1.50/1.25  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.50/1.25  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.50/1.25  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.50/1.25  
% 1.50/1.25  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d3A1ln8vne/DTF2DTF21468.p
% See solution above
% 1.50/1.25  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.26  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.50/1.26  thf(one_type,type,
% 1.50/1.26      one: $i ).
% 1.50/1.26  
% 1.50/1.26  thf(succ_type,type,
% 1.50/1.26      succ: $i > $i ).
% 1.50/1.26  
% 1.50/1.26  thf(one_is_first,axiom,
% 1.50/1.26      ! [X: $i] :
% 1.50/1.26        ( ( succ @ X )
% 1.50/1.26       != one ) ).
% 1.50/1.26  
% 1.50/1.26  thf(succ_injective,axiom,
% 1.50/1.26      ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 1.50/1.26        ( ( ( succ @ X )
% 1.50/1.26          = ( succ @ Y ) )
% 1.50/1.26       => ( X = Y ) ) ).
% 1.50/1.26  
% 1.50/1.26  thf(induction,axiom,
% 1.50/1.26      ! [M: $i > $o] :
% 1.50/1.26        ( ( ( M @ one )
% 1.50/1.26          & ! [X: $i] :
% 1.50/1.26              ( ( M @ X )
% 1.50/1.26             => ( M @ ( succ @ X ) ) ) )
% 1.50/1.26       => ! [Y: $i] : ( M @ Y ) ) ).
% 1.50/1.26  
% 1.50/1.26  thf(satz1,conjecture,
% 1.50/1.26      ! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
% 1.50/1.26        ( ( X != Y )
% 1.50/1.26       => ( ( succ @ X )
% 1.50/1.26         != ( succ @ Y ) ) ) ).
% 1.50/1.26  ------------------------
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_21468 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)First to succeed.
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.50/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_21468
% 1.50/1.27  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_21468
% 1.50/1.27  thf(func_def_1, type, succ: $i > $i).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(func_def_5, type, sK0: ($i > $o) > $i).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    $false),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f32,f23])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    (sK1 != sK2)),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ((succ @ sK2) = (succ @ sK1)) & (sK1 != sK2)),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK2])],[f16,f17])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((succ @ X0) = (succ @ X1)) & (X0 != X1)) => (((succ @ sK2) = (succ @ sK1)) & (sK1 != sK2))),
% 1.50/1.27    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ? [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((succ @ X0) = (succ @ X1)) & (X0 != X1))),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ? [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : (((succ @ X0) = (succ @ X1)) & (X0 != X1))),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ~! [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((X0 != X1) => ((succ @ X0) != (succ @ X1)))),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.50/1.27    ~! [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((X0 != X1) => ((succ @ X0) != (succ @ X1)))),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 1.50/1.27    ! [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : ((X0 != X1) => ((succ @ X0) != (succ @ X1)))),
% 1.50/1.27    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d3A1ln8vne/DTF2THF_21468.p',satz1)).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    (sK1 = sK2)),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f28])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f28,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ( ! [X0 : $i] : (((succ @ X0) != (succ @ sK1)) | (sK2 = X0)) )),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f25,f24])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ((succ @ sK2) = (succ @ sK1))),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ( ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((succ @ X0) != (succ @ X1)) | (X0 = X1)) )),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((succ @ X0) != (succ @ X1)) | (X0 = X1))),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.50/1.27    ! [X1 : $i,X0 : $i] : (((succ @ X0) != (succ @ X1)) | (X0 = X1))),
% 1.50/1.27    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.50/1.27  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 1.50/1.27    ! [X0 : $i,X1 : $i] : (((succ @ X0) = (succ @ X1)) => (X0 = X1))),
% 1.50/1.27    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.d3A1ln8vne/DTF2THF_21468.p',succ_injective)).
% 1.50/1.27  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_21468
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.50/1.27  
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.27  % (21751)------------------------------
% 1.50/1.27  % (21744)Success in time 0.011 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------