↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM636^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:16:38 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.25s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (  44 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  149 (  39   ~;  17   |;   2   &;  88   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (  14   ^;  28   !;   0   ?;  42   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_23,type,
    one: $i ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    succ: $i > $i ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    esk1_1: ( $i > $o ) > $i ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    esk2_0: $i ).

thf(satz2,conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( succ @ X1 )
     != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e8i602sJOp/E---3.1_3268662.p',satz2) ).

thf(induction,axiom,
    ! [X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X3 @ one )
        & ! [X1: $i] :
            ( ( X3 @ X1 )
           => ( X3 @ ( succ @ X1 ) ) ) )
     => ! [X2: $i] : ( X3 @ X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e8i602sJOp/E---3.1_3268662.p',induction) ).

thf(one_is_first,axiom,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( succ @ X1 )
     != one ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e8i602sJOp/E---3.1_3268662.p',one_is_first) ).

thf(succ_injective,axiom,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X1 )
        = ( succ @ X2 ) )
     => ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e8i602sJOp/E---3.1_3268662.p',succ_injective) ).

thf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( succ @ X1 )
       != X1 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz2]) ).

thf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: $i] :
        ( ( succ @ X1 )
       != X1 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X14: $i > $o,X16: $i] :
      ( ( ( X14 @ ( esk1_1 @ X14 ) )
        | ~ ( X14 @ one )
        | ( X14 @ X16 ) )
      & ( ~ ( X14 @ ( succ @ ( esk1_1 @ X14 ) ) )
        | ~ ( X14 @ one )
        | ( X14 @ X16 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[induction])])])])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( succ @ esk2_0 )
    = esk2_0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( succ @ X1 )
     != one ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[one_is_first]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( X3 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( X3 @ ( succ @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) ) )
      | ~ ( X3 @ one ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( succ @ esk2_0 )
    = esk2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X11: $i] :
      ( ( succ @ X11 )
     != one ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1
       != ( succ @ X1 ) )
      | ( one
        = ( succ @ one ) )
      | ( ( succ
          @ ( esk1_1
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( Z0
               != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) )
        = ( succ
          @ ( succ
            @ ( esk1_1
              @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                  ( Z0
                 != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(trigger,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( succ @ X1 )
     != one ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X12: $i,X13: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ @ X12 )
       != ( succ @ X13 ) )
      | ( X12 = X13 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[succ_injective])])]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ
          @ ( succ
            @ ( esk1_1
              @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                  ( Z0
                 != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) ) )
        = ( succ
          @ ( esk1_1
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( Z0
               != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( ( succ @ X1 )
       != X1 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( X3 @ ( esk1_1 @ X3 ) )
      | ( X3 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( X3 @ one ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X1 = X2 )
      | ( ( succ @ X1 )
       != ( succ @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( succ
      @ ( succ
        @ ( esk1_1
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( Z0
             != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) ) )
    = ( succ
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( Z0
           != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( X1
       != ( succ @ X1 ) )
      | ( ( esk1_1
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( Z0
             != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) )
       != ( succ
          @ ( esk1_1
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( Z0
               != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) ) )
      | ( one
        = ( succ @ one ) ) ),
    inference(trigger,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]),c_0_16,c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ
          @ ( esk1_1
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( Z0
               != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) )
        = X1 )
      | ( ( succ
          @ ( esk1_1
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( Z0
               != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) )
       != ( succ @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( ( succ
          @ ( esk1_1
            @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
                ( Z0
               != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) )
       != ( esk1_1
          @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
              ( Z0
             != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) )
      | ( ( succ @ X1 )
       != X1 ) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( succ
      @ ( esk1_1
        @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
            ( Z0
           != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) )
    = ( esk1_1
      @ ^ [Z0: $i] :
          ( Z0
         != ( succ @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X1: $i] :
      ( ( succ @ X1 )
     != X1 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).

thf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM636^2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.18  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:01:40 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.18  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.e8i602sJOp/E---3.1_3268662.p
% 0.08/0.25  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 0.08/0.25  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSFA.
% 0.08/0.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting new_ho_14 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % new_ho_13 with pid 3268677 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Result found by new_ho_13
% 0.08/0.25  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSFA.
% 0.08/0.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting new_ho_14 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.25  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.25  % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-DSFFFSBN
% 0.08/0.25  % partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF11-SSFFFSBN
% 0.08/0.25  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3268682 completed with status 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.25  % Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSFA.
% 0.08/0.25  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting new_ho_14 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting full_lambda_8 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting new_ho_13 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.25  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.25  % Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-DSFFFSBN
% 0.08/0.25  % partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF11-SSFFFSBN
% 0.08/0.25  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.25  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.25  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.25  
% 0.08/0.25  % Proof found!
% 0.08/0.25  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.25  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.25  % Parsed axioms                        : 6
% 0.08/0.25  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.08/0.25  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.08/0.25  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.08/0.25  % Processed clauses                    : 16
% 0.08/0.25  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.08/0.25  % ...remaining for further processing  : 14
% 0.08/0.25  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.08/0.25  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.08/0.25  % Generated clauses                    : 17
% 0.08/0.25  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13
% 0.08/0.25  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Paramodulations                      : 13
% 0.08/0.25  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.08/0.25  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.08/0.25  % ...of those cached                   : 6
% 0.08/0.25  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.08/0.25  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.08/0.25  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.25  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.08/0.25  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.25  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.08/0.25  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.08/0.25  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.08/0.25  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.08/0.25  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.08/0.25  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.08/0.25  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.08/0.25  % Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.08/0.25  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
% 0.08/0.25  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.25  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.08/0.25  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.08/0.25  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 0.08/0.25  % ...number of literals in the above   : 12
% 0.08/0.25  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Current number of archived clauses   : 8
% 0.08/0.25  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11
% 0.08/0.25  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.08/0.25  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.08/0.25  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.08/0.25  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.08/0.25  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.08/0.25  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.08/0.25  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 795
% 0.08/0.25  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 116
% 0.08/0.25  
% 0.08/0.25  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.25  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.08/0.25  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.25  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.08/0.25  % Maximum resident set size: 3888 pages
% 0.08/0.25  
% 0.08/0.25  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.25  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.08/0.25  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.25  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.08/0.25  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.25  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------