↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM636^3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:56:53 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 17.72s 17.94s
% Output   : Proof 17.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : NUM636^3 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.12/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 08:53:38 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 17.72/17.94  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 17.72/17.94  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (M : Iota → Prop), And (M one) (∀ (X : Iota), M X → M (succ X)) → ∀ (Y : Iota), M Y) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (m one) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #5 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), m X → m (succ X)) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #6 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (∀ (X : Iota), m X)) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), m X) False
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (Not (m (skS.0 0 a))) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (m (skS.0 0 a)) False
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #10 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (m a → m (succ a)) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (m a) False) (Eq (m (succ a)) True)
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #15 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop), Eq (And (a one) (∀ (X : Iota), a X → a (succ X)) → ∀ (Y : Iota), a Y) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop), Or (Eq (And (a one) (∀ (X : Iota), a X → a (succ X))) False) (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), a Y) True)
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop),
% 17.72/17.94    Or (Eq (∀ (Y : Iota), a Y) True) (Or (Eq (a one) False) (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), a X → a (succ X)) False))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 : Iota),
% 17.72/17.94    Or (Eq (a one) False) (Or (Eq (∀ (X : Iota), a X → a (succ X)) False) (Eq (a a_1) True))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 17.72/17.94    Or (Eq (a one) False) (Or (Eq (a a_1) True) (Eq (Not (a (skS.0 1 a a_2) → a (succ (skS.0 1 a a_2)))) True))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 17.72/17.94    Or (Eq (a one) False) (Or (Eq (a a_1) True) (Eq (a (skS.0 1 a a_2) → a (succ (skS.0 1 a a_2))) False))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (a one) False) (Or (Eq (a a_1) True) (Eq (a (skS.0 1 a a_2)) True))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #22 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (a one) False) (Or (Eq (a a_1) True) (Eq (a (succ (skS.0 1 a a_2))) False))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #33 (by superposition #[21, 4]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota),
% 17.72/17.94    Or (Eq ((fun x => m x) a) True) (Or (Eq ((fun x => m x) (skS.0 1 (fun x => m x) a_1)) True) (Eq False True))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #104 (by fluidLoobHoist #[22]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 17.72/17.94    Or (Eq (a a_1) True) (Or (Eq (a (succ (skS.0 1 a a_2))) False) (Or (Eq True False) (Eq (a one) False)))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #461 (by betaEtaReduce #[33]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (m a) True) (Or (Eq (m (skS.0 1 m a_1)) True) (Eq False True))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #462 (by clausification #[461]): ∀ (a a_1 : Iota), Or (Eq (m a) True) (Eq (m (skS.0 1 m a_1)) True)
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #463 (by superposition #[462, 9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (m (skS.0 1 m a)) True) (Eq True False)
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #495 (by clausification #[463]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (m (skS.0 1 m a)) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #496 (by superposition #[495, 11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (m (succ (skS.0 1 m a))) True)
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #505 (by clausification #[496]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (m (succ (skS.0 1 m a))) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #1559 (by clausification #[104]): ∀ (a : Iota → Prop) (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (a a_1) True) (Or (Eq (a (succ (skS.0 1 a a_2))) False) (Eq (a one) False))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #1575 (by superposition #[1559, 505]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq ((fun x => m x) a) True) (Or (Eq ((fun x => m x) one) False) (Eq False True))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #1677 (by betaEtaReduce #[1575]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (m a) True) (Or (Eq (m one) False) (Eq False True))
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #1678 (by clausification #[1677]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (m a) True) (Eq (m one) False)
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #1679 (by superposition #[1678, 4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (m a) True) (Eq False True)
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #1695 (by clausification #[1679]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (m a) True
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #1707 (by superposition #[1695, 9]): Eq True False
% 17.72/17.94  Clause #1724 (by clausification #[1707]): False
% 17.72/17.94  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------