↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : NUM641^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n148.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 13:11:15 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.44s
% Output   : Proof 0.44s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM641^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.02/0.04  % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.23  % Computer : n148.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.02/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 11:22:00 CST 2018
% 0.02/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.25  Python 2.7.13
% 0.44/0.92  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/']
% 0.44/0.92  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b3b52916dd0>, <kernel.Type object at 0x2b3b52916908>) of role type named nat_type
% 0.44/0.92  Using role type
% 0.44/0.92  Declaring nat:Type
% 0.44/0.92  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b3b52d6db90>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b3b52916440>) of role type named x
% 0.44/0.92  Using role type
% 0.44/0.92  Declaring x:nat
% 0.44/0.92  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b3b52916518>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b3b529162d8>) of role type named suc
% 0.44/0.92  Using role type
% 0.44/0.92  Declaring suc:(nat->nat)
% 0.44/0.92  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b3b52916a70>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b3b52916dd0>) of role type named pl
% 0.44/0.92  Using role type
% 0.44/0.92  Declaring pl:(nat->(nat->nat))
% 0.44/0.92  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b3b52916440>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b3b52916dd0>) of role type named n_1
% 0.44/0.92  Using role type
% 0.44/0.92  Declaring n_1:nat
% 0.44/0.92  FOF formula (forall (Xx:nat), (((eq nat) ((pl n_1) Xx)) (suc Xx))) of role axiom named satz4c
% 0.44/0.92  A new axiom: (forall (Xx:nat), (((eq nat) ((pl n_1) Xx)) (suc Xx)))
% 0.44/0.92  FOF formula (((eq nat) (suc x)) ((pl n_1) x)) of role conjecture named satz4g
% 0.44/0.92  Conjecture to prove = (((eq nat) (suc x)) ((pl n_1) x)):Prop
% 0.44/0.92  We need to prove ['(((eq nat) (suc x)) ((pl n_1) x))']
% 0.44/0.92  Parameter nat:Type.
% 0.44/0.92  Parameter x:nat.
% 0.44/0.92  Parameter suc:(nat->nat).
% 0.44/0.92  Parameter pl:(nat->(nat->nat)).
% 0.44/0.92  Parameter n_1:nat.
% 0.44/0.92  Axiom satz4c:(forall (Xx:nat), (((eq nat) ((pl n_1) Xx)) (suc Xx))).
% 0.44/0.92  Trying to prove (((eq nat) (suc x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 ((pl n_1) x)):(((eq nat) ((pl n_1) x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Found (eq_ref0 ((pl n_1) x)) as proof of (((eq nat) ((pl n_1) x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Found ((eq_ref nat) ((pl n_1) x)) as proof of (((eq nat) ((pl n_1) x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Found ((eq_ref nat) ((pl n_1) x)) as proof of (((eq nat) ((pl n_1) x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Found (satz4c00 ((eq_ref nat) ((pl n_1) x))) as proof of (((eq nat) (suc x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Found ((satz4c0 (fun (x1:nat)=> (((eq nat) x1) ((pl n_1) x)))) ((eq_ref nat) ((pl n_1) x))) as proof of (((eq nat) (suc x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Found (((satz4c x) (fun (x1:nat)=> (((eq nat) x1) ((pl n_1) x)))) ((eq_ref nat) ((pl n_1) x))) as proof of (((eq nat) (suc x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Found (((satz4c x) (fun (x1:nat)=> (((eq nat) x1) ((pl n_1) x)))) ((eq_ref nat) ((pl n_1) x))) as proof of (((eq nat) (suc x)) ((pl n_1) x))
% 0.44/0.92  Got proof (((satz4c x) (fun (x1:nat)=> (((eq nat) x1) ((pl n_1) x)))) ((eq_ref nat) ((pl n_1) x)))
% 0.44/0.92  Time elapsed = 0.145837s
% 0.44/0.92  node=25 cost=-130.000000 depth=6
% 0.44/0.92::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.44/0.92  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.92  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.92  (((satz4c x) (fun (x1:nat)=> (((eq nat) x1) ((pl n_1) x)))) ((eq_ref nat) ((pl n_1) x)))
% 0.44/0.92  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------