↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : NUM647^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:24:04 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.66s 1.44s
% Output   : Refutation 1.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (  19 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  11   ~;   4   |;   0   &;  32   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0   ^;  16   !;   0   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    z: nat ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(f25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f24,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    y != z,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    y != z,
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    y != z,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    y = z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kYvHu4lbE4/DTF2THF_3725.p',satz8a) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    y = z,
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: nat] :
      ( ( ( pl @ x @ y )
       != ( pl @ x @ X0 ) )
      | ( z = X0 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( pl @ x @ y )
    = ( pl @ x @ z ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( ( pl @ x @ y )
    = ( pl @ x @ z ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kYvHu4lbE4/DTF2THF_3725.p',i) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( pl @ X2 @ X0 )
       != ( pl @ X2 @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( ( pl @ X2 @ X0 )
       != ( pl @ X2 @ X1 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( ( pl @ X0 @ X1 )
       != ( pl @ X0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( X1 = X2 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( X1 != X2 )
     => ( ( pl @ X0 @ X1 )
       != ( pl @ X0 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( X2 != X3 )
     => ( ( pl @ X1 @ X2 )
       != ( pl @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kYvHu4lbE4/DTF2THF_3725.p',satz8) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM647^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:09:09 EST 2026
% 0.15/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.27/0.49  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.27/0.49  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  % File     : NUM647^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.27/0.49  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 0.27/0.49  % Problem  : Landau theorem 8a
% 0.27/0.49  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.27/0.49  % English  : y = z
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Refs     : [Lan30] Landau (1930), Grundlagen der Analysis
% 0.27/0.49  %          : [vBJ79] van Benthem Jutting (1979), Checking Landau's "Grundla
% 0.27/0.49  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.27/0.49  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.27/0.49  % Names    : satz8a [Lan30]
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.27/0.49  %          : Without extensionality : Theorem
% 0.27/0.49  % Rating   : 0.11 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.20 v8.2.0, 0.15 v8.1.0, 0.00 v6.0.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v5.1.0, 0.40 v5.0.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.27/0.49  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   2 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of atoms       :    4 (   4 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of connectives :   14 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &;   8   @)
% 0.27/0.49  %                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of symbols     :    5 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.27/0.49  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.27/0.49  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  % Comments : 
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  thf(nat_type,type,
% 0.27/0.49      nat: $tType ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(x,type,
% 0.27/0.49      x: nat ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(y,type,
% 0.27/0.49      y: nat ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(z,type,
% 0.27/0.49      z: nat ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(pl,type,
% 0.27/0.49      pl: nat > nat > nat ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(i,axiom,
% 0.27/0.49      ( ( pl @ x @ y )
% 0.27/0.49      = ( pl @ x @ z ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(et,axiom,
% 0.27/0.49      ! [Xa: $o] :
% 0.27/0.49        ( ~ ~ Xa
% 0.27/0.49       => Xa ) ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(satz8,axiom,
% 0.27/0.49      ! [Xx: nat,Xy: nat,Xz: nat] :
% 0.27/0.49        ( ( Xy != Xz )
% 0.27/0.49       => ( ( pl @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.27/0.49         != ( pl @ Xx @ Xz ) ) ) ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  thf(satz8a,conjecture,
% 0.27/0.49      y = z ).
% 0.27/0.49  
% 0.27/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.49  ------------------------
% 1.66/1.41  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.66/1.41  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.66/1.41  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:09:10 EST 2026
% 1.66/1.41  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.66/1.41  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.66/1.41  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.66/1.41  
% 1.66/1.41  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kYvHu4lbE4/DTF2DTF3725.p
% See solution above
% 1.66/1.41  ------------------------
% 1.66/1.42  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.66/1.42  thf(nat_type,type,
% 1.66/1.42      nat: $tType ).
% 1.66/1.42  
% 1.66/1.42  thf(x,type,
% 1.66/1.42      x: nat ).
% 1.66/1.42  
% 1.66/1.42  thf(y,type,
% 1.66/1.42      y: nat ).
% 1.66/1.42  
% 1.66/1.42  thf(z,type,
% 1.66/1.42      z: nat ).
% 1.66/1.42  
% 1.66/1.42  thf(pl,type,
% 1.66/1.42      pl: nat > nat > nat ).
% 1.66/1.42  
% 1.66/1.42  thf(i,axiom,
% 1.66/1.42      ( ( pl @ x @ y )
% 1.66/1.42      = ( pl @ x @ z ) ) ).
% 1.66/1.42  
% 1.66/1.42  thf(et,axiom,
% 1.66/1.42      ! [Xa: $o] :
% 1.66/1.42        ( ~ ~ Xa
% 1.66/1.42       => Xa ) ).
% 1.66/1.42  
% 1.66/1.42  thf(satz8,axiom,
% 1.66/1.42      ! [Xx: nat,Xy: nat,Xz: nat] :
% 1.66/1.42        ( ( Xy != Xz )
% 1.66/1.42       => ( ( pl @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.66/1.42         != ( pl @ Xx @ Xz ) ) ) ).
% 1.66/1.42  
% 1.66/1.42  thf(satz8a,conjecture,
% 1.66/1.42      y = z ).
% 1.66/1.42  ------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3862)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3725 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3725 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3725 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3858)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3725 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3725 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3859)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3725 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3857)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_3725 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 1.66/1.44  
% 1.66/1.44  
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3861)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.66/1.44  
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3860)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)First to succeed.
% 1.66/1.44  % (3862)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.66/1.44  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_3725
% 1.66/1.44  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_3725
% 1.66/1.44  thf(type_def_5, type, nat: $tType).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(func_def_0, type, nat: $tType).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(func_def_1, type, x: nat).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(func_def_2, type, y: nat).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(func_def_3, type, z: nat).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(func_def_4, type, pl: nat > nat > nat).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    $false),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f24,f16])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    (y != z)),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    (y != z)),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.66/1.44    ~(y = z)),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 1.66/1.44    (y = z)),
% 1.66/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kYvHu4lbE4/DTF2THF_3725.p',satz8a)).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    (y = z)),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    ( ! [X0 : nat] : (((pl @ x @ y) != (pl @ x @ X0)) | (z = X0)) )),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f17])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    ((pl @ x @ y) = (pl @ x @ z))),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.66/1.44    ((pl @ x @ y) = (pl @ x @ z))),
% 1.66/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kYvHu4lbE4/DTF2THF_3725.p',i)).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    ( ! [X2 : nat,X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : (((pl @ X2 @ X0) != (pl @ X2 @ X1)) | (X0 = X1)) )),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat,X2 : nat] : (((pl @ X2 @ X0) != (pl @ X2 @ X1)) | (X0 = X1))),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    ! [X1 : nat,X2 : nat,X0 : nat] : (((pl @ X0 @ X1) != (pl @ X0 @ X2)) | (X1 = X2))),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.66/1.44    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat,X2 : nat] : ((X1 != X2) => ((pl @ X0 @ X1) != (pl @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 1.66/1.44    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.66/1.44  thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.66/1.44    ! [X1 : nat,X2 : nat,X3 : nat] : ((X2 != X3) => ((pl @ X1 @ X2) != (pl @ X1 @ X3)))),
% 1.66/1.44    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.kYvHu4lbE4/DTF2THF_3725.p',satz8)).
% 1.66/1.44  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_3725
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.66/1.44  
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3856)------------------------------
% 1.66/1.44  % (3855)Success in time 0.019 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------