↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM647_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:09:25 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.60s 2.39s
% Output   : Refutation 3.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  14 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  24 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  10   ~;   3   |;   0   &;  56   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0   ^;  22   !;   1   ?;  24   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nat_type,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(x_decl,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(y_decl,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(z_decl,type,
    z: nat ).

thf(pl_decl,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: nat > nat > nat] :
        ! [B: nat,C: nat] :
          ( ( C @ ( B @ pl ) @ ( B @ A ) )
          = C ) ) ) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ( ( y @ ( x @ pl ) )
    = ( z @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( y @ ( x @ pl ) )
    = ( z @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ( ( z @ ( x @ pl ) )
    = ( y @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ( B != C )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) )
       != ( C @ ( A @ pl ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz8) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ( B != C )
     => ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) )
       != ( C @ ( A @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ! [C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) )
       != ( C @ ( A @ pl ) ) )
      | ( B = C ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[11]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) )
       != ( C @ ( A @ pl ) ) )
      | ( B = C ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ? [A: nat > nat > nat] :
    ! [B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ pl ) @ ( B @ A ) )
      = C ),
    inference(detectInverse,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) @ ( A @ sk1 ) )
      = B ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[14]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) @ ( A @ sk1 ) )
      = B ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( z @ ( x @ pl ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ pl ) ) )
      | ( ( y @ ( x @ pl ) @ ( A @ sk1 ) )
        = B ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[9,16]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( ( y @ ( x @ pl ) @ ( x @ sk1 ) )
    = z ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[17:[bind(A,$thf( x )),bind(B,$thf( z ))]]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    z = y,
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[18,16]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    y = z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz8a) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    y != z,
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    y != z,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    z != y,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[19,7]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM647_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.42  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 03:34:59 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.42  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/1.00  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.25/1.17  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (173ms). 
% 1.25/1.19  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.00/1.61  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.00/1.62  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.00/1.70  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.19/1.73  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.19/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 2.19/1.75  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.19/1.76  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.60/2.38  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.60/2.39  % Time passed: 1819ms (effective reasoning time: 1189ms)
% 3.60/2.39  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.60/2.39  % Axioms used in derivation (2): i, satz8
% 3.60/2.39  % No. of inferences in proof: 18
% 3.60/2.39  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1819 ms resp. 1189 ms w/o parsing
% 3.87/2.43  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.87/2.43  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------