↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM652^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:56:56 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.57s 3.81s
% Output   : Proof 3.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : NUM652^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 08:25:23 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.57/3.81  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/3.81  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (more x y) → Eq x y) True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.57/3.81    (∀ (Xx Xy : nat),
% 3.57/3.81      Not ((Eq Xx Xy → Not (more Xx Xy)) → Not (Not ((more Xx Xy → Not (less Xx Xy)) → Not (less Xx Xy → Ne Xx Xy)))))
% 3.57/3.81    True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Not (less x y))) True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #8 (by clausification #[0]): Or (Eq (Not (more x y)) False) (Eq (Eq x y) True)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): Or (Eq (Eq x y) True) (Eq (more x y) True)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): Or (Eq (more x y) True) (Eq x y)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #11 (by clausification #[3]): Eq (Not (less x y)) False
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): Eq (less x y) True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #13 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a : nat),
% 3.57/3.81    Eq
% 3.57/3.81      (∀ (Xy : nat),
% 3.57/3.81        Not ((Eq a Xy → Not (more a Xy)) → Not (Not ((more a Xy → Not (less a Xy)) → Not (less a Xy → Ne a Xy)))))
% 3.57/3.81      True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat),
% 3.57/3.81    Eq (Not ((Eq a a_1 → Not (more a a_1)) → Not (Not ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Ne a a_1)))))
% 3.57/3.81      True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat),
% 3.57/3.81    Eq ((Eq a a_1 → Not (more a a_1)) → Not (Not ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Ne a a_1)))) False
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #17 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (Not (Not ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Ne a a_1)))) False
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #22 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (Not ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Ne a a_1))) True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #23 (by clausification #[22]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq ((more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) → Not (less a a_1 → Ne a a_1)) False
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #24 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (more a a_1 → Not (less a a_1)) True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #25 (by clausification #[23]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (Not (less a a_1 → Ne a a_1)) False
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #26 (by clausification #[24]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (more a a_1) False) (Eq (Not (less a a_1)) True)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #27 (by clausification #[26]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (more a a_1) False) (Eq (less a a_1) False)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #28 (by superposition #[27, 10]): Or (Eq (less x y) False) (Or (Eq False True) (Eq x y))
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #29 (by clausification #[25]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (less a a_1 → Ne a a_1) True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #30 (by clausification #[29]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (less a a_1) False) (Eq (Ne a a_1) True)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #31 (by clausification #[30]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (less a a_1) False) (Ne a a_1)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #32 (by destructive equality resolution #[31]): ∀ (a : nat), Eq (less a a) False
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #33 (by clausification #[28]): Or (Eq (less x y) False) (Eq x y)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #34 (by superposition #[33, 12]): Or (Eq x y) (Eq False True)
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #35 (by clausification #[34]): Eq x y
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #37 (by backward demodulation #[35, 12]): Eq (less y y) True
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #39 (by superposition #[37, 32]): Eq True False
% 3.57/3.81  Clause #40 (by clausification #[39]): False
% 3.57/3.81  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------