↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : NUM656^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:24:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.56s 1.31s
% Output   : Refutation 1.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  147 (  54 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  205 (  67   ~;  19   |;   4   &;  88   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  25  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0   ^;  17   !;   0   ?;  17   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    more: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    less: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(f47,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f39,f43,f46]) ).

thf(f46,plain,
    ~ spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f45]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f44,f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( $true
     != ( more @ X1 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f24]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( X0 != X1 )
        | ( $true
         != ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      & ( ( $true
         != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        | ( X0 != X1 ) )
      & ( ( $true
         != ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f20]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( X0 != X1 )
        | ( $true
         != ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      & ( ( $true
         != ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      & ( ( $true
         != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
        | ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ( $true
           != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
       => ( ( ( $true
              = ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
           => ( $true
             != ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
         => ~ ( ( $true
                = ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
             => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ( $true
           != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( $true
                  = ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
               => ( $true
                 != ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
             => ~ ( ( $true
                    = ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
                 => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ~ ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( more @ X1 @ X0 )
               => ~ ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
             => ~ ( ( less @ X1 @ X0 )
                 => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X1 = X2 )
         => ~ ( more @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( more @ X1 @ X2 )
               => ~ ( less @ X1 @ X2 ) )
             => ~ ( ( less @ X1 @ X2 )
                 => ( X1 != X2 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IO29Hb4SJi/DTF2THF_10283.p',satz10b) ).

thf(f44,plain,
    ( ( ( more @ x @ x )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f27,f34]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( x = y )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f32]) ).

thf(f32,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( x = y ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( more @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( more @ x @ y )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    more @ x @ y,
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    more @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IO29Hb4SJi/DTF2THF_10283.p',m) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f42]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f41,f27]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( ( more @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f40]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( more @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f38]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( ( less @ x @ y )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f36]) ).

thf(f36,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( ( less @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( spl0_1
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f22,f36,f32]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( ( ( less @ x @ y )
      = $true )
    | ( x = y ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( x = y )
    | ( ( less @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( less @ x @ y )
     != $true )
   => ( x = y ) ),
    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ~ ~ ( ( ( less @ x @ y )
         != $true )
       => ( x = y ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ~ ~ ( ~ ( less @ x @ y )
       => ( x = y ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ~ ( less @ x @ y )
       => ( x = y ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ( less @ x @ y )
     => ( x = y ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IO29Hb4SJi/DTF2THF_10283.p',satz10g) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM656^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.16/0.34  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.16/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:09:29 EST 2026
% 0.19/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.30/0.50  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.30/0.50  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.30/0.50  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.50  % File     : NUM656^1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.30/0.50  % Domain   : Number Theory
% 0.30/0.50  % Problem  : Landau theorem 10g
% 0.30/0.50  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.30/0.50  % English  : ~(~(less x y) -> x = y)
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  % Refs     : [Lan30] Landau (1930), Grundlagen der Analysis
% 0.30/0.50  %          : [vBJ79] van Benthem Jutting (1979), Checking Landau's "Grundla
% 0.30/0.50  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.30/0.50  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.30/0.50  % Names    : satz10g [Lan30]
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.30/0.50  %          : Without extensionality : Theorem
% 0.30/0.50  % Rating   : 0.11 v9.1.0, 0.12 v9.0.0, 0.20 v8.2.0, 0.15 v8.1.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v3.7.0
% 0.30/0.50  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   1 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
% 0.30/0.50  %            Number of atoms       :    9 (   3 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.30/0.50  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.30/0.50  %            Number of connectives :   30 (  11   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  12   @)
% 0.30/0.50  %                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.30/0.50  %            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
% 0.30/0.50  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.30/0.50  %            Number of type conns  :    4 (   4   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.30/0.50  %            Number of symbols     :    5 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.30/0.50  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   0   ^;   3   !;   0   ?;   3   :)
% 0.30/0.50  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  % Comments : 
% 0.30/0.50  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.50  thf(nat_type,type,
% 0.30/0.50      nat: $tType ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  thf(x,type,
% 0.30/0.50      x: nat ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  thf(y,type,
% 0.30/0.50      y: nat ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  thf(more,type,
% 0.30/0.50      more: nat > nat > $o ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  thf(m,axiom,
% 0.30/0.50      more @ x @ y ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  thf(less,type,
% 0.30/0.50      less: nat > nat > $o ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  thf(et,axiom,
% 0.30/0.50      ! [Xa: $o] :
% 0.30/0.50        ( ~ ~ Xa
% 0.30/0.50       => Xa ) ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  thf(satz10b,axiom,
% 0.30/0.50      ! [Xx: nat,Xy: nat] :
% 0.30/0.50        ~ ( ( ( Xx = Xy )
% 0.30/0.50           => ~ ( more @ Xx @ Xy ) )
% 0.30/0.50         => ~ ~ ( ( ( more @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.30/0.50                 => ~ ( less @ Xx @ Xy ) )
% 0.30/0.50               => ~ ( ( less @ Xx @ Xy )
% 0.30/0.50                   => ( Xx != Xy ) ) ) ) ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  thf(satz10g,conjecture,
% 0.30/0.50      ~ ( ~ ( less @ x @ y )
% 0.30/0.50       => ( x = y ) ) ).
% 0.30/0.50  
% 0.30/0.50  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.50  ------------------------
% 1.39/1.28  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.39/1.28  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.39/1.28  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:09:30 EST 2026
% 1.39/1.28  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.39/1.28  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.39/1.28  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.39/1.28  
% 1.39/1.28  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IO29Hb4SJi/DTF2DTF10283.p
% See solution above
% 1.39/1.28  ------------------------
% 1.39/1.29  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.39/1.29  thf(nat_type,type,
% 1.39/1.29      nat: $tType ).
% 1.39/1.29  
% 1.39/1.29  thf(x,type,
% 1.39/1.29      x: nat ).
% 1.39/1.29  
% 1.39/1.29  thf(y,type,
% 1.39/1.29      y: nat ).
% 1.39/1.29  
% 1.39/1.29  thf(more,type,
% 1.39/1.29      more: nat > nat > $o ).
% 1.39/1.29  
% 1.39/1.29  thf(m,axiom,
% 1.39/1.29      more @ x @ y ).
% 1.39/1.29  
% 1.39/1.29  thf(less,type,
% 1.39/1.29      less: nat > nat > $o ).
% 1.39/1.29  
% 1.39/1.29  thf(et,axiom,
% 1.39/1.29      ! [Xa: $o] :
% 1.39/1.29        ( ~ ~ Xa
% 1.39/1.29       => Xa ) ).
% 1.39/1.29  
% 1.39/1.29  thf(satz10b,axiom,
% 1.39/1.29      ! [Xx: nat,Xy: nat] :
% 1.39/1.29        ~ ( ( ( Xx = Xy )
% 1.39/1.29           => ~ ( more @ Xx @ Xy ) )
% 1.39/1.29         => ~ ~ ( ( ( more @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.39/1.29                 => ~ ( less @ Xx @ Xy ) )
% 1.39/1.29               => ~ ( ( less @ Xx @ Xy )
% 1.39/1.29                   => ( Xx != Xy ) ) ) ) ).
% 1.39/1.29  
% 1.39/1.29  thf(satz10g,conjecture,
% 1.39/1.29      ~ ( ~ ( less @ x @ y )
% 1.39/1.29       => ( x = y ) ) ).
% 1.39/1.29  ------------------------
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_10283 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)First to succeed.
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.56/1.31  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_10283
% 1.56/1.31  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_10283
% 1.56/1.31  thf(type_def_5, type, nat: $tType).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(func_def_0, type, nat: $tType).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(func_def_1, type, x: nat).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(func_def_2, type, y: nat).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(func_def_3, type, more: nat > nat > $o).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(func_def_5, type, less: nat > nat > $o).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f47,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    $false),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f39,f43,f46])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f46,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ~spl0_1),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f45])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f45,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    $false | ~spl0_1),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f44,f29])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ( ! [X1 : nat] : (($true != (more @ X1 @ X1))) )),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(equality_resolution,[status(thm)],[f24])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f24,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ( ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : (($true != (more @ X1 @ X0)) | (X0 != X1)) )),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : (((X0 != X1) | ($true != (less @ X1 @ X0))) & (($true != (more @ X1 @ X0)) | (X0 != X1)) & (($true != (less @ X1 @ X0)) | ($true != (more @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f20])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f20,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : ((((X0 != X1) | ($true != (less @ X1 @ X0))) & (($true != (less @ X1 @ X0)) | ($true != (more @ X1 @ X0)))) & (($true != (more @ X1 @ X0)) | (X0 != X1)))),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f17])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f17,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : ~(((X0 = X1) => ($true != (more @ X1 @ X0))) => ((($true = (more @ X1 @ X0)) => ($true != (less @ X1 @ X0))) => ~(($true = (less @ X1 @ X0)) => (X0 != X1))))),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : ~(((X0 = X1) => ~($true = (more @ X1 @ X0))) => ~~((($true = (more @ X1 @ X0)) => ~($true = (less @ X1 @ X0))) => ~(($true = (less @ X1 @ X0)) => (X0 != X1))))),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : ~(((X0 = X1) => ~(more @ X1 @ X0)) => ~~(((more @ X1 @ X0) => ~(less @ X1 @ X0)) => ~((less @ X1 @ X0) => (X0 != X1))))),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f3])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f3,axiom,(
% 1.56/1.31    ! [X2 : nat,X1 : nat] : ~(((X1 = X2) => ~(more @ X1 @ X2)) => ~~(((more @ X1 @ X2) => ~(less @ X1 @ X2)) => ~((less @ X1 @ X2) => (X1 != X2))))),
% 1.56/1.31    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IO29Hb4SJi/DTF2THF_10283.p',satz10b)).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f44,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ((more @ x @ x) = $true) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f27,f34])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f34,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    (x = y) | ~spl0_1),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f32])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f32,definition,(
% 1.56/1.31    spl0_1 <=> (x = y)),
% 1.56/1.31    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f27,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ((more @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ((more @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    (more @ x @ y)),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f1])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 1.56/1.31    (more @ x @ y)),
% 1.56/1.31    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IO29Hb4SJi/DTF2THF_10283.p',m)).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f43,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ~spl0_2),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[status(thm)],[f42])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f42,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    $false | ~spl0_2),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f41,f27])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f41,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ((more @ x @ y) != $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f40,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ($true != $true) | ((more @ x @ y) != $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f23,f38])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f38,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ((less @ x @ y) = $true) | ~spl0_2),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f36])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f36,definition,(
% 1.56/1.31    spl0_2 <=> ((less @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.56/1.31    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ( ! [X0 : nat,X1 : nat] : (($true != (less @ X1 @ X0)) | ($true != (more @ X1 @ X0))) )),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f21])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f39,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    spl0_1 | spl0_2),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f22,f36,f32])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ((less @ x @ y) = $true) | (x = y)),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f18])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    (x = y) | ((less @ x @ y) = $true)),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ((less @ x @ y) != $true) => (x = y)),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(flattening,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ~~(~((less @ x @ y) = $true) => (x = y))),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.56/1.31    ~~(~(less @ x @ y) => (x = y))),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f5,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.56/1.31    ~~(~(less @ x @ y) => (x = y))),
% 1.56/1.31    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f4])).
% 1.56/1.31  thf(f4,conjecture,(
% 1.56/1.31    ~(~(less @ x @ y) => (x = y))),
% 1.56/1.31    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.IO29Hb4SJi/DTF2THF_10283.p',satz10g)).
% 1.56/1.31  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_10283
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)------------------------------
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.56/1.31  
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)------------------------------
% 1.56/1.31  % (10380)------------------------------
% 1.56/1.31  % (10379)Success in time 0.003 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------