↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : NUM656^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n031.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 13:11:19 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 4.97s
% Output   : Proof 4.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : NUM656^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.23  % Computer : n031.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.23  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.23  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.02/0.23  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.23  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.23  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 11:42:14 CST 2018
% 0.02/0.23  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.28  Python 2.7.13
% 3.60/4.00  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ac31f71dab8>, <kernel.Type object at 0x2ac3201934d0>) of role type named nat_type
% 3.60/4.00  Using role type
% 3.60/4.00  Declaring nat:Type
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ac31f71d878>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2ac31f71db00>) of role type named x
% 3.60/4.00  Using role type
% 3.60/4.00  Declaring x:nat
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ac31f71db90>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2ac3201935a8>) of role type named y
% 3.60/4.00  Using role type
% 3.60/4.00  Declaring y:nat
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ac31f71db00>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ac3201936c8>) of role type named more
% 3.60/4.00  Using role type
% 3.60/4.00  Declaring more:(nat->(nat->Prop))
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula ((more x) y) of role axiom named m
% 3.60/4.00  A new axiom: ((more x) y)
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2ac31f71dab8>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2ac320193b48>) of role type named less
% 3.60/4.00  Using role type
% 3.60/4.00  Declaring less:(nat->(nat->Prop))
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula (forall (Xa:Prop), (((Xa->False)->False)->Xa)) of role axiom named et
% 3.60/4.00  A new axiom: (forall (Xa:Prop), (((Xa->False)->False)->Xa))
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula (forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat), ((((((eq nat) Xx) Xy)->(((more Xx) Xy)->False))->((((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False)->False))->False)) of role axiom named satz10b
% 3.60/4.00  A new axiom: (forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat), ((((((eq nat) Xx) Xy)->(((more Xx) Xy)->False))->((((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False)->False))->False))
% 3.60/4.00  FOF formula (((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y))->False) of role conjecture named satz10g
% 3.60/4.00  Conjecture to prove = (((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y))->False):Prop
% 3.60/4.00  We need to prove ['(((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y))->False)']
% 3.60/4.00  Parameter nat:Type.
% 3.60/4.00  Parameter x:nat.
% 3.60/4.00  Parameter y:nat.
% 3.60/4.00  Parameter more:(nat->(nat->Prop)).
% 3.60/4.00  Axiom m:((more x) y).
% 3.60/4.00  Parameter less:(nat->(nat->Prop)).
% 3.60/4.00  Axiom et:(forall (Xa:Prop), (((Xa->False)->False)->Xa)).
% 3.60/4.00  Axiom satz10b:(forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat), ((((((eq nat) Xx) Xy)->(((more Xx) Xy)->False))->((((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False)->False))->False)).
% 3.60/4.00  Trying to prove (((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y))->False)
% 3.60/4.00  Found m:((more x) y)
% 3.60/4.00  Instantiate: Xx:=x:nat;Xy:=y:nat
% 3.60/4.00  Found m as proof of ((more Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 Xx):(((eq nat) Xx) Xx)
% 3.60/4.00  Found (eq_ref0 Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found m:((more x) y)
% 3.60/4.00  Instantiate: Xx:=x:nat;Xy:=y:nat
% 3.60/4.00  Found m as proof of ((more Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 Xx):(((eq nat) Xx) Xx)
% 3.60/4.00  Found (eq_ref0 Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found m:((more x) y)
% 3.60/4.00  Instantiate: Xx:=x:nat;Xy:=y:nat
% 3.60/4.00  Found m as proof of ((more Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 Xx):(((eq nat) Xx) Xx)
% 3.60/4.00  Found (eq_ref0 Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found m:((more x) y)
% 3.60/4.00  Instantiate: Xx:=x:nat;Xy:=y:nat
% 3.60/4.00  Found m as proof of ((more Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 Xx):(((eq nat) Xx) Xx)
% 3.60/4.00  Found (eq_ref0 Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found m:((more x) y)
% 3.60/4.00  Instantiate: Xx:=x:nat;Xy:=y:nat
% 3.60/4.00  Found m as proof of ((more Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 Xx):(((eq nat) Xx) Xx)
% 3.60/4.00  Found (eq_ref0 Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 3.60/4.00  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found m:((more x) y)
% 4.97/5.38  Instantiate: Xx:=x:nat;Xy:=y:nat
% 4.97/5.38  Found m as proof of ((more Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found m:((more x) y)
% 4.97/5.38  Instantiate: Xx:=x:nat;Xy:=y:nat
% 4.97/5.38  Found m as proof of ((more Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found eq_ref00:=(eq_ref0 Xx):(((eq nat) Xx) Xx)
% 4.97/5.38  Found (eq_ref0 Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found ((eq_ref nat) Xx) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found x30:=(x3 m):(((less Xx) Xy)->False)
% 4.97/5.38  Found (x3 m) as proof of (((less x) y)->False)
% 4.97/5.38  Found (x3 m) as proof of (((less x) y)->False)
% 4.97/5.38  Found (x0 (x3 m)) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found (x0 (x3 m)) as proof of (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)
% 4.97/5.38  Found ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m) as proof of False
% 4.97/5.38  Found (fun (x4:(((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m)) as proof of False
% 4.97/5.38  Found (fun (x3:(((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m)) as proof of ((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False)
% 4.97/5.38  Found (fun (x3:(((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m)) as proof of ((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))
% 4.97/5.38  Found (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m))) as proof of False
% 4.97/5.38  Found (fun (x2:(((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m)))) as proof of False
% 4.97/5.38  Found (fun (x1:((((eq nat) Xx) Xy)->(((more Xx) Xy)->False))) (x2:(((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m)))) as proof of ((((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False)->False)
% 4.97/5.38  Found (fun (x1:((((eq nat) Xx) Xy)->(((more Xx) Xy)->False))) (x2:(((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m)))) as proof of (((((eq nat) Xx) Xy)->(((more Xx) Xy)->False))->((((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False)->False))
% 4.97/5.38  Found (satz10b00 (fun (x1:((((eq nat) Xx) Xy)->(((more Xx) Xy)->False))) (x2:(((((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))->((((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx) Xy)->(((less Xx) Xy)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx) Xy)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) Xy))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m))))) as proof of False
% 4.97/5.38  Found ((satz10b0 y) (fun (x1:((((eq nat) Xx) y)->(((more Xx) y)->False))) (x2:(((((more Xx) y)->(((less Xx) y)->False))->((((less Xx) y)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) y)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more Xx) y)->(((less Xx) y)->False))) (x4:(((less Xx) y)->(not (((eq nat) Xx) y))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m))))) as proof of False
% 4.97/5.38  Found (((satz10b x) y) (fun (x1:((((eq nat) x) y)->(((more x) y)->False))) (x2:(((((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))->((((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))) (x4:(((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m))))) as proof of False
% 4.97/5.38  Found (fun (x0:((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y)))=> (((satz10b x) y) (fun (x1:((((eq nat) x) y)->(((more x) y)->False))) (x2:(((((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))->((((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))) (x4:(((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m)))))) as proof of False
% 4.97/5.38  Found (fun (x0:((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y)))=> (((satz10b x) y) (fun (x1:((((eq nat) x) y)->(((more x) y)->False))) (x2:(((((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))->((((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))) (x4:(((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m)))))) as proof of (((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y))->False)
% 4.97/5.42  Got proof (fun (x0:((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y)))=> (((satz10b x) y) (fun (x1:((((eq nat) x) y)->(((more x) y)->False))) (x2:(((((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))->((((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))) (x4:(((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m))))))
% 4.97/5.42  Time elapsed = 4.653621s
% 4.97/5.42  node=670 cost=934.000000 depth=16
% 4.97/5.42::::::::::::::::::::::
% 4.97/5.42  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.97/5.42  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.97/5.42  (fun (x0:((((less x) y)->False)->(((eq nat) x) y)))=> (((satz10b x) y) (fun (x1:((((eq nat) x) y)->(((more x) y)->False))) (x2:(((((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))->((((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y)))->False))->False))=> (x2 (fun (x3:(((more x) y)->(((less x) y)->False))) (x4:(((less x) y)->(not (((eq nat) x) y))))=> ((x1 (x0 (x3 m))) m))))))
% 4.97/5.42  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------