↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM671^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:17:56 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.01s 1.94s
% Output   : Refutation 3.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   9 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  20   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    6 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   ^;   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nat_type,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(x_decl,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(y_decl,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(z_decl,type,
    z: nat ).

thf(pl_decl,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ( pl @ x @ z )
    = ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19b) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( pl @ x @ z )
   != ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(4,plain,
    ( ( pl @ x @ z )
   != ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,plain,
    ( ( pl @ y @ z )
   != ( pl @ x @ z ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    x = y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i) ).

thf(6,plain,
    x = y,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    y = x,
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ( ( pl @ x @ z )
   != ( pl @ x @ z ) ),
    inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[5,7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM671^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.09/0.21  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:36:04 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.22  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.22  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.86/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.21/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (179ms). 
% 1.21/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.81/1.39  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.81/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.02/1.47  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.18/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.18/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.18/1.52  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.18/1.52  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.01/1.93  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.01/1.93  % Time passed: 1570ms (effective reasoning time: 934ms)
% 3.01/1.93  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.01/1.94  % Axioms used in derivation (1): i
% 3.01/1.94  % No. of inferences in proof: 9
% 3.01/1.94  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1570 ms resp. 934 ms w/o parsing
% 3.01/1.97  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.01/1.97  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------