↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM672^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:17:57 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.38s 2.07s
% Output   : Refutation 3.38s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   6 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   62 (   2   ~;   0   |;   0   &;  54   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0   ^;  14   !;   0   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nat_type,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(x_decl,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(y_decl,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(z_decl,type,
    z: nat ).

thf(less_decl,type,
    less: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(pl_decl,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(more_decl,type,
    more: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( less @ A @ B )
     => ( more @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz12) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( less @ A @ B )
     => ( more @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ( less @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz11) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ( less @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    less @ ( pl @ x @ z ) @ ( pl @ y @ z ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19c) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( less @ ( pl @ x @ z ) @ ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( less @ ( pl @ x @ z ) @ ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ( more @ ( pl @ A @ C ) @ ( pl @ B @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19a) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ( more @ A @ B )
     => ( more @ ( pl @ A @ C ) @ ( pl @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    less @ x @ y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l) ).

thf(8,plain,
    less @ x @ y,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[14,9,7,11,8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM672^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.20  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.20  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.20  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.20  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.20  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.20  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.20  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:35:31 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.91/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.25/0.97  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (188ms). 
% 1.25/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.84/1.39  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.03/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.03/1.48  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 4 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.22/1.51  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 4 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.22/1.53  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.22/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.22/1.54  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.38/2.07  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.38/2.07  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.38/2.07  % Time passed: 1727ms (effective reasoning time: 1078ms)
% 3.38/2.07  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.38/2.07  % Axioms used in derivation (4): satz12, satz11, satz19a, l
% 3.38/2.07  % No. of inferences in proof: 12
% 3.38/2.07  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1727 ms resp. 1078 ms w/o parsing
% 3.38/2.11  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.38/2.11  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------