↑ Up

cocATP---0.2.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : cocATP---0.2.0
% Problem  : NUM673^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n067.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory   : 32218.625MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan  8 13:11:24 EST 2018

% Result   : Theorem 0.90s
% Output   : Proof 0.90s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : NUM673^1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : python CASC.py /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.25  % Computer : n067.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.03/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.03/0.25  % Memory   : 32218.625MB
% 0.03/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.03/0.25  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.25  % DateTime : Fri Jan  5 12:29:49 CST 2018
% 0.03/0.25  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.28  Python 2.7.13
% 0.90/1.30  Using paths ['/home/cristobal/cocATP/CASC/TPTP/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/', '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/']
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b65799e82d8>, <kernel.Type object at 0x2b65799e8f38>) of role type named nat_type
% 0.90/1.30  Using role type
% 0.90/1.30  Declaring nat:Type
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b65799e8ab8>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b65799e8518>) of role type named x
% 0.90/1.30  Using role type
% 0.90/1.30  Declaring x:nat
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b657a438f80>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b65799e8518>) of role type named y
% 0.90/1.30  Using role type
% 0.90/1.30  Declaring y:nat
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b65799e82d8>, <kernel.Constant object at 0x2b65799e8ab8>) of role type named z
% 0.90/1.30  Using role type
% 0.90/1.30  Declaring z:nat
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b65799e8950>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b6579d413f8>) of role type named more
% 0.90/1.30  Using role type
% 0.90/1.30  Declaring more:(nat->(nat->Prop))
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula ((more x) y) of role axiom named m
% 0.90/1.30  A new axiom: ((more x) y)
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula (<kernel.Constant object at 0x2b65799e8518>, <kernel.DependentProduct object at 0x2b6579d413b0>) of role type named pl
% 0.90/1.30  Using role type
% 0.90/1.30  Declaring pl:(nat->(nat->nat))
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula (forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat) (Xz:nat), (((more Xx) Xy)->((more ((pl Xx) Xz)) ((pl Xy) Xz)))) of role axiom named satz19a
% 0.90/1.30  A new axiom: (forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat) (Xz:nat), (((more Xx) Xy)->((more ((pl Xx) Xz)) ((pl Xy) Xz))))
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula (forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat), (((eq nat) ((pl Xx) Xy)) ((pl Xy) Xx))) of role axiom named satz6
% 0.90/1.30  A new axiom: (forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat), (((eq nat) ((pl Xx) Xy)) ((pl Xy) Xx)))
% 0.90/1.30  FOF formula ((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y)) of role conjecture named satz19d
% 0.90/1.30  Conjecture to prove = ((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y)):Prop
% 0.90/1.30  We need to prove ['((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y))']
% 0.90/1.30  Parameter nat:Type.
% 0.90/1.30  Parameter x:nat.
% 0.90/1.30  Parameter y:nat.
% 0.90/1.30  Parameter z:nat.
% 0.90/1.30  Parameter more:(nat->(nat->Prop)).
% 0.90/1.30  Axiom m:((more x) y).
% 0.90/1.30  Parameter pl:(nat->(nat->nat)).
% 0.90/1.30  Axiom satz19a:(forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat) (Xz:nat), (((more Xx) Xy)->((more ((pl Xx) Xz)) ((pl Xy) Xz)))).
% 0.90/1.30  Axiom satz6:(forall (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat), (((eq nat) ((pl Xx) Xy)) ((pl Xy) Xx))).
% 0.90/1.30  Trying to prove ((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found satz19a0000:=(satz19a000 z):((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl y) z))
% 0.90/1.30  Found (satz19a000 z) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl y) z))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((satz19a00 Xz) m)) z) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl y) z))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((fun (Xz:nat)=> (((satz19a0 y) Xz) m)) z) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl y) z))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl y) z))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl y) z))
% 0.90/1.30  Found (satz6000 ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z)) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((satz600 (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z)) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found (((satz60 z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z)) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z)) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z)) as proof of ((more ((pl x) z)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found (satz6__eq_sym000 ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z))) as proof of ((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((satz6__eq_sym00 (fun (x1:nat)=> ((more x1) ((pl z) y)))) ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z))) as proof of ((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found (((satz6__eq_sym0 x) (fun (x1:nat)=> ((more x1) ((pl z) y)))) ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z))) as proof of ((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((((satz6__eq_sym z) x) (fun (x1:nat)=> ((more x1) ((pl z) y)))) ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z))) as proof of ((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Found ((((satz6__eq_sym z) x) (fun (x1:nat)=> ((more x1) ((pl z) y)))) ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z))) as proof of ((more ((pl z) x)) ((pl z) y))
% 0.90/1.30  Got proof (((((fun (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat)=> ((((eq_sym nat) ((pl Xx) Xy)) ((pl Xy) Xx)) ((satz6 Xx) Xy))) z) x) (fun (x1:nat)=> ((more x1) ((pl z) y)))) ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z)))
% 0.90/1.30  Time elapsed = 0.554870s
% 0.90/1.30  node=172 cost=904.000000 depth=14
% 0.90/1.30::::::::::::::::::::::
% 0.90/1.30  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/1.30  % SZS output start Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.90/1.30  (((((fun (Xx:nat) (Xy:nat)=> ((((eq_sym nat) ((pl Xx) Xy)) ((pl Xy) Xx)) ((satz6 Xx) Xy))) z) x) (fun (x1:nat)=> ((more x1) ((pl z) y)))) ((((satz6 y) z) (more ((pl x) z))) ((fun (Xz:nat)=> ((((satz19a x) y) Xz) m)) z)))
% 0.90/1.30  % SZS output end Proof for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------