↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM681^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:18:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.27s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   66 (  16 unt;   0 typ;   4 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  281 (  95 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  408 (  91   ~;  51   |;   4   &; 224   @)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  34  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  11 usr;   9 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   67 (   0 sgn  67   !;   0   ?;  67   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    z: nat ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    less: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    more: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( ( pl @ x @ z )
    = ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',i) ).

thf(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ~ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
               => ~ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
             => ~ ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
                 => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz10b) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ! [X2: nat,X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( less @ ( pl @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( pl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19c) ).

thf(f5,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( X0 != X1 )
     => ( ~ ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz10a) ).

thf(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0: nat,X2: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( more @ ( pl @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( pl @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19a) ).

thf(f7,conjecture,
    x = y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz20b) ).

thf(f8,negated_conjecture,
    x != y,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( less @ X2 @ X1 )
     => ( less @ ( pl @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( pl @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) )
     => ( $true
        = ( less @ ( pl @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( pl @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( X0 != X1 )
     => ( ~ ( more @ X1 @ X0 )
       => ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( X0 != X1 )
     => ( ( $true
         != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ~ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
               => ~ ( less @ X0 @ X1 ) )
             => ~ ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
                 => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
           != $true ) )
       => ~ ~ ( ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
                  = $true )
               => ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
                 != $true ) )
             => ~ ( ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
                    = $true )
                 => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X0 @ X2 )
     => ( more @ ( pl @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( pl @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( more @ X0 @ X2 ) )
     => ( $true
        = ( more @ ( pl @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( pl @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( X0 != X1 )
     => ( ( $true
         != ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
       => ( $true
          = ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ~ ( ( ( X0 = X1 )
         => ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
           != $true ) )
       => ( ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
             != $true ) )
         => ~ ( ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
                = $true )
             => ( X0 != X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    x != y,
    inference(flattening,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( X0 != X1 )
        | ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        | ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        | ( X0 != X1 ) )
      & ( ( X0 != X1 )
        | ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true ) )
      & ( ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( less @ ( pl @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( pl @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( more @ X0 @ X2 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( more @ ( pl @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( pl @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( ( more @ X1 @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( more @ ( pl @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( pl @ X2 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( less @ ( pl @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( pl @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( less @ X2 @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( pl @ x @ z )
    = ( pl @ y @ z ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( X0 != X1 )
      | ( ( less @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( X0 != X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f26]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( more @ ( pl @ X1 @ X0 ) @ ( pl @ X2 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( ( more @ X1 @ X2 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( less @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    x != y,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( $true
     != ( more @ X1 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f36]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( $true
     != ( less @ X1 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f45,definition,
    ( spl0_1
  <=> ( ( pl @ x @ z )
      = ( pl @ y @ z ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f47,plain,
    ( ( ( pl @ x @ z )
      = ( pl @ y @ z ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f45]) ).

thf(f48,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f33,f45]) ).

thf(f50,definition,
    ( spl0_2
  <=> ( x = y ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f52,plain,
    ( ( x != y )
    | spl0_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f50]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f39,f50]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( ( less @ ( pl @ y @ z ) @ ( pl @ X0 @ z ) )
          = $true )
        | ( $true
         != ( less @ x @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f32,f47]) ).

thf(f57,plain,
    ( ! [X0: nat] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( more @ ( pl @ y @ z ) @ ( pl @ X0 @ z ) ) )
        | ( ( more @ x @ X0 )
         != $true ) )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f37,f47]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( less @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f43,f55]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ( ( less @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f87]) ).

thf(f92,definition,
    ( spl0_4
  <=> ( ( less @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    ( ( ( less @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | spl0_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f92]) ).

thf(f95,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_4
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f88,f45,f92]) ).

thf(f109,plain,
    ( ( ( more @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f42,f57]) ).

thf(f110,plain,
    ( ( ( more @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f109]) ).

thf(f113,definition,
    ( spl0_6
  <=> ( ( more @ x @ y )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl0_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f115,plain,
    ( ( ( more @ x @ y )
     != $true )
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f113]) ).

thf(f116,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_6
    | ~ spl0_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f110,f45,f113]) ).

thf(f117,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( x = y )
    | ( ( less @ x @ y )
      = $true )
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f115,f38]) ).

thf(f118,plain,
    ( ( ( less @ x @ y )
      = $true )
    | ( x = y )
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f117]) ).

thf(f119,plain,
    ( ( x = y )
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f118,f94]) ).

thf(f120,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl0_2
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f119,f52]) ).

thf(f121,plain,
    ( spl0_2
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f120]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    spl0_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f48]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ~ spl0_2,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f53]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f95]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ( ~ spl0_1
    | ~ spl0_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f116]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    ( spl0_2
    | spl0_4
    | spl0_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f121]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ~ spl0_6,
    inference(rat,[],[s7,s1]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    ~ spl0_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s1]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s8,s2,s9,s11]) ).

thf(f122,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s13]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM681^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.18  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.06/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:43:35 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.06/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.06/0.22  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.06/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179637)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=715173718:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-1179637-1179645"...
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)...printing done.
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.27  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179645)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.20/0.27  % (1179637)Success in time 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.27  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------