↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM690^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:57:04 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.77s 3.93s
% Output   : Proof 3.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : NUM690^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 07:32:08 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.77/3.93  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/3.93  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (some fun Xv => diffprop y x Xv) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (lessis z u) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq
% 3.77/3.93    (∀ (Xx Xy Xz Xu : nat),
% 3.77/3.93      (some fun Xu => diffprop Xx Xy Xu) → moreis Xz Xu → some fun Xu_0 => diffprop (pl Xx Xz) (pl Xy Xu) Xu_0)
% 3.77/3.93    True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy : nat), lessis Xx Xy → moreis Xy Xx) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #4 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (some fun Xv => diffprop (pl y u) (pl x z) Xv)) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #5 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a : nat), Eq (∀ (Xy : nat), lessis a Xy → moreis Xy a) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (lessis a a_1 → moreis a_1 a) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (lessis a a_1) False) (Eq (moreis a_1 a) True)
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #8 (by superposition #[7, 1]): Or (Eq (moreis u z) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): Eq (moreis u z) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #10 (by betaEtaReduce #[0]): Eq (some (diffprop y x)) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #11 (by betaEtaReduce #[4]): Eq (Not (some (diffprop (pl y u) (pl x z)))) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #12 (by clausification #[11]): Eq (some (diffprop (pl y u) (pl x z))) False
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #13 (by betaEtaReduce #[2]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy Xz Xu : nat), some (diffprop Xx Xy) → moreis Xz Xu → some (diffprop (pl Xx Xz) (pl Xy Xu))) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : nat), Eq (∀ (Xy Xz Xu : nat), some (diffprop a Xy) → moreis Xz Xu → some (diffprop (pl a Xz) (pl Xy Xu))) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #15 (by clausification #[14]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Eq (∀ (Xz Xu : nat), some (diffprop a a_1) → moreis Xz Xu → some (diffprop (pl a Xz) (pl a_1 Xu))) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #16 (by clausification #[15]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : nat),
% 3.77/3.93    Eq (∀ (Xu : nat), some (diffprop a a_1) → moreis a_2 Xu → some (diffprop (pl a a_2) (pl a_1 Xu))) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : nat), Eq (some (diffprop a a_1) → moreis a_2 a_3 → some (diffprop (pl a a_2) (pl a_1 a_3))) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : nat),
% 3.77/3.93    Or (Eq (some (diffprop a a_1)) False) (Eq (moreis a_2 a_3 → some (diffprop (pl a a_2) (pl a_1 a_3))) True)
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #19 (by clausification #[18]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 a_3 : nat),
% 3.77/3.93    Or (Eq (some (diffprop a a_1)) False)
% 3.77/3.93      (Or (Eq (moreis a_2 a_3) False) (Eq (some (diffprop (pl a a_2) (pl a_1 a_3))) True))
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #20 (by superposition #[19, 10]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (moreis a a_1) False) (Or (Eq (some (diffprop (pl y a) (pl x a_1))) True) (Eq False True))
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #21 (by clausification #[20]): ∀ (a a_1 : nat), Or (Eq (moreis a a_1) False) (Eq (some (diffprop (pl y a) (pl x a_1))) True)
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #22 (by superposition #[21, 9]): Or (Eq (some (diffprop (pl y u) (pl x z))) True) (Eq False True)
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #23 (by clausification #[22]): Eq (some (diffprop (pl y u) (pl x z))) True
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #24 (by superposition #[23, 12]): Eq True False
% 3.77/3.93  Clause #26 (by clausification #[24]): False
% 3.77/3.93  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------