↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM696_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:50:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (  40 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   52 (  39   ~;   5   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   43 (   0 sgn  43   !;   0   ?;  43   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    x: nat ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    y: nat ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    pl: ( nat * nat ) > nat ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    n_1: nat ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    esk1_3: ( nat * ( nat * nat ) ) > nat ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    esk2_1: nat > nat ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    esk3_0: nat ).

tff(satz25,conjecture,
    ( ~ ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( y != pl(pl(x,n_1),X1) )
   => ( y = pl(x,n_1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz25) ).

tff(satz19a,axiom,
    ! [X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( X3 != pl(X4,X1) )
     => ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( pl(X3,X5) != pl(pl(X4,X5),X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19a) ).

tff(satz6,axiom,
    ! [X3: nat,X4: nat] : ( pl(X3,X4) = pl(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz6) ).

tff(satz24,axiom,
    ! [X3: nat] :
      ( ~ ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( X3 != pl(n_1,X1) )
     => ( X3 = n_1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz24) ).

tff(m,axiom,
    ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( y != pl(x,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).

tff(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( y != pl(pl(x,n_1),X1) )
     => ( y = pl(x,n_1) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz25]) ).

tff(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( y != pl(pl(x,n_1),X1) )
     => ( y = pl(x,n_1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

tff(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X3: nat,X4: nat,X5: nat] :
      ( ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( X3 != pl(X4,X1) )
     => ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( pl(X3,X5) != pl(pl(X4,X5),X1) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz19a]) ).

tff(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X6: nat] :
      ( ( y != pl(x,n_1) )
      & ( y != pl(pl(x,n_1),X6) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

tff(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X12: nat,X13: nat] : ( pl(X12,X13) = pl(X13,X12) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz6]) ).

tff(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X7: nat,X8: nat,X9: nat,X10: nat] :
      ( ( pl(X7,X10) = pl(pl(X8,X10),esk1_3(X7,X8,X10)) )
      | ( X7 != pl(X8,X9) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: nat] : y != pl(pl(x,n_1),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3: nat,X1: nat] : pl(X1,X3) = pl(X3,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

tcf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat,X5: nat,X4: nat] :
      ( ( X1 != pl(X3,X4) )
      | ( pl(X1,X5) = pl(pl(X3,X5),esk1_3(X1,X3,X5)) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

tff(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3: nat] :
      ( ~ ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( X3 != pl(n_1,X1) )
     => ( X3 = n_1 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz24]) ).

tcf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: nat] : pl(pl(n_1,x),X1) != y,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

tcf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X4: nat,X3: nat] : pl(pl(X1,X3),esk1_3(pl(X1,X4),X1,X3)) = pl(pl(X1,X4),X3),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

tff(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X14: nat] :
      ( ( X14 = n_1 )
      | ( X14 = pl(n_1,esk2_1(X14)) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])])]) ).

tff(c_0_18,plain,
    ~ ! [X1: nat] : ( y != pl(x,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m]) ).

tcf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: nat] : pl(x,pl(n_1,X1)) != y,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12]) ).

tcf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( X1 = n_1 )
      | ( X1 = pl(n_1,esk2_1(X1)) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

tff(c_0_21,plain,
    y = pl(x,esk3_0),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])]) ).

tcf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( pl(x,X1) != y )
      | ( X1 = n_1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

tcf(c_0_23,plain,
    y = pl(x,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

tcf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    y != pl(x,n_1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

tcf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    esk3_0 = n_1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

tcf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    pl(n_1,x) != y,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_25]),c_0_12]),c_0_26]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM696_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 02:57:30 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % new_bool_1 with pid 3255099 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.44  % Search class: FGUPF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % partial match(1): FGUPF-FFSM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3255103 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.44  % Search class: FGUPF-FFSF32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % partial match(1): FGUPF-FFSM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 11
% 0.11/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
% 0.11/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 6
% 0.11/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 0.11/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 19
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 6
% 0.11/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 13
% 0.11/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.11/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.11/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 24
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25
% 0.11/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 23
% 0.11/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.11/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 5
% 0.11/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 1
% 0.11/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 0.11/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.11/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.11/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.11/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.11/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 16
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.11/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6
% 0.11/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 5
% 0.11/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.11/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 629
% 0.11/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 106
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.44  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.11/0.44  
% 0.11/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.44  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.44  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Total time               : 0.012 s
% 0.11/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.11/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------