↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM696_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:09:40 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 74.96s 31.87s
% Output   : Refutation 75.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  25 unt;   0 typ;   3 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  79 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  369 (  59   ~;  16   |;   1   &; 283   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  10  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    9 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   75 (   4   ^;  63   !;   5   ?;  75   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   3  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nat_type,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(x_decl,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(y_decl,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(pl_decl,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(n_1_decl,type,
    n_1: nat ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: nat ).

thf(sk2_decl,type,
    sk2: nat > nat ).

thf(sk3_decl,type,
    sk3: nat > nat > nat > nat ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: nat] :
          ( y
          = ( A @ ( x @ pl ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk2_def,definition,
    ( sk2
    = ( ^ [A: nat] :
        @+[B: nat] :
          ( A
          = ( B @ ( n_1 @ pl ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(sk3_def,definition,
    ( sk3
    = ( ^ [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
        @+[D: nat] :
          ( ( A @ ( C @ pl ) )
          = ( D @ ( A @ ( B @ pl ) @ pl ) ) ) ) ) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( y
       != ( A @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( y
       != ( A @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( y
       != ( A @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ~ ~ ? [A: nat] :
          ( y
          = ( A @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ( y
    = ( sk1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[17]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ ( x @ pl ) )
    = y ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ pl ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz6) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[30]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ pl ) )
      = ( A @ ( B @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[31]) ).

thf(473,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ ( x @ pl ) )
       != ( B @ ( A @ pl ) ) )
      | ( ( A @ ( B @ pl ) )
        = y ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[19,32]) ).

thf(474,plain,
    ( ( x @ ( sk1 @ pl ) )
    = y ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[473:[bind(A,$thf( x )),bind(B,$thf( sk1 ))]]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ~ ~ ! [B: nat] :
              ( A
             != ( B @ ( n_1 @ pl ) ) )
     => ( A = n_1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz24) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ! [B: nat] :
          ( A
         != ( B @ ( n_1 @ pl ) ) )
     => ( A = n_1 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ~ ? [B: nat] :
            ( A
            = ( B @ ( n_1 @ pl ) ) )
     => ( A = n_1 ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( A = n_1 )
      | ( A
        = ( A @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[22]) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( A = n_1 )
      | ( ( A @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) )
        = A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ~ ! [D: nat] :
            ( A
           != ( D @ ( B @ pl ) ) )
     => ~ ! [D: nat] :
            ( ( C @ ( A @ pl ) )
           != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ pl ) @ pl ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz19a) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ~ ! [D: nat] :
            ( A
           != ( D @ ( B @ pl ) ) )
     => ~ ! [D: nat] :
            ( ( C @ ( A @ pl ) )
           != ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ pl ) @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ~ ~ ? [C: nat] :
              ( A
              = ( C @ ( B @ pl ) ) )
     => ~ ~ ! [C: nat] :
            ? [D: nat] :
              ( ( C @ ( A @ pl ) )
              = ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ pl ) @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [D: nat,C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( A @ pl ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ ( D @ sk3 ) ) @ ( D @ ( B @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
      | ( A
       != ( C @ ( B @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[26]) ).

thf(28,plain,
    ! [D: nat,C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( A @ pl ) )
        = ( A @ ( B @ ( D @ sk3 ) ) @ ( D @ ( B @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
      | ( A
       != ( C @ ( B @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ pl ) @ pl ) )
      = ( B @ ( A @ pl ) @ ( A @ ( C @ sk3 ) ) @ ( C @ ( A @ pl ) @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(69,plain,
    ! [D: nat,C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( A @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) )
       != ( C @ ( B @ pl ) ) )
      | ( ( D @ ( A @ pl ) )
        = ( C @ ( B @ pl ) @ ( B @ ( D @ sk3 ) ) @ ( D @ ( B @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
      | ( A = n_1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[24,29]) ).

thf(70,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ pl ) )
        = ( B @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ ( n_1 @ ( A @ sk3 ) ) @ ( A @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
      | ( B = n_1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[69:[bind(A,$thf( E )),bind(B,$thf( n_1 )),bind(C,$thf( E @ sk2 ))]]) ).

thf(127,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ pl ) )
        = ( B @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ ( n_1 @ ( A @ sk3 ) ) @ ( A @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
      | ( B = n_1 ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[70]) ).

thf(8170,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( x @ ( sk1 @ pl ) )
       != ( A @ ( B @ pl ) ) )
      | ( ( B @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ ( n_1 @ ( A @ sk3 ) ) @ ( A @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ pl ) )
        = y )
      | ( B = n_1 ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[474,127]) ).

thf(8171,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ sk3 ) ) @ ( x @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ pl ) )
      = y )
    | ( sk1 = n_1 ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[8170:[bind(A,$thf( x )),bind(B,$thf( sk1 ))]]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ( ~ ~ ! [A: nat] :
            ( y
           != ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
   => ( y
      = ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz25) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ~ ~ ! [A: nat] :
              ( y
             != ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
     => ( y
        = ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ( ! [A: nat] :
          ( y
         != ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
     => ( y
        = ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ~ ( ~ ? [A: nat] :
            ( y
            = ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
     => ( y
        = ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( y
       != ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) )
      & ( y
       != ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ( y
   != ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ( ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) )
   != y ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(33,plain,
    ( ( ( sk1 @ ( x @ pl ) )
     != ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) )
    | ( y != y ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[19,14]) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ ( x @ pl ) )
   != ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[33]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    ( ( sk1 != n_1 )
    | ( x != x ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[34]) ).

thf(36,plain,
    sk1 != n_1,
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[35]) ).

thf(55974,plain,
    ( ( sk1 @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ sk3 ) ) @ ( x @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ pl ) )
    = y ),
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[8171,36]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( y
     != ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) )
     != y ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(56213,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ sk3 ) ) @ ( x @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ pl ) )
       != ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) ) )
      | ( y != y ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[55974,13]) ).

thf(56214,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( sk1 @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ sk3 ) ) @ ( x @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ pl ) )
     != ( A @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[56213]) ).

thf(56826,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( ( sk1 @ sk2 @ ( n_1 @ pl ) @ ( n_1 @ ( x @ sk3 ) ) )
       != A )
      | ( ( x @ ( n_1 @ pl ) )
       != ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[56214]) ).

thf(57036,plain,
    ( ( x @ ( n_1 @ pl ) )
   != ( n_1 @ ( x @ pl ) ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[56826]) ).

thf(57916,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[57036,32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM696_8 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v8.0.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.38  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.38  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 03:45:53 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.59/0.69  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.72/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (94ms). 
% 0.95/0.80  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.15/0.99  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.15/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.44/1.04  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.44/1.06  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.44/1.07  % [INFO] 	 Problem is typed first-order (TPTP TFF). 
% 1.44/1.08  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.44/1.08  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 74.96/31.86  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 74.96/31.86  % Time passed: 31379ms (effective reasoning time: 31061ms)
% 74.96/31.86  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 74.96/31.87  % Axioms used in derivation (4): m, satz6, satz24, satz19a
% 74.96/31.87  % No. of inferences in proof: 47
% 74.96/31.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 31379 ms resp. 31061 ms w/o parsing
% 75.12/31.92  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 75.12/31.92  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------