↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM705^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:18:38 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.28s
% Output   : Refutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   18
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   84 (  12 unt;   0 typ;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  557 ( 135 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  745 ( 181   ~;  94   |;  16   &; 334   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  96  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   14 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    5 (   5   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   23 (  19 usr;  11 con; 0-4 aty)
%                                         (  18  !!;   0  ??;   0 @@+;   0 @@-)
%            Number of variables   :  121 (   0 sgn  74   !;   6   ?; 121   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    p: nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    some: ( nat > $o ) > $o ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    lessis: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    more: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vNOT: $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    vIMP: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    vPI: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > $o ) ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    db1: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_13,type,
    sK0: nat ).

thf(func_def_14,type,
    sK1: nat ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    some @ p,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',s) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ( ~ ( more @ X1 @ X0 )
       => ( X1 = X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz14) ).

thf(f4,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 )
     => ~ ( more @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz10d) ).

thf(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0: nat > $o] :
      ( ( some @ X0 )
     => ( some
        @ ^ [X1: nat] :
            ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                  ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                 => ( lessis @ X1 @ X2 ) )
             => ~ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz27) ).

thf(f6,conjecture,
    ~ ( ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
          ( ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                  ( ( p @ X2 )
                 => ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 ) )
             => ~ ( p @ X0 ) )
         => ( ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ X2 )
                   => ( lessis @ X1 @ X2 ) )
               => ~ ( p @ X1 ) )
           => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
     => ~ ( some
          @ ^ [X0: nat] :
              ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ X2 )
                   => ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 ) )
               => ~ ( p @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz27a) ).

thf(f7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
            ( ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ X2 )
                   => ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 ) )
               => ~ ( p @ X0 ) )
           => ( ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                      ( ( p @ X2 )
                     => ( lessis @ X1 @ X2 ) )
                 => ~ ( p @ X1 ) )
             => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
       => ~ ( some
            @ ^ [X0: nat] :
                ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                      ( ( p @ X2 )
                     => ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 ) )
                 => ~ ( p @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 )
     => ~ ( more @ X1 @ X0 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 ) )
     => ( ( more @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    some @ p,
    inference(rectify,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( some @ p )
    = $true ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 )
     => ( ~ ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
       => ( X1 = X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 ) )
     => ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
       => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ~ ~ ( ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
            ( ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ X2 )
                   => ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 ) )
               => ~ ( p @ X0 ) )
           => ( ~ ( ! [X3: nat] :
                      ( ( p @ X3 )
                     => ( lessis @ X1 @ X3 ) )
                 => ~ ( p @ X1 ) )
             => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
       => ~ ( some
            @ ^ [X4: nat] :
                ~ ( ! [X5: nat] :
                      ( ( p @ X5 )
                     => ( lessis @ X4 @ X5 ) )
                 => ~ ( p @ X4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ~ ~ ( ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
            ( ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                    ( ( ( p @ X2 )
                      = $true )
                   => ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 )
                      = $true ) )
               => ( ( p @ X0 )
                 != $true ) )
           => ( ~ ( ! [X3: nat] :
                      ( ( ( p @ X3 )
                        = $true )
                     => ( $true
                        = ( lessis @ X1 @ X3 ) ) )
                 => ( ( p @ X1 )
                   != $true ) )
             => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
       => ( ( some
            @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
                ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                    @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                        ( ( p @ Y1 )
                       => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
                 => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
         != $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: nat > $o] :
      ( ( some @ X0 )
     => ( some
        @ ^ [X1: nat] :
            ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                  ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                 => ( lessis @ X1 @ X2 ) )
             => ~ ( X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: nat > $o] :
      ( ( ( some @ X0 )
        = $true )
     => ( $true
        = ( some
          @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
              ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                  @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                      ( ( X0 @ Y1 )
                     => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
               => ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f20,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 ) )
     => ( ( more @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 ) )
     => ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
         != $true )
       => ( X0 = X1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
        ( ~ ( ! [X2: nat] :
                ( ( ( p @ X2 )
                  = $true )
               => ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 )
                  = $true ) )
           => ( ( p @ X0 )
             != $true ) )
       => ( ~ ( ! [X3: nat] :
                  ( ( ( p @ X3 )
                    = $true )
                 => ( $true
                    = ( lessis @ X1 @ X3 ) ) )
             => ( ( p @ X1 )
               != $true ) )
         => ( X0 = X1 ) ) )
   => ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ! [X0: nat > $o] :
      ( ( ( some @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( some
          @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
              ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                  @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                      ( ( X0 @ Y1 )
                     => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
               => ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( ( more @ X1 @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f20]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( X0 = X1 )
      | ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
      ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
        = $true )
      | ( $true
       != ( lessis @ X1 @ X0 ) )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true )
    | ? [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
        ( ( X0 != X1 )
        & ( ( p @ X1 )
          = $true )
        & ! [X3: nat] :
            ( ( ( p @ X3 )
             != $true )
            | ( $true
              = ( lessis @ X1 @ X3 ) ) )
        & ( ( p @ X0 )
          = $true )
        & ! [X2: nat] :
            ( ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( p @ X2 )
             != $true ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true )
    | ? [X1: nat,X0: nat] :
        ( ( ( p @ X0 )
          = $true )
        & ! [X2: nat] :
            ( ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( p @ X2 )
             != $true ) )
        & ( ( p @ X1 )
          = $true )
        & ! [X3: nat] :
            ( ( ( p @ X3 )
             != $true )
            | ( $true
              = ( lessis @ X1 @ X3 ) ) )
        & ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( more @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f28]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true )
    | ? [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
        ( ( ( p @ X1 )
          = $true )
        & ! [X2: nat] :
            ( ( ( lessis @ X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( p @ X2 )
             != $true ) )
        & ( ( p @ X0 )
          = $true )
        & ! [X3: nat] :
            ( ( ( p @ X3 )
             != $true )
            | ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X3 )
              = $true ) )
        & ( X0 != X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f34,plain,
    ( ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true )
    | ( ( $true
        = ( p @ sK1 ) )
      & ! [X2: nat] :
          ( ( ( lessis @ sK1 @ X2 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( p @ X2 )
           != $true ) )
      & ( ( p @ sK0 )
        = $true )
      & ! [X3: nat] :
          ( ( ( p @ X3 )
           != $true )
          | ( ( lessis @ sK0 @ X3 )
            = $true ) )
      & ( sK1 != sK0 ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1)],[f33]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( some @ p )
    = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( more @ X1 @ X0 )
        = $true )
      | ( X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f37,plain,
    ! [X0: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ( more @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( lessis @ X0 @ X1 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ! [X0: nat > $o] :
      ( ( ( some @ X0 )
       != $true )
      | ( $true
        = ( some
          @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
              ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                  @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                      ( ( X0 @ Y1 )
                     => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
               => ~ ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true )
    | ( sK1 != sK0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f40,plain,
    ! [X3: nat] :
      ( ( ( lessis @ sK0 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ X3 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( some
          @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
              ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                  @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                      ( ( p @ Y1 )
                     => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
               => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f41,plain,
    ( ( ( p @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f42,plain,
    ! [X2: nat] :
      ( ( ( lessis @ sK1 @ X2 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( p @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( some
          @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
              ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                  @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                      ( ( p @ Y1 )
                     => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
               => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f43,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( p @ sK1 ) )
    | ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).

thf(f49,definition,
    ( spl2_1
  <=> ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f51,plain,
    ( ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
     != $true )
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f49]) ).

thf(f53,definition,
    ( spl2_2
  <=> ( sK1 = sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( ( sK1 != sK0 )
    | spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f53]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f39,f53,f49]) ).

thf(f58,definition,
    ( spl2_3
  <=> ! [X2: nat] :
        ( ( ( lessis @ sK1 @ X2 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( p @ X2 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f59,plain,
    ( ! [X2: nat] :
        ( ( ( p @ X2 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( lessis @ sK1 @ X2 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl2_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f58]) ).

thf(f60,plain,
    ( spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f42,f49,f58]) ).

thf(f62,definition,
    ( spl2_4
  <=> ! [X3: nat] :
        ( ( ( lessis @ sK0 @ X3 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( p @ X3 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f63,plain,
    ( ! [X3: nat] :
        ( ( ( p @ X3 )
         != $true )
        | ( ( lessis @ sK0 @ X3 )
          = $true ) )
    | ~ spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f62]) ).

thf(f64,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f40,f62,f49]) ).

thf(f66,definition,
    ( spl2_5
  <=> ( $true
      = ( p @ sK1 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( p @ sK1 ) )
    | ~ spl2_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f66]) ).

thf(f69,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f43,f66,f49]) ).

thf(f71,definition,
    ( spl2_6
  <=> ( ( p @ sK0 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl2_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ( ( ( p @ sK0 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f71]) ).

thf(f74,plain,
    ( spl2_6
    | ~ spl2_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f41,f49,f71]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( some
        @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
            ~ ( ( !! @ nat
                @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                    ( ( p @ Y1 )
                   => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
             => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f38,f35]) ).

thf(f76,plain,
    ( ( some
      @ ^ [Y0: nat] :
          ~ ( ( !! @ nat
              @ ^ [Y1: nat] :
                  ( ( p @ Y1 )
                 => ( lessis @ Y0 @ Y1 ) ) )
           => ~ ( p @ Y0 ) ) )
    = $true ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f75]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_1 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f76,f51]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f77]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( lessis @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f59,f73]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( lessis @ sK1 @ sK0 ) )
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f80]) ).

thf(f83,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( more @ sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | ( sK1 = sK0 )
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f36,f82]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ( ( sK1 = sK0 )
    | ( ( more @ sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f83]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( ( ( more @ sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f84,f55]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( ( ( lessis @ sK0 @ sK1 )
     != $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f37,f85]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    ( ( ( lessis @ sK0 @ sK1 )
     != $true )
    | spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f86]) ).

thf(f88,plain,
    ( ( $true != $true )
    | ( ( lessis @ sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_5 ),
    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f63,f68]) ).

thf(f91,plain,
    ( ( ( lessis @ sK0 @ sK1 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f88]) ).

thf(f92,plain,
    ( $false
    | spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_5
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f91,f87]) ).

thf(f93,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_5
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f92]) ).

cnf(s1,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | ~ spl2_2 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f56]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f60]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f64]) ).

cnf(s4,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f69]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( ~ spl2_1
    | spl2_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f74]) ).

cnf(s6,plain,
    spl2_1,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f78]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    ( spl2_2
    | ~ spl2_3
    | ~ spl2_4
    | ~ spl2_5
    | ~ spl2_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f93]) ).

cnf(s8,plain,
    spl2_6,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s6]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    spl2_5,
    inference(rat,[],[s4,s6]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    spl2_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s6]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    spl2_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s6]) ).

cnf(s12,plain,
    spl2_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s7,s8,s9,s10,s11]) ).

cnf(s13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s1,s12,s6]) ).

thf(f94,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s13]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM705^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.18  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.18  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.18  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.18  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.18  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.18  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.18  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:42:16 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.18  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.18  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.23  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607617)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)lrs+10_1_cnfonf=off:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=1145411828:i=3:rtra=on:inj=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)Peak memory usage: 11 MB
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607640)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)WARNING Broken Constraint: if ho_split_queue_ratios(1,8) has been set then ho_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)WARNING Broken Constraint: if sine_to_age_tolerance(5) has been set then sine_to_age(off) is equal to on or sine_to_pred_levels(off) is not equal to off or sine_level_split_queue(off) is equal to on
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607639)lrs+10_16_si=on:nwc=1.5:random_seed=2344997800:i=18:kws=arity_squared:rtra=on:fe=abstraction:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3368200242:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)dis+21_4_fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=off:foolp=on:random_seed=3419898843:i=24:av=off:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607643)lrs+10_1_to=lpo:sil=128000:e2e=on:si=on:random_seed=303074888:s2a=on:i=75:s2at=3:aac=none:bd=preordered:rtra=on:fe=abstraction_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)dis+1002_4:1_sfv=off:to=lpo:plsq=on:fde=none:e2e=on:si=on:spb=non_intro:acc=on:uwa=off:fd=preordered:foolp=on:s2agt=32:slsqc=1:slsq=on:random_seed=2558057325:hsq=on:hsqr=16,1:s2a=on:i=634:add=on:nm=16:nicw=on:rtra=on:gtg=position:ss=included:ixr=off:c=on:inj=on:ntd=on:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/634Mi)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)dis+1002_8_to=kbo:sil=128000:tgt=full:drc=off:si=on:sp=const_max:lma=off:spb=non_intro:cbe=off:uwa=interpreted_only:random_seed=2860676054:hsqr=1,8:i=157:s2at=5:add=on:nm=2:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/157Mi)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1607617-1607638"...
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607642)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607641)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)...printing done.
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607643) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1607617-1607643"...
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)dis+10_1024_sil=128000:si=on:sp=unary_first:urr=on:uwa=all:fd=off:random_seed=500287635:i=2:hud=10:rtra=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)Instructions burned: 9 (million)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)Instruction limit reached! 
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)Termination reason: Instruction limit
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)Time elapsed: 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607646)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607644)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607639) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-1607617-1607639"...
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607643)...printing done.
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.09/0.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.28  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)------------------------------
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607638)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.09/0.28  % (1607617)Success in time 0.044 s
% 0.09/0.28  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------