%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : NUM708^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:18:02 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.20s 1.93s
% Output : Refutation 3.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 10 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 9 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 16 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 5 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 ^; 4 !; 0 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nat_type,type,
nat: $tType ).
thf(x_decl,type,
x: nat ).
thf(ts_decl,type,
ts: nat > nat > nat ).
thf(n_1_decl,type,
n_1: nat ).
thf(1,conjecture,
( x
= ( ts @ n_1 @ x ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz28g) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
( x
!= ( ts @ n_1 @ x ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(4,plain,
( x
!= ( ts @ n_1 @ x ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(5,plain,
( ( ts @ n_1 @ x )
!= x ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: nat] :
( ( ts @ n_1 @ A )
= A ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz28c) ).
thf(6,plain,
! [A: nat] :
( ( ts @ n_1 @ A )
= A ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(7,plain,
! [A: nat] :
( ( ts @ n_1 @ A )
= A ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[6]) ).
thf(8,plain,
! [A: nat] :
( ( ts @ n_1 @ A )
= A ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(9,plain,
x != x,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[5,8]) ).
thf(10,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : NUM708^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.08/0.21 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.21 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.21 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.21 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.21 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.21 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.21 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.21 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:44:58 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.21 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.21 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.88/0.79 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.25/0.90 % [INFO] Parsing done (109ms).
% 1.25/0.91 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.69/1.29 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 1.89/1.30 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.89/1.37 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 1 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.08/1.41 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 1 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.08/1.42 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.08/1.43 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.08/1.43 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 3.20/1.92 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 3.20/1.93 % Time passed: 1570ms (effective reasoning time: 1011ms)
% 3.20/1.93 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.20/1.93 % Axioms used in derivation (1): satz28c
% 3.20/1.93 % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 3.20/1.93 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1570 ms resp. 1011 ms w/o parsing
% 3.20/1.96 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.20/1.96 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------