↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : NUM713^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:18:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.29s 3.43s
% Output   : Refutation 8.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  26 unt;   0 typ;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   37 (  36 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  211 (  29   ~;   6   |;   0   &; 176   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   0   ^;  41   !;   2   ?;  44   :)
%                                         (   0  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   1  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(nat_type,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(x_decl,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(y_decl,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(z_decl,type,
    z: nat ).

thf(pl_decl,type,
    pl: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(ts_decl,type,
    ts: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(sk1_decl,type,
    sk1: nat ).

thf(sk1_def,definition,
    ( sk1
    = ( @+[A: nat] :
          ( x
          = ( pl @ y @ A ) ) ) ) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( x
       != ( pl @ y @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m) ).

thf(12,plain,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( x
       != ( pl @ y @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( x
       != ( pl @ y @ A ) ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ~ ~ ? [A: nat] :
          ( x
          = ( pl @ y @ A ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ( x
    = ( pl @ y @ sk1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[14]) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ( ( pl @ y @ sk1 )
    = x ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ ( pl @ B @ C ) )
      = ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ B ) @ ( ts @ A @ C ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz30) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat,C: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ ( pl @ B @ C ) )
      = ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ B ) @ ( ts @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(22,plain,
    ! [C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ ( pl @ B @ C ) )
      = ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ B ) @ ( ts @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[21]) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ ( pl @ B @ C ) )
      = ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ B ) @ ( ts @ A @ C ) ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( ts @ A @ x )
        = ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ B ) @ ( ts @ A @ C ) ) )
      | ( ( pl @ y @ sk1 )
       != ( pl @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[16,23]) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ x )
      = ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ y ) @ ( ts @ A @ sk1 ) ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[31:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( y )),bind(C,$thf( sk1 ))]]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ B )
      = ( ts @ B @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz29) ).

thf(18,plain,
    ! [A: nat,B: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ B )
      = ( ts @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ B )
      = ( ts @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[18]) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ A @ B )
      = ( ts @ B @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(83,plain,
    ! [C: nat,B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ y ) @ ( ts @ A @ sk1 ) )
        = ( ts @ C @ B ) )
      | ( ( ts @ A @ x )
       != ( ts @ B @ C ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[32,20]) ).

thf(84,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ y ) @ ( ts @ A @ sk1 ) )
      = ( ts @ x @ A ) ),
    inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[83:[bind(A,$thf( A )),bind(B,$thf( A )),bind(C,$thf( x ))]]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: nat] :
        ( ( ts @ x @ z )
       != ( pl @ ( ts @ y @ z ) @ A ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz32a) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ! [A: nat] :
          ( ( ts @ x @ z )
         != ( pl @ ( ts @ y @ z ) @ A ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ~ ! [A: nat] :
          ( ( ts @ x @ z )
         != ( pl @ ( ts @ y @ z ) @ A ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ x @ z )
     != ( pl @ ( ts @ y @ z ) @ A ) ),
    inference(polarity_switch,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ~ ? [A: nat] :
        ( ( ts @ x @ z )
        = ( pl @ ( ts @ y @ z ) @ A ) ),
    inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(10,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ x @ z )
     != ( pl @ ( ts @ y @ z ) @ A ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[9]) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [A: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ x @ z )
     != ( pl @ ( ts @ y @ z ) @ A ) ),
    inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(577,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( ( ts @ x @ A )
       != ( ts @ x @ z ) )
      | ( ( pl @ ( ts @ A @ y ) @ ( ts @ A @ sk1 ) )
       != ( pl @ ( ts @ y @ z ) @ B ) ) ),
    inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[84,11]) ).

thf(652,plain,
    ! [B: nat,A: nat] :
      ( ( x != x )
      | ( A != z )
      | ( ( ts @ A @ y )
       != ( ts @ y @ z ) )
      | ( ( ts @ A @ sk1 )
       != B ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[577]) ).

thf(667,plain,
    ( ( ts @ z @ y )
   != ( ts @ y @ z ) ),
    inference(simp,[status(thm)],[652]) ).

thf(687,plain,
    $false,
    inference(simplifyReflect,[status(thm)],[667,20]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM713^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.11/0.21  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.21  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.21  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.21  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.21  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.21  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.21  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:44:45 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.21  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.21  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.90/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.25/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (188ms). 
% 1.25/0.99  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.86/1.39  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.06/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.24/1.50  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 4 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.24/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 4 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.24/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF). 
% 2.24/1.55  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.24/1.56  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 8.29/3.43  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 8.29/3.43  % Time passed: 3068ms (effective reasoning time: 2428ms)
% 8.29/3.43  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 8.29/3.43  % Axioms used in derivation (3): m, satz30, satz29
% 8.29/3.43  % No. of inferences in proof: 29
% 8.29/3.43  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3068 ms resp. 2428 ms w/o parsing
% 8.29/3.46  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.29/3.46  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------