↑ Up

Duper---1.0.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : NUM728^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Oct  3 07:57:10 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Theorem 3.70s 3.88s
% Output   : Proof 3.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem    : NUM728^1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Oct  3 07:25:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.70/3.88  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/3.88  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx Xy : frac), eq Xx Xy → eq Xy Xx) True
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (Xx : frac) (Xn : nat), eq Xx (fr (ts (c1x Xx) Xn) (ts (c2x Xx) Xn))) True
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (eq (fr (ts (c1x x) n) (ts (c2x x) n)) x)) True
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #3 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xy : frac), eq a Xy → eq Xy a) True
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Eq (eq a a_1 → eq a_1 a) True
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a a_1 : frac), Or (Eq (eq a a_1) False) (Eq (eq a_1 a) True)
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #6 (by clausification #[2]): Eq (eq (fr (ts (c1x x) n) (ts (c2x x) n)) x) False
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #7 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : frac), Eq (∀ (Xn : nat), eq a (fr (ts (c1x a) Xn) (ts (c2x a) Xn))) True
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #8 (by clausification #[7]): ∀ (a : frac) (a_1 : nat), Eq (eq a (fr (ts (c1x a) a_1) (ts (c2x a) a_1))) True
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #9 (by superposition #[8, 5]): ∀ (a : frac) (a_1 : nat), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (eq (fr (ts (c1x a) a_1) (ts (c2x a) a_1)) a) True)
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #10 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : frac) (a_1 : nat), Eq (eq (fr (ts (c1x a) a_1) (ts (c2x a) a_1)) a) True
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #11 (by superposition #[10, 6]): Eq True False
% 3.70/3.88  Clause #13 (by clausification #[11]): False
% 3.70/3.88  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------