↑ Up

Vampire-SAT---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---5.0.1
% Problem  : NUM728^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:19:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.25s
% Output   : Refutation 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : NUM728^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.19  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:45:24 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.19  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 SAT
% 0.07/0.21  Running first-order model finding
% 0.07/0.21  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc --intent sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.25  % (664072)Will run a generic schedule for satisfiability detection.
% 0.07/0.25  % (664078)% WARNING: option uhcvi not known.
% 0.07/0.25  % (664078)dis+11_61:31_drc=ordering:lsd=5:bsr=unit_only:rp=on:newcnf=on:random_seed=301436579:i=135531:add=off:rawr=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/135531Mi)
% 0.07/0.25  % (664078)WARNING: Not using 'newcnf' as currently not compatible with higher-order inputs.
% 0.07/0.25  % (664078)WARNING: Look ahead literal selection is not currently compatible with higher-order. Ignoring request to use
% 0.07/0.25  % (664078) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-664072-664078"...
% 0.07/0.25  % (664078)...printing done.
% 0.07/0.25  % (664078)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.07/0.25  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.25  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.25  thf(type_def_5, type, frac: $tType).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(type_def_6, type, nat: $tType).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(type_def_7, type, sTfun: ($tType * $tType) > $tType).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(func_def_0, type, x: frac).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(func_def_1, type, n: nat).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(func_def_2, type, eq: (frac > frac > $o)).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(func_def_3, type, fr: (nat > nat > frac)).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(func_def_4, type, ts: (nat > nat > nat)).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(func_def_5, type, c1x: (frac > nat)).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(func_def_6, type, c2x: (frac > nat)).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f1,axiom,(
% 0.07/0.25    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((eq @ X0 @ X1) => (eq @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.07/0.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz38)).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f2,axiom,(
% 0.07/0.25    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : nat] : (eq @ X0 @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ X0) @ X1) @ (ts @ (c2x @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 0.07/0.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz40)).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f3,conjecture,(
% 0.07/0.25    (eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ x) @ n) @ (ts @ (c2x @ x) @ n)) @ x)),
% 0.07/0.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',satz40a)).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f4,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.07/0.25    ~(eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ x) @ n) @ (ts @ (c2x @ x) @ n)) @ x)),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f3])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f5,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((eq @ X0 @ X1) => (eq @ X1 @ X0))),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(rectify,[],[f1])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f6,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((((eq @ X0 @ X1)) = $true) => (((eq @ X1 @ X0)) = $true))),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f5])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f7,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : nat] : (eq @ X0 @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ X0) @ X1) @ (ts @ (c2x @ X0) @ X1)))),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f8,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : nat] : (((eq @ X0 @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ X0) @ X1) @ (ts @ (c2x @ X0) @ X1)))) = $true)),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f7])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f9,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ~(eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ x) @ n) @ (ts @ (c2x @ x) @ n)) @ x)),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(rectify,[],[f4])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f10,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ~ (((eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ x) @ n) @ (ts @ (c2x @ x) @ n)) @ x)) = $true)),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f9])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f11,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    (((eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ x) @ n) @ (ts @ (c2x @ x) @ n)) @ x)) != $true)),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(flattening,[],[f10])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f12,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((((eq @ X1 @ X0)) = $true) | (((eq @ X0 @ X1)) != $true))),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f13,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : frac] : ((((eq @ X0 @ X1)) != $true) | (((eq @ X1 @ X0)) = $true)) )),
% 0.07/0.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12])).
% 0.07/0.25  thf(f14,plain,(
% 0.07/0.25    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : nat] : ((((eq @ X0 @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ X0) @ X1) @ (ts @ (c2x @ X0) @ X1)))) = $true)) )),
% 0.07/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8])).
% 0.07/0.26  thf(f15,plain,(
% 0.07/0.26    (((eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ x) @ n) @ (ts @ (c2x @ x) @ n)) @ x)) != $true)),
% 0.07/0.26    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11])).
% 0.07/0.26  thf(f17,definition,(
% 0.07/0.26    ( ! [X0 : $o] : (($true = X0) | ($false = X0)) )),
% 0.07/0.26    introduced(theory,[fool_exhaustiveness_axiom])).
% 0.07/0.26  thf(f20,plain,(
% 0.07/0.26    ($true != $true) | (((eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ x) @ n) @ (ts @ (c2x @ x) @ n)) @ x)) = $false)),
% 0.07/0.26    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f15,f17])).
% 0.07/0.26  thf(f22,plain,(
% 0.07/0.26    (((eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ x) @ n) @ (ts @ (c2x @ x) @ n)) @ x)) = $false)),
% 0.07/0.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f20])).
% 0.07/0.26  thf(f29,plain,(
% 0.07/0.26    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : nat] : (($true != $true) | ($true = ((eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ X0) @ X1) @ (ts @ (c2x @ X0) @ X1)) @ X0)))) )),
% 0.07/0.26    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f13,f14])).
% 0.07/0.26  thf(f30,plain,(
% 0.07/0.26    ( ! [X0 : frac,X1 : nat] : (($true = ((eq @ (fr @ (ts @ (c1x @ X0) @ X1) @ (ts @ (c2x @ X0) @ X1)) @ X0)))) )),
% 0.07/0.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f29])).
% 0.07/0.26  thf(f58,plain,(
% 0.07/0.26    ($true = $false)),
% 0.07/0.26    inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f22,f30])).
% 0.07/0.26  thf(f59,plain,(
% 0.07/0.26    $false),
% 0.07/0.26    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f58])).
% 0.07/0.26  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 0.07/0.26  % (664078)------------------------------
% 0.07/0.26  % (664078)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.07/0.26  % (664078)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.07/0.26  % (664078)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.07/0.26  % (664078)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.07/0.26  % (664078)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.07/0.26  % (664078)Peak memory usage: 12 MB
% 0.07/0.26  % (664078)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.07/0.26  % (664072)Success in time 0.033 s
% 0.07/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------