↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NUM737^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:16:58 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 6.20s 1.22s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  28 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  14 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  414 (  14   ~;  10   |;   0   &; 388   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   10 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   62 (   0   ^;  62   !;   0   ?;  62   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    frac: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    x: frac ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    y: frac ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    z: frac ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    u: frac ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    more: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    ts: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(decl_29,type,
    num: frac > nat ).

thf(decl_30,type,
    den: frac > nat ).

thf(satz32d,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X1 @ X2 )
     => ( more @ ( ts @ X3 @ X1 ) @ ( ts @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p',satz32d) ).

thf(satz31,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ ( ts @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 )
      = ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p',satz31) ).

thf(satz33a,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( ts @ X2 @ X3 ) )
     => ( more @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p',satz33a) ).

thf(m,axiom,
    more @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( den @ x ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p',m) ).

thf(satz29,axiom,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( ts @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p',satz29) ).

thf(f,axiom,
    ( ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( den @ u ) )
    = ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ y ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p',f) ).

thf(e,axiom,
    ( ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ z ) )
    = ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( den @ x ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p',e) ).

thf(satz44,conjecture,
    more @ ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( den @ u ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ z ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p',satz44) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X22: nat,X23: nat,X24: nat] :
      ( ~ ( more @ X22 @ X23 )
      | ( more @ ( ts @ X24 @ X22 ) @ ( ts @ X24 @ X23 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz32d])])]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X27: nat,X28: nat,X29: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ ( ts @ X27 @ X28 ) @ X29 )
      = ( ts @ X27 @ ( ts @ X28 @ X29 ) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz31]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X19: nat,X20: nat,X21: nat] :
      ( ~ ( more @ ( ts @ X19 @ X21 ) @ ( ts @ X20 @ X21 ) )
      | ( more @ X19 @ X20 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz33a])])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( more @ ( ts @ X3 @ X1 ) @ ( ts @ X3 @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( more @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    more @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ y ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( den @ x ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X25: nat,X26: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ X25 @ X26 )
      = ( ts @ X26 @ X25 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[satz29]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ ( ts @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 )
      = ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( den @ u ) )
    = ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ y ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[f]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X1 @ X3 )
      | ~ ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( ts @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] : ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ y ) ) ) @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( den @ x ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ X1 @ X2 )
      = ( ts @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ u ) @ X1 ) )
      = ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ y ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat,X6: nat] :
      ( ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X3 )
      | ~ ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ X2 @ X6 ) ) @ ( ts @ X3 @ X6 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] : ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ y ) ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ x ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ ( num @ y ) @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( den @ u ) ) )
      = ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ y ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ X2 @ X3 ) )
      = ( ts @ X2 @ ( ts @ X1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_18]),c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( more @ ( ts @ X3 @ X1 ) @ ( ts @ X2 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ z ) )
    = ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( den @ x ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[e]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat,X3: nat,X6: nat,X7: nat] :
      ( ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ X2 ) @ ( ts @ X3 @ X6 ) )
      | ~ ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ X2 @ X7 ) ) @ ( ts @ X3 @ ( ts @ X6 @ X7 ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_27,plain,
    more @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ u ) @ ( den @ y ) ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ x ) @ ( den @ y ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_18]),c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( den @ u ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ z ) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz44]) ).

thf(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( more @ ( ts @ X3 @ X1 ) @ ( ts @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ z ) @ X1 ) )
      = ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ x ) @ X1 ) ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_25]),c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    more @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ u ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ x ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( den @ u ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ z ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

thf(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X1 @ ( ts @ ( den @ z ) @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( more @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ X1 ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( ts @ ( den @ x ) @ X2 ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

thf(c_0_34,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] : ( more @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( den @ u ) ) ) @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ x ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_31]) ).

thf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( den @ u ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ z ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

thf(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( more @ X1 @ ( ts @ ( den @ z ) @ X2 ) )
      | ~ ( more @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ X1 ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( ts @ X2 @ ( den @ x ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] : ( more @ ( ts @ ( num @ x ) @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( den @ u ) ) ) @ ( ts @ X1 @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ x ) ) ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_23]) ).

thf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( more @ ( ts @ ( num @ z ) @ ( den @ u ) ) @ ( ts @ ( num @ u ) @ ( den @ z ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_35]) ).

thf(c_0_39,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_18]),c_0_38]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NUM737^1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.19  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.19  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.19  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.19  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.19  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.19  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.19  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 12:46:36 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.19  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.19  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.23  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.24  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.Jp4TLCY8zu/E---3.1_1228303.p
% 6.20/1.22  % Version: 3.5.1-ho
% 6.20/1.22  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.20/1.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting full_lambda_5 with 300s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 300s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % new_ho_10 with pid 1228316 completed with status 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 6.20/1.22  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.20/1.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.20/1.22  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.20/1.22  % Search class: HHUSS-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 6.20/1.22  % partial match(1): FHUSS-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 6.20/1.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_ho_10 with 151s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % new_bool_1 with pid 1228327 completed with status 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 6.20/1.22  % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 6.20/1.22  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 6.20/1.22  % No SInE strategy applied
% 6.20/1.22  % Search class: HHUSS-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 6.20/1.22  % partial match(1): FHUSS-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 6.20/1.22  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_ho_10 with 151s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 6.20/1.22  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 6.20/1.22  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.20/1.22  
% 6.20/1.22  % Proof found!
% 6.20/1.22  % SZS status Theorem
% 6.20/1.22  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.20/1.22  % Parsed axioms                        : 19
% 6.20/1.22  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Initial clauses                      : 19
% 6.20/1.22  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 11
% 6.20/1.22  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 8
% 6.20/1.22  % Processed clauses                    : 3556
% 6.20/1.22  % ...of these trivial                  : 284
% 6.20/1.22  % ...subsumed                          : 2662
% 6.20/1.22  % ...remaining for further processing  : 609
% 6.20/1.22  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 6.20/1.22  % Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 6.20/1.22  % Generated clauses                    : 32132
% 6.20/1.22  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31833
% 6.20/1.22  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Paramodulations                      : 32132
% 6.20/1.22  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % NegExts                              : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Total rewrite steps                  : 22371
% 6.20/1.22  % ...of those cached                   : 19686
% 6.20/1.22  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 6.20/1.22  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 6.20/1.22  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 6.20/1.22  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 6.20/1.22  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 6.20/1.22  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 6.20/1.22  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 6.20/1.22  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 6.20/1.22  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 6.20/1.22  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 6.20/1.22  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 6.20/1.22  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 6.20/1.22  % Current number of processed clauses  : 584
% 6.20/1.22  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 37
% 6.20/1.22  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 6.20/1.22  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 6.20/1.22  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 542
% 6.20/1.22  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 28278
% 6.20/1.22  % ...number of literals in the above   : 56117
% 6.20/1.22  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Current number of archived clauses   : 25
% 6.20/1.22  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 136839
% 6.20/1.22  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 136839
% 6.20/1.22  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2639
% 6.20/1.22  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 6.20/1.22  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1112
% 6.20/1.22  % BW rewrite match successes           : 83
% 6.20/1.22  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 6.20/1.22  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 966355
% 6.20/1.22  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 85
% 6.20/1.22  
% 6.20/1.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.20/1.22  % User time                : 0.660 s
% 6.20/1.22  % System time              : 0.027 s
% 6.20/1.22  % Total time               : 0.687 s
% 6.20/1.22  % Maximum resident set size: 3900 pages
% 6.20/1.22  
% 6.20/1.22  % -------------------------------------------------
% 6.20/1.22  % User time                : 3.997 s
% 6.20/1.22  % System time              : 0.155 s
% 6.20/1.22  % Total time               : 4.152 s
% 6.20/1.22  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 6.20/1.22  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------